[Bug tree-optimization/78305] Wrong constant folding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78305 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug sanitizer/78294] -fsanitize=thread broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78294 Maxim Ostapenko changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m.ostapenko at samsung dot com --- Com

[Bug target/78213] [7 Regression] -fself-test fails on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78213 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7

[Bug middle-end/17308] nonnull attribute not as useful as it could

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17308 frankhb1989 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||frankhb1989 at gmail dot co

[Bug sanitizer/78294] -fsanitize=thread broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78294 Dmitry Vyukov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dvyukov at google dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug fortran/78293] [5/6/7 Regression] SIGABRT with function result used as argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78293 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org Assigne

[Bug target/78213] [7 Regression] -fself-test fails on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78213 --- Comment #6 from David Malcolm --- (In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #5) > Confirmed with a cross build with: > > cat >a.c < int i; > void bar();

[Bug fortran/77505] Negative character length not treated as LEN=0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77505 Elizebeth Punnoose changed: What|Removed |Added CC||elizebethp at gmail dot com --- Com

[Bug target/78213] [7 Regression] -fself-test fails on aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78213 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/77346] [7 Regression] ICE in push_reload, at reload.c:1350

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77346 --- Comment #2 from Arseny Solokha --- (In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #1) > I cannot reproduce this on a cross build from x86-64 Linux to > --target=powerpc-*-linux-gnu. I cannot reproduce on neither mainline nor 2 > months back on mai

[Bug c++/77849] [5/6 Regression] Warning about deprecated enum even when "-Wdeprecated-declarations" is off

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77849 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/77849] [5/6 Regression] Warning about deprecated enum even when "-Wdeprecated-declarations" is off

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77849 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org Sum

[Bug sanitizer/78267] [7 Regression] libsanitizer breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin16 at r241977

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78267 --- Comment #23 from Iain Sandoe --- (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #22) > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #3) > > (In reply to Maxim Ostapenko from comment #1) > > > Eh, mine. > > > > > > typedef void (^os_trace_payload_t)(xpc_ob

[Bug tree-optimization/71380] [7 Regression] internal compiler error: in copy_cond_phi_nodes, at graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c:2498

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71380 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/78305] Wrong constant folding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78305 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- >-0x4000 * a int a = 2; Does that not overflow?

[Bug tree-optimization/78305] New: Wrong constant folding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78305 Bug ID: 78305 Summary: Wrong constant folding Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization

[Bug target/77346] [7 Regression] ICE in push_reload, at reload.c:1350

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77346 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/78267] [7 Regression] libsanitizer breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin16 at r241977

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78267 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added CC||egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/78121] [7 Regression] ice in set_value_range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78121 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c/78304] New: -Wformat doesn't warn anymore for inttypes.h format string argument type mismatches

PRIu32 "\n", size); ^ gcc (GCC) 7.0.0 20161110 (experimental) doesn't give any warning with -Wformat. Note that both versions do warn when using "size: %u\n" as format string: t.c: In function ‘main’: t.c:8:19: warning: format ‘%u’ expects argument of type ‘unsigned

[Bug target/78303] New: PowerPC vec-init-{1,2,4,5,8,9} tests do not run on -mlittle -maltivec=be

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78303 Bug ID: 78303 Summary: PowerPC vec-init-{1,2,4,5,8,9} tests do not run on -mlittle -maltivec=be Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/37998] Unclear documentation of -fno-common

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37998 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/78127] [5/6/7 Regression] AArch64 internal compiler error: in lra_eliminate, at lra-eliminations.c:1440

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78127 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/78225] [7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/gomp/pr27573.c (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78225 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/78302] is_move_constructible_v> should be false

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78302 --- Comment #2 from TC --- Ugh, quasi-dup, I suppose. But if I'm reading the correspondence correctly, the ABI breaking is only because of triviality, correct? So if we just want to make is_move_constructible not lie, it should be possible to do

[Bug c++/78264] [7 regression] ICE in build_noexcept_spec, at cp/except.c:1196

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78264 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/37998] Unclear documentation of -fno-common

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37998 --- Comment #1 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: sandra Date: Thu Nov 10 23:56:30 2016 New Revision: 242062 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242062&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-11-10 Sandra Loosemore PR c/37998 gc

[Bug libstdc++/78302] is_move_constructible_v> should be false

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78302 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse --- See also PR 71301.

[Bug fortran/44348] ICE in build_function_decl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44348 --- Comment #14 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > The test in comment 2 compiles without error at revision r242002 > although I think it is invalid. It gives an ICE with r241962. This is due to r241972 (pr77596).

[Bug fortran/78300] Failure to compile a Fortran-2003 code with an optional dummy procedure argument.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78300 --- Comment #12 from DIL --- Indeed, thanks again.

[Bug fortran/77414] ICE in create_function_arglist, at fortran/trans-decl.c:2410

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77414 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > The tests z7.f90, z8.f90, and z9.f90 compiles without error > at revision r242002 although I think they are invalid. > They give an ICE with r241962. This is due to r241972 (pr77596).

[Bug fortran/78300] Failure to compile a Fortran-2003 code with an optional dummy procedure argument.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78300 --- Comment #11 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Not yet. I won't have time to apply the patch until > tomorrow or Saturday. I posted the patch to bugzilla > so it does not get lost. Once it is in the source tree, > you can use svn to pull the

[Bug fortran/78300] Failure to compile a Fortran-2003 code with an optional dummy procedure argument.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78300 --- Comment #10 from DIL --- Thanks!

[Bug fortran/78300] Failure to compile a Fortran-2003 code with an optional dummy procedure argument.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78300 --- Comment #9 from Steve Kargl --- On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 10:40:15PM +, liakhdi at ornl dot gov wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78300 > > --- Comment #8 from DIL --- > Is there a way to download the GCC source with t

[Bug rtl-optimization/78232] [7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr48124-4.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78232 --- Comment #3 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Thu Nov 10 22:45:39 2016 New Revision: 242059 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242059&root=gcc&view=rev Log: combine: Do not call simplify from inside change_zero_ext (PR78232)

[Bug fortran/78297] ICE in finish_equivalences, at fortran/trans-common.c:1246

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78297 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/78296] [7 regression] test case gcc.dg/ipa/vrp7.c fails starting with r242032

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78296 kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |kugan at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/78300] Failure to compile a Fortran-2003 code with an optional dummy procedure argument.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78300 --- Comment #8 from DIL --- Is there a way to download the GCC source with this patch applied?

[Bug libstdc++/78302] New: is_move_constructible_v> should be false

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78302 Bug ID: 78302 Summary: is_move_constructible_v> should be false Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 C

[Bug fortran/78277] ICE in is_anonymous_component, at fortran/interface.c:450

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78277 Fritz Reese changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/78277] ICE in is_anonymous_component, at fortran/interface.c:450

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78277 --- Comment #4 from Fritz Reese --- Author: foreese Date: Thu Nov 10 21:57:13 2016 New Revision: 242058 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242058&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix ICE and improve errors for invalid anonymous structure declarations.

[Bug c++/77337] [7 regression][c++1z] use before deduction of 'auto'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77337 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/77337] [7 regression][c++1z] use before deduction of 'auto'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77337 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Thu Nov 10 21:42:36 2016 New Revision: 242056 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242056&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/77337 - auto return and lambda * pt.c (tsubst_frie

[Bug fortran/78300] Failure to compile a Fortran-2003 code with an optional dummy procedure argument.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78300 --- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl --- Here's a patch that allows the reduced testcase compile. Index: gcc/fortran/resolve.c === --- gcc/fortran/resolve.c (revision 241667) +++ g

[Bug libstdc++/77459] [6/7 Regression] undefined reference to `snprintf' when building mingw-w64 cross-compiler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77459 François Dumont changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |fdumont at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug fortran/78300] Failure to compile a Fortran-2003 code with an optional dummy procedure argument.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78300 --- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl --- On Thu, Nov 10, 2016 at 09:06:15PM +, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: > > Confirmed from 4.8 up to trunk (7.0). It would be nice to have a reduced > reproducer. > I certainly agree with! It took a bit t

[Bug fortran/78300] Failure to compile a Fortran-2003 code with an optional dummy procedure argument.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78300 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/78301] New: noexcept() operator rejects sibling method call without object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78301 Bug ID: 78301 Summary: noexcept() operator rejects sibling method call without object Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug sanitizer/78267] [7 Regression] libsanitizer breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin16 at r241977

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78267 --- Comment #21 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Created attachment 40012 [details] > Untested fix 2. Bootstrap completed successfully with this patch.

[Bug fortran/78300] Failure to compile a Fortran-2003 code with an optional dummy procedure argument.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78300 --- Comment #4 from DIL --- Created attachment 40019 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40019&action=edit Source file

[Bug fortran/78300] Failure to compile a Fortran-2003 code with an optional dummy procedure argument.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78300 --- Comment #3 from DIL --- Created attachment 40018 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40018&action=edit Source file

[Bug fortran/78300] Failure to compile a Fortran-2003 code with an optional dummy procedure argument.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78300 --- Comment #2 from DIL --- Created attachment 40017 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40017&action=edit Source file

[Bug fortran/78300] Failure to compile a Fortran-2003 code with an optional dummy procedure argument.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78300 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug fortran/78277] ICE in is_anonymous_component, at fortran/interface.c:450

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78277 Fritz Reese changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING

[Bug fortran/78277] ICE in is_anonymous_component, at fortran/interface.c:450

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78277 --- Comment #3 from Fritz Reese --- Created attachment 40016 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40016&action=edit patch for pr78277 > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2016-11/msg00087.html Patch proposed, will commit soon unless

[Bug fortran/78300] New: Failure to compile a Fortran-2003 code with an optional dummy procedure argument.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78300 Bug ID: 78300 Summary: Failure to compile a Fortran-2003 code with an optional dummy procedure argument. Product: gcc Version: 6.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severit

[Bug fortran/78299] New: ICE in expand_omp_for_static_nochunk, at omp-low.c:9622

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78299 Bug ID: 78299 Summary: ICE in expand_omp_for_static_nochunk, at omp-low.c:9622 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority

[Bug rtl-optimization/78241] [7 Regression] wrong code with -funroll-loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78241 Pat Haugen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/78241] [7 Regression] wrong code with -funroll-loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78241 --- Comment #3 from Pat Haugen --- Author: pthaugen Date: Thu Nov 10 18:55:57 2016 New Revision: 242047 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=242047&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR rtl-optimization/78241 * loop-unroll.c (unroll_loop_run

[Bug fortran/78298] New: ICE in lookup_decl_in_outer_ctx, bei omp-low.c:4115

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78298 Bug ID: 78298 Summary: ICE in lookup_decl_in_outer_ctx, bei omp-low.c:4115 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/78297] ICE in finish_equivalences, at fortran/trans-common.c:1246

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78297 --- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz --- Compiles with both items in common block. $ cat z2.f90 module m real :: a(2), b(2) real :: c(2), d(2) equivalence (a, b) equivalence (c, d) common /xcom/ a, c end block data use m en

[Bug fortran/78297] New: ICE in finish_equivalences, at fortran/trans-common.c:1246

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78297 Bug ID: 78297 Summary: ICE in finish_equivalences, at fortran/trans-common.c:1246 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug sanitizer/78267] [7 Regression] libsanitizer breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin16 at r241977

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78267 --- Comment #20 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Did you regen fixincl.x (with ./genfixes in the source tree)? I did a clean bootstrap, but I did know that I had to run ./genfixes. BTW you probably mean ./fixincludes/genfixes, isn't it? I am cur

[Bug sanitizer/78267] [7 Regression] libsanitizer breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin16 at r241977

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78267 --- Comment #19 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #18 from Dominique d'Humieres --- [...] > Bootstrap is still broken with the patch: [...] Did you regen fixincl.x (with ./genfixes in the source tree)? A macOS 10.12 boot

[Bug middle-end/78295] [7 Regression] Spurious -Wuninitialized warning for vector element assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78295 Joseph S. Myers changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug sanitizer/78267] [7 Regression] libsanitizer breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin16 at r241977

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78267 --- Comment #18 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > Created attachment 40013 [details] > proposed fixincludes-based patch > > The attached patch passes fixincludes make check. I'll have to wait until > tonight to test it for real on macOS 10.12, tho

[Bug middle-end/78295] [7 Regression] Spurious -Wuninitialized warning for vector element assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78295 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/77337] [7 regression][c++1z] use before deduction of 'auto'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77337 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/72808] [6/7 Regression] ICE on valid c++ code in verify_type (gcc/tree.c:14047)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72808 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/78296] New: [7 regression] test case gcc.dg/ipa/vrp7.c fails starting with r242032

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78296 Bug ID: 78296 Summary: [7 regression] test case gcc.dg/ipa/vrp7.c fails starting with r242032 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/78290] Gfortran incorrectly creates a copy of an array passed to an array pointer dummy argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78290 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/78293] [5/6/7 Regression] SIGABRT with function result used as argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78293 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/78277] ICE in is_anonymous_component, at fortran/interface.c:450

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78277 foreese at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/78295] New: [7 Regression] Spurious -Wuninitialized warning for vector element assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78295 Bug ID: 78295 Summary: [7 Regression] Spurious -Wuninitialized warning for vector element assignment Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: nor

[Bug sanitizer/78294] New: -fsanitize=thread broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78294 Bug ID: 78294 Summary: -fsanitize=thread broken Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: sanitizer Assign

[Bug fortran/78293] New: SIGABRT with function result used as argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78293 Bug ID: 78293 Summary: SIGABRT with function result used as argument Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortr

[Bug testsuite/78292] [7 regression] test case gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-2.c fails starting with r241967

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78292 --- Comment #2 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- Sorry for that. Yes, GCC still requires vect_max_reduc to vectorize the loop, I will amend the test case.

[Bug tree-optimization/78114] [7 regression] gfortran.dg/vect/fast-math-mgrid-resid.f FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78114 --- Comment #7 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- Here is the reason failing with haswell. The loop is vectorized by vf=4, but iteration distance for all possible predictive commoning chains are at most 2 (by iterations), so after vf=4 vectorizatio

[Bug testsuite/78292] [7 regression] test case gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-2.c fails starting with r241967

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78292 --- Comment #1 from Bill Seurer --- r241967 | amker | 2016-11-08 08:08:06 -0600 (Tue, 08 Nov 2016) | 3 lines gcc/testsuite * gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-2.c: Drop

[Bug testsuite/78292] New: [7 regression] test case gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-2.c fails starting with r241967

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78292 Bug ID: 78292 Summary: [7 regression] test case gcc.dg/vect/vect-cond-2.c fails starting with r241967 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug tree-optimization/77309] [5/6 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu (in the 64-bit mode)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77309 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org Summ

[Bug c++/77337] [7 regression][c++1z] use before deduction of 'auto'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77337 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug tree-optimization/77856] [7 Regression] wrong code at -O2 on x86_64-linux-gnu in 32-bit mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77856 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/78291] New: overload resolution prefers non-member operator to member operator when should be ambiguous

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78291 Bug ID: 78291 Summary: overload resolution prefers non-member operator to member operator when should be ambiguous Product: gcc Version: 6.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/78290] New: Gfortran incorrectly creates a copy of an array passed to an array pointer dummy argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78290 Bug ID: 78290 Summary: Gfortran incorrectly creates a copy of an array passed to an array pointer dummy argument Product: gcc Version: 6.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/77761] [7 Regression] wrong code with -fschedule-insns -mavx512f --param=max-pending-list-length=512

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77761 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/77703] [6/7 Regression] ICE on assignment to pointer function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77703 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug middle-end/78201] [7 Regression] ICE in tree_to_shwi, at tree.h:4037 (seen both on ARM32 an AArch64)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78201 --- Comment #5 from Yvan Roux --- Ok, I'll validate the fix.

[Bug libgomp/78289] OpenMP produces high CPU load if used in more than one process

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78289 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/78201] [7 Regression] ICE in tree_to_shwi, at tree.h:4037 (seen both on ARM32 an AArch64)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78201 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug tree-optimization/78114] [7 regression] gfortran.dg/vect/fast-math-mgrid-resid.f FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78114 --- Comment #6 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- But for tests: FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/fast-math-mgrid-resid.f -O scan-tree-dump-times pcom "Executing predictive commoning without unrolling" 1 FAIL: gfortran.dg/vect/fast-math-mgrid-resid.f -

[Bug libgomp/78289] New: OpenMP produces high CPU load if used in more than one process

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78289 Bug ID: 78289 Summary: OpenMP produces high CPU load if used in more than one process Product: gcc Version: 6.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/78257] missing memcmp optimization with constant arrays

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78257 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #4) > Created attachment 40008 [details] > Very lightly tested patch. > > The attached (only superficially tested) patch changes fold_bultin_memcmp to > fold the compari

[Bug sanitizer/78267] [7 Regression] libsanitizer breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin16 at r241977

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78267 --- Comment #17 from Rainer Orth --- Created attachment 40013 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40013&action=edit proposed fixincludes-based patch The attached patch passes fixincludes make check. I'll have to wait until toni

[Bug tree-optimization/78114] [7 regression] gfortran.dg/vect/fast-math-mgrid-resid.f FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78114 --- Comment #5 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- It's because the loop is vectorized by vf=2 with -mavx2, while by vf=4 with -march=haswell. In that case the peeled prolog iterates more than 1 times, resulting in test failure.

[Bug middle-end/78103] Failure to optimize with __builtin_clzl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78103 prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||prathamesh3492 at gcc

[Bug sanitizer/78267] [7 Regression] libsanitizer breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin16 at r241977

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78267 --- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek --- Preapproved. If/once Rainer will have a fixincludes patch, this can be reverted.

[Bug sanitizer/78267] [7 Regression] libsanitizer breaks bootstrap on x86_64-apple-darwin16 at r241977

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78267 --- Comment #15 from Maxim Ostapenko --- Created attachment 40012 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=40012&action=edit Untested fix 2. Ok, thanks. I'm attaching a second short-term fix for now.

[Bug debug/78288] Compile time hog (with var-tracking) for libsanitizer/asan/asan_interceptors.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78288 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- Thanks for the references and explanation.

[Bug debug/78288] Compile time hog (with var-tracking) for libsanitizer/asan/asan_interceptors.cc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78288 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||compile-time-hog --- Comment #2 from Ri

  1   2   >