https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67397
Bug ID: 67397
Summary: GCC incorrectly accepts non-type template parameter
pack expansion of a parameter pack declared in the
same template-parameter-list
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67333
Mikhail Maltsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67396
Bug ID: 67396
Summary: [4.9/5.0 regression] Performance regression compiling
variadic function with many arguments
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67394
Mikhail Maltsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66634
Berlos Cander changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ntl21042 at kmhow dot com
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67393
Mikhail Maltsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67395
Bug ID: 67395
Summary: It is possible to override c++ access control in case
of indirect inheritance
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67371
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 67371, which changed state.
Bug 67371 Summary: Never executed "throw" in constexpr function fails to compile
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67371
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67371
--- Comment #8 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Author: trippels
Date: Sat Aug 29 18:51:26 2015
New Revision: 227323
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227323&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix c++/67371 (issues with throw in constexpr)
As PR67371 shows
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67394
Bug ID: 67394
Summary: crash due to null pointer deref in
demangle_signature()
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67393
Bug ID: 67393
Summary: segfault in cxxfilt in d_unqualified_name () at
./cp-demangle.c:1547
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: critical
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65970
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67174
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67026
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67367
--- Comment #8 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Aug 29 15:52:43 2015
New Revision: 227321
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227321&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-08-29 Jerry DeLisle
PR fortran/67367
* gfortra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67380
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67376
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||colu...@gmx-topmail.de
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67039
--- Comment #3 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #2)
> Resolved as WONTFIX?
Probably not. See the last 2 paragraphs in comment #1.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67367
--- Comment #7 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Aug 29 15:38:39 2015
New Revision: 227320
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227320&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-08-29 Jerry DeLisle
PR libgfortran/67367
* io/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67039
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66461
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65454
--- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Could this PR be closed as INVALID?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64854
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56408
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54599
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48244
--- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> I have submitted the necessary patches and test_result.log as pr64271
Does this mean that this PR can be closed? If yes, with which resolution?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31601
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66979
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66709
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67277
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67044
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Summ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67392
Bug ID: 67392
Summary: Invalid mmap return value check
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63510
--- Comment #11 from Chen Gang ---
Created attachment 36267
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36267&action=edit
The related fix patch for it.
The related fix patch for it: current input_location isn't precise for
reporting war
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67044
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67391
Bug ID: 67391
Summary: [SH] Convert clrt addc to normal add insn
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: targe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46193
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46193
--- Comment #8 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vries
Date: Sat Aug 29 07:07:51 2015
New Revision: 227315
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227315&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Handle mix/max pointer reductions in parloops
2015-08-29 Tom d
38 matches
Mail list logo