https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67728
--- Comment #25 from Andrew Roberts ---
The patch works on native armv7l-unknown-linux-gnuabihf with:
gcc-6-20160320
and in tree
gmp 6.1.0
mpc 1.0.3
mpfr 3.1.4
isl 0.16.1
although I wasn't seeing a problem with check-mpc.
At least the build comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70416
--- Comment #12 from Kazumoto Kojima ---
Created attachment 38105
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38105&action=edit
reduced test case for -O2 -fpic
reload1.c:reload_as_needed function generates the error message with
error_f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66382
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70052
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work|5.3.1 |4.9.4
Summary|ICE compiling _Dec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70018
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70420
Bug ID: 70420
Summary: (Building GCC) mtune=native and internal compiler
error at emit-rtl.c:1027
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70416
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70419
Bug ID: 70419
Summary: descriptions of -fpic/-fPIC and -fpic/-fPIE aren't
clear and contain syntax error
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70417
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70418
--- Comment #4 from sasho648 at gmail dot com ---
The full ice message is:
test_bug_0.c: In function ‘main’:
test_bug_0.c:24:1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
0xb482ef crash_signal
../../gcc/gcc/toplev.c:335
0xbda96a get_fram
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70418
--- Comment #3 from sasho648 at gmail dot com ---
currently *is* working fine and as expected when the function is not nested
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70418
--- Comment #2 from sasho648 at gmail dot com ---
Must be noted that such code must be valid and actually currently working fine
and as expected when the function is not nested. Eg.:
#include
extern void fp(int a, const struct {int _[a];} *b)
{
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70418
sasho648 at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|VM structure type specifier |VM structure type specifier
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70418
Bug ID: 70418
Summary: VM structure type specifier in list of parameter
declarations function definition
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70275
--- Comment #3 from Kevin Tucker ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #2)
> I'm not sure if this is desired, but changing it is not a huge amount of
> work: One just needs to move the check for
>
> /* Give preference to being able
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70416
--- Comment #10 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
Created attachment 38104
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38104&action=edit
Preprocessed source for sprintf.c when building with -mlra
sed source stored into /tmp/ccbUbdGW.out file, please attach this to
your bugreport.
Full build log in [1]. Preprocessed source ccbUbdGW.out is following shortly.
Adrian
> [1]
> https://people.debian.org/~glaubitz/ruby2.3_2.3.0-5_sh4-20160326-1814.build
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70417
Bug ID: 70417
Summary: New g++6 rejects previously valid code
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70416
--- Comment #8 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
Ok, I have added -save-temps to the command line which created both assembly
output as well as the preprocessed output.
Adrian
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70416
--- Comment #7 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
Created attachment 38103
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38103&action=edit
Assembly output for vm.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70416
--- Comment #6 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
Created attachment 38102
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38102&action=edit
Preprocessed source for vm.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70416
--- Comment #5 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #3)
> (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #1)
> > You could try to compile the package with -mlra and see if it helps.
>
> I'm giving that a tr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67728
--- Comment #24 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Created attachment 38101
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=38101&action=edit
possible patch
Hi,
this is a patch that fixes the check-mpc issue and
fixes gmp-6.1.0 in-tree
The reason fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70416
--- Comment #4 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #3)
>
> > What constraints does DTRACE_PROBE4 macro have?
>
> I'm not sure however where DTRACE_PROBE4 is defined. Is that specific for
> the build environmen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70416
--- Comment #3 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #1)
> You could try to compile the package with -mlra and see if it helps.
I'm giving that a try now and will report back shortly.
(In reply to Rich Felker fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70416
--- Comment #2 from Rich Felker ---
Since it's non-obvious where the relevant macros are defined, where that
__asm__ statement comes from, and what its operands are, it would be really
helpful if you or someone from the Ruby side could point it o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70416
--- Comment #1 from Oleg Endo ---
You could try to compile the package with -mlra and see if it helps.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70416
Bug ID: 70416
Summary: [SH]: error: 'asm' operand requires impossible reload
when building ruby2.3
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.1
URL: https://buildd.debian.org/status/fe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70412
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70275
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70366
--- Comment #6 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: prathamesh3492
Date: Sat Mar 26 10:08:47 2016
New Revision: 234490
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=234490&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-03-26 Richard Biener
Prath
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70356
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70235
--- Comment #21 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Nice work!
Unfortunately not finished yet!-(
program fmt
implicit none
real*4 y
character(45) :: fmtstr
integer :: p,w,d
y = 643.125
d=2
w=18
do p=-8,7
write(fmtstr,"(g0,g0,g0,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70359
--- Comment #10 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I am looking into it. -mcpu=arm966e-s does not uses the
TARGET_NEW_GENERIC_COSTS. i.e, the rtx costs setup by the back-end might not be
optimal.
34 matches
Mail list logo
