https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60976
--- Comment #25 from Jonathan Wakely ---
There was a G++ bug (now fixed) that made void_t not work, try this alternative
version:
template< class... > struct __voider { using type = void; };
template< class... _T0toN > using __void_t = typename
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68039
Bug ID: 68039
Summary: Incorrect unused-result warning
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60976
--- Comment #24 from Giuseppe Ottaviano ---
> No, only on trunk. It depends on the additions in r225242, so to use the new
> alloc_traits.h you would only need the new code in
> https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc/trunk/libstdc%2B%2B-v3/include/std/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67999
--- Comment #20 from Daniel Micay ---
> I think several issues are mixed:
A conforming C implementation requires either fixing both the compiler and libc
functions to handle > PTRDIFF_MAX objects or preventing them from being
allocated via stand
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68038
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68038
Bug ID: 68038
Summary: "Internal compiler error: Killed: program cc1" should
read "Virtual memory exhausted"
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68037
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66583
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Wed Oct 21 02:24:08 2015
New Revision: 229108
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229108&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/66583
* init.c (innermost_aggr_scope): New.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67999
--- Comment #19 from Alexander Cherepanov ---
(In reply to Daniel Micay from comment #5)
> Objects larger than PTRDIFF_MAX are forbidden with musl (malloc, mmap and
> friends report ENOMEM and it's explicitly undefined to create them in
> another
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67999
--- Comment #18 from Alexander Cherepanov ---
I guess nobody doubts that the current situation in gcc+glibc (and clang+glibc)
should be fixed as valid programs are miscompiled. And it's easy to imagine
security consequences of this when buffers h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66583
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57957
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67443
--- Comment #20 from Dominik Vogt ---
Created attachment 36553
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36553&action=edit
Dejagnu test case for s390/s390x.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67443
--- Comment #19 from Dominik Vogt ---
This is a cleaner test case for s390/s390x. If there was a way to tell gcc
"all registers except the first three argument registers are not available",
the test should be fairly easy to convert to other targ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68032
ge...@schorsch-tech.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
11
popq%rbp
leaq-16(%r13), %rsp
.cfi_def_cfa 7, 16
popq%r13
.cfi_def_cfa_offset 8
iret
.L5:
.cfi_restore_state
callabort
.cfi_endproc
.LFE0:
.size fn, .-fn
.comm ip,8,8
.comm error,8,8
++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 6.0.0 20151020 (experimental) [trunk revision 229078] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk -O1 -c small.c
$ gcc-5.2 -Os -c small.c
$
$ gcc-trunk -Os -c small.c
small.c: In function ‘fn1’:
small.c:4:1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
fn1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47235
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49565
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56626
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55179
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57360
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68035
Bug ID: 68035
Summary: ipa performance issue when no procedures are present
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52970
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59488
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ian.bush at nag dot co.uk
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67609
--- Comment #12 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Unfortunately, the patch doesn't fix similar PR67124 and (dup) PR68011.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52970
--- Comment #2 from Harald Anlauf ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #1)
> WORKSFORME from 4.8.5 up to trunk (6.0).
It looks like a dup of pr59488.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53796
--- Comment #16 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> AFAICT it remains unfixed. GFortran development resources being what they are,
> not all bugs can be promptly fixed.
> But what's the rush to close old unfixed bugs anyway? "Number of open bugs"
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67171
--- Comment #6 from Andre Vehreschild ---
Hi Paul,
No it's not, but the patch for the other pr addresses a lot of things in the
allocate. Mostly about functions returning class objects, but I remember to
have changed some of the things your patc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52622
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67171
--- Comment #5 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Andre Vehreschild from comment #4)
> Hi Paul,
>
> please compare:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2015-10/msg00033.html
>
> to your fix. Sounds like we are doing the same.
>
> - Andre
>
> O
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68034
Bug ID: 68034
Summary: Print warning when memset is optimized out
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53796
Janne Blomqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #15 from Janne Blomqvi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68027
--- Comment #4 from SztfG at yandex dot ru ---
I think this can be optimized in this way:
cmpl$100, %edi
jg a1
jne a2
jmp a3
without any label jumps
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53796
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67068
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68033
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
BT in trunk branch:
#0 c_tree_printer (pp=0x2518a50, text=0x7fffb650, spec=0x2513a61 "E",
precision=, wide=, set_locus=false, hash=false)
at ../../gcc/c/c-objc-common.c:174
#1 0x0177715c in pp_f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63861
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68033
Bug ID: 68033
Summary: OpenMP: ICE with teams distribute
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libgomp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56808
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67980
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|paolo.carlini at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68032
Tim Shen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||timshen at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67964
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue Oct 20 16:53:45 2015
New Revision: 229091
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229091&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/67964
* c-parser.c (c_parser_attributes): Break ou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67964
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45859
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67609
--- Comment #11 from Vladimir Makarov ---
I've committed the patch into the trunk. As the patch is not trivial, I'd wait
for a week before committing it into gcc-5-branch to see how it is doing on the
trunk first.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51632
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19109
--- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Oct 20 16:29:28 2015
New Revision: 229088
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229088&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add --enable-compressed-debug-sections={all,gas,gold,ld}
This patc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67609
--- Comment #10 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Tue Oct 20 16:26:05 2015
New Revision: 229087
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229087&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-10-20 Vladimir Makarov
PR rtl-optimization/67609
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51815
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52403
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52052
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67948
Andre Vieira changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andre.simoesdiasvieira@arm.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51947
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68021
--- Comment #3 from Yuri Rumyantsev ---
It looks like unswitching of outer loops pass simply triggers the issue and
this tree-ssa-loop-ivopts issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52970
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53029
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67980
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64919
--- Comment #14 from John Buddery ---
I did get a working 4.9.2 build, with the workaround from my earlier comment.
It's a 32 bit build, bootstrapped with the hp 4.6.2 gcc distribution, my config
line was:
$ ../gcc-4.9.2/configure --disable-l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64919
--- Comment #13 from Joseph John ---
Yes. i also tried without the mlp64 option both for building the 4.7.4 and also
for building the 4.9.2 using the 4.7.4 but again I have the same issue. Means.
* 4.7.4 build is successful.
* 4.9.2 build fails a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68023
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68023
David Barto changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67989
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||paolo.carlini at oracle dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66810
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66810
--- Comment #3 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Oct 20 15:20:29 2015
New Revision: 229083
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229083&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Skip local error_mark_node decls
There is no need to finalize loca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67985
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67985
--- Comment #1 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Oct 20 15:12:37 2015
New Revision: 229082
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229082&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Properly handle -miamcu and -march=lakemont
-miamcu specifies how
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67963
--- Comment #9 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Tue Oct 20 15:12:37 2015
New Revision: 229082
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229082&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Properly handle -miamcu and -march=lakemont
-miamcu specifies how
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67963
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15525
Andrew Haley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68032
Bug ID: 68032
Summary: std-c++-14: Regex fails to match
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
As
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21855
Andrew Haley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59796
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67933
--- Comment #4 from Mikael Morin ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #3)
> (In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #2)
> > The generated finalization wrapper has code doing
> > deallocate(ptr2%classes(:)%class_var)
> > where ptr2 is a poin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51591
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68031
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Yeah, it hits fold_stmt and follows SSA edges via nonnegative but it is not
supposed to (follow SSA edges). Reduced testcase:
void _mktm_r (long lcltime, int *res)
{
long rem = lcltime % ((60L * 60L) *
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68031
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
The usual name_registered_for_update_p trick helps.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67171
--- Comment #4 from Andre Vehreschild ---
Hi Paul,
please compare:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2015-10/msg00033.html
to your fix. Sounds like we are doing the same.
- Andre
On Tue, 20 Oct 2015 14:13:55 +
"pault at gcc dot gnu.org" wr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54389
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68031
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68031
Bug ID: 68031
Summary: cc1 crashes when compiling newlib / mktm_r.c
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67171
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68030
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68015
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Krebbel ---
Created attachment 36549
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36549&action=edit
Experimental fix
I'm regression testing the attached patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68030
Bug ID: 68030
Summary: Redundant address calculations in vectorized loop
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67443
--- Comment #18 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Tue, 20 Oct 2015, vogt at linux dot vnet.ibm.com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67443
>
> --- Comment #17 from Dominik Vogt ---
> > So does [patch] fix the issue?
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67964
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67443
--- Comment #17 from Dominik Vogt ---
> So does [patch] fix the issue?
Yes. The testsuite on 64-bit and 31-bit systems has no regressions with the
patch either.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67435
--- Comment #10 from Yann Collet ---
> there already is an aligned attribute for functions, variables and fields,
Sure, but none of them is related to aligning the start of an hot instruction
loop. Aligning the function instead looks like a poor
: No such file or directory
gcc.exe a.c -fdiagnostics-color=never
will output not colored error: a.c: No such file or directory
gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 6.0.0 20151020 (experimental)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68017
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||6.0
Target Milestone|6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68017
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Oct 20 12:34:19 2015
New Revision: 229073
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=229073&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-10-20 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/68017
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67460
--- Comment #8 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #7)
> Are you going to fix 5 branch as well? If not, would you like me to do the
> honours for you?
Please do it. I have no free time to spend on GCC these days. I
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67907
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68028
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67064
--- Comment #30 from Daniel Gutson ---
May I ask what's wrong with Andres Tiraboschi's solution approach?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67460
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53440
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66755
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68020
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|
1 - 100 of 143 matches
Mail list logo
