https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68128
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski ---
Does this work now?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72856
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71680
--- Comment #16 from Alan Modra ---
Author: amodra
Date: Wed Aug 10 05:43:36 2016
New Revision: 239317
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239317&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[RS6000] e500 part of pr71680
The fallback part of HARD_REGNO_CALLER_SAVE_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68477
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-checking,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68500
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
What happened to this set of patches? it is stage 1 now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72858
Bug ID: 72858
Summary: incorrect fixit hints in -Wformat diagnostics
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72857
Bug ID: 72857
Summary: incorrect caret location in -Wformat for width and
precision given by asterisk
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: mi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72856
Frédéric Buclin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72853
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72076
Thorsten Hirsch changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72853
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #39090|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68703
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68703
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Aug 9 22:03:07 2016
New Revision: 239309
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239309&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/68703 - bogus error with dependent vector length
gcc/c-fam
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72076
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
Also white spaces are still white spaces so joining lines should not make a
different.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72076
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Thorsten Hirsch from comment #6)
> One by one. :)
> I mean this snippet:
>
> template
>
> constexpr
>
> typename __gnu_cxx::__enable_if<__is_integer<_Tp>::__value,
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72076
--- Comment #6 from Thorsten Hirsch ---
One by one. :)
I mean this snippet:
template
constexpr
typename __gnu_cxx::__enable_if<__is_integer<_Tp>::__value,
int>::__type
ilogb(_Tp __x)
{ r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72076
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Thorsten Hirsch from comment #4)
> Sorry, you lost me - does my GMP installation cause the compilation error
> (illegal instruction) or does it cause the lonely constexpr without a type
> in the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69396
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> The ICE is gone with r238822.
Rather r235999.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58787
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65045
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2015-02-13 00:00:00 |2016-8-9
--- Comment #12 from Thomas Koe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72076
--- Comment #4 from Thorsten Hirsch ---
Sorry, you lost me - does my GMP installation cause the compilation error
(illegal instruction) or does it cause the lonely constexpr without a type
in the cmath header?
In other words: is the lonely const
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48776
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2013-06-16 00:00:00 |2016-8-9
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36412
--- Comment #2 from Peter Klotz ---
Hello Martin
It's great that you came up with a solution!
Meanwhile I removed "-l" from the command line to avoid the error and use an
additional script to rename files as soon as they are generated by gcov.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69859
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58787
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58787
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
No longer ICEs with r238822.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69396
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67757
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71194
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69860
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65173
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71795
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71795
--- Comment #12 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Tue Aug 9 20:33:00 2016
New Revision: 239302
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239302&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-08-09 Thomas Koenig
Backport from trunk
PR for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72855
Bug ID: 72855
Summary: Long compile time due to integrity checking during
dataflow analysis per loop
Product: gcc
Version: 5.4.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72848
--- Comment #2 from mikulas at artax dot karlin.mff.cuni.cz ---
gcc/hwint.h always defines HOST_WIDE_INT as 64-bit value. How could it be
32-bit?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72853
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71724
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||helloqirun at gmail dot com
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72746
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72853
--- Comment #2 from Michael Meissner ---
Created attachment 39090
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39090&action=edit
Proposed patch to fix the problem
Alan mixed up the stxsspx and stxssp alternatives. I haven't yet done the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72833
--- Comment #14 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Author: edlinger
Date: Tue Aug 9 17:58:00 2016
New Revision: 239301
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239301&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-08-09 Bernd Edlinger
PR bootstrap/72833
* fi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52116
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71691
--- Comment #9 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Based on c#6 I started thinking about how to make tree-ssa-loop-unswitch.c
appropriately conservative when a condition references a maybe-undefined
SSA_NAME.
To recap, tree_may_unswitch_on has this test:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72853
--- Comment #1 from Michael Meissner ---
I believe this is a duplicate of PR 72802 that Alan fixed on August 8th for
trunk (subversion id 239233), and backported to the gcc-6-branch (subversion id
239269)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64971
--- Comment #17 from Renlin Li ---
Author: renlin
Date: Tue Aug 9 17:20:14 2016
New Revision: 239300
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239300&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PATCH][PR64971]Convert function pointer to Pmode when emit call.
gcc/
201
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71712
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71712
--- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Aug 9 16:55:08 2016
New Revision: 239299
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239299&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/71712 - ABI tags on conversion ops.
* class.c (che
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71009
--- Comment #7 from Eric Gallager ---
Created attachment 39089
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39089&action=edit
some compressed compiler output
Still happens with trunk from the end of July. I tried playing around with some
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72741
--- Comment #4 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I could be mistaken, but I don't think there's anything we can do about that
test case because fortran doesn't have file scope. Specifically, in your
example,
SUBROUTINE r_w
IMPLICIT NONE
INTEG
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7652
--- Comment #56 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue Aug 9 16:39:28 2016
New Revision: 239297
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239297&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/7652
gcc/c-family/
* c-ada-spec.c (dump_generic_ad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72853
Bug ID: 72853
Summary: gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/20021120-1.c
generates incorrect stxssp op with -mcpu=power9
Product: gcc
Version: 6.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71981
--- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Tue Aug 9 16:13:37 2016
New Revision: 239295
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239295&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR ipa/71981] Make get_dynamic_type grok MEM_REF
2016-08-09 Martin Ja
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71981
--- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor ---
Author: jamborm
Date: Tue Aug 9 16:05:30 2016
New Revision: 239294
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239294&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR ipa/71981] Make get_dynamic_type grok MEM_REF
2016-08-09 Martin Ja
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72843
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72843
--- Comment #5 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Tue Aug 9 15:35:34 2016
New Revision: 239293
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239293&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/72843
* config/i386/i386.md (*movtf_inte
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72830
--- Comment #2 from Alex Henrie ---
All versions of GCC 5 and GCC 6 have the same problem.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33707
--- Comment #3 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: amker
Date: Tue Aug 9 15:10:55 2016
New Revision: 239292
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239292&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite
PR tree-optimization/33707
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72852
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72849
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72772
--- Comment #11 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: amker
Date: Tue Aug 9 15:08:02 2016
New Revision: 239291
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239291&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/72772
* tree-ssa-loop-nite
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72843
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #3)
> Created attachment 39084 [details]
> Proposed patch
>
> HJ, can you please test this patch?
It works. Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72772
--- Comment #10 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: amker
Date: Tue Aug 9 15:01:49 2016
New Revision: 239290
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239290&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/72772
* tree-ssa-loop-nite
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27453
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28478
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72849
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Aug 9 14:37:12 2016
New Revision: 239289
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239289&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/72849 - ICE with incomplete class.
* constexpr.c (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9
--- Comment #3 from mpf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mpf
Date: Tue Aug 9 14:36:45 2016
New Revision: 239288
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239288&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
MIPS: Skip gcc.dg/loop-8.c due to additional invariants
gcc/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36412
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72849
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56701
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill ---
New testcase fixed for GCC 7.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56701
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Aug 9 14:08:33 2016
New Revision: 239285
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239285&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/56701 - wrong type of &*this
* typeck.c (cp_build_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71824
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72834
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P5
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61636
Daniel Cooke changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dan.cooke89 at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72851
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72743
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 9 Aug 2016, tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72743
>
> Thomas Schwinge changed:
>
>What|Removed |Ad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72743
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2016-07-29 00:00:00 |2016-8-9
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72835
--- Comment #4 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Looks like it was a latent issue. In rewrite_expr_tree, when re-associate
operands, we should reset range_info for the LHS. We don’t do that now.
Following patch fixes the test case.
diff --git a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71654
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65345
--- Comment #28 from mpf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: mpf
Date: Tue Aug 9 12:36:18 2016
New Revision: 239278
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239278&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
MIPS: Use create_tmp_var_raw in mips_atomic_assign_expand_fenv
gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72852
Bug ID: 72852
Summary: constexpr inside class template cannot be recognized
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72835
kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kugan at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39609
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42015
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72851
Bug ID: 72851
Summary: [6/7 Regression] memory hog with -O3 on
s390x-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38401
--- Comment #28 from Richard Biener ---
The issue with the patch is that it does speculation for expressions that might
invoke undefined behavior. Like for gcc.c-torture/execute/2801-2.c where
it speculates a load from the next-next iteratio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43341
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44779
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72813
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72827
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72823
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72835
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||6.1.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72834
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72831
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72830
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
GCC 4.6 is no longer maintained, please try GCC 5 or newer.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72828
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.5 |---
Summary|[5/6/7 Regressio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72829
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72849
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72850
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72848
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
I wonder whether HWI is 32bits in your case. You'll hit the assert when a
counter overflow occurs.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72765
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71881
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
1 - 100 of 128 matches
Mail list logo