[Bug ada/69219] [5/6 regression] failed to compile nested subprograms with Inline_Always and Intrinsic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69219 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/69235] New: [concepts] Spurious ambiguous template instantiation error on oppositely constrained class template specializations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69235 Bug ID: 69235 Summary: [concepts] Spurious ambiguous template instantiation error on oppositely constrained class template specializations Product: gcc Version: u

[Bug testsuite/69007] [6 regression] test cases gcc.dg/vect/vect-reduc-dot-s8a.c fails starting with r231815

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69007 --- Comment #3 from Bill Schmidt --- I just tried the experiment with swapping the two patterns, and it does indeed solve the problem.

[Bug tree-optimization/68356] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr68264.c -O* execution test on x86_64-apple-darwin1(0|4)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68356 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Target|x86_64-apple-darwin1* |x86_64-apple-darwin1*

[Bug tree-optimization/68356] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/pr68264.c -O* execution test on x86_64-apple-darwin1(0|4)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68356 --- Comment #11 from John David Anglin --- Author: danglin Date: Tue Jan 12 02:06:20 2016 New Revision: 232256 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232256&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/68356 * gcc.dg/torture/pr68264

[Bug c/23087] Misleading warning, "... differ in signedness"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23087 --- Comment #17 from Keith Thompson --- I just took a quick look at the discussion on the gcc-patches mailing list. It's true that the standard doesn't classify plain "char" either as a signed integer type or as an unsigned integer type. But I

[Bug tree-optimization/69110] [4.9/5/6 Regression] execution failure in gcc.c-torture/execute/doloop-{1,2}.c with -ftree-parallelize-loops=2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69110 --- Comment #13 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- In 4.6, parloops failed to parallelize because in find_data_references_in_stmt we had: ... /* FIXME -- data dependence analysis does not work correctly for objects with invariant add

[Bug target/69194] [5/6 Regression] internal compiler error: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2286

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69194 --- Comment #2 from kugan at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kugan Date: Tue Jan 12 00:40:54 2016 New Revision: 232251 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232251&root=gcc&view=rev Log: gcc/ChangeLog: 2016-01-12 Kugan Vivekanandarajah

[Bug target/69225] gcc uses double precision instead of single float with -m32 -std=c99 -msoft-float

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69225 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/69225] gcc uses double precision instead of single float with -m32 -std=c99 -msoft-float

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69225 --- Comment #7 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: hjl Date: Tue Jan 12 00:30:30 2016 New Revision: 232249 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232249&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Set FLT_EVAL_METHOD to 2 only if 387 FPU is used When 387 FPU isn'

[Bug ada/69219] [5/6 regression] failed to compile nested subprograms with Inline_Always and Intrinsic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69219 yuta tomino changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|INVALID

[Bug middle-end/69234] recent GCC trunk compilers miscompile the V8 JavaScript interpreter/JITC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69234 --- Comment #13 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #12) > They are actually aware of the issue for over a year: > > https://bugs.chromium.org/p/v8/issues/detail?id=3782 That is sad and just means they don't car

[Bug ada/69219] [5/6 regression] failed to compile nested subprograms with Inline_Always and Intrinsic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69219 --- Comment #2 from yuta tomino --- > Yes, remove the convention Intrinsic, it doesn't make any sense here or add > pragma Inline_Always on the nested subprogram as indicated. I agree with your sense. The local subprograms would be optimized we

[Bug middle-end/69234] recent GCC trunk compilers miscompile the V8 JavaScript interpreter/JITC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69234 --- Comment #12 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #11) > (In reply to Abe from comment #9) > > Created attachment 37309 [details] > > preprocessed part of V8 > > > > I will attach a compressed form of the relev

[Bug middle-end/69234] recent GCC trunk compilers miscompile the V8 JavaScript interpreter/JITC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69234 --- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Abe from comment #9) > Created attachment 37309 [details] > preprocessed part of V8 > > I will attach a compressed form of the relevant file -- > "incremental-marking.cc" from V8, preprocessed

[Bug middle-end/69234] recent GCC trunk compilers miscompile the V8 JavaScript interpreter/JITC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69234 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/68853] [6 Regression] gcc-6 miscompiles Chromium v8 garbage collector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68853 --- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski --- *** Bug 69234 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug middle-end/69234] recent GCC trunk compilers miscompile the V8 JavaScript interpreter/JITC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69234 --- Comment #9 from Abe --- Created attachment 37309 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37309&action=edit preprocessed part of V8 I will attach a compressed form of the relevant file -- "incremental-marking.cc" from V8, preproc

[Bug middle-end/69234] recent GCC trunk compilers miscompile the V8 JavaScript interpreter/JITC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69234 Abe changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|DUPLICATE

[Bug tree-optimization/69232] floop-unroll-and-jam, at graphite_transform_loops with isl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69232 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/69234] recent GCC trunk compilers miscompile the V8 JavaScript interpreter/JITC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69234 --- Comment #7 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- At least the issue should be mentioned either in changes.html or porting_to.html.

[Bug middle-end/69234] recent GCC trunk compilers miscompile the V8 JavaScript interpreter/JITC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69234 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #5) > BTW, Honza promised to implement a -fnull-this-pointer switch for this issue, > because Firefox, Kdevelop, QT5, etc. are also affected. Sounds like so many

[Bug middle-end/69234] recent GCC trunk compilers miscompile the V8 JavaScript interpreter/JITC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69234 --- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- BTW, Honza promised to implement a -fnull-this-pointer switch for this issue, because Firefox, Kdevelop, QT5, etc. are also affected.

[Bug tree-optimization/68853] [6 Regression] gcc-6 miscompiles Chromium v8 garbage collector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68853 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||abe_skolnik at yahoo dot com --- C

[Bug middle-end/69234] recent GCC trunk compilers miscompile the V8 JavaScript interpreter/JITC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69234 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug middle-end/69234] recent GCC trunk compilers miscompile the V8 JavaScript interpreter/JITC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69234 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- In that case, I guess the questions are: 1) does -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks cure the crash? 2) do any of the functions/methods defined in the problematic file have nonnull attribute? 3) can you try to co

[Bug middle-end/69234] recent GCC trunk compilers miscompile the V8 JavaScript interpreter/JITC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69234 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- This sounds like maybe a bug in the V8 sources. Can you try -fno-delete-null-pointer-checks ? Also can you provide the preprocessed source which is being miscompiled?

[Bug c/68637] Array of function pointers with attribute leads to wrong code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68637 --- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- Indeed, the parse appears to be correct (although there are various existing cases where an attribute gets automatically moved to apply to a type rather than to the original declaration to

[Bug middle-end/69234] recent GCC trunk compilers miscompile the V8 JavaScript interpreter/JITC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69234 --- Comment #1 from Abe --- The file "incremental-marking.o" is compiled from the source code at "/src/heap/incremental-marking.cc".

[Bug middle-end/69234] New: recent GCC trunk compilers miscompile the V8 JavaScript interpreter/JITC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69234 Bug ID: 69234 Summary: recent GCC trunk compilers miscompile the V8 JavaScript interpreter/JITC Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norm

[Bug target/69225] gcc uses double precision instead of single float with -m32 -std=c99 -msoft-float

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69225 --- Comment #6 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- On Mon, 11 Jan 2016, kyukhin at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > BTW, for -std=gnu99 we have EXCESS_PRECISION_FAST engaged. > This differs from -std=c99 > > If this correct behavior? I see no menti

[Bug c/23087] Misleading warning, "... differ in signedness"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23087 --- Comment #16 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- Well, an additional note: 'char' and 'signed char' are different types (or similar in the unsigned case) could be added in the case where the types have the same representation, one is ch

[Bug ada/69219] [5/6 regression] failed to compile nested subprograms with Inline_Always and Intrinsic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69219 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/69158] [6 Regression] ICE in in cxx_eval_indirect_ref, at cp/constexpr.c:2598

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69158 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/69131] [4.9/5/6 Regression] default constructor of union incorrectly deleted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69131 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Mon Jan 11 20:53:07 2016 New Revision: 232243 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232243&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/69131 * method.c (walk_field_subobs): Add dtor_from

[Bug libgcc/69233] fixtfti returns bad value for TI overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69233 --- Comment #2 from Steven Munroe --- Well the language spec may not specify. But I can ask the platform to be consistent with itself. For PowerISA I would expect long double -> __int128 to be consistent with double -> long, which saturates (INT_

[Bug middle-end/69230] false -Wmaybe-uninitialized with -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69230 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libgcc/69233] fixtfti returns bad value for TI overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69233 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- It is unspecified what the value of an overflow conversion is. So 1 is correct so is -1 and/or INT_MAX. I don't think this is a bug. The test code which depends on these values is broken and should not be

[Bug target/48344] powerpc ICE with -fstack-limit-register=r2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48344 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dje at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4 f

[Bug libgcc/69233] New: fixtfti returns bad value for TI overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69233 Bug ID: 69233 Summary: fixtfti returns bad value for TI overflow Product: gcc Version: 5.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libgcc

[Bug middle-end/69230] false -Wmaybe-uninitialized with -O1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69230 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Summary|valid -Wma

[Bug middle-end/69230] valid -Wmaybe-uninitialized suppressed by -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69230 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED Resolution|INVALID

[Bug tree-optimization/69232] New: floop-unroll-and-jam, at graphite_transform_loops with isl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69232 Bug ID: 69232 Summary: floop-unroll-and-jam, at graphite_transform_loops with isl Product: gcc Version: 5.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug middle-end/69230] valid -Wmaybe-uninitialized suppressed by -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69230 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/69155] [6 Regression] ICE (segfault in gimple_stmt_nonnegative_warnv_p)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69155 --- Comment #7 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6) > (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4) > > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > > > I think we have a dup/related bug where we run

[Bug target/69231] rtx_cost of subreg is bad for <= wordmode integral subregs of > wordmode integral pseudos

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69231 Bug 69231 depends on bug 67462, which changed state. Bug 67462 Summary: [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/ifcvt-3.c scan-rtl-dump ce1 "3 true changes made" https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67462 What|Removed

[Bug target/67462] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/ifcvt-3.c scan-rtl-dump ce1 "3 true changes made"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67462 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/69231] rtx_cost of subreg is bad for <= wordmode integral subregs of > wordmode integral pseudos

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69231 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||uros at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milesto

[Bug libstdc++/48891] std functions conflicts with C functions when building with c++0x support (and using namespace std)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48891 Adhemerval Zanella changed: What|Removed |Added CC||adhemerval.zanella at linaro dot o

[Bug target/69231] New: rtx_cost of subreg is bad for <= wordmode integral subregs of > wordmode integral pseudos

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69231 Bug ID: 69231 Summary: rtx_cost of subreg is bad for <= wordmode integral subregs of > wordmode integral pseudos Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED S

[Bug middle-end/69230] New: valid -Wmaybe-uninitialized suppressed by -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69230 Bug ID: 69230 Summary: valid -Wmaybe-uninitialized suppressed by -O2 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middl

[Bug target/69071] [6 Regression] ICE: in decompose, at rtl.h:2107 with -g

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69071 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/67462] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/ifcvt-3.c scan-rtl-dump ce1 "3 true changes made"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67462 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Jan 11 19:07:31 2016 New Revision: 232242 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232242&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/67462 * gcc.dg/ifcvt-3.c: Only compile on lp64 t

[Bug target/69071] [6 Regression] ICE: in decompose, at rtl.h:2107 with -g

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69071 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Jan 11 19:06:34 2016 New Revision: 232241 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232241&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/69071 * lra-eliminations.c (move_plus_up): Only

[Bug c/69229] missing type information in diagnostics about type mismatch in conditional expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69229 --- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor --- Created attachment 37307 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37307&action=edit Prototype patch.

[Bug c++/68795] [6 Regression] Use of uninitialised value of size 8 in cp_parser_postfix_expression (parser.c:6831)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68795 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/68795] [6 Regression] Use of uninitialised value of size 8 in cp_parser_postfix_expression (parser.c:6831)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68795 --- Comment #5 from David Malcolm --- Author: dmalcolm Date: Mon Jan 11 18:03:15 2016 New Revision: 232238 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232238&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/68795: fix uninitialized close_paren_loc in cp_parser_postfix_ex

[Bug tree-optimization/69207] [6 Regression] gcc.target/aarch64/vldN_1.c ICEs at -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69207 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/69211] [6 Regression] g++ ICE on x86_64-linux-gnu (verify_gimple failed)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69211 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/69214] [4.9/5 Regression] ICE (segfault) at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu in "fail_abnormal_edge_coalesce"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69214 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||6.0 Summary|[4.9/5/6 Regressi

[Bug c++/69211] [6 Regression] g++ ICE on x86_64-linux-gnu (verify_gimple failed)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69211 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Jan 11 17:59:22 2016 New Revision: 232237 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232237&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/69211 * cp-gimplify.c (cp_fold): If COMPOUND_EXPR o

[Bug c/69229] New: missing type information in diagnostics about type mismatch in conditional expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69229 Bug ID: 69229 Summary: missing type information in diagnostics about type mismatch in conditional expressions Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Seve

[Bug go/68980] [6 regression] ps -o cmd in gotest isn't portable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68980 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/69214] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE (segfault) at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu in "fail_abnormal_edge_coalesce"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69214 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Jan 11 17:56:39 2016 New Revision: 232235 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232235&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/69214 * tree-vrp.c (simplify_cond_usi

[Bug tree-optimization/69207] [6 Regression] gcc.target/aarch64/vldN_1.c ICEs at -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69207 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Jan 11 17:55:38 2016 New Revision: 232233 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232233&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR tree-optimization/69207 * tree-vect-slp.c (vect_get_con

[Bug go/68980] [6 regression] ps -o cmd in gotest isn't portable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68980 --- Comment #4 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ian Date: Mon Jan 11 17:55:39 2016 New Revision: 232234 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232234&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR 68980 libgo/testsuite: portable ps usage in gotest

[Bug ipa/68930] Aggregate replacements not applied to inline function bodies.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68930 --- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka --- The information is consumed by ipcp_transform_function, so you can take a look. It is stored in ipcp_get_transformation_summary I think it is just matter of not freeing it (assuming it is freed after cloning is

[Bug target/69053] [6 Regression] ICE in build_vector_from_val

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69053 --- Comment #7 from Mikhail Maltsev --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #6) > Certainly bougs though. The following works for me - can you test that? Thanks, this patch fixes the ICE and passes bootstrap/regtest on x86_64-linux.

[Bug libstdc++/69222] [5 Regression] C++14 template code working in GCC 5.1 stops working in 5.2 and 5.3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69222 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||6.0 Summary|[5/6 Regression

[Bug c++/60976] Compilation with G++ 4.9.0 is 2-3 times slower than with 4.8.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60976 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/66856] [6 Regression] ICE in compute_live_loop_exits, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:234

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66856 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/66856] [6 Regression] ICE in compute_live_loop_exits, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:234

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66856 --- Comment #8 from Richard Biener --- Vectorizer generates : vect_cst__109 = { 3, 5, 3, 5, 3, 5, 3, 5 }; vect_cst__110 = { 3, 5, 3, 5, 3, 5, 3, 5 }; vect_cst__113 = {g_14(D), 1, g_14(D), 1, g_14(D), 1, g_14(D), 1}; vect_cst__114 = {g_

[Bug tree-optimization/66856] [6 Regression] ICE in compute_live_loop_exits, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.c:234

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66856 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #7

[Bug c++/60976] Compilation with G++ 4.9.0 is 2-3 times slower than with 4.8.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60976 --- Comment #31 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Mon Jan 11 16:47:58 2016 New Revision: 232232 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232232&root=gcc&view=rev Log: allocator_traits> partial specialization PR libstdc++/60976

[Bug c/68637] Array of function pointers with attribute leads to wrong code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68637 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug sanitizer/69147] [5 Regression] Several hundred asan failures with 5.3.1 on x86_64-apple-darwin15

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69147 --- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres --- I have run memcmp-1.exe under lldb trying various break points from line 1 to 12 and I always get Process 45744 launched: '/Users/dominiq/Documents/Fortran/g95bench/win/f90/bug/memcmp-1.exe' (x86_64)

[Bug debug/66668] [6 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/debug/dwarf2/stacked-qualified-types-3.c scan-assembler-times DIE \\([^\n]*\\) DW_TAG_(?:const|volatile|atomic|restrict)_type 8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8 Dominik Vogt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com --- Commen

[Bug sanitizer/69147] [5 Regression] Several hundred asan failures with 5.3.1 on x86_64-apple-darwin15

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69147 --- Comment #6 from Maxim Ostapenko --- Ok, it seems that libasan calls some function to be intercepted while AsanInitInternal still not completed. Could you try to run memcmp-1.exe under gdb to provide a backtrace from failed CHECK? This way, we

[Bug middle-end/68999] [6 Regression]: FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/save_1.f90 execution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68999 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/69170] [6 Regression] ICE (segfault) in find_uses_to_rename_use

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69170 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug tree-optimization/69173] [6 Regression] ICE (segfault) in vinfo_for_stmt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69173 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/69173] [6 Regression] ICE (segfault) in vinfo_for_stmt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69173 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Mon Jan 11 16:02:23 2016 New Revision: 232230 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232230&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-01-11 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/69173

[Bug sanitizer/69147] [5 Regression] Several hundred asan failures with 5.3.1 on x86_64-apple-darwin15

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69147 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/68999] [6 Regression]: FAIL: gfortran.fortran-torture/execute/save_1.f90 execution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68999 --- Comment #8 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: uros Date: Mon Jan 11 15:48:40 2016 New Revision: 232229 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232229&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR middle-end/68999 * alias.c (base_alias_check):

[Bug c++/66339] g++ 5.1.0 Generates memory leak

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66339 frankhb1989 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||frankhb1989 at gmail dot co

[Bug target/69175] [6 Regression] ICE in haifa_luid_for_non_insn, at haifa-sched.c:7895

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69175 --- Comment #11 from Bernd Schmidt --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #10) > Created attachment 37306 [details] > gcc6-pr69175.patch > > So, do you prefer this instead? Yes, this looks good to me.

[Bug rtl-optimization/69217] [6 Regression] ICE at var-tracking.c:5038 Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69217 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 CC|

[Bug target/69175] [6 Regression] ICE in haifa_luid_for_non_insn, at haifa-sched.c:7895

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69175 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 37306 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37306&action=edit gcc6-pr69175.patch So, do you prefer this instead?

[Bug c++/66339] g++ 5.1.0 Generates memory leak

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66339 --- Comment #6 from lh_mouse --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #5) > (In reply to lh_mouse from comment #4) > > (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3) > > > OK, whatever weird definition of leak you are using is irrelevant.

[Bug target/69228] New: Default mask is not allowed for AVX512 prefetch gather/scatter insns

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69228 Bug ID: 69228 Summary: Default mask is not allowed for AVX512 prefetch gather/scatter insns Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: assemble-fai

[Bug ipa/66616] [4.9/5/6 regression] fipa-cp-clone ignores thunk

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66616 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/69225] gcc uses double precision instead of single float with -m32 -std=c99 -msoft-float

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69225 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Component|middle-end |target Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/66339] g++ 5.1.0 Generates memory leak

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66339 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug libstdc++/66789] FAIL: tr1/8_c_compatibility/complex/50880.cc (test for excess errors) on bare-metal targets

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66789 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2015-07-29 00:00:00 |2016-1-11 --- Comment #3 fr

[Bug c++/66339] g++ 5.1.0 Generates memory leak

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66339 --- Comment #4 from lh_mouse --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3) > OK, whatever weird definition of leak you are using is irrelevant. The > memory is still in use until the program exits, and there is still a pointer > to it. It is

[Bug rtl-optimization/68796] Make use of and-immediate+compare instructions more robust

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68796 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution

[Bug target/67462] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/ifcvt-3.c scan-rtl-dump ce1 "3 true changes made"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67462 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Bernd Schmidt from comment #6) > That does look dodgy. It's also really old, from when rtx_cost was part of > cse.c. Kenner added it along with many other changes in r754 in 1992. > > See what h

[Bug c++/69211] [6 Regression] g++ ICE on x86_64-linux-gnu (verify_gimple failed)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69211 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- I guess the bug is that lots of code in fold-const.c is totally unprepared to see NOP_EXPR wrapping up INTEGER_CST (or other constants), it assumes that if argN is say INTEGER_CST, then argN == opN and thus d

[Bug rtl-optimization/68796] Make use of and-immediate+compare instructions more robust

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68796 --- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Mon Jan 11 14:44:22 2016 New Revision: 232228 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232228&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [AArch64] PR rtl-optimization/68796: Add patterns for QImo

[Bug c++/66339] g++ 5.1.0 Generates memory leak

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66339 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- OK, whatever weird definition of leak you are using is irrelevant. The memory is still in use until the program exits, and there is still a pointer to it. It is not lost, or forgotten about, it is in use by

  1   2   >