https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68466
Bug ID: 68466
Summary: libgcc, linux_atomic.c, compilation breaks on #include
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68465
Bug ID: 68465
Summary: pass_lim doesn't detect identical loop entry
conditions
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65849
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66474
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66224
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66378
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66378
--- Comment #1 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Sat Nov 21 04:43:50 2015
New Revision: 230699
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230699&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/66378
syscall: Fix initial offset value in syscal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66378
--- Comment #2 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Sat Nov 21 04:44:07 2015
New Revision: 230700
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230700&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/66378
syscall: Fix initial offset value in syscal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68462
--- Comment #3 from Manjeet Dahiya ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> N_domains and domain_array don't overlap at all and it is known to overlap
> as writing past arrays bounds is undefined and is unrelated to strict
> aliasing.
T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65484
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66406
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66406
--- Comment #1 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Sat Nov 21 01:47:13 2015
New Revision: 230697
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230697&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/66406
* go.test/go-test.exp (go-gc-tests): Sk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65785
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65785
--- Comment #4 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Sat Nov 21 01:41:55 2015
New Revision: 230696
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230696&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/65785
net: don't run multicast listen test on nil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65785
--- Comment #3 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Sat Nov 21 01:41:24 2015
New Revision: 230695
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230695&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/65785
net: don't run multicast listen test on nil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65849
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66224
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66574
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66474
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68458
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66574
--- Comment #4 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Sat Nov 21 01:27:44 2015
New Revision: 230694
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230694&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/66574
runtime: Use clock_gettime to get current t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68065
--- Comment #35 from Alexander Cherepanov ---
On 2015-11-20 04:06, joseph at codesourcery dot com wrote:
>> What does the following mean then?
>>
>> C11, 4p5:
>> "A strictly conforming program[...] It [...] shall not exceed any
>> minimum impleme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68454
--- Comment #6 from M Joshua Ryan ---
Just to clarify, the file with symbols is marked obsolete; the latest file is
believed good. No external symbols. It produces the compiler error when run
with no options `gcc xpost_main.i`.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68454
M Joshua Ryan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #36786|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68454
--- Comment #4 from M Joshua Ryan ---
Created attachment 36789
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36789&action=edit
.i file left by `make CFLAGS='-g -O2 -save-temps'`
I think this is the correct file now. I see "0" "0" and "1"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65785
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68141
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68141
--- Comment #1 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Fri Nov 20 23:44:25 2015
New Revision: 230689
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230689&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/68141
compiler: Use references in Archive_iterato
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67976
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Version|6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67976
--- Comment #7 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Fri Nov 20 23:37:48 2015
New Revision: 230688
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230688&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/67976
Bring https://codereview.appspot.com/154360045
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67976
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67976
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68434
Eric Niebler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eric.niebler at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68072
Ian Lance Taylor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68072
--- Comment #12 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Fri Nov 20 22:49:06 2015
New Revision: 230686
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230686&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/68072
cmd/cgo: ignore vars with no name or type
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68072
--- Comment #11 from ian at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ian
Date: Fri Nov 20 22:48:47 2015
New Revision: 230685
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230685&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR go/68072
cmd/cgo: ignore vars with no name or type
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68389
--- Comment #2 from Ketan ---
I tried 5.2 and did not see the issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68082
--- Comment #4 from angelo ---
Here what i see when i step into the function:
http://imgur.com/2802Ob5
I build on linux
$ cat /proc/version
Linux version 4.1.7001 (root@jerusalem) (gcc version 5.2.1 20150911 (Debian
5.2.1-17) ) #1 SMP Sat Sep
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68456
--- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Fri, 20 Nov 2015, dmitry.polukhin at gmail dot com wrote:
> What is the advantage of using 'long' instead of 'int' for uint32_t on a
> platform where both types can be used (i.e. actually
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68082
--- Comment #3 from angelo ---
Created attachment 36787
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36787&action=edit
code that generate the fault
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68082
--- Comment #2 from angelo ---
Hi,
finally i have more details.
I reproduce this issue on toolchains built for x86_64, from gcc 4.9.0 to latest
gcc 5.2.0.
Compiling options don't make great differences, i am actually using
-ggdb -Wall -fno-bu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68072
--- Comment #10 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
FYI, refiled as https://golang.org/issue/13344 and sent out
https://golang.org/cl/17151 , a variant of the patch you suggested.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68396
ryan.burn at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68453
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |spop at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68072
--- Comment #9 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
Thanks very much for taking the time to narrow down the test case. That is
nice and simple.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68464
Bug ID: 68464
Summary: ICE in constexpr function: ../../src/gcc/tree.c:11497
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68454
M Joshua Ryan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #36778|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62314
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm ---
I've committed support for fix-it hints within diagnostics to trunk (for gcc 6)
as r230674 (along with one trivial example of a fix-it hint in the C frontend).
Keeping this bug open, since it has lots of exa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68438
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
Candidate patch:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/msg02536.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62314
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Author: dmalcolm
Date: Fri Nov 20 20:08:47 2015
New Revision: 230674
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230674&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR 62314: add ability to add fixit-hints to a diagnostic
This is the c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68462
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68339
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Nov 20 19:57:50 2015
New Revision: 230673
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230673&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/68339
* omp-low.c (expand_simd_clones): Call
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68221
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Nov 20 19:50:46 2015
New Revision: 230672
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230672&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/68221
* omp-low.c (lower_rec_input_clauses):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68339
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Nov 20 19:49:47 2015
New Revision: 230671
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230671&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/68339
* omp-low.c (expand_simd_clones): Call
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68463
Bug ID: 68463
Summary: Offloading fails when some objects are compiled with
LTO and some without
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openacc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68462
--- Comment #1 from Manjeet Dahiya ---
GCC version details:
gcc version 4.8.4 (Ubuntu 4.8.4-2ubuntu1~14.04)
Here are the options I used:
gcc -c -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -m32 -S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68462
Bug ID: 68462
Summary: -fno-strict-aliasing not respected
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: c
Ass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68448
Jan Kratochvil changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68448
--- Comment #5 from jkratoch at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jkratoch
Date: Fri Nov 20 19:10:12 2015
New Revision: 230670
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230670&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/68448
* python/hook.in: Call
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68448
--- Comment #4 from jkratoch at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: jkratoch
Date: Fri Nov 20 19:00:51 2015
New Revision: 230669
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230669&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/68448
* python/hook.in: Call
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68458
--- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> > and where did you get GCC?
>
> From Cygwin.
Then you should ask them for support. As you might guess the status of this PR
is WORKSFORME for all the other gfortran users!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68269
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|rtl-optimization|target
--- Comment #5 from mrs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68458
--- Comment #3 from rgaveiga at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #2)
> > Where did you GCC?
>
> and where did you get GCC?
From Cygwin.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68461
Bug ID: 68461
Summary: make stage1-bubble all-target error: No rule to make
target `../src/c++98/libc++98convenience.la'
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68269
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68458
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68438
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67226
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66432
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66432
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 36785
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36785&action=edit
gcc6-pr66432.patch
Untested fix. We actually rely on decl_debug_args being the DECL_ORIGIN, not
something simi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66432
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|jakub at gcc dot gnu.org |
Component|middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67550
Jason Wyatt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jwyatt at feralinteractive dot
com
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68458
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68315
--- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> Yes. The easiest way would be to make tree-data-ref.c use it I suppose.
Hmm, Jakub's comment at https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46032#c2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68460
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #1 from vrie
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68460
Bug ID: 68460
Summary: ICE in init_stmt_vec_info_vec with -ftree-vectorize
and -ftree-parallelize-loops
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68173
--- Comment #13 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #12)
> callgrind points at bitmap_set_bit called via process_bb_lives ->
> mark_regno_dead.
> Maybe some code in that (the DCE code?) can be keyed on if (optimize)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55765
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68128
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68128
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Note, even if we fix this issue, it really won't help the phoronix benchmark
results, as it (intentionally?) penalizes the code for non-Intel compilers.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68149
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68149
--- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ktkachov
Date: Fri Nov 20 15:15:31 2015
New Revision: 230663
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230663&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[ARM] PR 68149 Fix ICE in unaligned_loaddi split
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68456
Dmitry Polukhin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmitry.polukhin at gmail dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68312
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 36784
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36784&action=edit
Suggested patch2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68312
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 36783
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36783&action=edit
Suggested patch1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68243
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68237
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52846
Bug 52846 depends on bug 66762, which changed state.
Bug 66762 Summary: ICE when compiling gfortran.dg/submodule_[16].f90 with -flto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66762
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66762
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66762
--- Comment #12 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Fri Nov 20 14:50:35 2015
New Revision: 230661
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230661&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-20 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/68237
* decl.c (gfc_m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68237
--- Comment #11 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Fri Nov 20 14:50:35 2015
New Revision: 230661
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230661&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-20 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/68237
* decl.c (gfc_m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68413
alahay01 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68413
--- Comment #9 from alahay01 at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: alahay01
Date: Fri Nov 20 14:20:24 2015
New Revision: 230658
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230658&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-11-20 Alan Hayward
PR tree-optimization/68
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67822
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68128
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Can't reproduce, at least not on i7-5960X (thus OMP_NUM_THREADS=16).
gcc -Ofast -fopenmp built cutcp is roughly the same performance in all of 4.6,
4.8, 5.1 and 6, the only thing that reliably helps (but only
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68456
--- Comment #3 from Yulia Koval ---
I agree, that %u usage is not a bug, but it still looks strange..
For gcc --target=i586-elf macro has:
#define __UINT32_TYPE__ long unsigned int
For non-target gcc or gcc --target=i586-unknown-linux it has:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67055
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dhowells at redhat dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68459
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68459
--- Comment #1 from dhowells at redhat dot com ---
The backtrace was obtained from a compiler built from unpatched gcc sources
produced from a gcc SVN branch with the following parameters:
SVNREV 225895
DATE 20150716
gcc_version 5.2.1
The compi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68459
Bug ID: 68459
Summary: ICE when compiling for alpha with -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
1 - 100 of 145 matches
Mail list logo