[Bug bootstrap/68404] [6 Regression] PGO/LTO bootstrap failure on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68404 --- Comment #20 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- Your patch fixes the problem for me. Thanks. I've also successfully build Firefox and run the Boost testsuite with it. (the Boost testsuite hit the PR68973 ICE once with -mlra. I will reduce a testca

[Bug lto/69707] FAIL: parallel-dims.c test for excess errors with -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69707 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--

[Bug lto/69707] FAIL: parallel-dims.c test for excess errors with -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69707 --- Comment #6 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: vries Date: Tue Feb 9 07:04:08 2016 New Revision: 233237 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233237&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Handle -fdiagnostics-color in lto 2016-02-09 Tom de Vries

[Bug bootstrap/69727] New: ICE in profiledbootstrap in reg_save_code at ../../gcc/caller-save.c:141

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69727 Bug ID: 69727 Summary: ICE in profiledbootstrap in reg_save_code at ../../gcc/caller-save.c:141 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug bootstrap/68404] [6 Regression] PGO/LTO bootstrap failure on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68404 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #37634|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug bootstrap/68404] [6 Regression] PGO/LTO bootstrap failure on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68404 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org|meissner at gcc dot gnu.org -

[Bug other/69722] [6 Regression] gcc/doc/extend.texi:7526: warning: node `Constraints' is next for `Extended Asm' in menu but not in sectioning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69722 --- Comment #4 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: sandra Date: Tue Feb 9 03:25:30 2016 New Revision: 233236 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233236&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-02-08 Sandra Loosemore PR other/69722

[Bug other/69722] [6 Regression] gcc/doc/extend.texi:7526: warning: node `Constraints' is next for `Extended Asm' in menu but not in sectioning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69722 --- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to sandra from comment #2) > I'm not seeing the warnings (different version of texinfo?), but I think I am using texinfo-6.0-1.fc23.x86_64. > Can you verify that the attached patch fixes the warnings?

[Bug other/69722] [6 Regression] gcc/doc/extend.texi:7526: warning: node `Constraints' is next for `Extended Asm' in menu but not in sectioning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69722 --- Comment #2 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- I'm not seeing the warnings (different version of texinfo?), but I think I've tracked down the problem to incorrect sectioning added in r225122: r225122 | rth | 2015-06-29 07:35:19 -0700 (Mon, 29

[Bug tree-optimization/69726] New: Bogus warnings with -O3 -Wuninitialized

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69726 Bug ID: 69726 Summary: Bogus warnings with -O3 -Wuninitialized Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimi

[Bug other/69722] [6 Regression] gcc/doc/extend.texi:7526: warning: node `Constraints' is next for `Extended Asm' in menu but not in sectioning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69722 --- Comment #1 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 37635 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37635&action=edit patch

[Bug bootstrap/69725] New: profiledbootstrap failure due to unsats for isl functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69725 Bug ID: 69725 Summary: profiledbootstrap failure due to unsats for isl functions Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priori

[Bug go/69357] libgo refers to _end in a non-weak way

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69357 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/69713] Invalid code of optimization in SH

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69713 --- Comment #6 from Kazumoto Kojima --- (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #5) > Anyway, I think this could be applied to GCC 5 and GCC 6. Kaz, what do you > think? Looks fine to me. Please go ahead.

[Bug c/44677] Warn for variables incremented but not used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44677 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||developm...@faf-ltd.com --- Commen

[Bug c++/69723] pre-post-increment/decrement and reading the same variable that is assigned should not be considered uses for Wunused-but-set-variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69723 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCO

[Bug middle-end/69537] [6 Regression] Incorrect -Wmaybe-uninitialized warning with enum variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69537 --- Comment #8 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ian Date: Tue Feb 9 00:34:55 2016 New Revision: 233235 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233235&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR go/69537 runtime: Don't refer to _end symbol in shar

[Bug go/69357] libgo refers to _end in a non-weak way

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69357 --- Comment #3 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ian Date: Tue Feb 9 00:34:55 2016 New Revision: 233235 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233235&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR go/69537 runtime: Don't refer to _end symbol in shar

[Bug libstdc++/69724] New: Unnecessary temporary object during std::thread construction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69724 Bug ID: 69724 Summary: Unnecessary temporary object during std::thread construction Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement

[Bug rtl-optimization/69714] [5/6 Regression] ffmpeg crc.c test miscompiled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69714 --- Comment #8 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2016-02-08, at 7:07 PM, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > This might be reproducible on a PowerPC machine too (big-endian rather than > the > little-endian version). As it was mentioned i

[Bug rtl-optimization/69714] [5/6 Regression] ffmpeg crc.c test miscompiled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69714 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[5 Regression] ffmpeg crc.c |[5/6 Regression] ffmpeg

[Bug rtl-optimization/69714] [5 Regression] ffmpeg crc.c test miscompiled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69714 --- Comment #6 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- On 2016-02-08, at 1:48 PM, pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > Do you know if it fails on the trunk? I retested trunk (revision 233199). My statement in comment #2 about trunk was incorrect. T

[Bug bootstrap/68404] [6 Regression] PGO/LTO bootstrap failure on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68404 --- Comment #17 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- And the "lto type not the same in decnumber" issue should go away with --disable-werror.

[Bug bootstrap/68404] [6 Regression] PGO/LTO bootstrap failure on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68404 --- Comment #16 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to Michael Meissner from comment #15) > Markus Trippelsdorf: Could you try the patch that I attached to the bug? I > get past the point that was failing before, but I get new errors (lto typ

[Bug bootstrap/68404] [6 Regression] PGO/LTO bootstrap failure on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68404 --- Comment #15 from Michael Meissner --- Markus Trippelsdorf: Could you try the patch that I attached to the bug? I get past the point that was failing before, but I get new errors (lto type not the same in the decnumber library), so I suspect

[Bug c++/69723] Inconsistent report of unused and uninitialized variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69723 --- Comment #5 from Peter VARGA --- I do not understand what you mean with "Replace unused++ with unused = unused + 1". How ever. I checked my example code in Compiler Explorer with clang and clang generates a warning as it should be. OK. You

[Bug bootstrap/68404] [6 Regression] PGO/LTO bootstrap failure on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68404 --- Comment #14 from Michael Meissner --- Created attachment 37634 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37634&action=edit Proposed patch to fix the problem

[Bug c++/69139] [4.9/5/6 Regression] deduction failure with trailing return type in function template argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69139 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/67835] bug with auto-deduced return type and functions invoked via ADL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67835 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/69139] [4.9/5/6 Regression] deduction failure with trailing return type in function template argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69139 --- Comment #7 from Patrick Palka --- Author: ppalka Date: Mon Feb 8 23:06:21 2016 New Revision: 233231 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233231&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix PR c++/69139 (deduction failure with trailing return type) gcc/cp/Ch

[Bug c++/69283] Auto deduction fails when ADL is required

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69283 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/67835] bug with auto-deduced return type and functions invoked via ADL

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67835 --- Comment #2 from Patrick Palka --- Author: ppalka Date: Mon Feb 8 23:02:50 2016 New Revision: 233230 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233230&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix PR c++/69283 (auto deduction fails when ADL is required) gcc/cp/Chan

[Bug c++/69283] Auto deduction fails when ADL is required

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69283 --- Comment #2 from Patrick Palka --- Author: ppalka Date: Mon Feb 8 23:02:50 2016 New Revision: 233230 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233230&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix PR c++/69283 (auto deduction fails when ADL is required) gcc/cp/Chan

[Bug target/69706] internal compiler error: in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2246

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69706 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug target/69706] internal compiler error: in extract_constrain_insn, at recog.c:2246

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69706 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/69723] Inconsistent report of unused and uninitialized variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69723 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug c++/69657] [6 Regression] abs() not inlined after including math.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69657 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/69657] [6 Regression] abs() not inlined after including math.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69657 --- Comment #10 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Mon Feb 8 22:07:54 2016 New Revision: 233229 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233229&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/69657 * name-lookup.c (do_nonmember_using_decl): L

[Bug tree-optimization/67153] [5/6 Regression] integer optimizations 53% slower than std::bitset<>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67153 --- Comment #23 from Nathan Kurz --- > 1. As a correction: *without* the count takes twice as long to run as with, >or when using bitset<>. Oops, I did say that backwards. My tests agree with what you say. > 2. As a heuristic, favoring a

[Bug lto/69707] FAIL: parallel-dims.c test for excess errors with -flto -fno-use-linker-plugin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69707 --- Comment #5 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- updated patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-02/msg00596.html

[Bug tree-optimization/69599] [6 Regression] libgomp.c fipa-pta tests compiled with -flto -flto-partition=max fail in execution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69599 --- Comment #8 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- update patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-02/msg00598.html

[Bug tree-optimization/68654] [6 Regression] CoreMark Pro performance degradation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68654 --- Comment #23 from Jeffrey A. Law --- I don't think it's worth the effort to try and keep that list sorted. I think we can get what we want with a single walk over the IL just before coalescing. That addresses the stability issue. Then we w

[Bug c++/69139] [4.9/5/6 Regression] deduction failure with trailing return type in function template argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69139 Adam Butcher changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|abutcher at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug tree-optimization/69209] [6 Regression] ICE at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu (verify_gimple failed)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69209 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/68721] [6 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68721 Bug 68721 depends on bug 69209, which changed state. Bug 69209 Summary: [6 Regression] ICE at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu (verify_gimple failed) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69209 What|Removed

[Bug tree-optimization/69209] [6 Regression] ICE at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu (verify_gimple failed)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69209 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Feb 8 20:07:56 2016 New Revision: 233228 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233228&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/69209 * ipa-split.c (split_function):

[Bug c++/10200] Weird clash with same names in different scopes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10200 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2016-01-22 00:00:00 |2016-2-8 --- Comment #32 from Jonathan

[Bug tree-optimization/68541] [6 Regression] Path splitting causes if-conversion miss

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68541 --- Comment #9 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Author: law Date: Mon Feb 8 19:52:50 2016 New Revision: 233227 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233227&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/68541 * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/split-path-1.c

[Bug target/69614] [6 Regression] wrong code with -Os -fno-expensive-optimizations -fschedule-insns -mtpcs-leaf-frame -fira-algorithm=priority @ armv7a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69614 --- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law --- I'd have to look at the current DCE implementation to if it's still relevant -- in the past we used to emit clobbers like this to tell DCE that the clobbered value is totally written when the writes were spl

[Bug c++/69723] Inconsistent report of unused and uninitialized variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69723 --- Comment #3 from Peter VARGA --- Dear Jakob, thank you for the explanation. But honestly, the "definition" when to warn is in my eyes wrong. Even var++ is reading and then setting the variable in this case it does NOT make sense! Just imagin

[Bug c++/69723] Inconsistent report of unused and uninitialized variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69723 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/69657] [6 Regression] abs() not inlined after including math.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69657 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug c++/69009] [5/6 Regression] ICE in instantiate_decl, at cp/pt.c:21511

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69009 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/10200] Weird clash with same names in different scopes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10200 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/69009] [5/6 Regression] ICE in instantiate_decl, at cp/pt.c:21511

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69009 --- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Mon Feb 8 19:22:57 2016 New Revision: 233226 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233226&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/69009 * pt.c (partial_specialization_p, impartial_

[Bug libstdc++/69717] std::pair is incompatible with std::is_constructible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69717 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/67153] [5/6 Regression] integer optimizations 53% slower than std::bitset<>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67153 --- Comment #22 from ncm at cantrip dot org --- (In reply to Nathan Kurz from comment #21) > My current belief is > that everything here is expected behavior, and there is no bug with either > the compiler or processor. > > The code spends most

[Bug libstdc++/69717] std::pair is incompatible with std::is_constructible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69717 --- Comment #2 from Daniel Krügler --- This is fixed in the current trunk (Tested on gcc HEAD 6.0.0 20160207 (experimental)). Btw.: Your test case is confusing. A better test case would be the following one, where the static assertion tests the e

[Bug libstdc++/69717] std::pair is incompatible with std::is_constructible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69717 Daniel Krügler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.

[Bug rtl-optimization/69609] block reordering consumes an inordinate amount of time, REE consumes much memory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69609 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at redhat dot com Summar

[Bug c++/69723] Inconsistent report of unused and uninitialized variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69723 --- Comment #1 from Peter VARGA --- Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/local/libexec/gcc/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/4.9.3/lto-wrapper Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu Configured with: ../gcc-4.9.3_source/configure --disa

[Bug rtl-optimization/69714] [5 Regression] ffmpeg crc.c test miscompiled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69714 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- This is most likely related to the bswap pass. Do you know if it fails on the trunk?

[Bug other/69722] [6 Regression] gcc/doc/extend.texi:7526: warning: node `Constraints' is next for `Extended Asm' in menu but not in sectioning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69722 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||documentation Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/69723] New: Inconsistent report of unused and uninitialized variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69723 Bug ID: 69723 Summary: Inconsistent report of unused and uninitialized variables Product: gcc Version: 4.9.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: trivial Pri

[Bug c++/69631] [6 Regression] Bogus overflow in constant expression error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69631 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/59627] ICE with OpenMP "declare reduction" and -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59627 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Feb 8 18:23:03 2016 New Revision: 233225 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233225&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/59627 * parser.c (cp_parser_omp_declare_reduction):

[Bug libfortran/69651] Usage of unitialized pointer io/list_read.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69651 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug ipa/69589] [6 Regression] ICE in initialize_node_lattices, at ipa-cp.c:971

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69589 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 37633 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37633&action=edit pr69589-2.C g++ -O2 -rdynamic -flto -o pr69589 pr69589-1.C pr69589-2.C This doesn't even emit -Wodr warnings e

[Bug ipa/69589] [6 Regression] ICE in initialize_node_lattices, at ipa-cp.c:971

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69589 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8

[Bug ipa/69239] [5 Regression] g++.dg/ipa/devirt-c-3.C FAILs with -O2 -fPIC --param=early-inlining-insns=196

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69239 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||6.0 Summary|[5/6 Regression]

[Bug ipa/69239] [5/6 Regression] g++.dg/ipa/devirt-c-3.C FAILs with -O2 -fPIC --param=early-inlining-insns=196

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69239 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Feb 8 17:41:35 2016 New Revision: 233224 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233224&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR ipa/69239 * g++.dg/ipa/pr69239.C: New test. Added:

[Bug preprocessor/69664] [6 Regression] column info is lost

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69664 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug preprocessor/69664] [6 Regression] column info is lost

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69664 --- Comment #5 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Mon Feb 8 17:33:45 2016 New Revision: 233223 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233223&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR preprocessor/69664: fix rich_location::override_column gcc/testsuit

[Bug target/69614] [6 Regression] wrong code with -Os -fno-expensive-optimizations -fschedule-insns -mtpcs-leaf-frame -fira-algorithm=priority @ armv7a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69614 --- Comment #7 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Hmmm, digging through the reload and post-reload split dumps I noticed this curiosity in arm.md: (define_split [(set (match_operand:DI 0 "s_register_operand" "") (zero_extend:DI (match

[Bug other/69722] New: [6 Regression] gcc/doc/extend.texi:7526: warning: node `Constraints' is next for `Extended Asm' in menu but not in sectioning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69722 Bug ID: 69722 Summary: [6 Regression] gcc/doc/extend.texi:7526: warning: node `Constraints' is next for `Extended Asm' in menu but not in sectioning Product: gcc

[Bug fortran/69368] [6 Regression] spec2006 test case 416.gamess fails with the g++ 6.0 compiler starting with r232508

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69368 --- Comment #34 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On February 8, 2016 4:49:20 PM GMT+01:00, "alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org" wrote: >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69368 > >alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org changed: > > What|R

[Bug target/60410] [4.9/5/6 Regression] -fshort-double ICEs x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60410 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/69614] [6 Regression] wrong code with -Os -fno-expensive-optimizations -fschedule-insns -mtpcs-leaf-frame -fira-algorithm=priority @ armv7a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69614 --- Comment #6 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- -mtpcs-frame or -mapcs seem to help exposing some other issue that I'm having trouble tracking down. -mtpcs-frame or -mapcs affect the behaviour of TARGET_CONDITIONAL_REGISTER_USAGE on arm. In a

[Bug c++/64697] C++11 thread_local: relocation truncated to fit: R_X86_64_PC32 against undefined symbol `TLS init function for N::ptd'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64697 --- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Václav Zeman from comment #9) > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #8) > > Your compiler doesn't have proper LTO support. Please turn it > > off with -fno-lto. > > How/why is it improper? Your LTO g

[Bug c++/64697] C++11 thread_local: relocation truncated to fit: R_X86_64_PC32 against undefined symbol `TLS init function for N::ptd'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64697 --- Comment #9 from Václav Zeman --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #8) > Your compiler doesn't have proper LTO support. Please turn it > off with -fno-lto. How/why is it improper?

[Bug fortran/69368] [6 Regression] spec2006 test case 416.gamess fails with the g++ 6.0 compiler starting with r232508

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69368 alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution

[Bug tree-optimization/68021] [6 Regression] ice in rewrite_use_nonlinear_expr with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68021 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to amker from comment #13) > Hmm, I posted a patch at > https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-02/msg00447.html > But after digging deeper I think the posted is unnecessary and it should be > fixe

[Bug c++/64697] C++11 thread_local: relocation truncated to fit: R_X86_64_PC32 against undefined symbol `TLS init function for N::ptd'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64697 --- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu --- Your compiler doesn't have proper LTO support. Please turn it off with -fno-lto.

[Bug tree-optimization/68021] [6 Regression] ice in rewrite_use_nonlinear_expr with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68021 --- Comment #13 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org --- Hmm, I posted a patch at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-02/msg00447.html But after digging deeper I think the posted is unnecessary and it should be fixed in fold stuff. The ivopt logic i

[Bug c++/69688] [6 Regression] -Wsign-compare causes bogus error: size of array ‘uc_code’ is not an integral constant-expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69688 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/69688] [6 Regression] -Wsign-compare causes bogus error: size of array ‘uc_code’ is not an integral constant-expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69688 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Mon Feb 8 15:40:33 2016 New Revision: 233220 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233220&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/69688 * constexpr.c (clear_cv_and_fold_caches):

[Bug rtl-optimization/69714] [5 Regression] ffmpeg crc.c test miscompiled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69714 --- Comment #4 from dave.anglin at bell dot net --- Hi Bernd, On 2016-02-08 10:19 AM, bernds at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > This could be tricky to debug without a PA box, but I'll look for a while. Thanks for taking a look. We have a couple of PA

[Bug target/60410] [4.9/5/6 Regression] -fshort-double ICEs x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60410 --- Comment #17 from Bernd Schmidt --- Author: bernds Date: Mon Feb 8 15:36:16 2016 New Revision: 233218 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233218&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Remove -fshort-double PR target/60410 * tree.c (build_c

[Bug rtl-optimization/69714] [5 Regression] ffmpeg crc.c test miscompiled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69714 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org Assi

[Bug c++/69631] [6 Regression] Bogus overflow in constant expression error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69631 --- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Mon Feb 8 15:31:47 2016 New Revision: 233216 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233216&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/69631 gcc/ * convert.c (convert_to_integer_1): Che

[Bug rtl-optimization/68730] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (in 32-bit mode)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68730 --- Comment #15 from Bernd Schmidt --- Author: bernds Date: Mon Feb 8 15:31:08 2016 New Revision: 233215 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233215&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix latent LRA remat issue (PR68730) PR rtl-optimization/68730

[Bug tree-optimization/69719] [5 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69719 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||6.0 Summary|[5/6 Regression]

[Bug libstdc++/48891] std functions conflicts with C functions when building with c++0x support (and using namespace std)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48891 --- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Mon Feb 8 15:22:32 2016 New Revision: 233214 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233214&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Enable isinf/isnan checks for all targets PR libstdc++/48891

[Bug c++/64697] C++11 thread_local: relocation truncated to fit: R_X86_64_PC32 against undefined symbol `TLS init function for N::ptd'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64697 --- Comment #7 from Václav Zeman --- Created attachment 37631 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37631&action=edit logs after complete recompilation logs after complete recompilation

[Bug c++/64697] C++11 thread_local: relocation truncated to fit: R_X86_64_PC32 against undefined symbol `TLS init function for N::ptd'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64697 --- Comment #6 from Václav Zeman --- Created attachment 37630 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37630&action=edit logs requested by #5 comment Here is the linking -v output and ld -V output.

[Bug hsa/69674] hsa offloading, -m32: "internal compiler error: in hsa_build_append_simple_mov"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69674 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/69139] [4.9/5/6 Regression] deduction failure with trailing return type in function template argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69139 --- Comment #5 from Adam Butcher --- The patch at https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-02/msg00561.html adds handling for cv/ref mentioned by TC in #c3. I've added handling of tx and exception specs to.

[Bug tree-optimization/69719] [5/6 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69719 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Feb 8 14:51:20 2016 New Revision: 233212 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=233212&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-02-08 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/69719

[Bug middle-end/65702] [5/6 Regression] ICE (tree check: expected ssa_name, have var_decl in expand_gimple_basic_block, at cfgexpand.c:5506) on arm-linux-gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65702 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org Assi

[Bug middle-end/65702] [5/6 Regression] ICE (tree check: expected ssa_name, have var_decl in expand_gimple_basic_block, at cfgexpand.c:5506) on arm-linux-gnueabihf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65702 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||su at cs dot ucdavis.edu --- Comment #10

  1   2   >