[Bug c++/70702] Build failure of ARM cross compiler under Cygwin - libc_name_p

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70702 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/61341] ICE for variadic templates: tsubst at cp/pt.c:11313, tree check: expected class ‘expression’, have ‘type’ (integer_type)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61341 Zhendong Su changed: What|Removed |Added CC||su at cs dot ucdavis.edu --- Comment #4 fr

[Bug c++/71821] New: ICE on invalid C++11 code (incorrect argument for alignas): unexpected expression ‘f’ of kind template_id_expr

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71821 Bug ID: 71821 Summary: ICE on invalid C++11 code (incorrect argument for alignas): unexpected expression ‘f’ of kind template_id_expr Product: gcc Version: 7.0

[Bug fortran/67757] ICE after "ambiguous reference"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67757 --- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- This appears to be fixed on 6 and 7. Please check.

[Bug target/71800] GCC generates invalid instruction (stxsiwx) with -mcpu=power7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71800 Bill Seurer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com --- Comm

[Bug fortran/71783] [5/6/7 Regression ] ICE on valid code in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl at gimplify.c:1801

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71783 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||brad.finney at humboldt dot edu

[Bug fortran/71782] [5/6/7 Regression] internal compiler error: in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71782 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--

Re: 10 x 1036778084 = ??

On 07/07/2016 10:07 PM, Nobby-Hirand wrote: I have just find strange answer, 10 x 1036778084 = 1777846248?? Your target has 32-bit integers. The value 1036778084 is close to the largest representable value. Multiplying by anything larger than 2 causes an overflow, and the result gets trunca

[Bug fortran/68426] Simplification of SPREAD with a derived type element causes ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68426 --- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Fri Jul 8 22:24:44 2016 New Revision: 238186 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238186&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-07-08 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/68426

[Bug c++/71820] New: ICE on valid C++ code: in arg_assoc_type, at cp/name-lookup.c:5583

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71820 Bug ID: 71820 Summary: ICE on valid C++ code: in arg_assoc_type, at cp/name-lookup.c:5583 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/71783] [5/6/7 Regression ] ICE on valid code in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl at gimplify.c:1801

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71783 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig --- The solution turns that fixes the ICE turns out to be reasonably simple: We were missing a charlen for the allocatable case. What I do not yet understand is why this code was reached in the first place; the

[Bug tree-optimization/50417] regression: memcpy with known alignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50417 --- Comment #17 from npl at chello dot at --- I got interrupted by a colleague at work, part 2 of the ramblings... Everything you could argue against memcpy beeing replaced by simpler instructions, doesnt change that the same issue persists with

[Bug rtl-optimization/71621] [7 Regression] ICE in assign_by_spills, at lra-assigns.c:1417 (error: unable to find a register to spill) w/ -O2 -mavx2 -ftree-vectorize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71621 --- Comment #4 from Vladimir Makarov --- Author: vmakarov Date: Fri Jul 8 20:29:12 2016 New Revision: 238178 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238178&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-07-08 Vladimir Makarov PR rtl-optimization/71621

[Bug middle-end/71606] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE on -O2 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu (internal compiler error: in get_expr_operands, at tree-ssa-operands.c:882)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71606 --- Comment #7 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Fri Jul 8 20:22:22 2016 New Revision: 238174 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238174&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Do not consider COMPLEX_TYPE as fold_convertible_p Backported fro

[Bug middle-end/71606] ICE on -O2 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu (internal compiler error: in get_expr_operands, at tree-ssa-operands.c:882)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71606 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/71606] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE on -O2 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu (internal compiler error: in get_expr_operands, at tree-ssa-operands.c:882)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71606 --- Comment #6 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Fri Jul 8 20:21:02 2016 New Revision: 238173 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238173&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Do not consider COMPLEX_TYPE as fold_convertible_p Backported fro

[Bug middle-end/71606] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE on -O2 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu (internal compiler error: in get_expr_operands, at tree-ssa-operands.c:882)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71606 --- Comment #5 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Fri Jul 8 20:20:23 2016 New Revision: 238172 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238172&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Do not consider COMPLEX_TYPE as fold_convertible_p Backported fro

[Bug c++/71784] [6/7 Regression] ICE on invalid code in push_access_scope, at cp/pt.c:229

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71784 --- Comment #10 from Ela --- > ... actually I made it simpler, in order to get to > the root of it: > > --- CORRECTION - #include using std::cout; #include template class A{ public: void f() & ;

[Bug c++/71784] [6/7 Regression] ICE on invalid code in push_access_scope, at cp/pt.c:229

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71784 --- Comment #9 from Ela --- (In reply to Ela from comment #8) > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #7) > > > Same as the origin, it's obviously an invalid code. > > Tested on all Clang-3.8 C++11,14,17 - it works. > > gcc-6.1.0 is a bit

[Bug c++/71784] [6/7 Regression] ICE on invalid code in push_access_scope, at cp/pt.c:229

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71784 --- Comment #8 from Ela --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #7) > Same as the origin, it's obviously an invalid code. Tested on all Clang-3.8 C++11,14,17 - it works. gcc-6.1.0 is a bit more explicit in some sense: - class instant

[Bug c++/71811] gcc6/c++/functional:1726:40: internal compiler error: in assign_temp, at function.c:961

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71811 --- Comment #2 from Jeffrey Walton --- Also see http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71210 (thanks JJ).

[Bug fortran/71799] [7 Regression] ICE in DO loop code emission (gfc_resolve_iterator)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71799 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/71770] gfortran: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault (program f951)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71770 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/71816] [7 Regression] bootstrap broken on multiple targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71816 --- Comment #6 from David Edelsohn --- Bootstrap is proceeding with r238077.

[Bug bootstrap/71816] [7 Regression] bootstrap broken on multiple targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71816 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Target|arm-linux-gnueabihf,|arm-linux-gnueabihf,

[Bug bootstrap/71816] [7 Regression] bootstrap broken on armhf-linux-gnuabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71816 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug bootstrap/71819] [7 regression] Bootstrap fail on S/390 32 bit starting with r238078

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71819 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC

[Bug target/71297] [7 regression] ICE on invalid code in altivec_resolve_overloaded_builtin (rs6000-c.c:5106) on powerpc64le-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71297 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/71819] New: [7 regression] Bootstrap fail on S/390 32 bit starting with r238078

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71819 Bug ID: 71819 Summary: [7 regression] Bootstrap fail on S/390 32 bit starting with r238078 Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/71297] [7 regression] ICE on invalid code in altivec_resolve_overloaded_builtin (rs6000-c.c:5106) on powerpc64le-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71297 --- Comment #3 from Bill Schmidt --- Author: wschmidt Date: Fri Jul 8 15:42:47 2016 New Revision: 238168 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238168&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [gcc] 2016-07-08 Bill Schmidt PR target/71297 * con

[Bug debug/71667] [7 Regression] ICE in as_a, at is-a.h:192 w/ -g -O2 -ftree-vectorize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71667 --- Comment #8 from Qirun Zhang --- (In reply to alahay01 from comment #7) > Fixed. > > Additional issue found by Qirun has been raised as PR 71818 Hi Alan, Sorry that I missed your previous message..

[Bug target/71806] PowerPC -mcpu=power9 enables __float128 without an explicit -mfloat128

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71806 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/71806] PowerPC -mcpu=power9 enables __float128 without an explicit -mfloat128

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71806 --- Comment #4 from Michael Meissner --- Fixed on trunk, subversion id 238161. Fixed on GCC 6.2 branch, subversion id 238165.

[Bug target/71806] PowerPC -mcpu=power9 enables __float128 without an explicit -mfloat128

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71806 --- Comment #3 from Michael Meissner --- Author: meissner Date: Fri Jul 8 14:51:44 2016 New Revision: 238165 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238165&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Back port from trunk [gcc] 2016-07-08 Michael Meissner

[Bug target/71806] PowerPC -mcpu=power9 enables __float128 without an explicit -mfloat128

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71806 --- Comment #2 from Michael Meissner --- Author: meissner Date: Fri Jul 8 14:49:37 2016 New Revision: 238164 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=238164&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [gcc] 2016-07-08 Michael Meissner PR target/71806

[Bug tree-optimization/50417] regression: memcpy with known alignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50417 --- Comment #16 from npl at chello dot at --- rguenther: Funny enough, I am using memcpy because thats the only standard conform way to move data around that might be aliased. And I use this often to parse binary streams from a network. I think y

[Bug libstdc++/66145] [5/6/7 Regression] std::ios_base::failure objects thrown from libstdc++.so use old ABI

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66145 --- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely --- Yes, and I'm still planning to fix it. (And I still think using exceptions in iostreams is dumb in the first place).

[Bug bootstrap/71816] [7 Regression] bootstrap broken on armhf-linux-gnuabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71816 Rainer Orth changed: What|Removed |Added Target|arm-linux-gnueabihf,|arm-linux-gnueabihf, |po

[Bug tree-optimization/71802] [7 Regression] gcc ICE at -O3 on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu in expand_LOOP_VECTORIZED

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71802 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- if-conversion builds _51 = LOOP_VECTORIZED (3, 4); but new phi replacement stmt prephitmp_63 = prephitmp_62 != 0 ? _3 : prephitmp_62; Degenerate phi! prephitmp_52 = PHI <3(6)> Degenerate phi! prephitmp_

[Bug tree-optimization/71815] SLSR misses several PHI candidate cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71815 --- Comment #3 from Bill Schmidt --- OK. I'm busy wrapping up some things before a vacation, but I'll plan to look into this when I get back.

[Bug tree-optimization/50417] regression: memcpy with known alignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50417 --- Comment #15 from Richard Biener --- Doesn't sanitize anything for int main() { int i, j;

[Bug tree-optimization/71815] SLSR misses several PHI candidate cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71815 --- Comment #2 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Fri, 8 Jul 2016, wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71815 > > --- Comment #1 from Bill Schmidt --- > Interesting. How do we enable/disable code

[Bug tree-optimization/50417] regression: memcpy with known alignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50417 --- Comment #14 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Fri, 8 Jul 2016, olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50417 > > --- Comment #13 from Oleg Endo --- > (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment

[Bug tree-optimization/71815] SLSR misses several PHI candidate cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71815 --- Comment #1 from Bill Schmidt --- Interesting. How do we enable/disable code hoisting? I don't see a documented option for this.

[Bug fortran/71730] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE when character length specification uses an undefined variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71730 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/50417] regression: memcpy with known alignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50417 --- Comment #13 from Oleg Endo --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #12) > > No, because the access is performed as 'int'. > > > Why should memcpy be any different? > > Because the memcpy stmt doesn't constitute a memory access bu

[Bug tree-optimization/50417] regression: memcpy with known alignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50417 --- Comment #12 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Fri, 8 Jul 2016, olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50417 > > --- Comment #11 from Oleg Endo --- > (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment

[Bug tree-optimization/50417] regression: memcpy with known alignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50417 --- Comment #11 from Oleg Endo --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #10) > > What makes the parameter type special? Would > > void test (const int *a, int *b) > { > std::memcpy ((char *)b, (char *)a, t); > } > > be invalid to opt

[Bug tree-optimization/60172] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] ARM performance regression from trunk@207239

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60172 --- Comment #28 from Richard Biener --- For GCC 6 we now have a DCE right before RTL expansion so what's the status of this bug for GCC6/7?

[Bug c++/63151] [5/6/7 regression] Accessibility error when brace-constructing base class with protected defaulted constructor and member variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63151 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug lto/66295] [5/6/7 Regression] LTO generates incorrect resolver call for function multiversioning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66295 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug middle-end/67239] [6/7 Regression] FAIL: 23_containers/unordered_set/insert/hash_policy.cc execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67239 --- Comment #25 from Richard Biener --- Is this fixed on trunk?

[Bug c++/69223] [5/6/7 regression] ICE with polymorphic lambda

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69223 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug preprocessor/69869] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault in call to skip_macro_block_comment when using '-traditional-cpp'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69869 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug ipa/70583] [6/7 Regression] FAIL: g++.old-deja/g++.abi/vtable2.C -std=gnu++98 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70583 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Priority|P3

[Bug rtl-optimization/70703] [6/7 regression] Regression in register usage on x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70703 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug tree-optimization/50417] regression: memcpy with known alignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50417 --- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Fri, 8 Jul 2016, olegendo at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50417 > > --- Comment #9 from Oleg Endo --- > (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #

[Bug c++/70768] [6/7 Regression] Increased compilation time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70768 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug libstdc++/53429] libstdc++ should guarantee not to expose complex::{imag,real} so it supports both C++98 and C++11

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53429 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/70781] [6/7 Regression] ICE on invalid C++ code with lambda expressions on x86_64-linux-gnu in finish_expr_stmt, at cp/semantics.c:677

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70781 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/70824] [6/7 Regression] cc1plus consumes all available memory on specific template code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70824 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||compile-time-hog, |

[Bug libstdc++/70845] [6/7 Regression] inherited piecewise_construct_t constructor from std::pair by "using-declarations" is missing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70845 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/70869] [6 Regression] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault on array of pointer to function members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70869 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Known to work|

[Bug tree-optimization/50417] regression: memcpy with known alignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50417 --- Comment #9 from Oleg Endo --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #8) > > But there is no good reasoning that can be applied that it is a valid > transform. What does clang do when s is void * and you cast that to > uint32_t *? Not

[Bug lto/70929] [4.9/5/6/7 regression] Cross-module inlining for functions having argument passed by reference is no longer working.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70929 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/70942] [6/7 Regression] [c++14] Incorrect deduction of generic lambda `auto&&` parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70942 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/70977] [6/7 Regression] Out of memory during compilation of facebook/wangle (flag c++0x works, flag c++14 fails).

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70977 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug fortran/71066] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] ICE in set_loop_bounds, at fortran/trans-array.c:4680

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71066 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug fortran/71067] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] ICE on data initialization with insufficient value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71067 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug c++/71092] [6/7 Regression] ICE: in cxx_eval_call_expression, at cp/constexpr.c:1449; only with -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71092 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Priority|P3

[Bug libstdc++/66145] [5/6/7 Regression] std::ios_base::failure objects thrown from libstdc++.so use old ABI

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66145 Boris Kolpackov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||boris at kolpackov dot net --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/71109] [6 Regression] gcc ICE at -O3 on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu in "maybe_record_trace_start"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71109 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-* Priority|P3

[Bug target/71112] [6/7 Regression] ICE with -fpie on aarch64 ILP32 big-endian

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71112 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c/71115] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Missing warning: excess elements in struct initializer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71115 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/71117] [6/7 Regression] Overeager application of conversion to function pointer during overload resolution of call to function object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71117 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/71164] [6/7 Regression] tree check fail at cp/pt.c:12961

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71164 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/71121] [6/7 Regression] Spurious warning: "the address of [...] will never be NULL [-Waddress]"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71121 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/71166] [7 Regression] ICE with nested constexpr/initializer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71166 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||6.2.0 Summary|[6/7 Regressio

[Bug c++/71166] [7 Regression] ICE with nested constexpr/initializer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71166 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/71236] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE on invalid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71236 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/71251] [5/6/7 regression] ICE on invalid code, with unusual template name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71251 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/71274] [5/6/7 Regression] deprecated static const member of struct raises warning without use

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71274 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug target/71294] [6/7 Regression] ICE in gen_add2_insn, at optabs.c:4442 on powerpc64le-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71294 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Priority|P3

[Bug c++/71290] [6/7 Regression] Flexible array member is not diagnosed with -pedantic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71290 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Priority|P3

[Bug target/71321] [6/7 Regression] x86: worse code for uint8_t % 10 and / 10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71321 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug target/71342] [6/7 Regression][RL78] set1 / clr1 with !addr16 sometimes doesn't work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71342 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug c++/71350] [4.9/5/6/7 regression] ICE on trailing return type declaration with initializer list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71350 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug rtl-optimization/71374] [5/6/7 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu: in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2190

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71374 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Priority|P3

[Bug c++/71463] [6/7 regression] unexpected warning: ignoring function return attributes on template argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71463 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug middle-end/71473] [5/6/7 Regression] cilkplus sum reducer ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71473 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c++/71495] [6/7 Regression] Spurious "note: initializing argument ... of ..." without any warning/error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71495 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||easyhack Priority|P3

[Bug tree-optimization/71264] [4.9/5 Regression] ICE in convert_move

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71264 --- Comment #17 from Bingfeng Mei --- OK, I will skip the vectorization check on our port then. Thanks.

[Bug tree-optimization/71264] [4.9/5 Regression] ICE in convert_move

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71264 --- Comment #16 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Fri, 8 Jul 2016, bmei at broadcom dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71264 > > Bingfeng Mei changed: > >What|Removed |Added >

[Bug tree-optimization/50417] regression: memcpy with known alignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50417 --- Comment #8 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Fri, 8 Jul 2016, npl at chello dot at wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50417 > > npl at chello dot at changed: > >What|Removed |Added

[Bug rtl-optimization/69891] wrong code with -mstringop-strategy=libcall @ i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69891 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.4

[Bug rtl-optimization/69891] wrong code with -mstringop-strategy=libcall @ i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69891 --- Comment #19 from Zdenek Sojka --- Target milestone 4.9.4 is not set.

[Bug tree-optimization/71264] [4.9/5 Regression] ICE in convert_move

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71264 Bingfeng Mei changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bmei at broadcom dot com --- Comment #15

[Bug c++/71553] [6 regression]ICE in assign_temp, at function.c:961

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71553 --- Comment #5 from dominik.stras...@onespin-solutions.com --- Works after applying the patch in my non-reduced test case, too. Thanks

[Bug tree-optimization/50417] regression: memcpy with known alignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50417 npl at chello dot at changed: What|Removed |Added CC||npl at chello dot at --- Comment #

[Bug libstdc++/71809] compile llvm3.8.0 failed by the libstdc++ of gcc6.1.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71809 --- Comment #4 from sulit --- ok

  1   2   >