--enable-languages=c,c++,lto
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 7.0.0 20160709 (experimental) [trunk revision 238191] (GCC)
$
$ g++-6.1 -c small.cpp
$
$ g++-trunk -c small.cpp
small.cpp:3:44: internal compiler error: in operand_equal_p, at
fold-const.c
-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 7.0.0 20160709 (experimental) [trunk revision 238191] (GCC)
$
$ g++-trunk -c small.cpp
small.cpp: In
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71826
--- Comment #3 from Zhendong Su ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> > This code is valid as I here should not be looked up in the dependent base
> > class. There is another bug about tha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70868
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71826
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> This code is valid as I here should not be looked up in the dependent base
> class. There is another bug about that already filed
That is bug 15272.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71826
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
This code is valid as I here should not be looked up in the dependent base
class. There is another bug about that already filed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71816
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/7.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 7.0.0 20160709 (experimental) [trunk revision 238191] (GCC)
$
$ clang++-3.8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70946
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Severity|n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71783
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sat Jul 9 22:18:29 2016
New Revision: 238192
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238192&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-07-09 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/71783
* frontend
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71012
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|https://buildd.debian.org/s |
|tatus/fetch.php?pkg=
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71028
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|ASS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71825
--- Comment #1 from Zhendong Su ---
Both the following are accepted:
$ g++-trunk -c small1.cpp
$ cat small1.cpp
namespace N
{
template < class > struct A;
}
template < class T > struct N::A
{
A () {}
};
$
$ g++-trunk -c small2.cpp
$ c
-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 7.0.0 20160709 (experimental) [trunk revision 238191] (GCC)
$
$ clang++-3.8 -c small.cpp
$
$ g++-trunk -c small.cpp
small.cpp:8:6: error: expected unqualified-id before ‘)’ token
A () {}
^
$
--
namespace N
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71822
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70802
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization, ra
--- Comment #1 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61341
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70861
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71821
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70870
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Index: data.c
===
--- data.c (revision 238178)
+++ data.c (working copy)
@@ -489,6 +489,15 @@ gfc_assign_data_value (gfc_exp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71824
Bug ID: 71824
Summary: ICE when compiling libiberty with Graphite loop
optimizations
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71816
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|arm-linux-gnueabihf,|
|powerpc-linux-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71770
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71816
--- Comment #9 from David Binderman ---
Created attachment 38865
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38865&action=edit
C source code
Flag -O2 required on x86_64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71770
--- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle ---
I am getting wfdb and will attemt to confirm this bug on non-cygwin.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66145
--- Comment #15 from Boris Kolpackov ---
> And I still think using exceptions in iostreams is dumb in the first place.
I am interested to hear what is your recommendation to do instead, call good()
after every IO operation?
In fact, I think tha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71816
--- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On July 8, 2016 5:47:43 PM GMT+02:00, "ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org"
wrote:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71816
>
>ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
>
> What|Remove
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69880
Boris Kolpackov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||boris at kolpackov dot net
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71770
--- Comment #6 from Isabelle ---
I searched for a second cugwin1.dll. I found an old (2004) one however it was
not in the path. I deleted it, rebooted, now there is only one. The same error
persists.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71823
Bug ID: 71823
Summary: g++ segfaults with -mfma and -ftree-slp-vectorize
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71783
--- Comment #6 from Toon Moene ---
On 07/08/2016 11:15 PM, tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71783
>
> --- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig ---
> The solution turns that fixes the ICE turns out to be
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50417
--- Comment #18 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #12)
> On Fri, 8 Jul 2016, olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
>
> > void test (const int *a, int *b)
> > {
> > a[100] = 1;
> > b[200] = 2;
> >
> > std::
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71816
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71822
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(gdb) p expr_p->base.code
$1 = SIZEOF_EXPR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71822
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71822
Bug ID: 71822
Summary: [6.0/6.1 Regression] internal compiler error: in
gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:11025
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70879
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Severity|n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71783
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Toon, does this fix the ICE for you as well?
It does for me without regression.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71067
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
The patch in comment 7 fixes the ICE without regression.
Steve,
Will it help if I do the packaging or do you prefer to do it yourself?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70254
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.4
Summary|Compiler crash
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70254
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|2016-03-16
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67757
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> This appears to be fixed on 6 and 7. Please check.
I still get
pr67757_db_1.f90:27:8:
use octonion_def, T2 => T
1
Error: Name 't2' at (1) is an ambiguous reference to 't' from module
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70254
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|1
43 matches
Mail list logo
