[Bug fortran/68950] [fortran] gfc_format_decoder cannot handle %qE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68950 --- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Using this patch: ... diff --git a/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c b/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c index 8c4fa03..2669bf2 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c +++ b/gcc/fortran/trans-decl.c @@ -2097,7 +2097,9

[Bug fortran/68950] [fortran] gfc_format_decoder cannot handle %qE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68950 --- Comment #1 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- To reproduce on trunk, introduce triggering of the error here: ... diff --git a/gcc/fortran/f95-lang.c b/gcc/fortran/f95-lang.c index 8556b70..60f4ad3 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/f95-lang.c +++ b/gcc/f

[Bug c++/67576] [4.9/5/6 Regression] expression of typeid( expression ) is evaluated twice

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67576 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug c++/68948] G++ voluntarily removes a function call with terrible side effects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68948 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- error_mark_node

[Bug inline-asm/68952] Wrong code with AVX inline-asm in 32-bit mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68952 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/68953] New: [6 Regression] [graphite] Wrong code w/ -O[12] -floop-nest-optimize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68953 Bug ID: 68953 Summary: [6 Regression] [graphite] Wrong code w/ -O[12] -floop-nest-optimize Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code

[Bug target/68945] enable libcilkrts on SPARC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68945 --- Comment #3 from Stefan Teleman --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #2) > Patches need to be posted on the gcc-patches@ mailing-list. > > A few remarks: > > - SPARC is not a platform/target, only an architecture, so I presume that

[Bug tree-optimization/67282] Wrong code with -floop-nest-optimize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67282 Arseny Solokha changed: What|Removed |Added CC||asolokha at gmx dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug inline-asm/68952] New: Wrong code with AVX inline-asm in 32-bit mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68952 Bug ID: 68952 Summary: Wrong code with AVX inline-asm in 32-bit mode Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: inlin

[Bug bootstrap/59878] [4.9 Regression] ISL from cloog does not work with trunk

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59878 --- Comment #7 from Patrick Palka --- Author: ppalka Date: Thu Dec 17 04:01:47 2015 New Revision: 231736 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231736&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix some blockers of PR c++/24666 (arrays decay to pointers too early) g

[Bug c++/24666] [meta-bug] arrays decay to pointers too early

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24666 --- Comment #2 from Patrick Palka --- Author: ppalka Date: Thu Dec 17 04:01:47 2015 New Revision: 231736 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231736&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix some blockers of PR c++/24666 (arrays decay to pointers too early) g

[Bug c++/66895] Array to pointer decay in list initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66895 --- Comment #1 from Patrick Palka --- Author: ppalka Date: Thu Dec 17 04:01:47 2015 New Revision: 231736 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231736&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix some blockers of PR c++/24666 (arrays decay to pointers too early) g

[Bug c++/41426] User defined conversion on return ignores array types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41426 --- Comment #2 from Patrick Palka --- Author: ppalka Date: Thu Dec 17 04:01:47 2015 New Revision: 231736 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231736&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix some blockers of PR c++/24666 (arrays decay to pointers too early) g

[Bug c++/16333] More array vs ptr stuff

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16333 --- Comment #2 from Patrick Palka --- Author: ppalka Date: Thu Dec 17 04:01:47 2015 New Revision: 231736 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231736&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix some blockers of PR c++/24666 (arrays decay to pointers too early) g

[Bug inline-asm/68843] ICE with "u" input constraint

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68843 --- Comment #8 from Bernd Edlinger --- (In reply to David from comment #7) > Would a doc patch be appropriate too? well, more difficult how to explain it right than to code it right, meanwhile I added a sentence in english this to the patch:

[Bug c++/68949] [5/6 Regression] Implicit initialization of array member silently miscompiling.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68949 --- Comment #5 from Wouter van Kesteren --- Created attachment 37058 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37058&action=edit zero-cout.cc

[Bug c++/68949] [5/6 Regression] Implicit initialization of array member silently miscompiling.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68949 --- Comment #4 from Wouter van Kesteren --- I realise that maybe in my effort to make a tiny testcase without headers so that the .ii wasnt hundreds of lines the testcase might have become a bit hard to grasp. I'll attach a second cc with a iostr

[Bug c++/67702] [4.9/5/6 Regression] Internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67702 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #5 from Jason Merril

[Bug c++/68949] [5/6 Regression] Implicit initialization of array member silently miscompiling.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68949 --- Comment #3 from Wouter van Kesteren --- The program is (imo atleast) supposed to exit with success (0), not with 1, which is a failure. So i would say it is NOT working in gcc6 based on the output you showed.

[Bug c++/68948] G++ voluntarily removes a function call with terrible side effects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68948 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|middle-end |c++ --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski -

[Bug middle-end/68948] G++ voluntarily removes a function call with terrible side effects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68948 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c++ |middle-end Severity|major

[Bug c++/68949] [5/6 Regression] Implicit initialization of array member silently miscompiling.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68949 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/68951] [6 Regression] ICE in vect_update_misalignment_for_peel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68951 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-* aarch64-*-* Statu

[Bug c++/68949] [5 Regression] Implicit initialization of array member silently miscompiling.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68949 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[5/6 Regression] Implicit |[5 Regression] Implicit

[Bug tree-optimization/68756] [6 Regression] ICE w/ -O1 -floop-nest-optimize and isl 0.15: isl-0.15/isl_id.c:213: unable to find id

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68756 Sebastian Pop changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |spop at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug inline-asm/68843] ICE with "u" input constraint

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68843 --- Comment #7 from David --- Would a doc patch be appropriate too?

[Bug c++/68710] flexible array member of a base class accepted in a non-empty derived class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68710 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/68613] initializer-string for array of chars is too long error on flexible array member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68613 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/68689] flexible array members in unions accepted in C++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68689 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/68478] flexible array members have complete type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68478 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/42121] g++ should warn or error on internal 0 size array in struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42121 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/42121] g++ should warn or error on internal 0 size array in struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42121 --- Comment #11 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Thu Dec 17 01:38:35 2015 New Revision: 231734 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231734&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Correct ChangeLogs for PR c++/42121 and related. Modified: trunk/gcc

[Bug c/68868] atomic_init emits an unnecessary fence

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68868 --- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Thu Dec 17 01:33:41 2015 New Revision: 231733 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231733&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c/68868 - atomic_init emits an unnecessary fence gcc/ChangeLog

[Bug c/68868] atomic_init emits an unnecessary fence

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68868 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/68805] ICE while var-tracking in simplify_binary_operation_1 with -g and -mvsx-timode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68805 --- Comment #3 from Michael Meissner --- Author: meissner Date: Thu Dec 17 01:01:24 2015 New Revision: 231732 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231732&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [gcc] 2015-12-15 Michael Meissner PR target/68805

[Bug libfortran/68867] numeric formatting problem in the fortran library

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68867 --- Comment #22 from Bill Schmidt --- Jerry, thanks very much for investigating. Given all the discussion here I agree with XFAILing this test for all powerpc. However, it does appear to be one of those intermittent failures, so we'll have to p

[Bug c/68951] New: ICE on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu at -O3 in both 32-bit and 64-bit modes (in vect_update_misalignment_for_peel, at tree-vect-data-refs.c:889)

/gcc-trunk --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib Thread model: posix gcc version 6.0.0 20151216 (experimental) [trunk revision 231674] (GCC) $: $: gcc-trunk -w -c small.c -O3 -m32 small.c: In function ‘fn1’: small.c:2:5: internal compiler error: in

[Bug bootstrap/67156] config/bootstrap-debug.mk: STAGE2_CFLAGS += -gtoggle

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67156 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/68779] [5.3 Regression] HPPA/PARISC 32-bit Linux kernel build triggers multiple ICEs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68779 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/68779] [5.3 Regression] HPPA/PARISC 32-bit Linux kernel build triggers multiple ICEs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68779 --- Comment #3 from John David Anglin --- Author: danglin Date: Thu Dec 17 00:14:13 2015 New Revision: 231728 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231728&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/68779 * config/pa/pa.md (atomic_loaddi): H

[Bug target/68779] [5.3 Regression] HPPA/PARISC 32-bit Linux kernel build triggers multiple ICEs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68779 --- Comment #2 from John David Anglin --- Author: danglin Date: Thu Dec 17 00:11:55 2015 New Revision: 231727 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231727&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/68779 * config/pa/pa.md (atomic_loaddi): H

[Bug objc++/68932] FAIL: obj-c++.dg/property/at-property-23.mm -fgnu-runtime (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68932 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug objc++/68932] FAIL: obj-c++.dg/property/at-property-23.mm -fgnu-runtime (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68932 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Wed Dec 16 23:56:27 2015 New Revision: 231726 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231726&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR objc++/68932 - FAIL: obj-c++.dg/property/at-property-23.mm -fgnu-runti

[Bug objc++/68932] FAIL: obj-c++.dg/property/at-property-23.mm -fgnu-runtime (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68932 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/68892] [6 Regression] Excessive dead loads produced by BB vectorization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68892 --- Comment #5 from Bill Seurer --- It also causes an ice when I compile 20100610.c seurer@genoa:~/tests/gcc$ ~/gcc/install/gcc-test3/bin/gcc -c -fgnu-tm -O3 20100610.c In function 'TMelement_alloc': cc1: internal compiler error: tree check: exp

[Bug other/68813] [openacc] lto1: internal compiler error: in input_varpool_node, at lto-cgraph.c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68813 cesar at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/67530] Failure to eliminate dead code produced by vector lowering

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67530 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug libfortran/68867] numeric formatting problem in the fortran library

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68867 --- Comment #21 from Jerry DeLisle --- Just to be double sure, I reverted my patch on the PowerPC I use for testing and see that default_format_denormal_2.f90 fails regardless, so this is a separate issue from this PR. I think xfailing the test

[Bug lto/67548] [5 Regression] LTO drops weak binding with "ld -r"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67548 --- Comment #14 from Tejas Belagod --- Author: belagod Date: Wed Dec 16 22:33:51 2015 New Revision: 231724 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231724&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Backport from Mainline PR lto/67548 * lto-plugi

[Bug target/68664] PowerPC: speculative sqrt in c-ray main loop causes large slow down

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68664 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug fortran/68950] New: [fortran] gfc_format_decoder cannot handle %qE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68950 Bug ID: 68950 Summary: [fortran] gfc_format_decoder cannot handle %qE Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: P3 Component: fortr

[Bug lto/68685] LTO build hits ICE in copy_to_mode_reg, at explow.c:595

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68685 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug target/68690] PowerPC64: TOC save in PHP core loop results in load hit store

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68690 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug c++/68949] [5.? Regression] Implicit initialization of array member silently miscompiling.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68949 --- Comment #1 from Wouter van Kesteren --- Created attachment 37057 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37057&action=edit cc

[Bug c++/68949] New: [5.? Regression] Implicit initialization of array member silently miscompiling.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68949 Bug ID: 68949 Summary: [5.? Regression] Implicit initialization of array member silently miscompiling. Product: gcc Version: 5.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug libfortran/68867] numeric formatting problem in the fortran library

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68867 --- Comment #20 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #19) > (In reply to Bill Seurer from comment #12) > > > I checked with the revision previous to this patch and the revision for this > > patch and the only difference

[Bug tree-optimization/68892] [6 Regression] Excessive dead loads produced by BB vectorization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68892 Bill Seurer changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at linux dot vnet.ibm.com --- Comm

[Bug target/68928] AVX loops on unaligned arrays could generate more efficient startup/cleanup code when peeling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68928 --- Comment #3 from Peter Cordes --- I posted this as a question on stackoverflow, and got some useful comments (and had some ideas while writing up a mask-gen answer). http://stackoverflow.com/questions/34306933/vectorizing-with-unaligned-buffe

[Bug target/68928] AVX loops on unaligned arrays could generate more efficient startup/cleanup code when peeling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68928 --- Comment #2 from Peter Cordes --- Richard wrote: > [...] avoid peeling for alignment on x86_64 and just use unaligned ops Yeah, that's what clang does, and may be optimal. Certainly it's easy, and gives optimal performance when buffers *are

[Bug middle-end/32401] [PPC/Altivec] Non optimal code structure with -mabi=altivec

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32401 Bug 32401 depends on bug 32429, which changed state. Bug 32429 Summary: [PPC, missing optimization] stack space not optimized when stack not used https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32429 What|Removed

[Bug target/32429] [PPC, missing optimization] stack space not optimized when stack not used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32429 Pat Haugen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libfortran/68867] numeric formatting problem in the fortran library

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68867 --- Comment #19 from Jerry DeLisle --- (In reply to Bill Seurer from comment #12) > I checked with the revision previous to this patch and the revision for this > patch and the only differences were fmt_g0_7 succeeding and > default_format_denor

[Bug libfortran/68867] numeric formatting problem in the fortran library

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68867 --- Comment #18 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Bill Schmidt from comment #16) > Hm, but comment #8 from PR24685 indicates that this is clearly a regression. > At that time Andrew Pinski asserted that this failure was restricted to > Darwin,

[Bug libfortran/68867] numeric formatting problem in the fortran library

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68867 --- Comment #17 from Steve Kargl --- On Wed, Dec 16, 2015 at 08:52:19PM +, wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68867 > > --- Comment #16 from Bill Schmidt --- > Hm, but comment #8 from PR24685 i

[Bug c/68162] [5 Regression] Incompatible pointer type using a typedef

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68162 Joseph S. Myers changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/68162] [5 Regression] Incompatible pointer type using a typedef

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68162 --- Comment #19 from Joseph S. Myers --- Author: jsm28 Date: Wed Dec 16 21:11:01 2015 New Revision: 231722 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231722&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix TYPE_MAIN_VARIANT construction for arrays of qualified typedefs (PR

[Bug target/68945] enable libcilkrts on SPARC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68945 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/68752] PowerPC: vector reciprocal square root estimate missed optimisations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68752 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug target/68753] PowerPC: double precision reciprocal estimate missed optimisations

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68753 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug target/68770] [6 Regression] Conditional jump or move depends on uninitialised value(s) default_secondary_reload() targhooks.c:940

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68770 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug target/68805] ICE while var-tracking in simplify_binary_operation_1 with -g and -mvsx-timode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68805 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug middle-end/68832] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/alias-2.c -O1 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68832 --- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka --- Created attachment 37055 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37055&action=edit proposed fix This patch adds compare of anchored variables

[Bug libfortran/68867] numeric formatting problem in the fortran library

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68867 --- Comment #16 from Bill Schmidt --- Hm, but comment #8 from PR24685 indicates that this is clearly a regression. At that time Andrew Pinski asserted that this failure was restricted to Darwin, and powerpc*-linux didn't fail the test.

[Bug target/68937] i686: -fno-plt produces wrong code (maybe only with tailcall)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68937 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #37053|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/68872] -mcpu=powerpc64le does not pass -mpower8 to gas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68872 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug tree-optimization/15524] [4.0 Regression] jump threading on trees is slow with switch statements with large # of cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15524 Bug 15524 depends on bug 10588, which changed state. Bug 10588 Summary: [PPC] i==0||j==0 should use cntlzw and srawi https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10588 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug rtl-optimization/10588] [PPC] i==0||j==0 should use cntlzw and srawi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10588 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug middle-end/26163] [meta-bug] missed optimization in SPEC (2k and 2k6 and 95)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163 Bug 26163 depends on bug 10588, which changed state. Bug 10588 Summary: [PPC] i==0||j==0 should use cntlzw and srawi https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10588 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug rtl-optimization/10588] [PPC] i==0||j==0 should use cntlzw and srawi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10588 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dje.gcc at gmail dot com,

[Bug middle-end/68832] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/alias-2.c -O1 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68832 --- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka --- The bug is caused by achors. We call Breakpoint 6, write_dependence_p (mem=0x769006f0, x=0x769006c0, x_mode=SImode, x_addr=0x76900690, mem_canonicalized=true, x_canonicalized=true, writep=false)

[Bug jit/64296] link failure of libgccjit.so for "in tree" gmp/mpc/mpfr/isl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64296 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2015-04-13 00:00:00 |2015-12-16 CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/25972] pack and unpack of long doubles via union generates poor code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25972 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED --- Comment #8 from Peter Bergner

[Bug rtl-optimization/25972] pack and unpack of long doubles via union generates poor code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25972 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/68937] i686: -fno-plt produces wrong code (maybe only with tailcall)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68937 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #37052|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug rtl-optimization/25972] pack and unpack of long doubles via union generates poor code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25972 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug target/68937] i686: -fno-plt produces wrong code (maybe only with tailcall)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68937 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #37049|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug ipa/68930] Aggregate replacements not applied to inline function bodies.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68930 --- Comment #7 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On December 16, 2015 7:28:35 PM GMT+01:00, hubicka at ucw dot cz wrote: >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68930 > >--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka --- >For the Martin's answer. I pok

[Bug c++/68948] G++ voluntarily removes a function call with terrible side effects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68948 --- Comment #1 from Vasily Sukhanov --- Created attachment 37051 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37051&action=edit compressed preprocessed file I had to compress the file to fit into 1M.

[Bug tree-optimization/68707] [6 Regression] testcase gcc.dg/vect/O3-pr36098.c vectorized using VEC_PERM_EXPR rather than VEC_LOAD_LANES

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68707 --- Comment #19 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On December 16, 2015 8:24:49 PM GMT+01:00, "alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org" wrote: >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68707 > >--- Comment #18 from alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org --- >Well,

[Bug tree-optimization/68946] [6 Regression] ICE at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in both 32- and 64-bit modes (in vect_analyze_stmt, at tree-vect-stmts.c:8013)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68946 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com --- Comment #2

[Bug c++/68941] ice in vect_analyze_stmt, at tree-vect-stmts.c:8013

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68941 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/68948] New: G++ voluntarily removes a function call with terrible side effects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68948 Bug ID: 68948 Summary: G++ voluntarily removes a function call with terrible side effects Product: gcc Version: 4.9.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major

[Bug tree-optimization/68946] [6 Regression] ICE at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in both 32- and 64-bit modes (in vect_analyze_stmt, at tree-vect-stmts.c:8013)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68946 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/68832] FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/alias-2.c -O1 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68832 --- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka --- I will take a look. Seems something still needs update for alias.

[Bug tree-optimization/68707] [6 Regression] testcase gcc.dg/vect/O3-pr36098.c vectorized using VEC_PERM_EXPR rather than VEC_LOAD_LANES

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68707 --- Comment #18 from alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Well, we've seen this patch fix some of the vectorizer performance regressions we've had on some benchmarks. On SPEC...the "SLP cancelled" case triggers all over the place, but in most of those

[Bug lto/61886] [4.9/5/6 Regression] LTO breaks fread with _FORTIFY_SOURCE=2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61886 Bug 61886 depends on bug 25140, which changed state. Bug 25140 Summary: aliases, including weakref, break alias analysis https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25140 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug middle-end/25140] aliases, including weakref, break alias analysis

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25140 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Depends on|68832

[Bug middle-end/24332] asm label declaration may be missing aliasing info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24332 Bug 24332 depends on bug 25140, which changed state. Bug 25140 Summary: aliases, including weakref, break alias analysis https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25140 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug target/32429] [PPC, missing optimization] stack space not optimized when stack not used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32429 Bill Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wschmidt at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug rtl-optimization/68947] New: CFG expansion computes incorrect frequencies with -ftree-parallelize-loops=4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68947 Bug ID: 68947 Summary: CFG expansion computes incorrect frequencies with -ftree-parallelize-loops=4 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

  1   2   3   >