[Bug bootstrap/72823] [7 Regression] r239175 causes build failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72823 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Target|powerpc64le-unknown-linux-g | |nu

[Bug bootstrap/72823] New: [7 Regression] r239175 causes ppc64le bootstrap failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72823 Bug ID: 72823 Summary: [7 Regression] r239175 causes ppc64le bootstrap failure Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority

[Bug c/70186] RFE: better handling of misspelled attributes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70186 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug tree-optimization/71994] [7 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71994 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/72076] cmath: illegal instruction (constexpr)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72076 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Thorsten Hirsch from comment #2) > In that case it might be a problem of Arch's multilib, which is their way of > allowing 32bit compilations on x64, see [1] and [2]. So my gcc package is > calle

[Bug lto/70345] Installing liblto_plugin under $LIBDIR/bfd-plugins

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70345 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/70345] Installing liblto_plugin under $LIBDIR/bfd-plugins

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70345 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement --- Comment #1 from Andrew P

[Bug c++/70515] Nested lambdas causing invalid captured pointers on some platforms

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70515 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Can't reproduce this on aarch64-linux-gnu with GCC 6.1.0.

[Bug c++/70515] Nested lambdas causing invalid captured pointers on some platforms

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70515 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Severity|major

[Bug c++/69045] missing optimization: forward constant propagation of regular expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69045 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Severity|n

[Bug target/72771] [6/7 Regression] powerpc64le ICE with -mcpu=power9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72771 --- Comment #5 from Alan Modra --- > I'm wondering why this pattern even has a Z alternative It would be nice to be able to edit bugzilla entries, to remove dumb comments like that one.

[Bug target/72771] [6/7 Regression] powerpc64le ICE with -mcpu=power9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72771 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at g

[Bug target/72771] [6/7 Regression] powerpc64le ICE with -mcpu=power9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72771 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gmail dot com --- Comment #4 from

[Bug tree-optimization/18046] Missed jump threading optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18046 --- Comment #20 from Patrick Palka --- Author: ppalka Date: Fri Aug 5 23:29:53 2016 New Revision: 239181 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239181&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Improve forward jump threading of switch statements (PR18046) gcc/Chang

[Bug tree-optimization/71691] [6/7 Regression] wrong code at -O3 in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes on x86_64-linux-gnu (Floating point exception)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71691 --- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Actually it's just the code that implies a range on the "other" side of an equality test against a boolean. So it'd just be reverting the patch for 69270 that hits uncprop -- which just improves codesize &

[Bug tree-optimization/71691] [6/7 Regression] wrong code at -O3 in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes on x86_64-linux-gnu (Floating point exception)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71691 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com --- Comment #7 fr

[Bug c++/72822] New: libiberty/ demangler crash

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72822 Bug ID: 72822 Summary: libiberty/ demangler crash Product: gcc Version: 6.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee

[Bug rtl-optimization/69847] Spec 2006 403.gcc slows down with -mlra vs. reload on PowerPC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69847 --- Comment #25 from Vladimir Makarov --- Author: vmakarov Date: Fri Aug 5 21:31:31 2016 New Revision: 239180 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239180&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-08-05 Vladimir Makarov PR rtl-optimization/69847

[Bug tree-optimization/70754] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE during predictive commoning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70754 Pat Haugen changed: What|Removed |Added Target|aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu |aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu,

[Bug go/72812] reflect FAILs with Solaris as

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72812 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug go/72812] reflect FAILs with Solaris as

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72812 --- Comment #2 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ian Date: Fri Aug 5 20:11:30 2016 New Revision: 239179 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239179&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR go/72812 * go-gcc.cc (char_needs_encoding): New

[Bug rtl-optimization/72821] New: [7 regression] RTL check: expected elt 2 type 'B', have '0' (rtx barrier) in BLOCK_FOR_INSN, at rtl.h:1424

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72821 Bug ID: 72821 Summary: [7 regression] RTL check: expected elt 2 type 'B', have '0' (rtx barrier) in BLOCK_FOR_INSN, at rtl.h:1424 Product: gcc Version: 7.0

[Bug c++/68724] [5/6/7 Regression] ice in unify, at cp/pt.c:19902

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68724 --- Comment #7 from Nathan Sidwell --- Author: nathan Date: Fri Aug 5 20:04:27 2016 New Revision: 239178 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239178&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/68724 * pt.c (unify): TRAIT_EXPR is an expr.

[Bug c++/68724] [5/6/7 Regression] ice in unify, at cp/pt.c:19902

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68724 --- Comment #6 from Nathan Sidwell --- Author: nathan Date: Fri Aug 5 19:58:36 2016 New Revision: 239177 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239177&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/68724 * pt.c (unify): TRAIT_EXPR is an expr.

[Bug libgcc/68468] frv/bfin FDPIC toolchain build error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68468 --- Comment #9 from Waldemar Brodkorb --- After opening my eyes, it seems something like this works for me: diff -Nur gcc-6.1.0.orig/libgcc/unwind-dw2-fde-dip.c gcc-6.1.0/libgcc/unwind-dw2-fde-dip.c --- gcc-6.1.0.orig/libgcc/unwind-dw2-fde-dip.c

[Bug target/72771] [6/7 Regression] powerpc64le ICE with -mcpu=power9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72771 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|6.2 |7.0 --- Comment #3 from Michael Meiss

[Bug testsuite/70108] [5/6/7 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/simulate-thread/speculative-store-2.c -O0 -g thread simulation test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70108 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug go/72812] reflect FAILs with Solaris as

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72812 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/72810] [7 Regression] error: type mismatch for case label in switch statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72810 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/72810] [7 Regression] error: type mismatch for case label in switch statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72810 --- Comment #3 from Patrick Palka --- Author: ppalka Date: Fri Aug 5 17:21:00 2016 New Revision: 239174 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239174&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix PR tree-optimization/72810 gcc/ChangeLog: PR tree-optimizat

[Bug target/72804] Poor code gen with -mvsx-timode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72804 --- Comment #1 from Peter Bergner --- Using the following patch, I'm able to clean up the first simple test case: Index: rs6000.c === --- rs6000.c(revision 239144) +++ rs6000.c

[Bug libstdc++/72820] std::function can't store types with overloaded operator new

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72820 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/72820] New: std::function can't store types with overloaded operator new

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72820 Bug ID: 72820 Summary: std::function can't store types with overloaded operator new Product: gcc Version: 6.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: rejects-valid

[Bug c++/71193] [7 Regression] error: invalid use of incomplete type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71193 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/71773] [7 Regression] bogus? error: invalid use of incomplete type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71773 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/72819] [AArch64] HFA structs of __fp16 incorrectly passed to functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72819 --- Comment #1 from James Greenhalgh --- Author: jgreenhalgh Date: Fri Aug 5 16:08:24 2016 New Revision: 239173 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239173&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [AArch64] Handle HFAs of float16 types properly Fix PR Target/72

[Bug middle-end/72818] No warning for dereferencing casted pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72818 pmatos at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|-

[Bug middle-end/72818] No warning for dereferencing casted pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72818 --- Comment #1 from pmatos at gcc dot gnu.org --- Please disregard the -fsanitize=undefined in my initial comment. I didn't expect -fsanitize=undefined to caught it. That was an artefact from my original example. I expected a warning from GCC at c

[Bug target/72819] [AArch64] HFA structs of __fp16 incorrectly passed to functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72819 James Greenhalgh changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/72819] New: [AArch64] HFA structs of __fp16 incorrectly passed to functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72819 Bug ID: 72819 Summary: [AArch64] HFA structs of __fp16 incorrectly passed to functions Product: gcc Version: 6.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/72818] New: No warning for dereferencing casted pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72818 Bug ID: 72818 Summary: No warning for dereferencing casted pointer Product: gcc Version: 5.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middl

[Bug tree-optimization/72817] New: wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes)

Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto --prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap Thread model: posix gcc version 7.0.0 20160805 (experimental) [trunk revision 239166] (GCC) $ $ gcc-trunk -Os small.c; ./a.out $ gcc-6.1 -O3 small.c; ./a.out $ $ /usr/local/gcc

[Bug target/63250] Complex fp16 arithmetic uses nonexistent libgcc functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63250 James Greenhalgh changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|2015-01-1

[Bug gcov-profile/58306] Broken profiling for unrar sources: error: corrupted value profile: value profile counter (X out of Y) inconsistent with basic-block count

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58306 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW Assignee|unassigned at gcc

[Bug gcov-profile/58306] Broken profiling for unrar sources: error: corrupted value profile: value profile counter (X out of Y) inconsistent with basic-block count

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58306 --- Comment #16 from Artem S. Tashkinov --- Created attachment 39059 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39059&action=edit unrarsrc-5.4.4 + profile data

[Bug gcov-profile/58306] Broken profiling for unrar sources: error: corrupted value profile: value profile counter (X out of Y) inconsistent with basic-block count

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58306 --- Comment #15 from Artem S. Tashkinov --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #13) > Ok, I'll try to reproduce, but I would need: > > 1) echo ""> /tmp/ff.c && gcc -march=native /tmp/ff.c -c -v Done. > 2) please upload somewhere a sample r

[Bug gcov-profile/67992] GCOV takes an absurdly long time to process a file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67992 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gcov-profile/58306] Broken profiling for unrar sources: error: corrupted value profile: value profile counter (X out of Y) inconsistent with basic-block count

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58306 --- Comment #14 from Artem S. Tashkinov --- Created attachment 39058 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=39058&action=edit gcc -march=native /tmp/ff.c -c -v

[Bug c/72816] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE on x86_64-linux-gnu (tree check: expected tree that contains ‘decl with RTL’ structure, have ‘field_decl’ in set_decl_rtl, at emit-rtl.c:1282)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72816 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code Target Milestone|-

[Bug c/72816] ICE on x86_64-linux-gnu (tree check: expected tree that contains ‘decl with RTL’ structure, have ‘field_decl’ in set_decl_rtl, at emit-rtl.c:1282)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72816 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/71981] [6/7 Regression] ICE at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (internal compiler error: in get_dynamic_type, at ipa-polymorphic-call.c:1667)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71981 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug fortran/72699] [6/7 Regression] ICE in gfc_check_dependency, at fortran/dependency.c:1257

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72699 --- Comment #5 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com --- Hi Dominique, You are quite right about the revision that fixes this PR, whose existence I hadn't noticed. Thanks for closing it. Cheers Paul On 5 August 2016 at 14:13, dominiq at l

[Bug c++/72769] ifstream Optimed Out ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72769 Roy Bellingan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|INVALID

[Bug libstdc++/72813] [6/7 Regression] atomic header cannot be compiled into translation unit with -fkeep-inline-functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72813 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug gcov-profile/48463] gcov generating bad function coverage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48463 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/72699] [6/7 Regression] ICE in gfc_check_dependency, at fortran/dependency.c:1257

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72699 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug gcov-profile/58306] Broken profiling for unrar sources: error: corrupted value profile: value profile counter (X out of Y) inconsistent with basic-block count

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58306 --- Comment #13 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Artem S. Tashkinov from comment #12) > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #11) > > I've just verified that GCC 5.3.1 and GCC 6.1.1 and latest trunk work fine > > (x86_64-linux-gnu). I built t

[Bug fortran/57373] ICE on invalid: insert_bbt(): Duplicate key found!

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57373 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/72810] [7 Regression] error: type mismatch for case label in switch statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72810 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug c/72816] New: ICE on x86_64-linux-gnu (tree check: expected tree that contains ‘decl with RTL’ structure, have ‘field_decl’ in set_decl_rtl, at emit-rtl.c:1282)

7.0.0 20160805 (experimental) [trunk revision 239162] (GCC) $ gcc-trunk small.c small.c:4:5: error: array size missing in ‘a’ A a; ^ small.c:4:3: internal compiler error: tree check: expected tree that contains ‘decl with RTL’ structure, have ‘field_decl’ in set_decl_rtl, at emit-rtl.c:1282

[Bug fortran/50259] Internal Error at (1): gfc_resolve_expr(): Bad expression type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50259 --- Comment #9 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > What about committing a test case (if this isn't already covered)? IMO the change in revision r238822 * error.c (gfc_internal_error): If there are any errors in the buffer, exit wit

[Bug gcov-profile/58306] Broken profiling for unrar sources: error: corrupted value profile: value profile counter (X out of Y) inconsistent with basic-block count

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58306 --- Comment #12 from Artem S. Tashkinov --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #11) > I've just verified that GCC 5.3.1 and GCC 6.1.1 and latest trunk work fine > (x86_64-linux-gnu). I built the binary and unrar a rar archive. > > Can you pl

[Bug driver/68794] an option for -fsanitize= is accepted even if the corresponding library is not available

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68794 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug tree-optimization/71802] [7 Regression] gcc ICE at -O3 on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu in expand_LOOP_VECTORIZED

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71802 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Note it is CFG cleanup triggering the loop removal through merging two BBs and propagating out the PHIs in the second. I have a patch fixing the missed block merging in that round of CFG cleanup.

[Bug c++/68724] [5/6/7 Regression] ice in unify, at cp/pt.c:19902

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68724 Nathan Sidwell changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/72815] New: libmpx on i386

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72815 Bug ID: 72815 Summary: libmpx on i386 Product: gcc Version: 6.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: other Assignee: unassign

[Bug c++/68724] [5/6/7 Regression] ice in unify, at cp/pt.c:19902

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68724 --- Comment #4 from Nathan Sidwell --- Author: nathan Date: Fri Aug 5 12:21:46 2016 New Revision: 239167 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=239167&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/68724 * pt.c (unify): TRAIT_EXPR is an expr.

[Bug libstdc++/72813] [6/7 Regression] atomic header cannot be compiled into translation unit with -fkeep-inline-functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72813 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid Status|UNCON

[Bug go/72814] reflect FAILs on 32-bit Solaris/SPARC: SIGILL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72814 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug go/72814] New: reflect FAILs on 32-bit Solaris/SPARC: SIGILL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72814 Bug ID: 72814 Summary: reflect FAILs on 32-bit Solaris/SPARC: SIGILL Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: go

[Bug libstdc++/72813] New: [6/7 Regression] atomic header cannot be compiled into translation unit with -fkeep-inline-functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72813 Bug ID: 72813 Summary: [6/7 Regression] atomic header cannot be compiled into translation unit with -fkeep-inline-functions Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug gcov-profile/49340] read_couts_file() not called for -fbranch-probabilities

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49340 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug gcov-profile/50228] Incorrect line execution count.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50228 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug go/72812] reflect FAILs with Solaris as

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72812 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug go/72812] New: reflect FAILs with Solaris as

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72812 Bug ID: 72812 Summary: reflect FAILs with Solaris as Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: go Assignee

[Bug tree-optimization/57558] Loop not vectorized if iteration count could be infinite

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57558 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #6 from

[Bug target/68273] [5/6/7 Regression] Wrong code on mips/mipsel due to (invalid?) peeking at alignments in function_arg.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68273 --- Comment #37 from Matthew Fortune --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #36) > On Fri, 3 Jun 2016, matthew.fortune at imgtec dot com wrote: > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68273 > > > > --- Comment #35 from Matth

[Bug middle-end/67239] [6 Regression] FAIL: 23_containers/unordered_set/insert/hash_policy.cc execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67239 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Known to work|

[Bug gcov-profile/52416] Branch coverage differences between 4.4 and 4.5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52416 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug ipa/70582] [6/7 regression] gcc.dg/attr-weakref-1.c FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70582 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/71652] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE in in ix86_target_macros_internal, at config/i386/i386-c.c:187

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71652 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-* Priority

[Bug middle-end/71700] [5/6 Regression] wrong code with struct assignment with sub-word signed bitfields

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71700 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/71821] [5/6/7 regression] ICE on invalid C++11 code (incorrect argument for alignas): unexpected expression ‘f’ of kind template_id_expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71821 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/71827] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE on invalid C++11 code with non constant diff between two labels

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71827 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/71834] [5/6/7 Regression] accepts invalid C++11 code with too few number of template arguments for class template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71834 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug tree-optimization/71881] [6 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 with -g enabled on x86_64-linux-gnu: cannot update SSA form

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71881 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug debug/71906] [6/7 Regression] Fortran allocatable strings debug info type size regression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71906 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug tree-optimization/71947] [6/7 Regression] x ^ y not folded to 0 if x == y by DOM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71947 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/71979] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE with on C++ code with incorrect type in overloaded base class '=' operator: in build_base_path, at cp/class.c:304

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71979 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||error-recovery Priority|P3

[Bug fortran/72714] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE in gfc_array_init_size, at fortran/trans-array.c:5235

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72714 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug tree-optimization/72746] [5/6/7 Regression] gcc ICE at -O2 and above on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu with “seg fault”

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72746 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/72759] [6 Regression] ICE on invalid C++ code on x86_64-linux-gnu (Segmentation fault, tree_class_check, ocp_convert)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72759 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||error-recovery Priority|P3

[Bug c++/72752] [6 Regression] ICE: in retrieve_specialization, at cp/pt.c:1183

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72752 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/72763] [5/6/7 Regression] incorrectly accepts invalid C++11 code that instantiates a non-template class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72763 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/72764] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE on invalid C++11 code instantiating an alias template: tree check: expected class ‘type’, have ‘exceptional’ (error_mark) in typedef_variant_p, at tree.c:12660

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72764 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug target/72771] [6/7 Regression] powerpc64le ICE with -mcpu=power9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72771 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/72800] [5/6 Regression] ICE on invalid C++14 code with initialized lambda capture: tree check: expected class ‘type’, have ‘exceptional’ (error_mark) in add_capture, at cp/lambda.c:505

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72800 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||error-recovery Priority|P3

[Bug tree-optimization/65307] [4.9 Regression] Incorrect optimization breaks basic arithmetic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65307 --- Comment #15 from Ozkan Sezer --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #14) > Fixed. By which commit was this fixed? Is the fix applicable to the now-closed 4.9 branch at all?

[Bug tree-optimization/72810] [7 Regression] error: type mismatch for case label in switch statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72810 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug c++/71773] [7 Regression] bogus? error: invalid use of incomplete type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71773 --- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- template struct a; template struct b; template struct b : a {}; template struct f; template struct h : f {}; template struct i; template typename i, g>::e>::j k(g, g); template struct l { int

  1   2   >