[Bug debug/69077] [6 Regression] omnetpp ICEs with -flto -g

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69077 kugan at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kugan at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug c++/69132] New: AVX optimization bug: extra unnecessary code insertion?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69132 Bug ID: 69132 Summary: AVX optimization bug: extra unnecessary code insertion? Product: gcc Version: 4.8.4 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priori

[Bug c++/69098] [6.0 regression] Member function pointer template flagged with 'is not a function template'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69098 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/69065] [C++11] multiple alignas specifiers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69065 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug lto/69119] More fun with LTO on arm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69119 --- Comment #3 from PeteVine --- You were right about #2 - I passed LDFLAGS=-fPIC to both configure and later make which solved the issue somewhere. Thanks a lot!

[Bug lto/69119] More fun with LTO on arm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69119 --- Comment #2 from PeteVine --- Unfortunately I don't a have working 5.x at my disposal on arm. I'll remember about this issue when it becomes available. Anyway on 4.9, the suggestion is to recompile something with -fPIC but it's not clear what

[Bug target/63304] Aarch64 pc-relative load offset out of range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63304 --- Comment #38 from PeteVine --- Hi all, I'm trying to narrow down a similar issue on armv7 and would welcome any suggestions where to start: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69082 Thx

[Bug other/67648] No need to save callee-saved registers in interrupt handler

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67648 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/67552] [meta] x86 interrupt attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67552 Bug 67552 depends on bug 67648, which changed state. Bug 67648 Summary: No need to save callee-saved registers in interrupt handler https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67648 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/69131] New: [4.9/5/6 Regression] default constructor of union incorrectly deleted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69131 Bug ID: 69131 Summary: [4.9/5/6 Regression] default constructor of union incorrectly deleted Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug lto/69119] More fun with LTO on arm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69119 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/69123] [6 Regression] --with-build-config='bootstrap-O3 bootstrap-debug' miscompiled stage 2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69123 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/69130] New: explicit atomic ops treating non-constant memory orders as memory_order_seq_cst

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69130 Bug ID: 69130 Summary: explicit atomic ops treating non-constant memory orders as memory_order_seq_cst Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: n

[Bug bootstrap/69129] New: [6 Regression] ICE in get_attr_got, at config/mips/mips.md:694 on mips-linux-gnu

: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstrap Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: doko at gcc dot gnu.org Target Milestone: --- seen with trunk 20160103, building libgfortran $ gcc/build/./gcc/xgcc -B/scratch/packages/cross/6/gcc-6-cross-1/gcc

[Bug fortran/69128] [4.9/5/6 Regression] OpenMP workshare problem with SUM()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69128 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/65045] [4.9/5 Regression] ICE when using the same name for a block and a variable.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65045 --- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres --- From https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2016-01/msg9.html > Since I last looked at this PR, it seems to have fixed itself on > trunk. I just committed a testcase as revision 232042. It has been fixe

[Bug fortran/69121] IEEE_SCALB is not generic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69121 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/62536] ICE (segfault) for invalid END BLOCK statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62536 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Resolution|FIXED

[Bug fortran/69128] New: [4.9/5/6 Regression] OpenMP workshare problem with SUM()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69128 Bug ID: 69128 Summary: [4.9/5/6 Regression] OpenMP workshare problem with SUM() Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priorit

[Bug fortran/65045] [4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE when using the same name for a block and a variable.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65045 --- Comment #9 from Paul Thomas --- Author: pault Date: Sun Jan 3 20:55:19 2016 New Revision: 232042 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=232042&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2016-01-03 Paul Thomas PR fortran/65045 * gfortran.dg/pr

[Bug c++/69127] New: inconsistent handling of initializers of zero-length array members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69127 Bug ID: 69127 Summary: inconsistent handling of initializers of zero-length array members Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/69101] IEEE_SELECTED_REAL_KIND is not generic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69101 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug c++/69125] [6 regression] Please don't print "‘visibility’ attribute ignored" when setting hidden visibility for anonymous namespace classes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69125 --- Comment #1 from Thiago Macieira --- On the pragma issue: https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69126

[Bug c/69126] New: [6 regression] _Pragma does not apply if part of a macro

test.cpp [nothing printed] With GCC 6: $ ~/gcc6/bin/gcc -O2 -Wall -c /tmp/test.cpp /tmp/test.cpp: In function ‘int g()’: /tmp/test.cpp:13:9: warning: unused variable ‘x’ [-Wunused-variable] int x; ^ /tmp/test.cpp:17:5: note: in expansion of macro ‘MACRO’ MACRO; ^~~~~ GCC 6 built from trunk last night (20160103).

[Bug ipa/62051] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Undefined reference to vtable with -O2 and -fdevirtualize-speculatively

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62051 ziebell_marco at posteo dot de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ziebell_marco at posteo d

[Bug c++/69125] New: [6 regression] Please don't print "‘visibility’ attribute ignored" when setting hidden visibility for anonymous namespace classes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69125 Bug ID: 69125 Summary: [6 regression] Please don't print "‘visibility’ attribute ignored" when setting hidden visibility for anonymous namespace classes Product: gcc

[Bug target/67841] error: unable to find a register to spill if all registers are callee-saved

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67841 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/67552] [meta] x86 interrupt attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67552 Bug 67552 depends on bug 67841, which changed state. Bug 67841 Summary: error: unable to find a register to spill if all registers are callee-saved https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67841 What|Removed

[Bug target/69124] arm miss compiled code since gcc 5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69124 --- Comment #1 from Sebastian Andrzej Siewior --- Created attachment 37214 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37214&action=edit -E output of the test case

[Bug target/69124] New: arm miss compiled code since gcc 5

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69124 Bug ID: 69124 Summary: arm miss compiled code since gcc 5 Product: gcc Version: 5.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug bootstrap/69123] New: [6 Regression] --with-build-config='bootstrap-O3 bootstrap-debug' miscompiled stage 2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69123 Bug ID: 69123 Summary: [6 Regression] --with-build-config='bootstrap-O3 bootstrap-debug' miscompiled stage 2 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sever

[Bug inline-asm/59155] ICE: in reg_overlap_mentioned_p, at rtlanal.c:1473

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59155 --- Comment #6 from Bernd Edlinger --- (In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #1) > By the way, the following: > > double f(double x){ > asm volatile("":"+X"(x)); > return x; > } > double g(){ > return f(1.); > } > > is rejected with: > >

[Bug target/69034] ICE: RTL check: expected elt 1 type 'e' or 'u', have 'i' (rtx unspec) in copy_replacements_1, at reload.c:6323 with -fPIC and "X" asm input

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69034 Bernd Edlinger changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de --- C

[Bug c/69122] New: -Wmisleading-indentation false positive with empty macros

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69122 Bug ID: 69122 Summary: -Wmisleading-indentation false positive with empty macros Product: gcc Version: 5.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prio

[Bug fortran/69101] IEEE_SELECTED_REAL_KIND is not generic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69101 Francois-Xavier Coudert changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #9 from F

[Bug target/69120] sse2_shufpd_v2df_mask has wrong name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69120 Kirill Yukhin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|