https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78238
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70909
Robert Schiele changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rschiele at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67738
Robert Schiele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78236
--- Comment #3 from Christophe Monat ---
(In reply to Tim Shen from comment #2)
> I proposed another way to fix this in the list:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/libstdc++/2016-11/msg8.html
Looks perfect - I was somewhat annoyed by the _M_match() c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78247
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I don't think this is anything we can fix for dwarf2; maybe for dwarf4 (or 5)
with split debugging.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78236
Tim Shen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||timshen at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78059
--- Comment #6 from Bernhard Heckel ---
Ping
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78247
Bug ID: 78247
Summary: Unused inline function returning u32string causes
u32string debuginfo to be emitted.
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78231
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The correct way to implement swap for your own type is to overload it in your
type's namespace, and it will be found by ADL.
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11562/how-to-overload-stdswap
http://stackover
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78231
--- Comment #4 from Alfredo ---
ok, thanks for the clarification.
So algorithms on iterators that swap use `::std::iter_swap`? (I didn't know
that.) That is step forward.
Is then one allowed to overload/specialize `std::iter_swap`? Just like o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78231
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
See 17.6.3.2 [swappable.requirements]. ValueSwappable is defined in terms of
swappable, which is defined in terms of swappable with, which is defined in
terms of an unqualified call to swap. It has nothing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51119
--- Comment #34 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Created attachment 39987
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39987&action=edit
A test program
Just ran some tests comparing reference results and results using -Ofast.
-Ofast does reorder
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72803
--- Comment #6 from Aldy Hernandez ---
In cp_lexer_new_main() we read all the tokens from the preprocessor:
/* Get the remaining tokens from the preprocessor. */
while (token.type != CPP_EOF)
{
cp_lexer_get_preprocessor_token (lexer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78246
--- Comment #1 from Zoltan Hidvegi ---
Created attachment 39986
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39986&action=edit
gcc -O2 -S -Wall warning_test.C gives incorrect warning: variable ‘sm’ set but
not used
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78246
Bug ID: 78246
Summary: Incorrect vector variable set but not used warning
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78231
--- Comment #2 from Alfredo ---
@Jonathan, Can you link to the part of the line in the standard? I found that
standard to be very vague, for example in defining ValueSwappable. Is
ValueSwappable something that can be called with `std::iter_swap`,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71924
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
On second thought, the right fix is to report the problem consistently for all
kinds of storage, including auto variables, alloca-ted storage, and compound
literals.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71723
--- Comment #4 from Walter Spector ---
As you are surmising, there are actually two problems in the example. First,
'data' needs the 'target' attribute in order to be pointed to. Second, 'data'
must either have the 'target' or a 'pointer' attri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78245
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78245
Bug ID: 78245
Summary: missing -Wformat-length on an overflow of a
dynamically allocated buffer
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78244
Bug ID: 78244
Summary: Narrowing conversion is accepted in a function
template, but it should be rejected
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78238
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78243
Bug ID: 78243
Summary: incorrect byte offset in vextractuh with -mcpu=power9
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78229
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Nov 7 22:35:43 2016
New Revision: 241942
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241942&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/78229
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_gimple_fold_bui
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51119
--- Comment #33 from Jerry DeLisle ---
With #pragma GCC optimize ( "-O3" )
$ gfc -static -O2 -finline-matmul-limit=0 compare.f90
$ ./a.out
=
MEASURED GIGAFLO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64735
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Component|c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71313
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||david_bjornbak at keysight dot
com
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78167
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78236
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78231
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78156
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78167
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I'm going to backport all the fixes to the
gcc-5-branch soon, so this will be fixed for 5.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78184
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66146
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||simon.heybrock at esss dot se
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77459
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to François Dumont from comment #6)
> Created attachment 39984 [details]
> Stop using __builtin_snprintf until __has_builtin is supported.
>
> Could you try this patch ? Until we have __has_built
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72822
Orion Poplawski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||orion at cora dot nwra.com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78242
Bug ID: 78242
Summary: Error in testsuite/gcc.dg/asan/use-after-scope-8.c
since its introduction
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78240
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51119
--- Comment #32 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Created attachment 39985
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39985&action=edit
Proposed patch to get testing going
This patch works pretty good for me. My results are as follows:
gfortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78238
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70601
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.9.4
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78239
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77459
--- Comment #6 from François Dumont ---
Created attachment 39984
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39984&action=edit
Stop using __builtin_snprintf until __has_builtin is supported.
Could you try this patch ? Until we have __ha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77784
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78009
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78122
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||55207
--- Comment #5 from janu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78240
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78241
--- Comment #1 from Zdenek Sojka ---
$ x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/repo/gcc-trunk/binary-latest-amd64/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/repo/gcc-trunk/binary-trunk-241681-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78241
Bug ID: 78241
Summary: [7 Regression] wrong code with -funroll-loops
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68972
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|msebor at gcc dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78064
--- Comment #6 from Florian Weimer ---
Author: fw
Date: Mon Nov 7 19:54:05 2016
New Revision: 241929
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241929&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libgcc/78064: Add missing include directive to unwind-c.c
Backpo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78238
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78226
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Nov 7 19:33:27 2016
New Revision: 241927
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241927&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-11-07 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/78226
* expr.c (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78206
--- Comment #6 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mrs
Date: Mon Nov 7 19:17:04 2016
New Revision: 241926
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241926&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-11-06 Jack Howarth
PR driver/78206
* incpa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78240
--- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
For completeness, without -fdec :
$ gfortran-7-20161106 z1.f90
z1.f90:2:12:
structure /s/
1
Error: STRUCTURE at (1) is a DEC extension, enable with -fdec-structure
z1.f90:4:6:
en
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78240
Bug ID: 78240
Summary: ICE in match_clist_expr, at fortran/decl.c:728
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fort
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78206
--- Comment #5 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mrs
Date: Mon Nov 7 18:35:50 2016
New Revision: 241920
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241920&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-11-06 Jack Howarth
PR driver/78206
* incpa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78239
--- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
An invalid example, with uninitialized parameter n :
$ cat z2.f90
program p
character(*), parameter :: z(2) = [character(n) :: 'x', 'y']
end
$ gfortran-7-20161106 -fimplicit-none z2.f90
f951: int
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78206
--- Comment #4 from mrs at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mrs
Date: Mon Nov 7 18:33:49 2016
New Revision: 241919
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241919&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-11-06 Jack Howarth
PR driver/78206
* incpa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78239
Bug ID: 78239
Summary: ICE in char_len_param_value, at fortran/decl.c:926,
with -fimplicit-none
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78238
Bug ID: 78238
Summary: ICE: verify_gimple failed, with -fdefault-integer-8
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72803
--- Comment #5 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Confirmed with the attachment. Thanks.
Let's leave this open for now, as the ICE occurs in a different place than
PR77949. It could be another unrelated bug caused by the same patch. Though
it seems like
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77538
--- Comment #18 from Dmitry Vyukov ---
Looks like shadow stack overflow.
Do you use fibers, ucontext, longjmp, exceptions or any other non-obvious
control flow constructs?
Fibers and exceptions are not supported. Longjmp should work.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77834
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Nov 7 17:35:16 2016
New Revision: 241917
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241917&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/77834
* dse.c (dse_step5): Call scan_reads even
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78227
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Nov 7 17:33:27 2016
New Revision: 241916
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241916&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/78227
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_expand_sse_cmp)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35691
--- Comment #1 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: prathamesh3492
Date: Mon Nov 7 17:32:17 2016
New Revision: 241915
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241915&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-11-07 Prathamesh Kulkarni
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78235
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Related to PR 66149.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78235
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|middle-end |c++
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78016
Jiong Wang changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78064
--- Comment #5 from Florian Weimer ---
Author: fw
Date: Mon Nov 7 17:08:40 2016
New Revision: 241914
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241914&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libgcc/78064: Add missing include directive to unwind-c.c
Backpo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77596
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|un
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77309
--- Comment #3 from Bernd Schmidt ---
Author: bernds
Date: Mon Nov 7 16:59:11 2016
New Revision: 241912
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241912&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/77309
* combine.c (make_compound_oper
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68467
Joseph S. Myers changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61118
Hervé Codina changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||herve.codina at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77822
--- Comment #25 from Dominik Vogt ---
I see.
This test verifies that a negative "pos" is indeed rejected:
--
#include
int g;
void foo(int64_t b)
{
if (b >> 65 & 1)
g = b;
}
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78237
Bug ID: 78237
Summary: std::timed_mutex::try_lock_for/until affected by
system realtime clock
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78236
--- Comment #1 from Christophe Monat ---
Comment on attachment 39982
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39982
Proposed patch to fix the regex_iterator constructor
>diff --git a/libstdc++-v3/include/bits/regex.h
>b/libstdc++-v3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78236
Bug ID: 78236
Summary: regex_iterator constructor is incomplete and creates
uninitialized values that may be used
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77822
--- Comment #24 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominik Vogt from comment #23)
> Regarding the ARM patch:
>
> + {
> +if (!IN_RANGE (INTVAL (operands[2]) + INTVAL (operands[3]),
> +1, GET_MODE_BITSIZE (DImode
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77822
--- Comment #23 from Dominik Vogt ---
Regarding the ARM patch:
+ {
+if (!IN_RANGE (INTVAL (operands[2]) + INTVAL (operands[3]),
+ 1, GET_MODE_BITSIZE (DImode) - 1))
+ FAIL;
+ }
Isn't this patch too simple? On s390x w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72785
--- Comment #17 from dhowells at redhat dot com ---
(In reply to dhowe...@redhat.com from comment #16)
> ...
> 0027 :
> 27: 0f bd c7bsr%edi,%eax
> 2a: 83 f0 1fxor$0x1f,%eax
> 2d: c3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78226
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
Here's the commit, the PR number was incorrect.
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Nov 7 15:25:21 2016
New Revision: 241909
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241909&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-11-07 Thomas Koen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72785
--- Comment #16 from dhowells at redhat dot com ---
I guess the following could be used:
int clz_ilog2(unsigned long x)
{
return __builtin_clz(x);
}
which compiles to:
0027 :
27: 0f bd c7bsr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77538
--- Comment #17 from peien luo ---
(In reply to Dmitry Vyukov from comment #16)
> > The stack size limit in my box is 8M. I have also checked /proc/limits.
>
> So, is increasing stack size help?
> Tsan increases stack consumption. 8MB is not tha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72785
--- Comment #15 from dhowells at redhat dot com ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #14)
> (In reply to dhowe...@redhat.com from comment #13)
> ...
> Ugh, no. Why not just x && (x & -x) == x ? __builtin_ctz (x) : -1
> (or ctzl or ctzll d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71860
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||janus at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78235
--- Comment #2 from David Edelsohn ---
20_util/variant/compile.cc produces a similar error:
In file included from
/nasfarm/edelsohn/src/src/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/20_util/variant/compile.cc:21:
/tmp/GCC/powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.0.0/libstdc++-v3/includ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71723
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46006
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
So currently we indeed miss the "sinks":
t.i:29:6: note: === vect_analyze_data_ref_accesses ===
t.i:29:6: note: Detected interleaving load MEM[(struct B *)&v] and MEM[(struct
B *)&v + 8B]
t.i:29:6: note: De
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78235
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78235
Bug ID: 78235
Summary: [7 Regression] libstdc++ testsuite run.cc ICE in
int_bit_position
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72785
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to dhowe...@redhat.com from comment #13)
> Another possibility, at least for handling ilog2(), could be to provide
> __builtin_ilog2(unsigned long x) as an alternative.
>
> Note that the kernel il
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72785
dhowells at redhat dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dhowells at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77822
Dominik Vogt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78234
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78224
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78221
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78233
--- Comment #1 from Pauli ---
Sorry. Error in original report:
gcc (Debian 6.2.0-11) 6.2.0 20161103
with command:
gcc -isystem /usr/local/armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabi/include -isystem
/usr/local/armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabi/sys-include-g -O2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78234
Bug ID: 78234
Summary: [7 Regression] LLVM reports
dynamic-stack-buffer-overflow in
gimple-ssa-store-merging.c
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78221
--- Comment #10 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Mon Nov 7 13:46:31 2016
New Revision: 241906
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=241906&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-11-07 Thomas Koenig
Backport from trunk
PR for
1 - 100 of 146 matches
Mail list logo
