https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68454
--- Comment #1 from M Joshua Ryan ---
This is on a fresh install of cygwin64 on a new Windows 10 laptop.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68454
Bug ID: 68454
Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68453
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot
ethz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68453
Bug ID: 68453
Summary: graphite ICE: segfault
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-end
Assigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68279
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2015-11-20
--- Comment #4 from Joos
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68452
Bug ID: 68452
Summary: C front end doesn't call PLUGIN_FINISH_DECL on
CONST_DECLs
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68451
Bug ID: 68451
Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault when using
decltype with friend inside a class template
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66573
jvg1981 at aim dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvg1981 at aim dot com
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68448
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68450
Bug ID: 68450
Summary: regex matching different from ECMAScript?
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68065
--- Comment #34 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Thu, 19 Nov 2015, ch3root at openwall dot com wrote:
> What does the following mean then?
>
> C11, 4p5:
> "A strictly conforming program[...] It [...] shall not exceed any
> minimum im
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68065
--- Comment #33 from Alexander Cherepanov ---
On 2015-11-12 06:25, msebor at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68065
>
> --- Comment #31 from Martin Sebor ---
> (In reply to Alexander Cherepanov from comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68428
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68065
--- Comment #32 from Alexander Cherepanov ---
Sorry for the late reply. Decided to read DR 260 and got distracted. It
so fundamentally undermines the base of classical C that it took me some
time to grasp the scale:-)
On 2015-11-12 01:51, jose
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68335
--- Comment #4 from Sebastian Pop ---
testcase added in r230630
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68439
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68341
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68440
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68441
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68335
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68442
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68422
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Nov 19 22:29:08 2015
New Revision: 230629
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230629&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/68422
* cp-tree.h (PACK_EXPANSION_SIZEOF_P): New.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68412
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68412
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Thu Nov 19 22:04:00 2015
New Revision: 230627
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230627&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/68412
* c-typeck.c (parser_build_binary_op): Prope
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68427
--- Comment #5 from wam at hiwaay dot net ---
Created attachment 36776
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36776&action=edit
response to comment 4
Here is the stuff in reply to comment 4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68348
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68449
Bug ID: 68449
Summary: ICE in cxx_eval_constant_expression on atomic_load in
C++
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68448
--- Comment #2 from Jan Kratochvil ---
[patch] Python Pretty Printers get disabled on libstdc++ reload by GDB (PR
libstdc++/68448)
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/msg02418.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68448
--- Comment #1 from Jan Kratochvil ---
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1279406
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68448
Bug ID: 68448
Summary: Python Pretty Printers get disabled on libstdc++
reload by GDB
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68412
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||su at cs dot ucdavis.edu
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68447
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61534
--- Comment #11 from Marek Polacek ---
Np. It's certainly something I'd love to see fixed :/. Hopefully the next
stage1.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61534
--- Comment #10 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #9)
> So that's why this PR is still open.
Sure, sorry, I should have been clearer. It was mostly a note to myself so I do
not need to re-check next time I look
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61534
--- Comment #9 from Marek Polacek ---
So that's why this PR is still open.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61534
--- Comment #8 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
The last patch did not fix the original testcase nor
gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr40172-3.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68447
Bug ID: 68447
Summary: ICE with -Wall on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu in
fold_binary_loc, at fold-const.c:9085
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
{ typedef M I; };
enum Type { };
typedef Dl L;
Type t;
struct R { X1 f; };
};
With: gcc version 6.0.0 20151119 (experimental) (GCC)
t.i: In instantiation of ‘class Dl’:
t.i:8:47: required from ‘class X1’
t.i:16:20: required from here
t.i:1:30: error: TYPE_CANONICAL is not compatibl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68443
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68446
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #0)
[...]
> I ran a git bisect, it indicated that the failure of test-volatile.c was
> introduced by:
>
> commit 25faed340686df8d7bb2242dc8d04285976922b6
> Author: mar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68446
Bug ID: 68446
Summary: jit testsuite failures seen inside
dwarf2out.c:gen_producer_string
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61502
--- Comment #18 from Alexander Cherepanov ---
A bit simplified variant:
#include
int main()
{
int x, y = 1;
int *volatile v;
int *p;
v = &y;
p = v;
if (p == &x + 1) {
*p = 2;
printf("y = %d\n", y);
}
}
077t.ali
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66762
--- Comment #11 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> The attached patch fixes the problem but is, as yet, not regtested.
Confirmed and regtested without regression. Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68445
Bug ID: 68445
Summary: ICE: internal compiler error: in operator[], at vec.h
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68444
Bug ID: 68444
Summary: [libvtv] All libvtv tests fail for powerpc*-*-linux*
(undefined references)
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68443
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67868
--- Comment #11 from Bill Schmidt ---
However, I should note that although libvtv builds and installs for Power, it
fails the testsuite completely, so we are going to leave this disabled for now.
I'll open a bug report on the test failures.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68396
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Nov 19 18:25:38 2015
New Revision: 230620
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230620&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/68396
2015-11-19 Ryan Burn
* pt.c (find_parame
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68443
Bug ID: 68443
Summary: [ada] FAIL: c39006b
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: ada
Assignee: unassig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68427
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to wam from comment #3)
> comment 1: How do I go about doing that (posting preprocessed source file) ?
It's explained at the link you should have read before creating a bug:
https://gcc.gnu.org/b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68442
--- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
Detected with reversed order :
$ cat z2.f90
module m
interface gkind
procedure g
end interface
contains
integer function g()
g = 1
end
subroutine f(x)
character(kind=gk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68442
Bug ID: 68442
Summary: ICE on kind specification, depending on ordering of
functions
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68441
Bug ID: 68441
Summary: ICE on using transfer with character parameter
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68440
--- Comment #2 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
Detected :
$ cat z7.f90
subroutine s
type t
end type
class(t), allocatable :: x = t()
end
$ gfortran -g -O0 -Wall -fcheck=all z7.f90
z7.f90:4:29:
class(t), allocatable :: x = t()
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68440
--- Comment #1 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
Some variants :
$ cat z4.f90
subroutine s
type t
end type
class(t), parameter :: x = t()
end
$ gfortran -g -O0 -Wall -fcheck=all z4.f90
f951: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68440
Bug ID: 68440
Summary: ICE on declaring class variable with wrong attribute
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68439
Bug ID: 68439
Summary: ICE in
alloc_scalar_allocatable_for_subcomponent_assignment,
at fortran/trans-expr.c:6711
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.1
Status: U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66621
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67089
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68421
--- Comment #2 from acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org ---
So, looking at the dump files, at the end of tree form we have copies from the
register globals and uses of the copies only:
:
execute_data.0_4 = execute_data;
opline.1_5 = opline;
_6 =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68438
Bug ID: 68438
Summary: [6 Regression] Conditional jump or move depends on
uninitialised value in location_adhoc_data_eq
(line-map.c:89)
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46032
--- Comment #21 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to vries from comment #20)
> This patch seems to have the desired effect on the original testcase:
> ...
> diff --git a/gcc/omp-low.c b/gcc/omp-low.c
> index 830db75..996756b 100644
> --- a/gcc/om
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68392
Mikhail Maltsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46032
--- Comment #20 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This patch seems to have the desired effect on the original testcase:
...
diff --git a/gcc/omp-low.c b/gcc/omp-low.c
index 830db75..996756b 100644
--- a/gcc/omp-low.c
+++ b/gcc/omp-low.c
@@ -9361,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60736
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.9/5/6 Regression] Crash |[4.9 Regression] Crash in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67770
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.9/5/6 Regression] i386: |[4.9 Regression] i386:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67409
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68376
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.9/5/6 Regression] wrong |[4.9 Regression] wrong code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68409
--- Comment #1 from f3rn4nd0.c354r ---
I forget to specify the compilation options used:
-std=c++11 -Wall -Wextra -save-temps
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67409
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Nov 19 16:34:32 2015
New Revision: 230616
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230616&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/67409
* decl.c (identify_goto): Add LOC and DIAG_K
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68413
alahay01 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
Assignee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67868
--- Comment #10 from Bill Schmidt ---
Thanks, Ramana! I've verified that this is working ok for Power as well.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68392
Michael Matz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matz at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67409
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Nov 19 16:18:39 2015
New Revision: 230613
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230613&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/67409
* decl.c (identify_goto): Add LOC and DIAG_KI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68437
Bug ID: 68437
Summary: [concepts] fold expression, pack expansion, and
deduced constraint requirement
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68435
--- Comment #4 from Yuri Rumyantsev ---
Created attachment 36774
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36774&action=edit
tar file
tar file contains good and bad ce1-rtl dumps showing the problem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68435
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68435
--- Comment #3 from Alexander Fomin ---
This can be reproduced both for i686-*-* and x86_64-*-* hosts.
converted.
2 true changes made.
but file t21.c.209r.ce1 produced by 20151119 compiler does not
1 possible IF blocks searched.
0 IF blocks converted.
0 true changes made.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68413
--- Comment #7 from Ilya Enkovich ---
Looking deeper the difference is caused by different result of
is_nonwrapping_integer_induction called for reduction related phi statement.
For the first call it is:
i_12 = PHI
For the second call it is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68436
Bug ID: 68436
Summary: [5 Regression] wrong code on x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 5.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: mid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68413
--- Comment #6 from Ilya Enkovich ---
I checked what is happening and seems the reason is in different
STMT_VINFO_VEC_REDUCTION_TYPE (stmt_info) on analysis and transform phases.
During analysis it is INTEGER_INDUC_COND_REDUCTION, for transforma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68408
--- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Eric, thank you very much for the quick fix!
You're welcome.
> I confirm it is fixed on sparc-elf-g++ (GCC) 5.2.1 20151119.
Thanks, independent verification is always helpful.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68431
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68431
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Thu Nov 19 15:12:35 2015
New Revision: 230608
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230608&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/68431
* tree-vrp.c (extract_range_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68435
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57845
--- Comment #16 from Sergey Organov ---
I confirm it is fixed on sparc-elf-gcc (GCC) 5.2.1 20151119.
Thanks one more time!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68435
Bug ID: 68435
Summary: [6 Regression] Missed if-conversion optimization
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68408
--- Comment #7 from Sergey Organov ---
Eric, thank you very much for the quick fix!
I confirm it is fixed on sparc-elf-g++ (GCC) 5.2.1 20151119.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68401
--- Comment #8 from Joost VandeVondele
---
(In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #7)
> (In reply to Joost VandeVondele from comment #6)
> > (In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #5)
> > > (In reply to Joost VandeVondele from comment #4)
> > >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68401
--- Comment #7 from Mikael Morin ---
(In reply to Joost VandeVondele from comment #6)
> (In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #5)
> > (In reply to Joost VandeVondele from comment #4)
> > > In the original post I suggested that I already looked a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68393
--- Comment #7 from Bill Schmidt ---
Thanks, Richard!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68427
--- Comment #3 from wam at hiwaay dot net ---
comment 1: How do I go about doing that (posting preprocessed source file) ?
The tarball I uploaded just has 2 text files showing the output of my effort to
compile the code, & the code in its own tarb
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68434
Bug ID: 68434
Summary: [concepts] ICE same canonical type node for different
types
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68401
--- Comment #6 from Joost VandeVondele
---
(In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #5)
> (In reply to Joost VandeVondele from comment #4)
> > In the original post I suggested that I already looked at the code,
>
> What changes did you try?
Baby
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61313
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61313
--- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Thu Nov 19 13:32:54 2015
New Revision: 230605
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230605&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR lto/61313
* configure.ac (PLUGIN_LD_SUFFIX): Do not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68401
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61313
--- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Thu Nov 19 13:32:10 2015
New Revision: 230604
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230604&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR lto/61313
* configure.ac (PLUGIN_LD_SUFFIX): Do not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61313
--- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou ---
Author: ebotcazou
Date: Thu Nov 19 13:31:33 2015
New Revision: 230603
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230603&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR lto/61313
* configure.ac (PLUGIN_LD_SUFFIX): Do not
1 - 100 of 148 matches
Mail list logo
