https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68945
--- Comment #8 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #7 from Stefan Teleman ---
>> Since Stefan hasn't followed up and I'm currently looking at other
>> libcilkrts issues anyway, I'm taking over from here.
>
> Had every inten
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70607
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse ---
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/lwg-defects.html#1137
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70594
--- Comment #16 from Patrick Palka ---
Success, compiling dwarf2out.c with "-O2 -fcompare-debug --param
ggc-min-expand=3 --param ggc-min-heapsize=3 -save-temps" managed to trigger the
compare-debug failure while leaving behind a bunch of temp fil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70416
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70416
--- Comment #28 from Oleg Endo ---
Fixed for GCC 6 and GCC 5.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67391
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67391
--- Comment #36 from Oleg Endo ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Sat Apr 9 02:46:50 2016
New Revision: 234847
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234847&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from mainline
2016-04-03 Oleg Endo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70416
--- Comment #27 from Oleg Endo ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Sat Apr 9 02:46:50 2016
New Revision: 234847
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234847&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from mainline
2016-04-03 Oleg Endo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70594
--- Comment #15 from Patrick Palka ---
I tried building latest gcc with BOOT_CFLAGS="-O2 -fcompare-debug" and the
build fails with an -fcompare-debug error while compiling dwarf2out.c. The
failure doesn't go away if I make the constexpr_call_tab
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70584
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70599
Ambroz Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ambrop7 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70603
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36159
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mhadji at gmail dot com
--- Comment #16 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70607
Bug ID: 70607
Summary: The return type of std::conj must be std::complex
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70599
--- Comment #3 from Graeme ---
Since the issue is due to my computer running out of memory, I tried adding
some more swap space:
fallocate -l 100G extra_swap
mkswap extra_swap
sudo swapon extra_swap
Swap usage peaked at about 16.7 GB (plus 8 GB
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70605
--- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl ---
On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 09:41:33PM +, nuclearlee at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70605
>
> --- Comment #2 from Lee Harding ---
> You are correct with your assumption
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70381
--- Comment #6 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Fri Apr 8 21:53:48 2016
New Revision: 234843
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234843&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Merge in __float128 complex support; Merge in PR 70381 fix
Added:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70381
--- Comment #5 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Fri Apr 8 21:51:58 2016
New Revision: 234842
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234842&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Merge in pr 70381 fix; update documentation
Modified:
branches/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70381
--- Comment #4 from Michael Meissner ---
Author: meissner
Date: Fri Apr 8 21:49:17 2016
New Revision: 234841
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234841&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Merge in pr 70381 fix; update documentation
Modified:
branches/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70605
--- Comment #2 from Lee Harding ---
You are correct with your assumption of what I expect is the correct output.
I'm new to bugzilla, and I couldn't come up with a search that could find this
issue anywhere else. Since this has been fixed already
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70605
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70605
--- Comment #1 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
You failed to identify what you expected. I suspect what
you call correct output is
troutmask:sgk[205] ./z
string_in, string_cat_with_comma result: hello, hello
added hello to get hello
str_l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70577
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70582
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70594
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70606
Bug ID: 70606
Summary: new warning for unicode quotes
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: c++
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70594
--- Comment #14 from Nathan Sidwell ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #13)
> If you remove the deletableness, then I'd say it is really important to
> empty the whole freelist at least at the end of parsing, so that when GIMPLE
> optim
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68722
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|paolo at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70594
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70201
--- Comment #5 from Andrés Agustín Tiraboschi ---
I'm going to upload a new version for dumping dependencies quickly, so please
ignore the current attachment.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70533
cesar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70289
cesar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70534
cesar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70373
cesar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70535
cesar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70348
cesar at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70535
--- Comment #1 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: cesar
Date: Fri Apr 8 21:09:47 2016
New Revision: 234840
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234840&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR lto/70289
PR ipa/70348
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70289
--- Comment #5 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: cesar
Date: Fri Apr 8 21:09:47 2016
New Revision: 234840
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234840&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR lto/70289
PR ipa/70348
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70348
--- Comment #10 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: cesar
Date: Fri Apr 8 21:09:47 2016
New Revision: 234840
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234840&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR lto/70289
PR ipa/70348
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70534
--- Comment #1 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: cesar
Date: Fri Apr 8 21:09:47 2016
New Revision: 234840
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234840&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR lto/70289
PR ipa/70348
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70533
--- Comment #1 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: cesar
Date: Fri Apr 8 21:09:47 2016
New Revision: 234840
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234840&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR lto/70289
PR ipa/70348
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70373
--- Comment #2 from cesar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: cesar
Date: Fri Apr 8 21:09:47 2016
New Revision: 234840
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234840&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR lto/70289
PR ipa/70348
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70594
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Nathan Sidwell from comment #11)
> Patrick's original patch did 2 things AFAICT
> 1) make constexpr_call_table GC deletable
> 2) add the fundef_copies_table etc.
>
> The failure we're observing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70594
--- Comment #12 from Nathan Sidwell ---
(In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #9)
> The decls belonging to a copy of a function must have new UIDs though
> because their uids are used to track their mutable values (within the
> constexpr_ctx::
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70594
--- Comment #11 from Nathan Sidwell ---
Patrick's original patch did 2 things AFAICT
1) make constexpr_call_table GC deletable
2) add the fundef_copies_table etc.
The failure we're observing is of constexpr_call_table losing information,
which t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70594
--- Comment #10 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8)
> (In reply to Nathan Sidwell from comment #7)
> > copy_node_stat allocates a new UID for decls. so despite its name
> > 'copy_decl_no_change' does cause a chan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70605
Bug ID: 70605
Summary: allocatable character scalar in type empty after
assign
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70594
--- Comment #9 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Nathan Sidwell from comment #7)
> The change in debug generation causes purtabations in when GC happens.
> Such that in onecase we find a cached result, and in the other case we do
> not. Wh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70594
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70590
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70590
--- Comment #13 from Patrick Palka ---
Author: ppalka
Date: Fri Apr 8 20:17:10 2016
New Revision: 234837
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234837&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR c++/70590 (error: location references block not in block tree)
g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70452
--- Comment #15 from Patrick Palka ---
Author: ppalka
Date: Fri Apr 8 20:17:10 2016
New Revision: 234837
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234837&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR c++/70590 (error: location references block not in block tree)
g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70594
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70604
--- Comment #1 from Josh Poimboeuf ---
Created attachment 38227
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38227&action=edit
Linux .config
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70604
Bug ID: 70604
Summary: switch statement optimization creates dead code
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70603
--- Comment #1 from Marios Hadjieleftheriou ---
I just tried using 5.2.0 and I get the same issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70603
Bug ID: 70603
Summary: gcc alignas issue with pointers to template class
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70578
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70602
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The following patch fixes this:
--- gcc/tree-sra.c (revision 234833)
+++ gcc/tree-sra.c (working copy)
@@ -2743,6 +2743,9 @@ generate_subtree_copies (struct access *
gimple_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70602
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||alan.lawrence at arm dot com,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70574
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70593
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70593
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Apr 8 17:28:20 2016
New Revision: 234834
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234834&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/70593
* tree-ssa-coalesce.c (build_ssa_confl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70602
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48052
--- Comment #19 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I think this is fixed now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70574
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Apr 8 17:21:17 2016
New Revision: 234833
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234833&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/70574
* fwprop.c (forward_propagate_an
/configure --enable-languages=c,c++,lto
--prefix=/usr/local/gcc-trunk --disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 6.0.0 20160408 (experimental) [trunk revision 234826] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk -m32 -O0 small.c; ./a.out
$ gcc-5.3 -m32 -O1 small.c; ./a.out
$
$ gcc-trunk -m32 -O1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48052
--- Comment #18 from ctice at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ctice
Date: Fri Apr 8 17:09:09 2016
New Revision: 234832
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234832&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Unify changes with Android's GCC 4.9 compiler.
Add the followi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52563
--- Comment #10 from ctice at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ctice
Date: Fri Apr 8 17:09:09 2016
New Revision: 234832
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234832&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Unify changes with Android's GCC 4.9 compiler.
Add the followi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64878
--- Comment #10 from ctice at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ctice
Date: Fri Apr 8 17:09:09 2016
New Revision: 234832
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234832&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Unify changes with Android's GCC 4.9 compiler.
Add the followi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66638
--- Comment #7 from ctice at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ctice
Date: Fri Apr 8 17:09:09 2016
New Revision: 234832
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234832&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Unify changes with Android's GCC 4.9 compiler.
Add the followin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65447
--- Comment #5 from ctice at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ctice
Date: Fri Apr 8 17:09:09 2016
New Revision: 234832
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234832&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Unify changes with Android's GCC 4.9 compiler.
Add the followin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69650
--- Comment #53 from Bernd Schmidt ---
Hmm. Something got reallocated perhaps? It's not entirely obvious to me where
that would happen. Does the following help at all?
Index: directives.c
=
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70594
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69650
--- Comment #52 from Roger Orr ---
Ah - added print of *pfile->line_table at line 978 and compared with the value
when we error.
978 struct line_maps *line_table = pfile->line_table;
$3702 = {info_ordinary = {maps = 0x7fffec65d000, alloca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70601
--- Comment #4 from zmi ---
ok, my fault)
ice on allocatable type only
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70519
Jim Wilson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wilson at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #11 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69650
--- Comment #51 from Roger Orr ---
Thanks, I hope to try that on Monday.
The function gets called multiple times, so I need to identify the last time.
The memory must have changed *during* the call to do_linemarker as the new_file
variable is se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69650
--- Comment #50 from Bernd Schmidt ---
The 0xa5 bytes probably come from ggc-page, which tries to poison freed memory.
This does suggest that there's a use-after-free issue here.
At the step after "p map", try "watch -l map->to_file" followed by
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70601
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> and this one?
> ...
It gives
call concrete % run()
internal compiler error: in fold_convert_loc, at fold-const.c:2256
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39159
--- Comment #7 from Martin Sebor ---
I'm not an expert in this area but the approach seems reasonable to me. I
didn't test it in 5.x but with 6.0, it doesn't make a difference because
simple_cst_equal() cannot compare TREE_LISTs. Using attribut
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70601
--- Comment #2 from zmi ---
and this one?
programtest
use concrete_type_module
implicit none
type(concrete_type), allocatable :: concrete
allocate(concrete)
call concrete % init()
call concrete % run()
end program test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69650
--- Comment #49 from Roger Orr ---
Alas, valgrind finds nothing untoward.
make MAKEINFO=true STAGE1_CXXFLAGS="-g -O0" clean-stage1
make MAKEINFO=true STAGE1_CXXFLAGS="-g -O0" all-stage1
valgrind /var/tmp/gcc-trunk-234481/build/gcc/cc1plus -fpre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70588
--- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor ---
I agree that the SIZE_MAX/2 limit isn't very useful. A lower limit would be
more useful (I proposed one on the order of tens of kilobytes to megabytes in
my patch for bug 69517). Jason and I have been discu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70601
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70588
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5/6 regression] SIGBUS on |SIGBUS on a VLA larger than
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70601
Bug ID: 70601
Summary: [OOP] ICE on procedure pointer component call
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70600
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68945
--- Comment #7 from Stefan Teleman ---
> Since Stefan hasn't followed up and I'm currently looking at other
> libcilkrts issues anyway, I'm taking over from here.
Had every intention to follow-up with a cleaned-up patch, but did not find
the tim
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70590
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #8)
> --- a/gcc/cp/constexpr.c
> +++ b/gcc/cp/constexpr.c
> @@ -4143,6 +4143,12 @@ cxx_eval_outermost_constant_expr (tree t, bool
> allow_non_constant,
>
>verify
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70599
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||compile-time-hog,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68887
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||afanfa at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70590
--- Comment #11 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #10)
> (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #9)
> > Which hunk do you want me to test?
>
> The last one, sorry about the garbled message.
Firefox comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70588
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||16994
--- Comment #4 from Martin Sebor -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70594
--- Comment #5 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #4)
> Created attachment 38225 [details]
> test.ii test case (g++ -O1 -fcompare-debug)
>
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
> > Without the testcase it is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70590
--- Comment #10 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #9)
> Which hunk do you want me to test?
The last one, sorry about the garbled message.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70590
--- Comment #9 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Which hunk do you want me to test?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70590
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70590
--- Comment #8 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #6)
> (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #5)
> > (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #4)
> > > (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #3)
> > > >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70594
--- Comment #4 from Tobias Burnus ---
Created attachment 38225
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38225&action=edit
test.ii test case (g++ -O1 -fcompare-debug)
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
> Without the testcase
1 - 100 of 164 matches
Mail list logo
