https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70355
--- Comment #2 from Richard Henderson ---
Created attachment 38113
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38113&action=edit
proposed patch
Testing the following, which works on the reduced test case.
As a missed-optimization, we r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70432
Bug ID: 70432
Summary: Move operation across function call to reduce save /
restore
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66382
--- Comment #7 from Michael Meissner ---
I do not think it is worthwhile to expand the IEEE 128-bit software emulation
routines at the point of call in ISA 2.07 (power8). This is due to the fact
that a lot of processing goes on in the emulation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64266
--- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #7)
> until the C++ committee decides something about whether __func__ can be
> shared.
Actually, C++11 already says "It is unspecified whether such a variable has an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70422
--- Comment #7 from Jim Wilson ---
The function alloc_entries calls fancy_abort with __func__, causing the string
to get into the output. This function is inlined into the hash_table expand
function, which is then in turn inlined into other func
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70353
--- Comment #16 from Martin Sebor ---
I was just about commit the following patch for the failure (false positive) in
the test.
Index: gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
===
--- gcc/testsuite/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64971
--- Comment #8 from Richard Henderson ---
Created attachment 38112
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38112&action=edit
proposed patch
Andrew's approach to force the SYMBOL_REF to DImode is certainly one way
to approach it; ano
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64266
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 70353, which changed state.
Bug 70353 Summary: [5/6 regression] ICE on __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ in a constexpr
function
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70353
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70353
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70353
--- Comment #14 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Mar 28 20:16:21 2016
New Revision: 234511
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234511&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/70422
PR c++/64266
PR c++/70353
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70422
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Mar 28 20:16:21 2016
New Revision: 234511
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234511&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/70422
PR c++/64266
PR c++/70353
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64266
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Mar 28 20:16:21 2016
New Revision: 234511
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234511&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/70422
PR c++/64266
PR c++/70353
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70431
Bug ID: 70431
Summary: [C++11] Out of line defaulted copy constructor of a
union does not compile.
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70235
--- Comment #23 from Jerry DeLisle ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #22)
> Created attachment 38107 [details]
> New patch with test.
>
> With the patch we now get for y=6431.25
>
> ru,-8pf18.2 y= 0.01
>
> IMO thi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70421
--- Comment #3 from Zdenek Sojka ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #2)
> Untested fix:
> --- gcc/config/i386/i386.c(revision 234449)
> +++ gcc/config/i386/i386.c(working copy)
> @@ -46930,7 +46930,7 @@ half:
> {
>tm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70430
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64177
iverbin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iverbin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70397
--- Comment #2 from vehre at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vehre
Date: Mon Mar 28 16:29:14 2016
New Revision: 234507
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234507&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/fortran/ChangeLog:
2016-03-28 Andre Vehreschild
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70107
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
You need to add "-std=c++11 -fpermissive" to gcc < 6.
Trunk seems to be fixed, but gcc-5 and gcc-4.9 still ICE.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70107
--- Comment #3 from Bill Schmidt ---
Also, on latest GCC 5 and GCC 4.9, the front end objects:
wschmidt@genoa:~/src$ $GCC_INSTALL/bin/g++ -w -c -mcpu=power8 pr70107.ii
pr70107.ii:3:46: error: expected type-specifier before 'decltype'
auto ope
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70107
--- Comment #2 from Bill Schmidt ---
Could not confirm with trunk r234476 on powerpc64le dated 2016-03-24. Can you
please retry with something at least that recent?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70430
Bug ID: 70430
Summary: Incorrect result for logical "and" operation with
mixed vector and scalar
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70416
--- Comment #17 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #16)
>
> Wow, great to hear :).
I'm now testing this patch on sh-elf...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70416
--- Comment #16 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #15)
> (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #14)
> >
> > Maybe at that stage in the reload code it will end up using the last *addsi3
> > pattern and not try t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70429
Kirill Yukhin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kyukhin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69515
--- Comment #2 from Tom Honermann ---
(In reply to Tom Honermann from comment #1)
Actually, the test case in comment 1 seems to be a different issue; its failure
is a regression introduced in r234231 via bug 70095.
As of r234231 (and up through
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70422
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Jim Wilson from comment #4)
> The broken targets all define flag_section_anchors at -O1 and up.
Probably the -O1 matters because it implies -fmerge-constants.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70095
Tom Honermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tom at honermann dot net
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70416
--- Comment #15 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #14)
>
> Maybe at that stage in the reload code it will end up using the last *addsi3
> pattern and not try to look for a new pattern in the .md when it wants to
> change it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70134
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70429
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70406
Kirill Yukhin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70429
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70429
Ilya Enkovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69515
Tom Honermann changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tom at honermann dot net
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70429
Bug ID: 70429
Summary: Wrong code with -O1.
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: una
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70406
--- Comment #5 from Kirill Yukhin ---
Author: kyukhin
Date: Mon Mar 28 08:01:56 2016
New Revision: 234501
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234501&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/70406.
gcc/
* config/i386/i386.md (define_split, and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70406
--- Comment #4 from Kirill Yukhin ---
Author: kyukhin
Date: Mon Mar 28 07:59:44 2016
New Revision: 234500
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234500&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/70406
gcc/
* config/i386/i386.md (define_split, andn
39 matches
Mail list logo
