https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67835
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67835
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67818
--- Comment #7 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
See https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2015-10/msg00339.html.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67835
Bug ID: 67835
Summary: bug with auto-deduced return type and functions
invoked via ADL
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67834
Bug ID: 67834
Summary: [5 Regression] Local references inside comdat groups
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67728
--- Comment #6 from Brett Neumeier ---
Created attachment 36441
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36441&action=edit
document symptoms of problem and workaround
Since the issue is a corner-case (it's only triggered when cross-c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56590
--- Comment #4 from Oleg Endo ---
The AMS branch is here: https://github.com/erikvarga/gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67716
--- Comment #21 from Oleg Endo ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Sat Oct 3 15:20:58 2015
New Revision: 228449
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=228449&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport from mainline
2015-09-29 Kaz Kojima
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67818
--- Comment #6 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> Do you have a patch I can try?
See https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2015-04/msg00110.html.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67818
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #4)
> (In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #3)
> > So the question is whether r222477 should be backported, or r228361
> > reverted.
>
> I have looked at the r222477 patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67732
--- Comment #4 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #2)
>
> void
> foo (float mat[])
> {
> float *p = &mat[16];
>
> *--p = 0.0; *--p = 0.0; *--p = 0.0; *--p = 0.0;
> *--p = 0.0; *--p = 0.0; *--p = 0.0; *--p =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67832
Marco Barsacchi changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67818
--- Comment #4 from Mikael Morin ---
(In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #3)
> So the question is whether r222477 should be backported, or r228361 reverted.
I have looked at the r222477 patch more in details, and it seems reasonable
after all
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67818
--- Comment #3 from Mikael Morin ---
memcpy was fixed by Andre at r222477 on trunk.
I think it fixes the regression, but I'm a little uncomfortable with
backporting it, because of its medium size.
So the question is whether r222477 should be back
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66790
--- Comment #42 from Bernd Schmidt ---
I don't think that would actually help. Even if something is an actual incoming
argument register, it may still be uninitialized by the caller. That's true for
plain scalars, but even more likely for somethi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67832
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67832
--- Comment #1 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
*** Bug 67833 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67833
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67833
Bug ID: 67833
Summary: gfortran framework not found Accelerate
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67832
Bug ID: 67832
Summary: gfortran framework not found Accelerate
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67831
Mikhail Maltsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67831
Bug ID: 67831
Summary: Internal error on complicated constexpr
initialization.
Product: gcc
Version: lto
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority
22 matches
Mail list logo
