https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77613
Bug ID: 77613
Summary: Powerpc64le: redundant swaps in autovectorised loop
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77393
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77612
Bug ID: 77612
Summary: ICE on invalid character len in contained procedure
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77608
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.9.3, 5.3.0, 6.2.0, 7.0
--- Comment #2 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77608
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77607
hyc at symas dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |FIXED
--- Comment #2 from hyc at s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66835
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
I think this has been fixed, can you try again?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69963
lkrupp at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69963
--- Comment #3 from lkrupp at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: lkrupp
Date: Thu Sep 15 23:54:40 2016
New Revision: 240168
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240168&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-09-15 Louis Krupp
PR fortran/69963
* p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77610
Bug ID: 77610
Summary: [sh] memcpy is wrongly inlined even for large copies
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77609
--- Comment #1 from roland at gnu dot org ---
Created attachment 39626
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39626&action=edit
trunk fix
This is the fix that shows the behavior difference reported above.
note, @object
.size foonote, 24
foonote:
.long 7
.long 2
.long 17
.string "foobar"
.zero 1
.value 23
.zero 2
.ident "GCC: (GNU) 7.0.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77607
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=11660
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77503
PeteVine changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70090
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77608
Bug ID: 77608
Summary: missing protection on trivially detectable runtime
buffer overflow
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77606
--- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor ---
The following test case reduces the problem to __builtin_object_size failing
for pointers to objects that are the result of a __builtin_malloc call (or VLA
definition) with an argument that's a runtime conditi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77607
Bug ID: 77607
Summary: Aarch64 LDP operand rejected incorrectly
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: inline-a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77602
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77606
Bug ID: 77606
Summary: abort in __memcpy_chk on an in-bounds copy with type-2
builtin_object_size
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/7.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 7.0.0 20160915 (experimental) [trunk revision 240161] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77604
--- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
A "scalar" version works :
$ cat y1.f90
program p
call s
contains
function f(x, y) result(z)
character(*), intent(in) :: x, y
character(len(x)**len(y)) :: z
z = x // y
end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77604
Bug ID: 77604
Summary: ICE in get_frame_type, at tree-nested.c:208
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77603
--- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
Still invalid with -fimplicit-none (or at source level),
but done in no time (in contrast to pr77602) :
$ time gfortran-7-20160911 -fimplicit-none -c z1.f90
z1.f90:4:29:
implicit character(le
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77603
Bug ID: 77603
Summary: ICE: Segmentation fault (program f951)
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77602
--- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
Adding -fimplicit-none does not help :
$ time gfortran-7-20160911 -fimplicit-none -c z1.f90
gfortran: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (program f951)
Please submit a full bug report,
with p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77602
Bug ID: 77602
Summary: ICE with cyclic length declaration: Killed (program
f951)
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47915
Gerhard Steinmetz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gerhard.steinmetz.fortran@t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77601
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77503
--- Comment #14 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: amker
Date: Thu Sep 15 16:31:35 2016
New Revision: 240166
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240166&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/77503
* tree-vect-loop.c (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77601
--- Comment #1 from lh_mouse ---
Oops, the last line in `main()` should have been
constexpr bool b3 = is_same{};
And as the comment before that line says, it works with g++.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77601
Bug ID: 77601
Summary: error: cannot convert 'is_same' to 'const
bool' in initialization
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77600
--- Comment #1 from dhowells at redhat dot com ---
warthog>m68k-linux-gnu-gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/usr/bin/m68k-linux-gnu-gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/libexec/gcc/m68k-linux-gnu/6.1.1/lto-wrapper
Target: m68k-linux-gnu
Configured
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77599
--- Comment #1 from dhowells at redhat dot com ---
warthog>m68k-linux-gnu-gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/usr/bin/m68k-linux-gnu-gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/libexec/gcc/m68k-linux-gnu/6.1.1/lto-wrapper
Target: m68k-linux-gnu
Configured
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77600
Bug ID: 77600
Summary: M68K: gcc generates rubbish with -mshort
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77598
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77514
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Started with r228471.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77522
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77599
Bug ID: 77599
Summary: M68K: __builtin_bswap32() isn't compiled correctly
with -mshort
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71878
Thomas Preud'homme changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||6.2.1
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77526
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67904
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71878
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71436
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77281
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77593
--- Comment #4 from tprince at computer dot org ---
Same failure of f951 after checking alternate svn apps.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39170
Albi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||albrecht.guendel at web dot de
--- Comment #16 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77484
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77597
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Well ABI tags are an extension on top of the IA64 C++ ABI and was first
implemented by GCC.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77598
Bug ID: 77598
Summary: consexpr compilation failure on reference type casting
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77544
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Sep 15 12:35:13 2016
New Revision: 240164
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240164&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-09-15 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/77544
* fol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77544
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||7.0
Summary|[6/7 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77425
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Sep 15 12:27:35 2016
New Revision: 240163
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240163&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/77425
* sched-int.h (sd_iterator_cond)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77475
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Sep 15 12:26:39 2016
New Revision: 240162
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240162&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/77475
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_parse_strin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77597
Bug ID: 77597
Summary: GCC 6.2 / LLVM 3.9 name mangling discrepancy for
function with instantiated template in signature whose
template argument involves an ABI tag.
Product
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77587
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77567
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Kostya Serebryany from comment #6)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> > Created attachment 39612 [details]
> > pr77567-2.patch
> >
> > Slightly larger patch, which attempts to diagn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77587
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77411
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72743
--- Comment #9 from Chung-Lin Tang ---
Author: cltang
Date: Thu Sep 15 10:00:14 2016
New Revision: 240156
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240156&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-09-15 Chung-Lin Tang
Backport from mainline
201
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72743
--- Comment #8 from Chung-Lin Tang ---
Author: cltang
Date: Thu Sep 15 09:46:36 2016
New Revision: 240155
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240155&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-09-15 Chung-Lin Tang
PR fortran/72743
* ipa-icf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77589
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #4)
> So DW_OP_GNU_implicit_ptr doesn't work here? Not sure
> I understand how DW_OP_GNU_implicit_ptr works fully. That is,
>
> ... *(D#1 + 24)
> DW_OP_GNU_i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66683
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Here is the testcase just in case github ever goes down:
#include
#include
#define TEST
(1.01*1.01*1.01*1.01*1.01*1.01*1.01*1.01*1.01*1.01*1.01*1.01*1.01*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77589
--- Comment #4 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 15 Sep 2016, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77589
>
> Jakub Jelinek changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77596
Bug ID: 77596
Summary: [F03] procedure pointer with implicit interface in
type pointing to a function can be 'called'
Product: gcc
Version: 5.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77589
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77595
--- Comment #1 from Andrzej Krzemienski ---
I mean, the expectation is that member functions whose constraints are not
satisfied should be omitted during explicit class template instantiation.
See this discussion for more background:
https://gro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63743
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Component|t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63581
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67111
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||armv6kz-hardfloat-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66890
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77589
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77588
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77593
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71199
--- Comment #10 from Yu Xuanchi ---
So there is currently i'm working on:
-Add "OVERLOAD" tree or just use chain. So we can put all function with same
identifier overloaded in a same tree so we can obtain them use
build_external_ref.
-Find a way
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77594
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77544
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
The issue is inconsistent folding done by associates split_tree when facing
~X vs -X - 1. I have a patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77595
Bug ID: 77595
Summary: concepts: constrained member functions illegally
instantiated during explicit class template
instantiation
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77514
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||7.0
Summary|[6/7 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77514
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Sep 15 07:17:45 2016
New Revision: 240153
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=240153&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-09-15 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/77514
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77594
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|
82 matches
Mail list logo