[Bug fortran/69860] ICE on missing end apostrophe with character(kind=4)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69860 --- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Index: expr.c === --- expr.c (revision 237945) +++ expr.c (working copy) @@ -970,8 +970,14 @@ gfc_is_constant_expr (gfc_expr

[Bug fortran/69867] ICE on initializing character in type with array of incompatible data

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69867 --- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Index: decl.c === --- decl.c (revision 237945) +++ decl.c (working copy) @@ -1912,8 +1916,10 @@ build_struct (const char *na

[Bug fortran/69962] ICE on missing parameter attribute, in gfc_set_constant_character_len

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69962 --- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Index: decl.c === --- decl.c (revision 237945) +++ decl.c (working copy) @@ -1485,10 +1485,14 @@ gfc_set_constant_character_

[Bug target/60950] powerpc-e500v2-linux-gnuspe: ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2202

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60950 Arseny Solokha changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/69810] PowerPC64: unrecognizable insn

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69810 Arseny Solokha changed: What|Removed |Added CC||asolokha at gmx dot com --- Comment #11

[Bug target/65248] Copy relocation against protected symbol doesn't work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65248 --- Comment #12 from jb999 at gmx dot de --- Yes, that's why I'm using binutils 2.25.1 to link firefox. I was just wondering whether binutils >= 2.26 and gcc 4.9.3 might cause harm. >From what I understand will binutils >= 2.26 with gcc 4.9.3 al

[Bug target/71727] O3 optimization assumes 16byte alignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71727 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/71727] O3 optimization assumes 16byte alignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71727 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- >unaligned supported by hardware. This is wrong here.

[Bug fortran/69964] ICE on misspelled end block data, in gfc_ascii_statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69964 --- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Index: parse.c === --- parse.c (revision 237945) +++ parse.c (working copy) @@ -5626,8 +5628,11 @@ parse_block_data (void)

[Bug tree-optimization/71726] Simplify (intptr_t)p+4-(intptr_t)(p+4)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71726 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug tree-optimization/71595] [7 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu: in check_loop_closed_ssa_use, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:704

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71595 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |7.0

[Bug c++/59498] [DR 1430][4.9/5/6/7 Regression] Pack expansion error in template alias

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59498 Paul Keir changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pkeir at outlook dot com --- Comment #11 fro

[Bug c++/71737] ICE following 2x pack expansion in non-pack with template alias

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71737 --- Comment #1 from Paul Keir --- Created attachment 38820 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38820&action=edit Minimal testcase.

[Bug c++/71737] New: ICE following 2x pack expansion in non-pack with template alias

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71737 Bug ID: 71737 Summary: ICE following 2x pack expansion in non-pack with template alias Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/70282] cc1plus hangs taking 100% CPU in LLVM's Function.cpp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70282 PeteVine changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/70006] Duplicate errors "label not defined"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70006 --- Comment #7 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Index: io.c === --- io.c(revision 237945) +++ io.c(working copy) @@ -3052,7 +3052,7 @@ gfc_resolve_dt (gfc_dt *dt, loc

[Bug target/71733] ICE in vmx test cases with -mcpu=power9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71733 --- Comment #5 from Peter Bergner --- This patch bootstrapped and regtested with no regressions. I'll submit it when I get back from the long holiday weekend.

[Bug target/71733] ICE in vmx test cases with -mcpu=power9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71733 --- Comment #4 from Peter Bergner --- Aaron, the following patch seems to fix the problem for me. Can you give this a try? I'm currently bootstraapping and regtesting it. Index: gcc/config/rs6000/rs6000.c ==

[Bug target/71733] ICE in vmx test cases with -mcpu=power9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71733 --- Comment #3 from Peter Bergner --- Confirmed, we're not disabling TARGET_P9_DFORM_VECTOR when we disable vsx. (gdb) p TARGET_VSX $14 = false (gdb) p TARGET_P9_VECTOR $15 = false (gdb) p TARGET_P9_DFORM_SCALAR $16 = false (gdb) p TARGET_P9_DFO

[Bug fortran/68566] ICE on using unusable array in reshape (double free or corruption)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68566 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug target/71733] ICE in vmx test cases with -mcpu=power9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71733 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/70159] missed CSE optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70159 AK changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hiraditya at msn dot com --- Comment #11 from AK -

[Bug target/71722] incorrect code for test pr64252.c for -mcpu=power9 -mpower9-vector -ftree-vectorize -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71722 --- Comment #4 from Bill Schmidt --- Another possibility is all the vperm instructions, as this is little endian and we might expect to see vpermr on occasion. That's hard to tell without digging deeper.

[Bug c/70339] Poor message for "singed" vs "signed" typo

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70339 --- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab --- On powerpc: /daten/gcc/gcc-20160701/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/diagnostic-token-ranges.c: In function 'unknown_type_name': /daten/gcc/gcc-20160701/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/diagnostic-token-ranges.c:21:3: error: unkno

[Bug tree-optimization/71736] ICE in verify_ssa

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71736 --- Comment #4 from Bernd Edlinger --- gcc -c min.c min.c: In function 'signal_handler': min.c:28:36: warning: implicit declaration of function 'bb_error_msg_and_die' [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] ).__i))) & 0x7f) + 1) >> 1) > 0) ) bb_error_

[Bug tree-optimization/71736] ICE in verify_ssa

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71736 --- Comment #3 from Bernd Edlinger --- Created attachment 38819 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38819&action=edit delta-reduced test case

[Bug tree-optimization/71736] ICE in verify_ssa

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71736 --- Comment #2 from Bernd Edlinger --- Created attachment 38818 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38818&action=edit preprocessed source code

[Bug tree-optimization/71736] ICE in verify_ssa

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71736 --- Comment #1 from Bernd Edlinger --- full command line was: gcc -Wp,-MD,mailutils/.mail.o.d -std=gnu99 -Iinclude -Ilibbb -include include/autoconf.h -D_GNU_SOURCE -DNDEBUG -D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_LARGEFILE64_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -D"B

[Bug tree-optimization/71736] New: ICE in verify_ssa

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71736 Bug ID: 71736 Summary: ICE in verify_ssa Product: gcc Version: 7.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assig

[Bug fortran/71687] ICE in omp_add_variable, at gimplify.c:5821

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71687 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Sat Jul 2 10:25:52 2016 New Revision: 237944 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237944&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2016-07-01 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug fortran/71717] A gfortran silent "wrong code" bug in the transition from 4.9.0 -> 4.9.1, using OpenMP.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71717 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Sat Jul 2 10:24:41 2016 New Revision: 237943 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237943&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2016-07-01 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug fortran/71704] ICE with -fopenmp and some omp constructs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71704 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Sat Jul 2 10:23:45 2016 New Revision: 237942 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237942&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2016-06-30 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug fortran/71705] [4.9/5/6/7 Regression] ICE in lower_omp_target, at omp-low.c:16136

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71705 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Sat Jul 2 10:22:48 2016 New Revision: 237941 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237941&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2016-06-30 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c/71685] [6 Regression] Segmentation fault in gcc when compiling the attached file.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71685 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Sat Jul 2 10:22:11 2016 New Revision: 237940 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237940&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2016-06-29 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug middle-end/71626] [4.9/5/6 regression] ICE at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu (in output_constant_pool_2, at varasm.c:3837)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71626 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Sat Jul 2 10:21:24 2016 New Revision: 237939 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237939&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2016-06-28 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/71559] ICE in ix86_fp_cmp_code_to_pcmp_immediate, at config/i386/i386.c:23042 (KNL/AVX512)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71559 --- Comment #20 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Sat Jul 2 10:18:27 2016 New Revision: 237938 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237938&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backported from mainline 2016-06-20 Jakub Jelinek

[Bug middle-end/71735] arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc: internal compiler error (cc1plus)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71735 Andreas Schwab changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |INVALID

[Bug middle-end/71735] arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc: internal compiler error (cc1plus)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71735 Florian changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/71735] arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc: internal compiler error (cc1plus)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71735 --- Comment #2 from Florian --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > This is most likely out of memory. > The process is killed by the kernel. Hi Andrew, Many thanks It's more than likely free -m total used f

[Bug middle-end/71735] arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc: internal compiler error (cc1plus)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71735 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||memory-hog URL|https://gi

[Bug c++/71735] New: arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc: internal compiler error (cc1plus)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71735 Bug ID: 71735 Summary: arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc: internal compiler error (cc1plus) Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri