https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71496
--- Comment #3 from Iain Sandoe ---
Created attachment 38686
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38686&action=edit
Proposed fix
Thanks to Segher for helping discuss this through and analysis of the rtl
dumps.
The load_macho_pic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71417
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71403
--- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
*** Bug 71417 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71466
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71403
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
*** Bug 71466 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71403
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #2 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71500
Michael Duggan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mwd at md5i dot com
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71466
--- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Jan,
It's a nice theory, but if that were the case I'd expect we'd be having these
problems before pulling the backwards threading bits into their own pass. I'm
pretty sure the iterations data isn't even i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71310
--- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Fri Jun 10 23:58:09 2016
New Revision: 237319
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237319&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
fold-const: Don't access bit fields with too big mode (PR71310)
Cur
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71499
--- Comment #1 from Joel Yliluoma ---
Addendum: While this works, reading LTO data and producing HOST code:
/usr/local/libexec/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/6.1.0/lto1 -dumpbase tmpe.o -auxbase
tmpe -version -fopenacc tmpe.o -o /tmp/ccZgHvRO.s
This
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71500
Bug ID: 71500
Summary: regex::icase only works on first character in a range
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71499
Bug ID: 71499
Summary: ICE in LTO1 when attempting NVPTX offloading
(-fopenacc)
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71478
--- Comment #4 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71478
--- Comment #3 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kugan
Date: Fri Jun 10 21:57:01 2016
New Revision: 237318
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237318&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
2016-06-11 Kugan Vivekanandarajah
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71170
--- Comment #15 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #14)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #12)
> > Is it still broken?
>
> I think so. Attachment seems to break svn 237286, dated today.
The issue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68188
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71497
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71495
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71494
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 10 19:49:05 2016
New Revision: 237317
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237317&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/71494
* tree-nested.c (convert_nonlocal_refe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68657
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 10 19:46:13 2016
New Revision: 237316
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237316&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/68657
* c.opt (Wpsabi): Add Warning flag.
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71170
--- Comment #14 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #12)
> Is it still broken?
I think so. Attachment seems to break svn 237286, dated today.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71170
--- Comment #13 from David Binderman ---
Created attachment 38685
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38685&action=edit
C source code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71495
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
: ../gcc/configure --prefix=/home/absozero/trunk/root-gcc
--enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 7.0.0 20160610 (experimental) [trunk revision 237307] (GCC)
$ gcc-trunk -O3 a.c
a.c: In function ‘main’:
a.c:5:5: internal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68843
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Jun 10 18:40:37 2016
New Revision: 237315
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237315&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR inline-asm/68843
* gcc.target/i386/pr68843-2.c: Add dg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68188
--- Comment #4 from Piotr Pilarczyk ---
Still present in 6.1, what's the current status of this bug (for some reason
it's still marked as unconfirmed)? Will it ever get fixed or is it simply
ignored?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71392
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71241
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71392
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
Author: msebor
Date: Fri Jun 10 17:38:19 2016
New Revision: 237314
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237314&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/71392 - SEGV calling integer overflow built-ins with a null pointer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70729
--- Comment #25 from Yuri Rumyantsev ---
Richard!
I prepared the second part of patch and checked that it does not
produce any new failures.
What is your opinion - could I send it to GCC community for review?
ChangeLog:
2016-06-10 Yuri Rumyant
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71495
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71414
--- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On June 10, 2016 5:22:39 PM GMT+02:00, "jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org"
wrote:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71414
>
>--- Comment #9 from Martin Jambor ---
>(In reply to Richard Bien
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71335
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71335
--- Comment #5 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Fri Jun 10 16:23:06 2016
New Revision: 237312
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237312&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/71335
* tree-ssa-threadbackward.c (pro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71498
Bug ID: 71498
Summary: ubsan bounds checking influenced by surrounding code
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71414
--- Comment #9 from Martin Jambor ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
> An interesting observation is that we clone sum32 for IPA-CP of n == 1024 but
> for some unknown reason figure Alignment of 'a' as unusable:
The function sum32
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71373
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Well, if you want something that works well with wide range of GCCs, then your
case OMP_CLAUSE_TILE:
/* OpenACC tile clauses are discarded during gimplification, so we
don't exp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71445
--- Comment #18 from Adhemerval Zanella
---
Yes, I will take care of reverting compiler-rt changes and bring the issues you
raised.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71445
--- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Well, you should then revert your compiler-rt patch (and most likely double
check the signed vs. unsigned types, in the patch you've committed there were
various signedness (but for big endian even size) iss
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71476
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|error-recovery, |ice-on-valid-code
|ice
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71445
--- Comment #16 from Adhemerval Zanella
---
I am sorry for make you waste your time Jakub, after some deliberation I
decided to revert this patch on glibc. I will close this bug after push this
change on glibc side.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71445
--- Comment #15 from Florian Weimer ---
There is now a proposal to revert the glibc change instead:
https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2016-06/msg00339.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71445
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 38682
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38682&action=edit
sanitizer-msghdr.patch
Completely untested patch with what I had in mind.
Seems cmsg_len is not really used in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71373
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |SUSPENDED
Assignee|unassigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71475
--- Comment #6 from Alexander Cherepanov ---
Ok, what about this:
--
#include
#include
int main()
{
long double d;
char s[sizeof(long double)];
memcpy(&d, "
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71497
Bug ID: 71497
Summary: Warning text for -Wmisleading-indentation
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: trivial
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71373
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
OMP_CLAUSE_UNIFORM
OMP_CLAUSE_INBRANCH
OMP_CLAUSE_NOTINBRANCH
The above 3 clauses are only allowed in the declare simd directive, so nothing
tree-nested.c sees.
OMP_CLAUSE__LOOPTEMP_
OMP_CLAUSE__SIMDUID_
T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71373
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|patch |
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71109
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
To me this looks like invalid jump optimization. In *.csa we have:
(jump_insn 27 26 28 3 (set (pc)
(if_then_else (ne (reg:CCZ 17 flags)
(const_int 0 [0]))
(label_ref 97)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71373
Bug 71373 depends on bug 71381, which changed state.
Bug 71381 Summary: C/C++ OpenACC cache directive rejects valid syntax
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71381
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71381
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71480
Maxim Ostapenko changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71109
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
Target Milest
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71480
--- Comment #4 from chefmax at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: chefmax
Date: Fri Jun 10 12:57:14 2016
New Revision: 237306
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237306&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-06-10 Maxim Ostapenko
PR sanitizer/71480
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71252
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64716
vekumar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vekumar at gcc dot gnu.org
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71170
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71252
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #23
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71323
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68843
Bernd Edlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68843
--- Comment #9 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Author: edlinger
Date: Fri Jun 10 12:22:21 2016
New Revision: 237303
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237303&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc:
2016-06-10 Bernd Edlinger
PR inline-asm/68843
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64516
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71408
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So fixed?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71013
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71013
--- Comment #8 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2016-06-10, at 6:44 AM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> LLONG_MAX is no longer used in the code. Is this fixed now?
It probably is but I haven't tested. I had updated patch to use int64_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70842
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71494
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71216
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.4
Summary|[4.8/4.9/5/6/7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70673
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71121
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66295
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71227
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70942
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71342
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70845
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70748
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70959
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70977
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71092
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70824
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71496
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71495
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69028
Yury V. Zaytsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|5.3.0 |6.1.1
--- Comment #2 from Yury V. Zayt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71496
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68581
Yury V. Zaytsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|5.2.1 |6.1.1
--- Comment #1 from Yury V. Zayt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71496
Bug ID: 71496
Summary: Two picbase loads created for libjava code on
powerpc-darwin after rev 22022.
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71495
--- Comment #1 from Yury V. Zaytsev ---
Created attachment 38678
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38678&action=edit
Pre-processed class with GCC 6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71495
Bug ID: 71495
Summary: [6 Regression] Spurious "note: initializing argument
... of ..." without any warning/error
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69558
--- Comment #15 from Jakub Jelinek ---
David, do we consider this fixed for real now with r233637, or is some further
work planed?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71179
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71013
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71183
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71475
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71475
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[6/7 Regression]|[5/6/7 Regression]
|Op
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71373
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Author: tschwinge
Date: Fri Jun 10 10:12:36 2016
New Revision: 237300
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237300&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR middle-end/71373] Handle more OMP_CLAUSE_* in nested function de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71381
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Author: tschwinge
Date: Fri Jun 10 10:12:22 2016
New Revision: 237299
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237299&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR c/71381] C/C++ OpenACC cache directive rejects valid syntax
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71486
--- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Completely disabling TARGET_MEMBER_TYPE_FORCES_BLK, the testcase compiles OK:
-O2
movabsq $-9223372036854775808, %rdi
movl$16383, %esi
callfoo
movl$1, %edi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71472
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71489
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|i386-pc-solaris2.*, |i386-pc-solaris2.*,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71491
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
1 - 100 of 155 matches
Mail list logo
