https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69247
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |krebbel at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68298
--- Comment #8 from Chengnian Sun ---
Created attachment 37326
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37326&action=edit
compiled with r230270 at -O3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68298
Chengnian Sun changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chengniansun at gmail dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68298
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
--- Comment #6 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69252
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu |powerpc64*-unknown-linux-gn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45053
Alan Modra changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|amodra at gmail dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68682
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68715
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69068
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69184
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67755
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5/6 Regression] Bad edge |[5 Regression] Bad edge
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67755
--- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Wed Jan 13 04:17:36 2016
New Revision: 232313
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232313&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PATCH][PR tree-optimization/pr67755] Fix profile insanity adjustments
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54809
--- Comment #3 from tbsaunde at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: tbsaunde
Date: Wed Jan 13 02:51:11 2016
New Revision: 232309
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232309&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
remove mark_hook gty attribute
gcc/ChangeLog:
2016-01-12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69116
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
anguages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 6.0.0 20160112 (experimental) [trunk revision 232269] (GCC)
$ g++-4.4 -v
Using built-in specs.
Target: x86_64-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Ubuntu/Linaro
4.4.7-8ubuntu1'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57438
--- Comment #25 from Iain Sandoe ---
Created attachment 37324
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37324&action=edit
Avoid empty function bodies V1
So...
The #if TARGET_MACHO code in ix86_output_function_epilogue () is supposed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69256
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||armv7a-cros-linux-gnueabi
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69256
Bug ID: 69256
Summary: Need to get rid of "Warning: IT blocks containing
32-bit Thumb instructions are deprecated in ARMv8"
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRME
del: posix
gcc version 6.0.0 20160112 (experimental) [trunk revision 232269] (GCC)
$ gcc-trunk -c abc.c
abc.c: In function ‘fun1’:
abc.c:7:40: warning: passing argument 2 of ‘__builtin_ia32_gather3siv4di’ from
incompatible pointer type [-Wincompatible-pointer-types]
a = __builtin_ia32_gather
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69006
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
Candidate patch posted here:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-01/msg00782.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69251
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69169
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #5 from vrie
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69216
--- Comment #2 from Benigno ---
benigno@benigno-System-Product-Name:~$ gcc --version
gcc (Ubuntu 5.2.1-23ubuntu1~15.10) 5.2.1 20151028
Copyright (C) 2015 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69196
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68976
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69196
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target Milestone|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69253
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|NE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65194
Jan Engelhardt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WONTFIX |WORKSFORME
--- Comment #2 from Jan Enge
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69251
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69251
--- Comment #4 from Matthias Klose ---
Created attachment 37322
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37322&action=edit
preprocessed source
attaching the unmodified preprocessed source. note that creduce 2.4.0 core
dumped during t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69247
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 37321
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37321&action=edit
gcc6-pr69247.patch
Untested fix. At least if the fact that the bswaphi2 pattern sets some HImode
register mean
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63602
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68756
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67282
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68953
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68823
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68809
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68976
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68976
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot
ethz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68692
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68146
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69155
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60637
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
To be clear, I'm not opposed to reusing the C++11 code for the non-standard
C++98 functions (all of them, not just signbit). That seems like a reasonable
project to undertake in stage 1, if someone is inter
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69251
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---
The test case doesn't look valid. There's no way to initialize a B* from void
(the result of the only operator<< in the program, even if it doesn't match the
arguments it's called with.
Maybe it got reduced
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60637
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #5)
> Why do you want to use a different code for C++98 and C++11? The best
> solution would be to remove the declaration in C++98, since it is not
> standard, but if w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69247
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
languages=c --enable-lto --enable-gold
--enable-stage1-languages=c
Thread model: posix
gcc version 6.0.0 20160112 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66797
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69217
--- Comment #5 from Iain Buclaw ---
(In reply to Iain Buclaw from comment #2)
> Fixed the first case, and now there is a second.
>
> Again, can't reproduce using equivalent C++ with g++. This time however I
> have no idea why, as both look like
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68644
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68733
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65194
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69177
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69249
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
Known
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69177
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69251
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69236
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69252
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.9.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69247
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69003
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||link-failure, wrong-code
Target Milest
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67376
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68877
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68877
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Jan 12 21:19:58 2016
New Revision: 232296
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232296&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
libstdc++/68877 Reimplement std::__is_swappable
2016-01-12 Daniel Krueg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68965
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
This seems to fix it and hopefully doesn't regress anything...
--- a/gcc/cp/pt.c
+++ b/gcc/cp/pt.c
@@ -11924,6 +11924,9 @@ tsubst_decl (tree t, tree args, tsubst_flags_t
complain)
/* Rename the param
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69246
--- Comment #9 from Richard Henderson ---
There wouldn't be anything wrong with REG_ARGS_SIZE on a
call_pop pattern in and of itself -- in fact I'd expect it.
I don't know if it's worth generating one for a sibcall;
it might be easier to treat i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67755
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60637
--- Comment #5 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #4)
> I think we can fix the C++98 std::signbit(_Tp) with:
>
> typedef typename __gnu_cxx::__promote<_Tp>::__type __type;
> return sizeof(__type) == sizeof
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69246
--- Comment #8 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
(In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #7)
> I think the problem with the old code was that we were using
> a non-sibcall expander for an ECF_SIBCALL call. I.e. we generated
> an insn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60040
--- Comment #11 from Ambroz Bizjak ---
Created attachment 37320
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37320&action=edit
Modified patch which clears failure
I made a wild guess that the issue is that the "failure" is not cleared, s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66461
--- Comment #9 from Jerry DeLisle ---
(In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #6)
> Hiesenbug. Steves fix, probably on BSD, does not work on linux. Some of my
> attempts work when running within the debugger, but do not work outside the
> debugge
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69198
--- Comment #8 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Jan 12 19:57:56 2016
New Revision: 232295
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232295&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix alignment check in AVX-512 masked store
Backport from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69253
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68995
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Jan 12 19:39:47 2016
New Revision: 232294
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232294&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Extend std::function test for PR 68995
* testsuite/20_util/funct
4-pc-linux-gnu/6.0.0/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-pc-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc/configure --prefix=/home/absozero/trunk/root-gcc
--enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 6.0.0 20160112 (experimental) [trunk revision 232269] (GCC)
$ g++-tru
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65886
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62051
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Honza, any progress on this?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69239
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69246
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66214
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60040
Ambroz Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ambrop7 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60637
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I think we can fix the C++98 std::signbit(_Tp) with:
typedef typename __gnu_cxx::__promote<_Tp>::__type __type;
return sizeof(__type) == sizeof(long double)
? __builtin_signbitl(__type(
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68810
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60637
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68049
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69241
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |ipa
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69092
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68911
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69246
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68995
--- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Jan 12 18:11:20 2016
New Revision: 232288
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232288&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
libstdc++/68995 qualify calls to __callable_functor
PR libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68995
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69092
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Jan 12 18:11:28 2016
New Revision: 232289
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232289&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Remove noexcept from function template that can throw
PR libstdc
usr/bin/powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu-as
--with-sysroot=/usr/powerpc64-unknown-linux-gnu --disable-multilib
--disable-libstdcxx-pch
--prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-232261-checking-yes-rtl-df-nographite-powerpc64
Thread model: posix
gcc version 6.0.0 20160112 (experimental) (GCC)
$ powerpc64-unknow
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69246
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
The following patch does the trick, if having REG_ARGS_SIZE on sibcalls
is correct that is. I couldn't find any documentation on REG_ARGS_SIZE.
--- 8< ---
diff --git a/gcc/combine.c b/gcc/combine.c
ind
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68911
--- Comment #7 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: amker
Date: Tue Jan 12 17:49:51 2016
New Revision: 232286
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232286&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/68911
* tree-vrp.c (adjust
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69082
--- Comment #16 from PeteVine ---
Thanks. Were issue #69004 to be fixed too that would probably justify a bugfix
release in the 4.9 series, no?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69082
Renlin Li changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68965
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69082
--- Comment #14 from Renlin Li ---
Author: renlin
Date: Tue Jan 12 17:32:18 2016
New Revision: 232284
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232284&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[Backport][PR69082][ARM]Backport "[PATCH][ARM]Tighten the conditions for
arm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69161
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|aarch64 |aarch64, arm
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51965
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|4.9.4 |---
1 - 100 of 263 matches
Mail list logo