https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70867
yuta tomino changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||demoonlit at panathenaia dot
halfm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70868
Bug ID: 70868
Summary: Assigning constructed temporary of class with
nontrivial constructor uses unnecessary temporary
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66488
--- Comment #9 from Stanisław Halik ---
I'm sorry to be bumping this issue but it's been months.
cheers,
sh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70867
Bug ID: 70867
Summary: access discriminant in return aggregate detected as
dangling if set from an implicit dereference in
generic package
Product: gcc
Version: 6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47226
Tatsuyuki Ishi changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ishitatsuyuki at gmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70866
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc64le
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70866
Bug ID: 70866
Summary: powerpc64le -ffixed-cr2 -ffixed-cr3 -ffixed-cr4 ICE
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70063
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Wygle ---
This appears to be fixed in GCC 6.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70831
--- Comment #3 from Jeff Bai ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> You'll eventually run into PR60277 as well. Probably requires
> --enable-checking=release to trigger.
I do apologize for my limited knowledge, but what is the relev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70826
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70826
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gmail dot com
--- Comment #8 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68120
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70839
--- Comment #9 from jonwilliams at gmail dot com ---
unsubscribe
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 10:37 AM, doko at gcc dot gnu.org <
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70839
>
> --- Comment #7 from Matthi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63142
ryan.burn at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ryan.burn at gmail dot com
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70843
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69582
--- Comment #6 from ryan.burn at gmail dot com ---
There's also some issues with cilk features and precompiled headers. I put in
70865 to track.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70843
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Apr 28 22:23:01 2016
New Revision: 235615
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235615&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/70843
* fold-const.c (operand_equal_p): Don'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70865
Bug ID: 70865
Summary: [cilkplus] errors when using cilk features with
precompiled headers
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65960
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69582
Bug 69582 depends on bug 65960, which changed state.
Bug 65960 Summary: ICE in Cilk spawn with argument with non-trivial constructor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65960
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65960
ryan.burn at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ryan.burn at gmail dot com
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70861
--- Comment #3 from Wilco ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> Note I think if we had gotos instead of assignment here we should do the
> similar thing for the switch table itself.
Absolutely, that was my point.
> Note also the ass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70855
Harald Anlauf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gmx dot de
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70552
--- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor ---
See also bug 54021 for additional background.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70850
Bill Deegan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70507
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70864
Bug ID: 70864
Summary: internal compiler error: in gfc_get_symbol_decl, at
fortran/trans-decl.c:1403
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68803
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70668
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70863
Bug ID: 70863
Summary: Finalization of array of derived type causes segfault
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70845
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at redhat dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70845
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ville.voutilainen at gmail dot
com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70858
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70858
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Apr 28 19:52:02 2016
New Revision: 235611
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235611&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/70858
* config/i386/i386.c (bdesc_special_args):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70858
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Apr 28 19:47:06 2016
New Revision: 235610
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235610&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/70858
* config/i386/i386.c (bdesc_special_args):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70861
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note I think if we had gotos instead of assignment here we should do the
similar thing for the switch table itself.
Note also the assignment to i is getting in the way for the switch to constant
table form.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70858
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Apr 28 19:45:48 2016
New Revision: 235609
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235609&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/70858
* config/i386/i386.c (bdesc_special_args):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70861
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I think we should turn this into the following:
((unsigned)a) <= 9 ? table[a] : (a == 110 ? 27 : 77);
That is pull out the 110/default case so table would be small.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70858
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Apr 28 19:33:34 2016
New Revision: 235607
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235607&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/70858
* config/i386/i386.c (bdesc_special_args):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70862
--- Comment #1 from ryan.burn at gmail dot com ---
Simpler reproduction:
template
concept bool C = true;
template
constexpr bool a = false;
template
requires C
constexpr bool a = true;
template
requires a
void f(Tx...) {
}
int main()
lla/attachment.cgi?id=38369&action=edit
reproduces the bug
The attached code should be valid and compiles with an older version of gcc
(20160120), but now breaks with (20160428) giving the following error:
/tmp/ccthKyXf.s: Assembler messages:
/tmp/ccthKyXf.s:269: Error:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66425
Steven Bosscher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||steven at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54379
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Apr 28 19:01:19 2016
New Revision: 235597
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235597&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Implement C++17 [[nodiscard]] attribute.
PR c++/38172
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38172
--- Comment #12 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Apr 28 19:01:19 2016
New Revision: 235597
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235597&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Implement C++17 [[nodiscard]] attribute.
PR c++/38172
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70346
Bill Gates changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gregnietsky at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70861
Bug ID: 70861
Summary: Improve code generation of switch tables
Product: gcc
Version: 7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70858
--- Comment #3 from Steven Noonan ---
Cool. I'll let the project maintainer know to not use the __builtin_* variants.
_bextr_u32 and _bextr_u64 look much more friendly, too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70821
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70858
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70821
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Apr 28 17:10:14 2016
New Revision: 235586
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235586&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/70821
* config/i386/sync.md (define_peephole2 *a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70858
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70668
--- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Author: segher
Date: Thu Apr 28 16:50:41 2016
New Revision: 235583
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235583&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
nds32: Fix casesi (PR70668)
Expanders do not have more elements in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70839
--- Comment #8 from Matthias Klose ---
and 5.4.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70839
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|6.2 |5.4
Summary|[6/7 regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70839
--- Comment #7 from Matthias Klose ---
Author: doko
Date: Thu Apr 28 16:37:27 2016
New Revision: 235582
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235582&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-04-28 Rainer Orth
PR java/70839
* decl.c (parse_v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66425
--- Comment #25 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #24)
> I agree that (void) should suppress the warning. Jakub, do you remember why
> you made a different choice?
I think the request came from Uli that it isn't tha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70842
--- Comment #3 from nathanael.huebbe at informatik dot uni-hamburg.de ---
This is getting even nastier. As it turns out, even though the code I gave
above compiles, it does not produce correct results. To be precise, if I use a
routine like
s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54379
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66425
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70841
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse ---
Related to PR55912.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70839
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70858
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70839
--- Comment #5 from Rainer Orth ---
Author: ro
Date: Thu Apr 28 16:21:41 2016
New Revision: 235578
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235578&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Don't include minor version in GCJ ABI version (PR java/70839)
PR java
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61229
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70729
--- Comment #12 from Yuri Rumyantsev ---
Created attachment 38367
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38367&action=edit
modified patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70860
Bug ID: 70860
Summary: [nvptx] Revisit cfun->machine->doing_call
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61027
simon at pushface dot org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||5.1.0, 5.2.0
--- Comment #6 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70729
--- Comment #11 from Yuri Rumyantsev ---
Richard,
I slightly modify the patch proposed by you:
1. Apply loop->safelen check only if lim is invoked before loop vectorization
since its value could be non-correct (I simply add bool param to it).
2.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38172
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkrimer at epochlabs dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70487
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38172
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dushistov at mail dot ru
--- Comment #10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68469
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38172
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gcc at bobbyperu dot info
--- Comment #9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66177
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70850
--- Comment #4 from Bill Deegan ---
If it's not supported, perhaps it should issue error and exit?
(Build still running..)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70859
Bug ID: 70859
Summary: Bad column number in type-generic function errors
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70852
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
/* PR c/70852 */
/* { dg-do compile } */
/* { dg-options "-Wall" } */
extern void *memset (void *, int, __SIZE_TYPE__);
extern int A[];
void
fn1 (void)
{
memset (A, 0, 1);
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70858
Bug ID: 70858
Summary: __builtin_ia32_bextr_u64 ICE with '-m32
-march=core-avx2'
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66849
--- Comment #7 from simon at pushface dot org ---
t-aprofile produced an excellent result - for me, anyway; it includes
everything I need (cortex-*), as well as a whole lot more - just lots of disk
space for multilibs.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70857
Bug ID: 70857
Summary: [6 Regression] ICE with -fopenmp -fopenacc in
insert_vi_for_tree, at tree-ssa-structalias.c:2813
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70852
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70856
Bug ID: 70856
Summary: [6 Regression] ICE with -fopenacc in
get_constraint_for_ssa_var, at
tree-ssa-structalias.c:2952
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Sta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70854
Bug ID: 70854
Summary: ICE in gfc_process_block_locals, at
fortran/trans-decl.c:6447
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70850
--- Comment #3 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
Do we support ./configure these days?
Historically we have only supported SRCDIR/configure run in an empty directory.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70855
Bug ID: 70855
Summary: [6 Regression] ICE with -fopenmp in
gfc_trans_omp_workshare(): Bad statement code
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70854
--- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
Similar for other intrinsic types :
$ cat z3.f90
program p
real :: x(2), y(2)
block
real, parameter :: a(2) = 0.0
x = a
block
y = 0.0
end block
end block
end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70839
--- Comment #4 from Rainer Orth ---
Author: ro
Date: Thu Apr 28 15:25:14 2016
New Revision: 235575
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235575&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Don't include minor version in GCJ ABI version (PR java/70839)
PR java
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69659
--- Comment #8 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
> Can you confirm that the patch fixes the issue in all cases
> and does not raise new issues?
Yes, I can confirm this now.
FYI, there is a separate/independed issue, see pr70853 comment 1.
My best re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70595
--- Comment #5 from Rainer Orth ---
Initial patch installed for 7.1, more TBD, to keep PR open.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70852
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70595
--- Comment #4 from Rainer Orth ---
Author: ro
Date: Thu Apr 28 15:16:57 2016
New Revision: 235574
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235574&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Cilk Plus testsuite needs massive cleanup (PR testsuite/70595)
gcc:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70853
--- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
Messages interchanged (v5/v6) with a user defined type :
$ cat z3.f90
program p
type t
end type
type(t), pointer :: z(:)
z(1:2) => null()
end
$ gfortran-6 -c z3.f90
internal compiler error:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70853
Bug ID: 70853
Summary: ICE on pointing to null, in gfc_add_block_to_block, at
fortran/trans.c:1599
Product: gcc
Version: 6.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: dcb314 at hotmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 38366
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38366&action=edit
C source code
The attached C code, when compiled by gcc trunk dated 20160428, does this
/home/dcb/r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69604
--- Comment #9 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
Update, using fresh new release gfortran-6 --version
GNU Fortran (SUSE Linux) 6.1.0 20160427 [gcc-6-branch revision 235475]
The error message has changed :
$ gfortran-6 -c z1.f90
internal compiler er
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70828
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||openmp
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70847
--- Comment #4 from Kai Tietz ---
As side-note: There is something pretty fishy in tree-pretty-print.c for
OBJ_TYPE_REF, too. We do here recurse endless. Simply add to command line
'-fdump-tree-original' for reproducing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70826
Bernd Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amodra at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70845
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Yes, I think it's valid.
It started being rejected with r233719
PR c++/69842
* method.c (forward_parm): Handle parameter packs.
* lambda.c (maybe_add_lambda_conv_op): Use it for th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70132
--- Comment #10 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Thu Apr 28 14:44:07 2016
New Revision: 235573
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=235573&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[ARM] PR driver/70132: Avoid double fclose in driver-arm.
1 - 100 of 209 matches
Mail list logo