[Bug rtl-optimization/67325] Optimize shift (aka subreg) of load to simple load

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67325 --- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse --- I am seeing the same code (well, with shrq) if I make the types unsigned.

[Bug rtl-optimization/67325] Optimize shift (aka subreg) of load to simple load

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67325 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|target |rtl-optimization --- Comment #1 from And

[Bug target/67325] New: Optimize shift (aka subreg) of load to simple load

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67325 Bug ID: 67325 Summary: Optimize shift (aka subreg) of load to simple load Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/64327] ../../gcc/gcc/rtlanal.c:4881:48: runtime error: shift exponent 4294967295 is too large for 64-bit type 'long unsigned int'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64327 --- Comment #6 from Vittorio Zecca --- I "fixed" this one by substituting rtlanal.c:4907 if (bitwidth > HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT ) with if (bitwidth > HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT || !bitwidth)

[Bug other/63426] [meta-bug] Issues found with -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426 Bug 63426 depends on bug 61943, which changed state. Bug 61943 Summary: tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c:4148 signed integer overflow https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61943 What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/61943] tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c:4148 signed integer overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61943 Vittorio Zecca changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/67324] New: Failures in Assignable concept's requires-expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67324 Bug ID: 67324 Summary: Failures in Assignable concept's requires-expression Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: major Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/67323] New: Use non-unit stride loads by preference when applicable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67323 Bug ID: 67323 Summary: Use non-unit stride loads by preference when applicable Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority

[Bug target/67322] New: [Aarch64] Exploit Wide Add operations when appropriate

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67322 Bug ID: 67322 Summary: [Aarch64] Exploit Wide Add operations when appropriate Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug target/67321] [ARM] Exploit Wide Add operations when appropriate

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67321 --- Comment #1 from Michael Collison --- Created attachment 36242 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36242&action=edit Patch to generate arm vaddw

[Bug target/67321] New: [ARM] Exploit Wide Add operations when appropriate

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67321 Bug ID: 67321 Summary: [ARM] Exploit Wide Add operations when appropriate Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug other/57195] Mode attributes with specific mode iterator can not be used as mode iterators in *.md files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57195 Michael Collison changed: What|Removed |Added CC||michael.collison at linaro dot org -

[Bug middle-end/67320] Incorrect standard names for wide addition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67320 --- Comment #1 from Michael Collison --- Created attachment 36241 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36241&action=edit Patch for widening addition doc Proposed patch to fix wide addition documentation errors.

[Bug middle-end/67320] New: Incorrect standard names for wide addition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67320 Bug ID: 67320 Summary: Incorrect standard names for wide addition Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: middle-e

[Bug c++/65152] Several friend function definitions break lookup

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65152 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Yes, fixed by r227044

[Bug c++/67318] [6 regression] Parsing error when using abbreviated integral type names in template parameter pack declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67318 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/65152] Several friend function definitions break lookup

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65152 --- Comment #3 from Roger Orr --- Note that this has been fixed in gcc-trunk (tested 22-Aug-2015)

[Bug c++/63693] ICE in resolve_typename_type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63693 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/67319] New: Short-hand concepts for variadic member functions broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67319 Bug ID: 67319 Summary: Short-hand concepts for variadic member functions broken Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priorit

[Bug c++/63693] ICE in resolve_typename_type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63693 --- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Sat Aug 22 17:44:46 2015 New Revision: 227098 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=227098&root=gcc&view=rev Log: /cp 2015-08-22 Paolo Carlini PR c++/63693 *

[Bug target/67037] [4.9 Regression] Wrong code at -O1 and above on ARM

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67037 --- Comment #3 from Mikael Pettersson --- Started with r206023, an LRA patch.

[Bug c++/66957] [4.9/5/6 Regression] incorrect "is protected within this context" error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66957 Casey Carter changed: What|Removed |Added CC||Casey at Carter dot net --- Comment #8 fr

[Bug sanitizer/67308] FATAL: ThreadSanitizer: unexpected memory mapping

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67308 Jerome Robert changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jeromerobert at gmx dot com --- Comment

[Bug target/67290] powerpc: suboptimal add of u64 with u32

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67290 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug regression/67288] [4.9 regression] non optimal simple function (useless additional shift/remove/shift/add)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67288 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug c/67316] Address local variable returned as 0x0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67316 --- Comment #3 from Lionel Landwerlin --- Thanks for the explanation. I did notice the warning, I was just surprised that hboehm's GC suddenly stop working. I guess that's the price a major version bump :)

[Bug c/67316] Address local variable returned as 0x0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67316 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug libgomp/67303] libgomp: ThreadSanitizer: data race in libgomp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67303 Joost VandeVondele changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-

[Bug libgomp/66761] libgomp: ThreadSanitizer: data race in libgomp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66761 Joost VandeVondele changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-

[Bug c++/67318] New: [6 regression] Parsing error when using abbreviated integral type names in template parameter pack declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67318 Bug ID: 67318 Summary: [6 regression] Parsing error when using abbreviated integral type names in template parameter pack declaration Product: gcc Version: 6.0

[Bug c++/67315] [4.9 Regression] Strange 'this' pointer behavior when calling virtual function with different optimization attributes.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67315 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug c++/67315] Strange 'this' pointer behavior when calling virtual function with different optimization attributes.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67315 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|critical|normal

[Bug lto/67157] Compiling gcc6 with liblto_plugin, v5.2.0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67157 Guido Haztsis changed: What|Removed |Added CC||guido.hatzsis at yandex dot com --- Comm

[Bug target/67310] [PATCH] gcc 4.8.4 fails to compile with -march=native on VIA nano CPU

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67310 --- Comment #2 from jol_indien at yahoo dot fr --- This new version of the patch is: * an optimisation, avoiding modifying code that does not need to be * a bugfix, fixing "nocona" architecture detection Please consider applying in recent gcc ver

[Bug target/67310] [PATCH] gcc 4.8.4 fails to compile with -march=native on VIA nano CPU

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67310 jol_indien at yahoo dot fr changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #36234|0 |1 is obsolete|