[Bug middle-end/67239] [6 Regression] FAIL: 23_containers/unordered_set/insert/hash_policy.cc execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67239 --- Comment #15 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On November 14, 2015 12:09:28 AM GMT+01:00, "hjl.tools at gmail dot com" wrote: >https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67239 > >--- Comment #14 from H.J. Lu --- >(In reply to Richard Bien

[Bug rtl-optimization/68185] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (in 64-bit mode)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68185 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Preud'homme --- Things start to go awry in the get_defs called at the end of make_defs_and_copies_lists for conditional move in ree.c. ree correctly detect that insn 308 is a conditional move and do the transitive closu

[Bug target/66785] internal compiler error in record_operand_use

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66785 --- Comment #3 from Jim Wilson --- Created attachment 36705 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36705&action=edit untested patch that may be wasting memory

[Bug target/66785] internal compiler error in record_operand_use

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66785 Jim Wilson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wilson at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 fr

[Bug tree-optimization/68343] FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/fuse-{1,2}.c scan-tree-dumps

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68343 --- Comment #6 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Sebastian Pop from comment #5) > You need ISL 0.15 to have these tests pass. > Could you please report which ISL version you configured gcc with? isl-0.14

[Bug tree-optimization/68343] FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/fuse-{1,2}.c scan-tree-dumps

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68343 Sebastian Pop changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |spop at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug middle-end/67239] [6 Regression] FAIL: 23_containers/unordered_set/insert/hash_policy.cc execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67239 --- Comment #14 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #13) > > Can you check whether disabling PRE fixes the runtime failure? > -O1: OK. -O1 -finline-small-functions: Bad. -O1 -fno-tree-fre -finline-small-functions: Bad.

[Bug target/63304] Aarch64 pc-relative load offset out of range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63304 --- Comment #37 from Evandro --- Here's what I had in mind: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-11/msg01787.html Feedback is welcome.

[Bug tree-optimization/68343] FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/fuse-{1,2}.c scan-tree-dumps

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68343 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||spop at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug c/68344] New: No warning for old-style function declarations.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68344 Bug ID: 68344 Summary: No warning for old-style function declarations. Product: gcc Version: 5.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug tree-optimization/68343] FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/fuse-{1,2}.c scan-tree-dumps

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68343 --- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- Hmm, before r230190 (add testsuite automatic dg-options and dg-do action for isl-ast-gen-* and fuse-* files) I have one FAIL, but two UNRESOLVED: ... PASS: gcc.dg/graphite/fuse-1.c (test for excess

[Bug fortran/68319] ICE on using interface with included entry

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68319 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--

[Bug fortran/68319] ICE on using interface with included entry

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68319 --- Comment #9 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Fri Nov 13 21:28:10 2015 New Revision: 230352 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230352&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-11-13 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/68319

[Bug tree-optimization/68343] FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/fuse-{1,2}.c scan-tree-dumps

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68343 --- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org --- This failure is introduced here: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-regression/2015-11/msg00186.html : ... FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/fuse-1.c scan-tree-dump-times forwprop4 "gimple_simplified to[^\\n]*\\^ 12" 1

[Bug tree-optimization/68343] FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/fuse-{1,2}.c scan-tree-dumps

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68343 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/68319] ICE on using interface with included entry

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68319 --- Comment #8 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: kargl Date: Fri Nov 13 21:11:42 2015 New Revision: 230351 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230351&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-11-13 Steven G. Kargl PR fortran/68319

[Bug tree-optimization/68343] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/fuse-{1,2}.c scan

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68343 Bug ID: 68343 Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/fuse-{1,2}.c scan Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimi

[Bug tree-optimization/68341] FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/interchange-{1,11,13}.c (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68341 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/67803] ICE on concatenating wrong character array constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67803 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/68342] New: Unexpected expansion pattern contains no argument packs error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68342 Bug ID: 68342 Summary: Unexpected expansion pattern contains no argument packs error Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug tree-optimization/68341] New: FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/interchange-{1,11,13}.c (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68341 Bug ID: 68341 Summary: FAIL: gcc.dg/graphite/interchange-{1,11,13}.c (internal compiler error) Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/68237] ICE on invalid with submodules

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68237 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug rtl-optimization/68340] New: Inner-nested constant-bounded loop not recognized as constant-bounded during loop unrolling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68340 Bug ID: 68340 Summary: Inner-nested constant-bounded loop not recognized as constant-bounded during loop unrolling Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/68339] New: g++.dg/vect/simd-clone-2.cc ICEs with aggressive GC settings and OpenMP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68339 Bug ID: 68339 Summary: g++.dg/vect/simd-clone-2.cc ICEs with aggressive GC settings and OpenMP Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/63517] bogus Wreturn-type warning after error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63517 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug sanitizer/68338] tsan report error about c++11 static local initialize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68338 Dmitry Vyukov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||dvyukov at google dot com --- Comment #3

[Bug sanitizer/68338] tsan report error about c++11 static local initialize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68338 --- Comment #2 from Evgeniy Dushistov --- The problem as I understand assembler in check that find out is static variable initialized, clang emit this: callq 45bdb0 <__tsan_atomic8_load> while gcc emit callq 401260 <__tsan_read1@plt>

[Bug c/67629] bogus -Wreturn-type in a function with tautological if-else

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67629 --- Comment #1 from Martin Sebor --- See also bug 68336, which may be a possible duplicate of this one.

[Bug middle-end/68336] False positive Wreturn-type warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68336 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug sanitizer/68338] tsan report error about c++11 static local initialize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68338 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |5.2.0 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wak

[Bug libstdc++/58393] Please relax feature check for std::to_string and std::sto* for uClibc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58393 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/61580] stoi function unknown on W7/Cygwin/x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61580 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/68338] New: tsan report error about c++11 static local initialize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68338 Bug ID: 68338 Summary: tsan report error about c++11 static local initialize Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Comp

[Bug rtl-optimization/68330] [6 Regression]: FAIL: gcc.target/alpha/pr42269-1.c scan-assembler-not addl on alpha-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68330 --- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #2) > Hrm, I don't think your analysis is entirely correct yet -- you say > with the old compiler insn 19 is removed, but that sets reg 73 which > is still used in i

[Bug tree-optimization/68198] [6 Regression]Excessive code size, compile time and memory usage bloat due to FSM threading in 453.povray

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68198 --- Comment #8 from Jeffrey A. Law --- Creating a forwarder outside the path doesn't help since you still have to have an edge to the forwarder from each copy of the block with the SWITCH_EXPR. The solution is to realize that a path containing

[Bug rtl-optimization/68330] [6 Regression]: FAIL: gcc.target/alpha/pr42269-1.c scan-assembler-not addl on alpha-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68330 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |segher at gcc dot gnu.org -

[Bug tree-optimization/68060] [6 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in vect_get_vec_def_for_operand, at tree-vect-stmts.c:1413

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68060 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c/68337] New: [MPX] memcpy() for arrays with function pointers results in huge resource usage and binaries

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68337 Bug ID: 68337 Summary: [MPX] memcpy() for arrays with function pointers results in huge resource usage and binaries Product: gcc Version: 5.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/68319] ICE on using interface with included entry

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68319 --- Comment #7 from Steve Kargl --- On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 04:08:05PM +, sgk at troutmask dot apl.washington.edu wrote: > --- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl --- > On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 12:42:16AM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > >

[Bug rtl-optimization/68330] [6 Regression]: FAIL: gcc.target/alpha/pr42269-1.c scan-assembler-not addl on alpha-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68330 --- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #0) > Revision r230164 [1] regressed: > > FAIL: gcc.target/alpha/pr42269-1.c scan-assembler-not addl > > on alpha-linux-gnu. > > The difference starts in combine, where

[Bug fortran/68319] ICE on using interface with included entry

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68319 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |kargl at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/68319] ICE on using interface with included entry

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68319 --- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl --- On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 12:42:16AM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > It seems that gfortran is missing a check for ENTRY. F2008 has > > C1206 (R1205) An interface-body shall not contain a data-stmt,

[Bug tree-optimization/68317] [6 regression] ice in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:380

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68317 Jiong Wang changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #5 fr

[Bug middle-end/68336] False positive Wreturn-type warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68336 --- Comment #1 from Yichao Yu --- Ref clang bug report https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=25521

[Bug tree-optimization/68317] [6 regression] ice in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:380

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68317 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/68336] New: False positive Wreturn-type warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68336 Bug ID: 68336 Summary: False positive Wreturn-type warning Product: gcc Version: 5.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-end

[Bug middle-end/68117] [6 Regression] error: invalid PHI argument <<< Unknown tree: >>>

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68117 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/68319] ICE on using interface with included entry

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68319 --- Comment #4 from Dominique d'Humieres --- > In fact, gfortran is not issues an error for data-stmt, format-stmt, > or stmt-function-stmt. Confirmed: the following test compiles module m interface subroutine s entry e i

[Bug tree-optimization/68327] [6 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in vect_is_simple_use, at tree-vect-stmts.c:8562

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68327 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ienkovich at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug libstdc++/68323] chrono reference to ‘literals’ namespace is ambiguous when using gnu-versioned-namespace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68323 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/65837] [arm-linux-gnueabihf] lto1 target specific builtin not available

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65837 --- Comment #30 from chrbr at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: chrbr Date: Fri Nov 13 15:19:19 2015 New Revision: 230327 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230327&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-11-13 Christian Bruel PR target/65837

[Bug rtl-optimization/68194] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68194 ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee

[Bug fortran/68319] ICE on using interface with included entry

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68319 --- Comment #3 from Steve Kargl --- On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 12:42:16AM +, kargl at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > --- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- > It seems that gfortran is missing a check for ENTRY. F2008 has > > C1206 (R1205)

[Bug tree-optimization/68264] tree-call-cdce wrongly uses ordered comparisons

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68264 rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolutio

[Bug target/64358] Wrong code for __int128 operations in powerpc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64358 Pat Haugen changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/58393] Please relax feature check for std::to_string and std::sto* for uClibc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58393 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Fri Nov 13 14:51:25 2015 New Revision: 230324 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230324&root=gcc&view=rev Log: More fine-grained autoconf checks for C99 library 2015-11-13 Jennifer Y

[Bug libstdc++/61580] stoi function unknown on W7/Cygwin/x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61580 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Fri Nov 13 14:51:25 2015 New Revision: 230324 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230324&root=gcc&view=rev Log: More fine-grained autoconf checks for C99 library 2015-11-13 Jennifer Y

[Bug tree-optimization/68264] tree-call-cdce wrongly uses ordered comparisons

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68264 --- Comment #2 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: rsandifo Date: Fri Nov 13 14:43:38 2015 New Revision: 230323 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230323&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR68264: Use unordered comparisons for tree-call-cdce.c

[Bug c/68320] internal compiler error: in declspecs_add_type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68320 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/68320] internal compiler error: in declspecs_add_type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68320 --- Comment #1 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Fri Nov 13 14:05:59 2015 New Revision: 230322 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230322&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c/68320 * c-parser.c (c_parser_for_statement): Treat

[Bug other/68247] Remove pass_first_instance

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68247 vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #3 from vrie

[Bug c/68334] combination of weak and noreturn attributes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68334 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug middle-end/68335] ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have real_cst in add_phi_arg_for_new_expr, at sese.c:1373

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68335 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/68334] combination of weak and noreturn attributes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68334 --- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- I don't see any difference between declaring the function noreturn (or pure, or const, or returning non-aliased memory like malloc, or ...) and declaring it to have a certain type. In both

[Bug middle-end/68335] ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have real_cst in add_phi_arg_for_new_expr, at sese.c:1373

||.ch, spop at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1 from Joost VandeVondele --- graphite ICE trying to collect some timing data.. gcc version 6.0.0 20151113 (experimental) [trunk revision 230282] (GCC)

[Bug middle-end/68335] New: ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have real_cst in add_phi_arg_for_new_expr, at sese.c:1373

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68335 Bug ID: 68335 Summary: ICE: tree check: expected ssa_name, have real_cst in add_phi_arg_for_new_expr, at sese.c:1373 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/68321] [5/6 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (in 64-bit mode)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68321 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- So in fact started with r211725.

[Bug rtl-optimization/68321] [5/6 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (in 64-bit mode)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68321 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- I'll try bisecting with --param allow-store-data-races=0.

[Bug rtl-optimization/68321] [5/6 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (in 64-bit mode)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68321 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/52277] spell corrector for misspelled identifiers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52277 --- Comment #3 from David Malcolm --- Implementation of Levenshtein distance (in C++) committed to trunk as r230285; currently we offer hints for misspelled command-line options (PR 67613), and in the C FE for misspelled fields. There's plenty m

[Bug fortran/47266] Optimization: Declare PRIVATE module procedures as "TREE_PUBLIC = 0" ("static function")

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47266 --- Comment #9 from Mikael Morin --- (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #8) > In comment 6 > > * gfortran.dg/warn_unused_function_2.f90: New test. > > should be > > * gfortran.dg/module_private_2.f90: New test. > > The

[Bug c/68334] New: combination of weak and noreturn attributes

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68334 Bug ID: 68334 Summary: combination of weak and noreturn attributes Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug ipa/68311] gcc/ipa-icf.c:3041: possible sequence point error ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68311 --- Comment #8 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Fri Nov 13 12:39:00 2015 New Revision: 230313 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230313&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Enhance Changelog entry related to PR ipa/68311. Modified: trunk/gcc/

[Bug ipa/68311] gcc/ipa-icf.c:3041: possible sequence point error ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68311 --- Comment #7 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #6) > (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #5) > > Fixed. > > Except that the Changelog doesn't describe the patch :). Enhanced in r230313 :) Martin

[Bug ipa/68311] gcc/ipa-icf.c:3041: possible sequence point error ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68311 --- Comment #6 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #5) > Fixed. Except that the Changelog doesn't describe the patch :).

[Bug ipa/68311] gcc/ipa-icf.c:3041: possible sequence point error ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68311 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/68311] gcc/ipa-icf.c:3041: possible sequence point error ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68311 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- Author: marxin Date: Fri Nov 13 12:26:23 2015 New Revision: 230311 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230311&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Fix PR ipa/68311 PR ipa/68311 * ipa-icf.c (sem_item_optim

[Bug tree-optimization/68306] [6 Regression] ICE: in vectorizable_store, at tree-vect-stmts.c:5651

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68306 --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener --- Author: rguenth Date: Fri Nov 13 12:14:57 2015 New Revision: 230310 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=230310&root=gcc&view=rev Log: 2015-11-13 Richard Biener PR tree-optimization/68306

[Bug middle-end/67239] [6 Regression] FAIL: 23_containers/unordered_set/insert/hash_policy.cc execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67239 --- Comment #13 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #4) > + /* If that didn't simplify to a constant see if we have recorded > + temporary expressions from taken edges. */ > + if (!val || TREE_CODE (val

[Bug tree-optimization/68333] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/slp-multitypes-4.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68333 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/68295] internal compiler error / segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68295 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Maier-Komor --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3) > Works for me on x86_64-linux. Yes - it seems to be cygwin specific...

[Bug tree-optimization/68333] New: [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/slp-multitypes-4.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68333 Bug ID: 68333 Summary: [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/vect/slp-multitypes-4.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects scan-tree-dump-times vect "vectorized 1 loops" 1 Product: gcc

[Bug middle-end/67239] [6 Regression] FAIL: 23_containers/unordered_set/insert/hash_policy.cc execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67239 --- Comment #12 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #11) > Can you attach preprocessed source for x32? Ah, it's in the tar file.

[Bug middle-end/67239] [6 Regression] FAIL: 23_containers/unordered_set/insert/hash_policy.cc execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67239 --- Comment #11 from Richard Biener --- Can you attach preprocessed source for x32?

[Bug middle-end/67790] [6 Regression] verify_ssa failed: definition in block 20 follows the use

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67790 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- The issue here is that /* If we detected "res -= x[i]" earlier, rewrite it into "res += -x[i]" now. If this turns out to be useless reassoc will clean it up again. */ if (orig_code == MINUS_

[Bug driver/67613] spell suggestions for misspelled command line options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67613 --- Comment #4 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- This is awesome! Great job. Do not forget to mention all your awesome work in https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-6/changes.html Some people think GCC is dead, and it is far from it. Let them know!

[Bug target/68332] [6 Regression] ICE: in rs6000_is_valid_mask, at config/rs6000/rs6000.c:17052 with __sync_and_and_fetch() @ powerpc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68332 --- Comment #1 from Zdenek Sojka --- Statistics for other variants: 4 internal compiler error: RTL check: expected code 'const_int', have 'mem' in rs6000_is_valid_mask, at config/rs6000/rs6000.c:17052 4 internal compiler error: RTL

[Bug fortran/36854] [meta-bug] fortran front-end optimization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36854 Bug 36854 depends on bug 47266, which changed state. Bug 47266 Summary: Optimization: Declare PRIVATE module procedures as "TREE_PUBLIC = 0" ("static function") https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47266 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/47266] Optimization: Declare PRIVATE module procedures as "TREE_PUBLIC = 0" ("static function")

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47266 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/68332] [6 Regression] ICE: in rs6000_is_valid_mask, at config/rs6000/rs6000.c:17052 with __sync_and_and_fetch() @ powerpc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68332 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug tree-optimization/68315] ivdep has no effect in parloops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68315 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- Yes. The easiest way would be to make tree-data-ref.c use it I suppose.

[Bug rtl-optimization/68321] [5/6 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu (in 64-bit mode)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68321 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug tree-optimization/68306] [6 Regression] ICE: in vectorizable_store, at tree-vect-stmts.c:5651

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68306 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||su at cs dot ucdavis.edu --- Comment #9

[Bug tree-optimization/68324] [6 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68324 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/68317] [6 regression] ice in set_value_range, at tree-vrp.c:380

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68317 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener

[Bug tree-optimization/68327] [6 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in vect_is_simple_use, at tree-vect-stmts.c:8562

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68327 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/68198] [6 Regression]Excessive code size, compile time and memory usage bloat due to FSM threading in 453.povray

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68198 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #6) > Fixing ought to be fairly easy... Create a forwarder block outside of the path?

[Bug rtl-optimization/68328] [4.9/5/6 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68328 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||4.8.5 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/68295] internal compiler error / segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68295 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-cygwin Host|

[Bug target/68332] New: [6 Regression] ICE: in rs6000_is_valid_mask, at config/rs6000/rs6000.c:17052 with __sync_and_and_fetch() @ powerpc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68332 Bug ID: 68332 Summary: [6 Regression] ICE: in rs6000_is_valid_mask, at config/rs6000/rs6000.c:17052 with __sync_and_and_fetch() @ powerpc Product: gcc Version: 6.

  1   2   >