https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26598
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68868
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68629
--- Comment #1 from Thomas Preud'homme ---
Author: thopre01
Date: Mon Dec 14 02:05:16 2015
New Revision: 231605
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231605&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-12-14 Thomas Preud'homme
PR testsuite/68629
* lib
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6
Bug ID: 6
Summary: No Warning when converting an array of a subclass to
its parent
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68799
--- Comment #7 from Bill Schmidt ---
The most likely cause here is memory being improperly overwritten. If the data
from the next round of dumps don't turn up anything, I'll need a debuggable
version of gcc so I can try to sort out the offender.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68799
--- Comment #6 from Bill Schmidt ---
Hm, that almost worked. Can you please delete the line
dump_incr_vec ();
from that patch and try again? Sorry for the trouble. Meanwhile I'll see if
the partial data I got triggers any ideas.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68743
--- Comment #19 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2015-12-13, at 3:09 PM, sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu wrote:
> Inspection of the other z.c.* files show that floor is called.
> Is hpux defining floorf someplace that the HAVE_FLOO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68843
--- Comment #6 from Bernd Edlinger ---
How about this?
I think tt should fix both issues.
Index: reg-stack.c
===
--- reg-stack.c (Revision 231598)
+++ reg-stack.c (Arbeitskopie)
@@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67355
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68560
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #37024|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68560
--- Comment #19 from Mikael Morin ---
(In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #18)
> Lightly tested so far.
It actually regress heavily.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68560
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #36937|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66848
--- Comment #22 from Jack Howarth ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #21)
>
> for both -m32 and -m64. Are they related?
Yes. If you apply the ugly hack from comment 11, you will find that it fixes
both the boehm-gc test suite re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67355
--- Comment #10 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Sun Dec 13 20:43:44 2015
New Revision: 231600
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231600&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR67355] drop dummy zero from reverse VTA ops, fix infinite recursion
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68843
--- Comment #5 from Bernd Edlinger ---
and that's the next oddity:
cat t1.c
int test (double x, double y)
{
int r;
asm ("fist %0\t# %0 %1 %2" : "=r" (r) : "r" (x), "t" (y));
return r;
}
gcc -S t1.c -m32
t1.c: In function ‘test’:
t1.c:4:3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67355
--- Comment #9 from Alexandre Oliva ---
Author: aoliva
Date: Sun Dec 13 20:37:26 2015
New Revision: 231599
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=231599&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[PR67355] drop dummy zero from reverse VTA ops, fix infinite recursion
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68887
Bug ID: 68887
Summary: [6 regression] gfortran.dg/coarray/event_[12].f90
-fcoarray=lib -O2 -lcaf_single -latomic fails
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68743
--- Comment #18 from Steve Kargl ---
On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 07:11:46PM +, dave.anglin at bell dot net wrote:
>
> > Perhaps, adding a few pessimizations will prevent gcc
> > from doing the optimization.
>
> Will give these a whirl.
>
I t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68878
--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka ---
OK, the bug is caused by fact that new decl merging won't merge decls without
symbol table entries. Devirtualization uses them and it means we lose a ctor.
I have fix for the merging, but it seems to be a late
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68743
--- Comment #17 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2015-12-13, at 1:36 PM, sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu wrote:
> If gcc is doing an optimization that changes (float)floor(x) to
> __builtin_floorf() and then __builtin_floorf() is m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68743
--- Comment #16 from Steve Kargl ---
On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 05:39:41PM +, dave.anglin at bell dot net wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68743
>
> --- Comment #15 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
> On 2015-12-13, at 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68743
--- Comment #15 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2015-12-13, at 11:16 AM, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> What happens if you change -std=gnu11 to -std=c11?
I will check soon. Possibly, this should be -std=c90 as most
c99 functions are
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68861
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66460
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||philipp.classen at gmx dot net
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66982
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66982
--- Comment #1 from Philipp Claßen ---
Confirmed with gcc 5.3.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68743
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68880
David Ward changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--- Comment #3 from David Ward ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68886
Bug ID: 68886
Summary: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/stkalign.c execution test
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68743
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Component|tree-optimiza
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68885
Bug ID: 68885
Summary: [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/mpx/memmove-1.c
-O3 -g (internal compiler error)
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68880
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68880
--- Comment #1 from François Dumont ---
Not sure it is a regression. Of course before the patch the operator was called
in namespace std so your operator was considered. Now we are using intermediate
functor that are not in std namespace so your
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68884
--- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
markus@x4 /tmp % cat tst.ii
namespace std {
template struct A { static constexpr _Tp value = __v;
};
typedef A true_type;
}
template struct VsA;
template struct ValueTemplate {
template class, cla
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68884
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68884
--- Comment #3 from meinaccountnr2 at web dot de ---
Created attachment 37023
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37023&action=edit
ubuntu crash report
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68884
--- Comment #2 from meinaccountnr2 at web dot de ---
Created attachment 37022
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37022&action=edit
Preprocessed source
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68884
--- Comment #1 from meinaccountnr2 at web dot de ---
Created attachment 37021
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37021&action=edit
console output
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68884
Bug ID: 68884
Summary: template of value template crashes the compiler
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18385
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19201
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68820
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68883
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68883
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68883
Bug ID: 68883
Summary: FAIL: gcc.c-torture/execute/builtins/memops-asm.c
execution, -O2 -flto
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68882
--- Comment #1 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 37019
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=37019&action=edit
tentative patch
Newer version that patch posted in RFC
Handles case that default def is NULL.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68882
Bug ID: 68882
Summary: Dump ssaname info for default defs
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: other
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68768
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62018
--- Comment #31 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
This PR seems "fixed" (as in silenced) on x86_64-apple-darwin15.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68881
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68881
Bug ID: 68881
Summary: UNRESOLVED/FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/attr-weakref-1 -O2 -flto
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
51 matches
Mail list logo
