https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71156
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71378
Bug ID: 71378
Summary: A compilable file fails to compile when ASAN options
are specified
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71328
Chengnian Sun changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chengniansun at gmail dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71201
--- Comment #4 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Wed Jun 1 23:23:42 2016
New Revision: 237021
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237021&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2016-06-01 Michael Meissner
Back port from trunk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71377
Bug ID: 71377
Summary: SFINAE expression compiles, but it should not because
of 14.5.5p8
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70077
Michele Caini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|5.3.1 |6.1.0
--- Comment #4 from Michele Caini
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71243
Michele Caini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70883
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
Standalone patch requested and posted here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-06/msg00093.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71376
Bug ID: 71376
Summary: __cpp_noexcept_function_type feature test macro not
defined.
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70688
cesar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70688
--- Comment #3 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: cesar
Date: Wed Jun 1 20:40:10 2016
New Revision: 237012
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237012&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/70688
* pr70688.c: New file.
Added:
b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70688
--- Comment #2 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: cesar
Date: Wed Jun 1 20:37:44 2016
New Revision: 237011
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237011&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/70688
* pr70688.c: New file.
Added:
t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70688
--- Comment #1 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 38621
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38621&action=edit
new test case
This issue has been resolved in trunk r236678. I forgot to include a PR tag in
the Chan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71375
Bug ID: 71375
Summary: Failure on startup on rs6000-ibm-aix{4.3|5.1.0}
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tar
Configured with: ../gcc-source-trunk/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 7.0.0 20160601 (experimental) [trunk revision 236978] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk -O0 -c small.c
$ gcc-4.9 -O1 -c small.c
$
$ gcc-trunk -O1 -c small.c
small.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71186
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71186
--- Comment #2 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Wed Jun 1 20:09:35 2016
New Revision: 237006
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237006&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[gcc]
2016-05-31 Michael Meissner
PR target/71186
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66295
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka ---
In resolution file we have:
1
q.o 5
200 7c41b073ca657863 PREVAILING_DEF_IRONLY _Z3foov
212 7c41b073ca657863 PREVAILING_DEF_IRONLY _Z3foov.arch_core2
215 7c41b073ca657863 PREVAILING_DEF_IRONLY _Z3foov.resolver
2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67310
jol_indien at yahoo dot fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71363
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71156
--- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Wed Jun 1 18:46:11 2016
New Revision: 237004
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237004&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-06-01 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/71156
* decl.c (copy_p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52393
--- Comment #11 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Wed Jun 1 17:06:50 2016
New Revision: 237003
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=237003&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-06-01 Jerry DeLisle
PR fortran/52393
* io.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71335
--- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Sigh. I see what's going on. Definitely mine.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71314
--- Comment #4 from Bill Seurer ---
I tried it and it indeed appears to be fixed. Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71372
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71151
--- Comment #11 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
well, IIRC for Tiny .rodata is still a part of .data and not part of .text? If
this is still the case, then on Tiny the best place for jump tables is also
.text.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71373
Bug ID: 71373
Summary: Handle more OMP_CLAUSE_* in nested function
decomposition
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openacc, openmp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71371
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71156
--- Comment #7 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Wed Jun 1 14:30:00 2016
New Revision: 236996
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236996&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-06-01 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/71156
* decl.c (copy_p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71371
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jun 1 14:29:04 2016
New Revision: 236995
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236995&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/71371
* gimplify.c (gimplify_omp_for): Tempo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71151
--- Comment #10 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Well, then we should remove TARGET_ASM_FUNCTION_RODATA_SECTION implementation
altogether (it's weird, not only because it patches flag_data_sections), same
for ASM_OUTPUT_ADDR_VEC_ELT.
Instead implement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71371
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Wed Jun 1 14:24:02 2016
New Revision: 236994
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236994&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/71371
* gimplify.c (gimplify_omp_for): Tempo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71366
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Jun 1 14:05:22 2016
New Revision: 236993
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236993&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-06-01 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/71366
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71366
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67310
--- Comment #18 from Uroš Bizjak ---
I have committed the bugfix part of the patch [1] to mainline SVN, and will
backport it to other release branches.
The addition of new VIA CPUs is not a regression fix, so the patch will be
applied to mainlin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67310
--- Comment #17 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Wed Jun 1 13:44:37 2016
New Revision: 236991
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236991&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/67310
* config/i386/driver-i386.c (host
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71372
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hendrikborghorst@googlemail
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70848
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71372
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71372
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71372
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71372
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
I've seen a similar bug being reported recently and was not able to confirm on
x86_64 so I made it target specific (IIRC it was mingw or cygwin).
GCC certainly honors volatile here (on x86_64-linux).
I can
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71261
--- Comment #19 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Jun 1 13:08:24 2016
New Revision: 236989
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236989&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-06-01 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/71261
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71151
--- Comment #9 from Senthil Kumar Selvaraj
---
For both kinds of invocation (mergeable constants and jump tables), the decl
passed is current_function_decl. And that looks right from the documentation
for the target hook.
I'll submit another pa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71372
Bug ID: 71372
Summary: GCC Optimization "tree-dse" does not respect access to
volatile* upon explicit cast.
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71151
--- Comment #8 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
What about avr_asm_function_rodata_section? Isn't it possible to filter DECL
and only transform for addr_vect?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71291
--- Comment #13 from Maxim Ostapenko ---
Created attachment 38620
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38620&action=edit
mozconfig
This .mozconfig with current trunk clang 3.9.0. The source code I've downloaded
from here:
$ hg c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71291
--- Comment #12 from Georg Koppen ---
(In reply to Maxim Ostapenko from comment #10)
> I've build Firefox locally with clang with optimizations disabled
> (CFLAGS="-fsanitize=address -fsanitize-recover=address -O0") and got pretty
> the same back
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67310
--- Comment #16 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #15)
> (In reply to jol_indien from comment #14)
> > Created attachment 38619 [details]
> > Merged patch to properly detect VIA nano CPU + add Nano / Eden x2/x4
> > famili
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67310
--- Comment #15 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to jol_indien from comment #14)
> Created attachment 38619 [details]
> Merged patch to properly detect VIA nano CPU + add Nano / Eden x2/x4
> families arch keywords
>
> This new patch is a merge of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48116
Marcin Baczyński changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marbacz at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63859
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67310
--- Comment #14 from jol_indien at yahoo dot fr ---
Created attachment 38619
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38619&action=edit
Merged patch to properly detect VIA nano CPU + add Nano / Eden x2/x4 families
arch keywords
This n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67310
--- Comment #13 from jol_indien at yahoo dot fr ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #12)
> I will merge together your follow-up patch, and commit the combined patch.
>
> BTW: Can you please send me what to put in the ChangeLog as your name
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71371
Bug ID: 71371
Summary: ICE with OpenMP taskloop and addressable iterator
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71371
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||openmp
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71370
Bug ID: 71370
Summary: asan infinite recursion if gcc configured without tls
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67310
--- Comment #12 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to jol_indien from comment #10)
> this patch doesn't do the trick, it detects the VIA Nano CPU as a core2 one.
Yep, this was by design. There is no VIA entries in the processor entry table,
and core
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71142
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71142
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||asolokha at gmx dot com
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71311
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-*
Component|middle-en
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71311
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Wed Jun 1 10:33:35 2016
New Revision: 236980
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236980&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-06-01 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/71311
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67310
--- Comment #11 from jol_indien at yahoo dot fr ---
Created attachment 38618
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38618&action=edit
patch to properly detect VIA nano CPU + add Nano / Eden x2/x4 families arch
keywords
This patch is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66635
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66635
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Wed Jun 1 09:48:05 2016
New Revision: 236978
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236978&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-06-01 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/66635
* g++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66635
--- Comment #2 from Paolo Carlini ---
Indeed, but the ICE was real and it's fixed for 5.4.0. I'm adding a testcase
and closing the bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71369
Bug ID: 71369
Summary: Compile failure about template function call operator
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71368
Bug ID: 71368
Summary: [concepts] ICE on constrained compound requirement
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71364
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57466
--- Comment #12 from Paolo Carlini ---
I'm having another look at this, and the last comments added to DR1584 and
coming to the conclusion that gcc probably doesn't need further work, in
particular the patch that I had to revert pointed to a real
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21413
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71366
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70735
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71361
amker at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amker at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69068
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
*** Bug 69184 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69184
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71359
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71366
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chengniansun at gmail dot com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67310
--- Comment #10 from jol_indien at yahoo dot fr ---
this patch doesn't do the trick, it detects the VIA Nano CPU as a core2 one.
I guess the problem is that processor is first set to PROCESSOR_GENERIC but the
VIA Nano CPU check (ie CENTAUR vendor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71361
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target Milestone|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71358
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71358
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Jun 1 07:44:10 2016
New Revision: 236976
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236976&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ada/71358
* g-comlin.adb (Display_Section_Help): Do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71358
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Wed Jun 1 07:43:57 2016
New Revision: 236975
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=236975&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ada/71358
* g-comlin.adb (Display_Section_Help): Do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71364
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |7.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71366
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
85 matches
Mail list logo
