https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77690
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65682
Paul Hua changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77702
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |target
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77702
Bug ID: 77702
Summary: suffix or operands invalid for `movq'
Product: gcc
Version: 5.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77696
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77695
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61175
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61839
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65424
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Sev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65682
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77695
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |blocker
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77695
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Target|x86_64-redhat-l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77701
Chris Manghane changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77677
--- Comment #7 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Bill Seurer from comment #6)
> The test case 176.gcc in the spec2000 benchmarks still fails apparently with
> the same error even after 240352
>
> (this is with 240383)
>
> loop.c: At
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77701
Bug ID: 77701
Summary: suspicious code in go/go-gcc.cc
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: go
Assign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77677
Bill Seurer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||seurer at linux dot
vnet.ibm.com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77700
Bug ID: 77700
Summary: suspicios code in cp/parser.c
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77699
Bug ID: 77699
Summary: suspicious code in get_next_line
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: preprocessor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77698
Bug ID: 77698
Summary: Loop not considered hot after profiling
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: gcov-profil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77676
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |bootstrap
--- Comment #16 from Martin Seb
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77676
--- Comment #15 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Thu Sep 22 21:28:07 2016
New Revision: 240383
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240383&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/77676 - powerpc64 and powerpc64le stage2 bootstrap fail
gcc/te
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77697
Bug ID: 77697
Summary: suspicious code in tree-ssa-forwprop.c
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimiz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77693
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|UNCO
I think I have observed a bug in the reporting of uninitialized
variables using -Wall .
As an example, this small program does not report any warnings:
#include
int main(int argc, char *argv[])
{
int v1[1];
int *v2 = new int;
printf("%d\n", v1[0]);
*v2 = 1;
}
Why not?
An almost identic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77694
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|UN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77695
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68212
Pat Haugen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77696
Bug ID: 77696
Summary: Confusing wording for -Wformat-length=
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77695
Bug ID: 77695
Summary: x86_64 bootstrap failure due to undeclared
hook_uint_uintp_false
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77694
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60352
--- Comment #2 from Giuseppe Ottaviano ---
It still happens in GCC 7: https://godbolt.org/g/GgyCZn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60352
Giuseppe Ottaviano changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ott at fb dot com
--- Comment #1 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61019
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61019
--- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Sep 22 17:11:33 2016
New Revision: 240380
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240380&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-09-22 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/61019
* g++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77694
--- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
For completeness, older official releases give :
$ gfortran-6 -O2 z1.f90
z1.f90:4:7:
y = .nt. x
1
Error: Unknown operator 'nt' at (1)
(null):0: confused by earlier errors, bailing out
$
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61019
--- Comment #3 from Paolo Carlini ---
Fixed for 6.1.0. I'm adding the testcase and closing the bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77694
Bug ID: 77694
Summary: ICE in optimize_binop_array_assignment, at
fortran/frontend-passes.c:1080
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77693
--- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
Some other variants :
$ cat z2.f90
program p
complex, pointer :: a
complex :: z
data a /(1.,2.)/
z = a
print *, z
end
$ cat z3.f90
program p
character, pointer :: a
logical :: z
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77693
Bug ID: 77693
Summary: ICE in rtl_for_decl_init, at dwarf2out.c:17378
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fort
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77686
--- Comment #4 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The differences between r234749 and the one before it start in 032t.esra:
--- good/wrong.cpp.032t.esra2016-09-22 17:41:24.914598329 +0100
+++ bad/wrong.cpp.032t.esra 2016-09-22 17:40:33.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77686
--- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
A slightly adjusted testcase is:
#include
#include
struct C
{
void
doCb ()
{
size_t dummy_a = 1;
std::cout << "";
auto tmp = this;
std::function f;
f = [this, &dummy
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77686
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57466
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #15
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71979
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71979
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Sep 22 16:14:20 2016
New Revision: 240376
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240376&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2016-09-22 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/71979
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77672
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
I think the general improvement I'm suggesting is to be able to put the
tilde(s) under or point the caret at any character of the format string,
including either of the two quotes.
It's already possible to un
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77692
--- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #0)
> Btw., the { dg-do compile { target i386*-*-* } } is quite strange: e.g. on
> Solaris/x86, the test is still run with -m32 and -m64 for a 32-bit compiler,
> while on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71979
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Thu Sep 22 15:26:23 2016
New Revision: 240373
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240373&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2016-09-22 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/71979
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77672
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62258
--- Comment #22 from Jonathan Wakely ---
For the record, the 4.8.3 regression was introduced by r207131 and the 4.7.4
regression by r208991, with the fixes for PR 41174 and PR 59224.
The fix should apply cleanly and be safe for the 4.7 and 4.8 b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77691
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Presumably caused by r240187 or r240192
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77676
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #14 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77692
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77691
--- Comment #4 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
> Presumably caused by r240187 or r240192
I think I had r240187 (or a slightly earlier variant thereof) in my
r240175 tree when bootstrapping o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77691
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77691
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I think that means malloc is not returning memory suitably aligned for
max_align_t.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77692
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
: debug
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: ro at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milestone: ---
Host: i386-pc-solaris2.12
Target: i386-pc-solaris2.12
Build: i386-pc-solaris2.12
Between 20160916 and 20160922, gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77691
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
20160916 and 20160922, experimental/memory_resource/resource_adaptor.cc
started to FAIL on 32-bit Solaris 12/x86 (not yet tried on S10 or S11),
S12/SPARC
is fine:
FAIL: experimental/memory_resource/resource_adaptor.cc execution test
Assertion failed: aligned(p), file
/vol/gcc/src/hg/trunk/local
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77689
--- Comment #9 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to morandidodo from comment #8)
> Actually, I tried it, but it does not seem to work. Indeed, using
> -mveclibabi=svml -lsvml -I(path-to-intel-lib-dir) does not seem to change
> the call address. If
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77689
--- Comment #8 from morandidodo at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #7)
> (In reply to morandidodo from comment #6)
>
> > However, I just made some tests, and it seems that the performance lost is
> > particularly related t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77689
--- Comment #7 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to morandidodo from comment #6)
> However, I just made some tests, and it seems that the performance lost is
> particularly related to std::log. If something else is being used, like
> std::sqrt for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77686
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77676
--- Comment #13 from Gerald Pfeifer ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #10)
> Created attachment 39670 [details]
> Patch under test.
With this patch, i?86-unknown-freebsd11 is back in bootstrap land again.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77653
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77653
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Thu Sep 22 12:52:09 2016
New Revision: 240354
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240354&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR ipa/77653
PR ipa/77653
* gcc.dg/ipa/pr77653.c: New
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77665
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5/6/7 Regression] ICE in |[5/6 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77679
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
> Author: rguenth
> Date: Thu Sep 22 12:16:42 2016
> New Revision: 240353
>
> URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240353&root=gcc&view=rev
> Log:
> 2016-09-22 Richard Biener
>
> PR middle-end/776
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77677
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Somewhat mitigated but it is bound to happen again (the IL is not TREE_OVERFLOW
clean) -> fix IPA propagation.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77679
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77678
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|ice-on-invalid-code |
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77677
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Sep 22 12:16:12 2016
New Revision: 240352
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240352&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-09-22 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/77677
* gim
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77678
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Sep 22 12:15:38 2016
New Revision: 240351
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240351&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-09-22 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/77678
* exp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77689
--- Comment #6 from morandidodo at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> First of all you need to make sure to have recent glibc installed to benefit
> from
> the vectorized math routines therein. Otherwise we cannot ve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77689
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77689
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #2)
> > Clang is pretty impressive using libc++ and -Ofast:
>
> Looks like they can remove all stores from th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48298
--- Comment #23 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Thu Sep 22 11:26:59 2016
New Revision: 240349
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240349&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-09-22 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/48298
* gfortran.h :
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77689
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #2)
> Clang is pretty impressive using libc++ and -Ofast:
Looks like they can remove all stores from the loop. Though it does not remove
the empty loop afterwar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77665
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Sep 22 11:17:24 2016
New Revision: 240348
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240348&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR fortran/77665
* tree-inline.c (remap_gimple_stmt): Set
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77690
Bug ID: 77690
Summary: -Wformat-length %s false positive after strlen check
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77689
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77689
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48298
--- Comment #22 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Walter Spector from comment #18)
> Awesome!
>
> I have noticed one bug so far. The compiler is missing a check to see if
> the arguments in the I/O procedures have the 'optional' attribute. It
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77689
Bug ID: 77689
Summary: Missing vectorization lead to huge performance loss
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77688
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77688
Bug ID: 77688
Summary: [7 Regression] libgo bootstrap broken on
mips*-linux-gnu and sparc*-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77676
--- Comment #12 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> The patch should resolve all the issues discussed in this bug.
> I don't have access to Darwin so I'd appreciate your help validating it there.
The patch restores bootstrap on darwin. Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77687
Bug ID: 77687
Summary: frame access after release without redzone on powerpc
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53991
--- Comment #12 from torvald at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Thanks for reporting that you are affected as well. Regarding your question
about bumping the priority, one problem for the TM support in general has been
to be able to judge how many users are
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77653
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |ipa
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77686
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77686
Bug ID: 77686
Summary: [6/7 Regression] wrong code on arm-linux-gnueabi and
arm-linux-gnueabihf
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77677
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
#4 0x0189c86e in ipcp_vr_lattice::meet_with_1 (this=0x280a780,
other_vr=0x769a3e88) at /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/ipa-cp.c:987
987 vrp_meet (&m_vr, other_vr);
(gdb) l
982
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61367
amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amker at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77680
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77678
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
--- Comment #3 from Ric
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77679
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
--- Comment #2 from Ric
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77685
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77683
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
Summary|[7.0 regression]
1 - 100 of 107 matches
Mail list logo
