[Bug libgomp/68403] FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/loop-auto-1.c -DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68403 --- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Fails with r230508 for me.

[Bug libgomp/68403] FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/loop-auto-1.c -DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68403 --- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- src/libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/loop-auto-1.c:119:9: internal compiler error: in gimplify_omp_for, at gimplify.c:8605 0xd6ff23 gimplify_omp_for src/gcc/gi

[Bug libgomp/68403] FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/loop-auto-1.c -DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68403 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libgomp/68403] New: FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/loop-auto-1.c -DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68403 Bug ID: 68403 Summary: FAIL: libgomp.oacc-c++/../libgomp.oacc-c-c++-common/loop-aut o-1.c -DACC_DEVICE_TYPE_host=1 -DACC_MEM_SHARED=1 (internal compiler error)

[Bug tree-optimization/68402] FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/split-path-1.c execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68402 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/68402] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/split-path-1.c execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68402 Bug ID: 68402 Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/split-path-1.c execution test Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/68383] Demangler stack overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68383 --- Comment #7 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- Created attachment 36749 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36749&action=edit Somewhat reduced testcase markus@x4 tmp % g++ -w -c -std=c++14 write.ii markus@x4 tmp % nm write.o | grep

[Bug c++/68158] Function attributes parsed incorrectly in C++ (while -fcilkplus)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68158 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/68401] New: improve 'Allocation would exceed memory limit'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68401 Bug ID: 68401 Summary: improve 'Allocation would exceed memory limit' Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fort

[Bug c++/68396] bug with parameter pack expansion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68396 --- Comment #1 from ryan.burn at gmail dot com --- It looks like this was caused with the commit "Handle auto parameter packs." (https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/018c146eec4143116f7f422239d56eb4047be3a4#diff-8570312acacadf34317aa24621800c0

[Bug libgcc/59412] __fixunsdfDI triggers wrong inexact exceptions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59412 --- Comment #5 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- I'm not aware of anyone working on these exceptions / rounding modes issues.

[Bug middle-end/68117] [6 Regression] error: invalid PHI argument <<< Unknown tree: >>>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68117 --- Comment #36 from Gary Funck --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #35) > Yes, I thought the cfgexpand.c place is a better one and the only one > that would be related to the place where I removed the old > redirect_edge_var_map_dest

[Bug target/68400] New: ICE in change_address_1, at emit-rtl.c:2125

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68400 Bug ID: 68400 Summary: ICE in change_address_1, at emit-rtl.c:2125 Product: gcc Version: 5.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: targe

[Bug c++/68399] New: c++11 default initialization of a large array: slow compile

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68399 Bug ID: 68399 Summary: c++11 default initialization of a large array: slow compile Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug other/42270] manual's sections are ordered counter intuitively

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42270 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sandra at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug middle-end/68393] internal compiler error: in convert_move, at expr.c:286

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68393 --- Comment #3 from Anton Blanchard --- No problems Richard! Thanks for the quick fix, it works for me.

[Bug other/46218] TARGET_PREFERRED_OUTPUT_RELOAD_CLASS is not documented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46218 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug middle-end/68393] internal compiler error: in convert_move, at expr.c:286

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68393 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirme

[Bug libgcc/59412] __fixunsdfDI triggers wrong inexact exceptions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59412 --- Comment #4 from baoshan --- (In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #3) > It's a bug in libgcc2.c for the subset of targets for which this code gets > used (note 64-bit targets will generally be using it for TImode not > DImode) *

[Bug tree-optimization/66949] [6 Regression] ICE at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in tree_ssa_phiopt_worker, at tree-ssa-phiopt.c:335

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66949 Anton Blanchard changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anton at samba dot org --- Comment #3

[Bug libgcc/59412] __fixunsdfDI triggers wrong inexact exceptions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59412 --- Comment #3 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- It's a bug in libgcc2.c for the subset of targets for which this code gets used (note 64-bit targets will generally be using it for TImode not DImode) *and* which have hardware exceptions.

[Bug libgcc/59412] __fixunsdfDI triggers wrong inexact exceptions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59412 --- Comment #2 from baoshan --- Why this has been unconfirmed for so long time? Can someone tell us if this is a bug in libgcc2.c or not? Thanks.

[Bug middle-end/68392] ICE: SIGSEGV in update_uses (fwprop.c:896) with -fno-checking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68392 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/68373] autopar fails on loop exit phi with argument defined outside loop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68373 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch Status|UNCON

[Bug tree-optimization/68398] New: coremark regression due to r229685

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68398 Bug ID: 68398 Summary: coremark regression due to r229685 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimiz

[Bug libstdc++/68397] New: std::tr1::expint fails in __expint_En_cont_frac for some long double arguments due to low __max_iter value

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68397 Bug ID: 68397 Summary: std::tr1::expint fails in __expint_En_cont_frac for some long double arguments due to low __max_iter value Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UN

[Bug c++/68396] New: bug with parameter pack expansion

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68396 Bug ID: 68396 Summary: bug with parameter pack expansion Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Ass

[Bug bootstrap/68346] [6 Regression] Bootstrap failure on i686-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68346 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Tue Nov 17 21:49:23 2015 New Revision: 230508 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230508&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR bootstrap/68346 * typeck.c (build_static_cast_1): Forc

[Bug c++/68395] [concepts] segfault in valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68395 --- Comment #1 from ryan.burn at gmail dot com --- Created attachment 36745 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36745&action=edit preprocessed code

[Bug c++/68395] New: [concepts] segfault in valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68395 Bug ID: 68395 Summary: [concepts] segfault in valid code Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Ass

[Bug c++/68394] New: [concepts] segfault in valid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68394 Bug ID: 68394 Summary: [concepts] segfault in valid code Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Ass

[Bug middle-end/48254] documentation minor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48254 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/66785] internal compiler error in record_operand_use

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66785 Bernd Schmidt changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernds at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5

[Bug middle-end/68393] internal compiler error: in convert_move, at expr.c:286

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68393 Anton Blanchard changed: What|Removed |Added CC||richard.guenther at gmail dot com,

[Bug middle-end/68392] ICE: SIGSEGV in update_uses (fwprop.c:896) with -fno-checking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68392 Mikhail Maltsev changed: What|Removed |Added CC||miyuki at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/66785] internal compiler error in record_operand_use

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66785 --- Comment #4 from Bernd Schmidt --- Author: bernds Date: Tue Nov 17 21:20:20 2015 New Revision: 230499 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230499&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/66785 * regrename.c (record_operand_use): Keep

[Bug middle-end/68393] New: internal compiler error: in convert_move, at expr.c:286

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68393 Bug ID: 68393 Summary: internal compiler error: in convert_move, at expr.c:286 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority

[Bug c/48568] Missing documentation for __attribute__((visibility ("protected"))) on variables.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48568 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c/48568] Missing documentation for __attribute__((visibility ("protected"))) on variables.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48568 --- Comment #1 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: sandra Date: Tue Nov 17 21:07:15 2015 New Revision: 230498 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230498&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-11-17 Sandra Loosemore PR 48568 * doc

[Bug libstdc++/66059] make_integer_sequence should use a log(N) implementation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66059 --- Comment #8 from Daniel Frey --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #7) > (In reply to Daniel Frey from comment #3) > > A better O(log N) library-only solution than the linked one is available at > > https://github.com/taocpp/sequences/

[Bug middle-end/68392] ICE: SIGSEGV in update_uses (fwprop.c:896) with -fno-checking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68392 --- Comment #1 from Zdenek Sojka --- $ aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=/mnt/svn/gcc-trunk/binary-230409-checking-yes-rtl-df-nographite-aarch64/bin/aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/mnt/svn/gcc-t

[Bug middle-end/68392] New: ICE: SIGSEGV in update_uses (fwprop.c:896) with -fno-checking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68392 Bug ID: 68392 Summary: ICE: SIGSEGV in update_uses (fwprop.c:896) with -fno-checking Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug c++/68391] New: -Wsuggest-override does not work on Item 12 of Effective Modern C++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68391 Bug ID: 68391 Summary: -Wsuggest-override does not work on Item 12 of Effective Modern C++ Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/66059] make_integer_sequence should use a log(N) implementation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66059 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Daniel Frey from comment #3) > A better O(log N) library-only solution than the linked one is available at > https://github.com/taocpp/sequences/blob/master/include/tao/seq/ > make_integer_sequ

[Bug libstdc++/66059] make_integer_sequence should use a log(N) implementation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66059 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- Fixed on trunk

[Bug libstdc++/66059] make_integer_sequence should use a log(N) implementation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66059 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Tue Nov 17 19:54:33 2015 New Revision: 230496 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230496&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR libstdc++/66059 optimise _Build_index_tuple PR libstdc++/6605

[Bug target/68390] New: Incorrect code due to indirect tail call of varargs function with hard float ABI

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68390 Bug ID: 68390 Summary: Incorrect code due to indirect tail call of varargs function with hard float ABI Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug fortran/59910] ICE in gfc_conv_array_initializer, at fortran/trans-array.c:5327

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59910 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/68389] internal compiler error: in tree_low_cst, at tree.h:4431

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68389 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/68389] New: internal compiler error: in tree_low_cst, at tree.h:4431

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68389 Bug ID: 68389 Summary: internal compiler error: in tree_low_cst, at tree.h:4431 Product: gcc Version: 4.7.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug target/53587] [manual] Option -mms-bitfields not documented

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53587 sandra at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|-

[Bug bootstrap/68361] [6 regression] Bootstrap failure with --enable-checking=release

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68361 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Tue Nov 17 18:16:29 2015 New Revision: 230470 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230470&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR bootstrap/68361 * cvt.c (cp_convert_and_check): Use wa

[Bug bootstrap/68346] [6 Regression] Bootstrap failure on i686-linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68346 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Tue Nov 17 18:16:35 2015 New Revision: 230471 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230471&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR bootstrap/68346 * c-common.c (warn_tautological_cmp):

[Bug c++/68308] [6 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected integer_cst, have var_decl in decompose, at tree.h:5105

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68308 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/68308] [6 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected integer_cst, have var_decl in decompose, at tree.h:5105

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68308 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- Author: msebor Date: Tue Nov 17 18:09:36 2015 New Revision: 230468 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230468&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/68308 - [6 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected integer_cst, have

[Bug other/56036] Wrong indentation in multiple -O options explaination

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56036 --- Comment #4 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: sandra Date: Tue Nov 17 18:06:01 2015 New Revision: 230467 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230467&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-11-17 Sandra Loosemore PR target/56036

[Bug lto/68384] LTO error for global register variables in PHP 7 compiling on powerpc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68384 --- Comment #5 from acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org --- The partitioning seems to be involved. If you add -flto-partition=max, you can get past the global register error. However 230270 that I've been using for testing then hits a recursive inlining e

[Bug sanitizer/64820] Libsanitizer fails with ((AddrIsAlignedByGranularity(addr + size))) != (0)" (0x0, 0x0) if ssp is enabled.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64820 --- Comment #8 from joakim.tjernlund at transmode dot se --- As stack protector is default in gcc, I don't think it is specific. I did bite me on ppc with only -fsanitize=address and ASAN_OPTIONS=detect_stack_use_after_return=1

[Bug libstdc++/65329] [C++14] constexpr complex::real(), imag() are non-const

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65329 Elias Pipping changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pipping at exherbo dot org --- Comment #

[Bug sanitizer/64820] Libsanitizer fails with ((AddrIsAlignedByGranularity(addr + size))) != (0)" (0x0, 0x0) if ssp is enabled.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64820 --- Comment #7 from Maxim Ostapenko --- (In reply to joakim.tjernl...@transmode.se from comment #6) > Is this fix in gcc 4.9.3? No, this didn't go to GCC 4.9, only to GCC 5. > If not, will go into 4.9.4? Well, actually we didn't plan backport

[Bug c++/68388] New: incomplete type bug when using decltype

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68388 Bug ID: 68388 Summary: incomplete type bug when using decltype Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug tree-optimization/68317] [6 regression] ice in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:380

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68317 --- Comment #6 from Jiong Wang --- Created attachment 36741 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36741&action=edit prototype-fix (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3) > (gdb) p debug_generic_expr (max) > 4294443008(OVF) >

[Bug fortran/65751] Bogus &L in error message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65751 --- Comment #6 from dominiq at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: dominiq Date: Tue Nov 17 16:29:45 2015 New Revision: 230465 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230465&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-11-17 Dominique d'Humieres PR fortran/65751

[Bug sanitizer/64820] Libsanitizer fails with ((AddrIsAlignedByGranularity(addr + size))) != (0)" (0x0, 0x0) if ssp is enabled.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64820 joakim.tjernlund at transmode dot se changed: What|Removed |Added CC||joakim.tjernlund@

[Bug c++/68386] error: invalid initialization of reference of type 'void (&&)()' from expression of type 'void()'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68386 Johannes Schaub changed: What|Removed |Added CC||schaub.johannes@googlemail.

[Bug lto/68384] LTO error for global register variables in PHP 7 compiling on powerpc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68384 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- First off it seems wrong PHP is using global registers. But anyways the problem looks related to partitioning.

[Bug c++/68387] New: [c++1z] gcc hangs forever on this code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68387 Bug ID: 68387 Summary: [c++1z] gcc hangs forever on this code Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/68383] Demangler stack overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68383 --- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- It compiles with 4.9.3. I'm currently reducing the testcase...

[Bug c/68162] [5/6 Regression] Incompatible pointer type using a typedef

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68162 --- Comment #12 from Joseph S. Myers --- Could you post your dwarf2out.c patch to gcc-patches for review?

[Bug c++/68308] [6 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected integer_cst, have var_decl in decompose, at tree.h:5105

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68308 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug middle-end/67438] [6 Regression] ~X op ~Y pattern relocation causes loop performance degradation on 32bit x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67438 --- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 17 Nov 2015, ysrumyan at gmail dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67438 > > --- Comment #9 from Yuri Rumyantsev --- > It looks like such transformation is pro

[Bug c++/68383] Demangler stack overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68383 --- Comment #5 from Ian Lance Taylor --- Thanks for the test case. Which version of GCC are you using to compile? When I try to compile the test case I get /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/4.9.3/include/avx512fintrin.h: In function ‘__m512i _m

[Bug fortran/68382] Linux Binary Download page broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68382 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/68381] [6 Regression] wrong code and quality regression with __builtin_mul_overflow() @ aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68381 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org -

[Bug middle-end/68117] [6 Regression] error: invalid PHI argument <<< Unknown tree: >>>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68117 --- Comment #35 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Tue, 17 Nov 2015, gary at intrepid dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68117 > > --- Comment #34 from Gary Funck --- > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #33)

[Bug target/68293] [6 Regression] ICE: in prepare_cmp_insn, at optabs.c:3813 with vector compare with -O0 @ aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68293 Ilya Enkovich changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/68305] [6 regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu: tree check: expected class ‘expression’, have ‘exceptional’ (ssa_name) in tree_operand_check, at tree.h:3436

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68305 Ilya Enkovich changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/68134] [6 Regression] float64x1_t comparison ICE on aarch64-none-elf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68134 Ilya Enkovich changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/68381] [6 Regression] wrong code and quality regression with __builtin_mul_overflow() @ aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68381 --- Comment #2 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to ktkachov from comment #1) > Confirmed. Started with the combine change @ r230326. The wrong-code part, I should say. I didn't look at the code quality regression yet

[Bug c++/68383] Demangler stack overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68383 --- Comment #4 from fiesh at zefix dot tv --- I added a preprocessed file that triggers the bug. It was created using g++ -I. -std=c++14 -E -o write.ii write.cpp and can be compiled and linked using g++ -std=c++14 -o write write.ii This binar

[Bug c++/68383] Demangler stack overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68383 --- Comment #3 from fiesh at zefix dot tv --- Created attachment 36739 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36739&action=edit Preprocessed c++ file

[Bug bootstrap/68361] [6 regression] Bootstrap failure with --enable-checking=release

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68361 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/68386] New: error: invalid initialization of reference of type 'void (&&)()' from expression of type 'void()'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68386 Bug ID: 68386 Summary: error: invalid initialization of reference of type 'void (&&)()' from expression of type 'void()' Product: gcc Version: 5.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/67438] [6 Regression] ~X op ~Y pattern relocation causes loop performance degradation on 32bit x86

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67438 --- Comment #9 from Yuri Rumyantsev --- It looks like such transformation is profitable if only def statements have a single use, i.e. it looks reasonable for if (255 - a) > (255 -b) /* a,b have char type. */ but it does not look reasonable

[Bug c/68385] New: ICE building libstdc++ on arm-none-eabi

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68385 Bug ID: 68385 Summary: ICE building libstdc++ on arm-none-eabi Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug middle-end/68117] [6 Regression] error: invalid PHI argument <<< Unknown tree: >>>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68117 --- Comment #34 from Gary Funck --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #33) > Can you try the patch attached to comment #29? That seemed to fix the issue in 32/libgfortran, though I haven't tried a build from scratch yet. Regarding the pa

[Bug lto/68384] LTO error for global register variables in PHP 7 compiling on powerpc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68384 --- Comment #3 from acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 36737 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36737&action=edit main.i

[Bug rtl-optimization/68381] [6 Regression] wrong code and quality regression with __builtin_mul_overflow() @ aarch64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68381 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/68384] LTO error for global register variables in PHP 7 compiling on powerpc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68384 --- Comment #1 from acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 36735 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36735&action=edit zend_execute.i

[Bug lto/68384] LTO error for global register variables in PHP 7 compiling on powerpc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68384 --- Comment #2 from acsawdey at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 36736 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36736&action=edit php_cli.i

[Bug lto/68384] New: LTO error for global register variables in PHP 7 compiling on powerpc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68384 Bug ID: 68384 Summary: LTO error for global register variables in PHP 7 compiling on powerpc64le Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug rtl-optimization/68328] [4.9/5/6 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68328 --- Comment #8 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- The above testcase should be adjusted a bit for targets that have different char signedness than x86: int a, b, c = 1, d = 1, e; __attribute__((noinline, noclone)) int foo (void) { asm volatil

[Bug c++/68383] Demangler stack overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68383 --- Comment #2 from fiesh at zefix dot tv --- g++ 4.9.3, I do have the source code and will try to provide a minimal test case.

[Bug c++/68383] Demangler stack overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68383 --- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- @fi...@zefix.tv Ian asks: »Was the symbol _ZSt7forwardIRKZN5Write14DataMapGrammarISt20back_insert_iteratorISsEEC4EvEUlRT_E_EOS5_RNSt16remove_referenceIS5_E4typeE generated by g++ or clang? That is, is

[Bug other/61321] demangler crash on casts in template parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61321 --- Comment #14 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- It was first reported in PR68159. I've opened PR68383 for the issue. The reporter is CCed in PR68383, so please ask him there directly.

[Bug other/61321] demangler crash on casts in template parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61321 --- Comment #13 from Ian Lance Taylor --- Was the symbol from comment #12, _ZSt7forwardIRKZN5Write14DataMapGrammarISt20back_insert_iteratorISsEEC4EvEUlRT_E_EOS5_RNSt16remove_referenceIS5_E4typeE, generated by g++ or clang? That is, is it suppose

[Bug middle-end/68134] [6 Regression] float64x1_t comparison ICE on aarch64-none-elf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68134 --- Comment #5 from Ilya Enkovich --- Author: ienkovich Date: Tue Nov 17 13:22:40 2015 New Revision: 230463 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230463&root=gcc&view=rev Log: gcc/ PR middle-end/68134 * targhooks.c (default_get_m

[Bug target/68143] [5/6 Regression][ARM] Wrong code initialising struct member after zeroing out the whole struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68143 --- Comment #3 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: ktkachov Date: Tue Nov 17 13:20:08 2015 New Revision: 230462 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230462&root=gcc&view=rev Log: [ARM] PR 68143 Properly update memory offsets when expandi

[Bug c++/68383] New: Demangler stack overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68383 Bug ID: 68383 Summary: Demangler stack overflow Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assignee: un

[Bug other/61321] demangler crash on casts in template parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61321 --- Comment #12 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- _ZSt7forwardIRKZN5Write14DataMapGrammarISt20back_insert_iteratorISsEEC4EvEUlRT_E_EOS5_RNSt16remove_referenceIS5_E4typeE still recurses endless, even with your patch applied.

  1   2   >