https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63867
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32199
nightstrike changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nightstrike at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70006
--- Comment #5 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> OK, How about WONTFIX? If the programmer fixes the
> issue reported in the "duplicate" error message, then
> the problem goes away.
Well, this is quite general: if your code does not generate any e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42108
--- Comment #72 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Fixed on trunk (solar).
Any plan for 4.9 or should this PR closed as FIXED?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70014
Bug ID: 70014
Summary: [ARM] Predicate does not match constraint
(*subsi3_carryin_const)
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60126
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60126
--- Comment #7 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dominiq
Date: Mon Feb 29 06:09:47 2016
New Revision: 233802
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233802&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-02-29 Harald Anlauf
PR fortran/60126
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70013
Bug ID: 70013
Summary: packed structure tree-sra loses initialization
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70012
Bug ID: 70012
Summary: test case
gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-vect-33.c fails
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70011
Bill Seurer changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||powerpc64le-linux-gnu
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70011
Bug ID: 70011
Summary: [6 regression] test case
gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-fast-math-vect-pr2
9925.c fails
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70010
--- Comment #2 from Cyril Bur ---
Created attachment 37820
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37820&action=edit
with -flto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70010
--- Comment #1 from Cyril Bur ---
Created attachment 37819
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37819&action=edit
without -flto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70010
Bug ID: 70010
Summary: powerpc: -flto forgets 'no-vsx' function attributes
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70001
--- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #6)
> struct X
> {
> int a;
>
> constexpr X () : a (0) { }
> };
>
> const int N = 1 << 19;
>
> struct A
> {
> X elems[N];
> } F;
>
>
> Just playing around, b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70009
Bug ID: 70009
Summary: test case libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/vprop.c fails
starting with its introduction in r233607
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70006
--- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
OK, How about WONTFIX? If the programmer fixes the
issue reported in the "duplicate" error message, then
the problem goes away. Amazing what an error message
can convey!
PS: The first duplicate
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69997
--- Comment #2 from Liu Qiang ---
yeah, i recommitted the page before the first committing done.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69997
Liu Qiang changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||EH
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70001
--- Comment #6 from Patrick Palka ---
struct X
{
int a;
constexpr X () : a (0) { }
};
const int N = 1 << 19;
struct A
{
X elems[N];
} F;
Just playing around, but naively sharing the constructor of each array element
in the case of defa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70008
Bug ID: 70008
Summary: [ARM] Reverse subtract with carry can be generated in
thumb2 mode
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69990
--- Comment #3 from Alan Modra ---
Oh, and in case it isn't obvious, -free-loop-vectorize is what triggers the
alignment increase of arrays in pass_ipa_increase_alignment.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69990
--- Comment #2 from Alan Modra ---
Created attachment 37817
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37817&action=edit
prevent var alias
Jan, does this look reasonable?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69990
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60126
--- Comment #6 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dominiq
Date: Sun Feb 28 22:40:06 2016
New Revision: 233798
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233798&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-02-28 Harald Anlauf
PR fortran/60126
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47674
--- Comment #14 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Feb 28 22:27:55 2016
New Revision: 233797
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233797&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-02-28 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/68147
PR fortra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68147
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Sun Feb 28 22:27:55 2016
New Revision: 233797
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233797&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-02-28 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/68147
PR fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70006
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Resolution|WORKSFORME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70006
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70006
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70001
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70007
Bug ID: 70007
Summary: [4.9/5/6 Regression] wrong code with -mbmi2
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70001
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 from H
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70006
Bug ID: 70006
Summary: Duplicate errors "label not defined"
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70005
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56007
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
Thread model: posix
gcc version 6.0.0 20160228 (experimental) [trunk revision 233789] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk -Os small.c; ./a.out
$ gcc-5.3 -O2 small.c; ./a.out
$
$ gcc-trunk -O2 small.c
$ ./a.out
Aborted (core dumped)
$
---
unsigned char a = 6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70001
--- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Actually the nested array is enough to reproduce the issue:
#include
#include
const int LOG = 17;
const int N = (1 << LOG);
std::array, N>, LOG> F;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70004
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70004
Bug ID: 70004
Summary: [6 Regression] FAIL:
gcc.target/aarch64/scalar_shift_1.c
scan-assembler-times neg\\td[0-9]+, d[0-9]+ 4
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70003
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||aarch64-linux-gnu
Severity|nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70003
Bug ID: 70003
Summary: gcc.target/aarch64/scalar_shift_1.c should be split up
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70002
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|rtl-optimization|target
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70002
Bug ID: 70002
Summary: [6 Regression] gcc.dg/torture/pr52429.c -O2 -flto
-fno-use-linker-plugin -flto-partition=none ICEs
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70001
--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
markus@x4 tmp % cat fft-old.cpp
#include
#include
using namespace std;
typedef std::complex cd;
const int LOG = 17;
const int N = (1 << LOG);
array A;
array B;
void FFT(array &arr) { array, LOG +
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56007
--- Comment #10 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Feb 28 19:07:42 2016
New Revision: 233795
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233795&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-02-28 Harald Anlauf
Jerry DeLisle
PR fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70001
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69989
--- Comment #8 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Sun Feb 28 18:54:00 2016
New Revision: 233794
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233794&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add a test for PR tree-optimization/69989
Backport from ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66310
--- Comment #9 from Jerry DeLisle ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #8)
... snip ...
> before the patch and with
>
> pr66310_1.f90:3:0:
>
>print *, repeat(z, huge(1_4))
>
> internal compiler error: Segmentation fault:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56007
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70001
Bug ID: 70001
Summary: Infinity compilation time
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67013
TC changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rs2740 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #11 from TC --
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61156
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61156
--- Comment #12 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Feb 28 18:16:56 2016
New Revision: 233793
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233793&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-02-28 Jerry DeLisle
Backported from mainline
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69989
--- Comment #7 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Sun Feb 28 17:41:45 2016
New Revision: 233792
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233792&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add a test for PR tree-optimization/69989
PR tree-optimiza
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin ---
Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.
0x00975130 in is_gimple_reg_type (type=0x0) at ../../gcc/gcc/gimple-expr.h:75
75return !AGGREGATE_TYPE_P (type);
(gdb) bt
#0 0x00975130 in is_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7
Bug ID: 7
Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/pr69666.c (internal compiler
error)
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69961
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69995
--- Comment #2 from Louis Dionne ---
I know but using a runtime assert allows showing that with/without constexpr
have different results. Also, I wanted to emphasize the fact that it could
result into a runtime error, since these are much more in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69926
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60126
--- Comment #5 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: dominiq
Date: Sun Feb 28 13:39:39 2016
New Revision: 233790
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233790&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2016-02-28 Harald Anlauf
PR fortran/60126
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66310
--- Comment #8 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Created attachment 37811
> --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37811&action=edit
> Proposed patch
>
> This patch fixes some signed integer problems in a few places and allows the
> t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69995
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6
Bug ID: 6
Summary: [6 Regression] ICE in verify_loop_structure, at
cfgloop.c:1639 (error: loop with header 3 not in loop
tree) at -O3 or -Ofast
Product: gcc
V
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67800
afomin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69988
--- Comment #5 from Andreas Schwab ---
The gccgo commandline uses -static-libgcc. Make sure that -lgcc is linked
after libgo.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69997
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|blocker |normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69997
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab ---
*** Bug 69998 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69998
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69995
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
72 matches
Mail list logo
