https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71578
Bug ID: 71578
Summary: [7 Regression] segfault during LTO/PGO bootstrap on
ppc64le
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71559
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Component|lib
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71559
--- Comment #12 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #11)
> There are definitely bugs on some architectures involving ordinary ordered
> comparisons such as < and >= wrongly using quiet instructions. See bug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71572
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |inline-asm
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pi
: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 7.0.0 20160617 (experimental) [trunk revision 237557] (GCC)
$
$ g++-6.1 -c small.cpp
small.cpp:1:36: error: too many initializers for ‘’
struct { int a; } s1
-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 7.0.0 20160617 (experimental) [trunk revision 237557] (GCC)
$
$ g++-6.1 -c small.cpp
$
$ g++-trunk -c small.cpp
small.cpp: In function ‘void foo()’:
small.cpp:10:26
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71575
--- Comment #1 from Aric Belsito ---
Forgot this in OP:
$ gcc -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/usr/x86_64-gentoo-linux-musl/gcc-bin/6.1.0/gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-gentoo-linux-musl/6.1.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-gen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71575
Bug ID: 71575
Summary: internal compiler error: in copy_cond_phi_nodes, at
graphite-isl-ast-to-gimple.c:2500
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sev
-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 7.0.0 20160617 (experimental) [trunk revision 237557] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk -c small.c
small.c:2:1: internal compiler error: in default_conversion, at
c/c-typeck.c:2118
int fn2
with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 7.0.0 20160617 (experimental) [trunk revision 237557] (GCC)
$:
$: gcc-trunk small.c
small.c: In function ‘f2’:
small.c:4:3: internal compiler error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71571
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71571
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org
Ass
++,lto
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 7.0.0 20160617 (experimental) [trunk revision 237557] (GCC)
$
$ clang-3.8 -c small.c
$
$ gcc-trunk -c small.c
small.c: In function ‘fn1’:
small.c:7:3: internal compiler error: in force_constant_size, at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71338
--- Comment #2 from dj at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dj
Date: Fri Jun 17 22:24:17 2016
New Revision: 237566
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237566&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/71338
* config/rl78/rl78-expand.c (umulqihi3): Enable for G
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71435
--- Comment #12 from Eric Botcazou ---
> The tentative fix restored bootstrap on sparc-linux. Test results look
> OK-ish.
Thanks, I'll post it tomorrow morning.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71435
--- Comment #11 from Mikael Pettersson ---
(In reply to Mikael Pettersson from comment #10)
> (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #9)
> > > Created attachment 38699 [details]
> > > Tentative fix.
> >
> > It successfully passed a full bootstr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71559
--- Comment #11 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Fri, 17 Jun 2016, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> The patch is completely untested though (and wonder if we have testcases for
> not raising exceptions when isgreater etc. arguments ar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71571
David B. Robins changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||crisv32-axis-linux-gnu
H
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71571
--- Comment #2 from David B. Robins ---
Created attachment 38721
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38721&action=edit
Larger repro - crashes reliably - requires additional -O2 -fno-inline
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71571
--- Comment #1 from David B. Robins ---
Created attachment 38720
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38720&action=edit
Small repro - emits branch (ba) without delay-slot instruction
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71571
Bug ID: 71571
Summary: [CRIS] Multiple inheritance non-virtual PIC thunk
causes crash
Product: gcc
Version: 4.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71545
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71545
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Jun 17 18:53:46 2016
New Revision: 237561
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237561&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
libstdc++/71545 fix debug checks in binary search algorithms
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71559
--- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu ---
This is related to PR 37158?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71545
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Jun 17 18:28:34 2016
New Revision: 237560
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237560&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
libstdc++/71545 fix debug checks in binary search algorithms
PR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71548
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|UN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71559
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
If I compile the above testcase with -O2 -mavx -ftrapping-math, then it
generates vucomiss in each case, which seems wrong to me (because for
gt/ge/lt/le it should raise exceptions, so IMHO should use vcomiss
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71559
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com,
: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 7.0.0 20160617 (experimental) [trunk revision 237557] (GCC)
$
$ g++-trunk -c small.cpp
small.cpp: In function ‘void foo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71569
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|UN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71143
--- Comment #7 from Vidya Praveen ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jun 17 16:35:33 2016
New Revision: 237558
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237558&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/71209 - wrong error with dependent base
* typeck.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71550
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
Assigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71560
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71569
Bug ID: 71569
Summary: [5/6] Crash: External definition of template member
from template struct
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71143
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71209
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jun 17 16:35:33 2016
New Revision: 237558
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237558&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/71209 - wrong error with dependent base
* typeck.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71143
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71559
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I've created the table just by walking through the 'D' handling.
That said, looking e.g. at
https://people.eecs.berkeley.edu/~wkahan/ieee754status/IEEE754.PDF
for the C comparisons (EQ, NE, LT, LE, GT, GE) EQ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71545
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The irreflexive assertion is incorrect for lexicographical compare too:
#include
struct X { };
bool operator<(X, int) { return true; }
bool operator<(int, X) { return false; }
// Not a strict weak orde
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71559
--- Comment #6 from Carlos Tripiana Montes ---
Hope you guys can do that and fix this problem soon. It would much appreciated
as we are (at Barcelona Supercomputing Center, Spain) doing research on KNL and
we need the fastest/most robust code we
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71568
Bug ID: 71568
Summary: Inexplicable error: "X is inaccessible within this
context" for a public member
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71559
Ilya Enkovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71567
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71508
--- Comment #2 from Paul Olaru
---
Created attachment 38716
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38716&action=edit
Preprocessed source (gzipped)
The uncompressed file is barely above 1MB. Is it normal for it to be this
large?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71354
--- Comment #3 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: amker
Date: Fri Jun 17 13:55:06 2016
New Revision: 237555
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237555&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/71354
* gcc.dg/vect/vect-2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71567
Bug ID: 71567
Summary: Incorrect loop optimization
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.5
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71544
--- Comment #6 from fortranbug at gmail dot com ---
Thank you for the suggested workaround. This can certainly be helpful in the
short term. However, we would not want to rely on tuning compiler optimization
switches in the future to ensure corre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59861
milasudril at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|minor |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71541
--- Comment #6 from Hans Philipp Annen ---
> -Wl,--whole-archive -lpthread -Wl,--no-whole-archive
This did help.
Without it, the destructor of condition_variable just jumps to nowhere:
> Dump of assembler code for function _ZNSt18condition_vari
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71562
--- Comment #2 from Peter VARGA ---
I disagree 100% with your comment!
I am definitely NOT a genius and I needed 5 minutes to find out where the hard
coded size is set.
Look at the GNU Glibc - you can crash an existing system when running
./conf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71559
--- Comment #4 from Carlos Tripiana Montes ---
I wasn't sure but that was my intuition. But I'm afraid I don't have enough
knowledge to propose a fix.
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> I'd say it is a bug in ix86_fp_cmp_code_to_pcmp_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71566
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71545
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71541
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
It does for Fedora and Red Hat-derived systems. Try:
-Wl,--whole-archive -lpthread -Wl,--no-whole-archive
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71562
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Peter VARGA from comment #0)
> This would increase the flexibility for the programmer without a hack in the
> c++ include file...
Allowing programmers to change the ABI per-translation unit ..
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71566
denis.campredon at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||denis.campredon at gmai
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71347
--- Comment #3 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: amker
Date: Fri Jun 17 09:26:05 2016
New Revision: 237552
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237552&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/71347
* tree-ssa-loop-ivopt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71354
--- Comment #2 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: amker
Date: Fri Jun 17 09:21:12 2016
New Revision: 237551
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237551&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/71354
* gcc.dg/vect/vect-23
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71559
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71566
Bug ID: 71566
Summary: Attribute [[aligned(16)]] on function is ignored
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64385
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71563
--- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> That said, about the zero/non-zero bits, it is
> even more complicated in this case, because e.g. 1 / -1 has all bits set,
> the thing is just that it is then undef
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71559
Igor Zamyatin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||izamyatin at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71565
Bug ID: 71565
Summary: INTENT(IN) polymorphic argument with pointer
components - reject valid code
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71561
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71563
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71563
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
67 matches
Mail list logo
