[Bug c++/67139] [concepts] ICE on checking concepts with void with variable template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67139 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/67138] [concepts] bogus "not more constrained" error for more constrained partial specialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67138 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/66937] Do not compare constraints for unconstrained template template parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66937 --- Comment #3 from Roland B --- (In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #1) > Author: jason > Date: Thu Aug 6 17:42:25 2015 > New Revision: 226687 > > URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226687&root=gcc&view=rev > Log: > PR c++/66937 >

[Bug c++/66937] Do not compare constraints for unconstrained template template parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66937 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug libfortran/67140] undefined reference to _gfortran_mvbits_i16

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67140 --- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 36144 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36144&action=edit patch Patched built and tested with OP's code. Regression test passed.

[Bug target/67002] [5] [SH]: Bootstrap stage 2/3 comparison failure - gcc/real.o differs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67002 --- Comment #22 from Oleg Endo --- (In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #21) > > Yes, it works. I'm uncomfortable with it because the current use of > crtl->emit.x_cur_insn_uid aka cur_insn_uid is limitted to emit-rtl.c. > I think that the

[Bug target/67002] [5] [SH]: Bootstrap stage 2/3 comparison failure - gcc/real.o differs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67002 --- Comment #21 from Kazumoto Kojima --- (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #20) > Yes, that looks OK. treg_set_expr-something recog matching is actually only > required during combine. The simpler forms like (reg:SI T_REG) could also > be req

[Bug fortran/67140] undefined reference to _gfortran_mvbits_i16

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67140 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4 Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug rtl-optimization/67124] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O1, -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67124 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ra CC|

[Bug libgomp/67141] New: wrong libgomp mutex initialisation order

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67141 Bug ID: 67141 Summary: wrong libgomp mutex initialisation order Product: gcc Version: 5.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libgomp

[Bug fortran/64022] [F2003][IEEE] ieee_support_flag does not handle kind=10 and kind=16 REAL variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64022 Francois-Xavier Coudert changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Version|5.

[Bug fortran/67140] New: undefined reference to _gfortran_mvbits_i16

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67140 Bug ID: 67140 Summary: undefined reference to _gfortran_mvbits_i16 Product: gcc Version: 4.8.4 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortr

[Bug middle-end/67133] [6 Regression] ICE at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu in gimple_op, at gimple.h:2274

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67133 --- Comment #10 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #9) > trippels@gcc2-power8 llvm_build % cat AnalysisConsumer.ii It is also latent in r226635, just compile with options: -O2 -fisolate-erroneous-paths-at

[Bug c++/67139] [concepts] ICE on checking concepts with void with variable template

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67139 Eric Niebler changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[concepts] ICE on checking |[concepts] ICE on checking

[Bug c++/67139] [concepts] ICE on checking concepts with void

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67139 --- Comment #2 from Eric Niebler --- Thanks, except that that is invalid code, and this bug is an ICE-on-valid. Here's the equivalent valid repro case: template constexpr typename T::type::value_type _v = T::type::value; template concept bool

[Bug go/66870] split stack issues on ppc64le and ppc64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66870 --- Comment #21 from boger at us dot ibm.com --- Created attachment 36142 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36142&action=edit Configure gold with split stack based on binutils version This is an updated version of the previous

[Bug middle-end/67124] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O1, -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67124 --- Comment #6 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #5) > Wrong expansion, adding CC. The expand code looks OK to me. Assigning to one DImode word of a TImode isn't supposed to change the other half. I th

[Bug middle-end/67133] [6 Regression] ICE at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu in gimple_op, at gimple.h:2274

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67133 --- Comment #9 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- trippels@gcc2-power8 llvm_build % cat AnalysisConsumer.ii class A; struct B { typedef A type; }; template struct I : B {}; class C { public: C(char *); int size(); }; template struct D; template

[Bug c++/66260] [C++14] Failure to compile variable template with recursively defined partial specialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66260 --- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Thu Aug 6 18:45:05 2015 New Revision: 226696 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226696&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/67130 PR c++/67131 PR c++/66260 * m

[Bug c++/67131] [6 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67131 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Thu Aug 6 18:45:05 2015 New Revision: 226696 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226696&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/67130 PR c++/67131 PR c++/66260 * m

[Bug c++/67130] [6 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected identifier_node, have template_decl in write_unqualified_id, at cp/mangle.c:1218

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67130 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Thu Aug 6 18:45:05 2015 New Revision: 226696 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226696&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/67130 PR c++/67131 PR c++/66260 * m

[Bug c++/67139] [concepts] ICE on checking concepts with void

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67139 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/67133] [6 Regression] ICE at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu in gimple_op, at gimple.h:2274

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67133 --- Comment #8 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- Or even with options: -O2 -fisolate-erroneous-paths-attribute (why is the latter not enabled by default?)

[Bug middle-end/67133] [6 Regression] ICE at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu in gimple_op, at gimple.h:2274

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67133 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/65886] [5/6 Regression] Copy reloc in PIE incompatible with DSO created by -Wl,-Bsymbolic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65886 --- Comment #35 from Thiago Macieira --- I've only tried with SUSE's distro build, as my own GCC build is now GCC 6. However, I can reproduce it with my GCC 6 build. Let me investigate if OpenSUSE applied a patch.

[Bug target/65886] [5/6 Regression] Copy reloc in PIE incompatible with DSO created by -Wl,-Bsymbolic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65886 --- Comment #34 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Thiago Macieira from comment #33) > gcc 5.2.1 can no longer reproduce the testcase. > > Has the situation changed? GCC 5 r226650 still fails for me.

[Bug libfortran/66458] Loading libgfortran.so changes the FPU exception flags

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66458 --- Comment #5 from Francois-Xavier Coudert --- The comment in the front-end confirms the original intent, which is that FPU shouldn't be messed with if the user didn't explicitly request it: /* If -ffpe-trap option was provided, add a call to

[Bug libfortran/66936] io/unix.c gratuitously uses S_IRWXG and S_IRWXO on the basis that umask() is available

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66936 --- Comment #13 from Francois-Xavier Coudert --- (In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #12) > Aren't there enough occurences of __MINGW32__ in io/unix.c? > Why add yet another kludge? Put the #undef at line 48. Indeed, that works equally: Inde

[Bug c++/67139] New: [concepts] ICE on checking concepts with void

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67139 Bug ID: 67139 Summary: [concepts] ICE on checking concepts with void Product: gcc Version: c++-concepts Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compone

[Bug libfortran/66936] io/unix.c gratuitously uses S_IRWXG and S_IRWXO on the basis that umask() is available

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66936 --- Comment #12 from Steve Kargl --- On Thu, Aug 06, 2015 at 04:57:15PM +, fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > > Index: io/unix.c > === > --- io/unix.c (revision 226632) > +

[Bug target/65886] [5/6 Regression] Copy reloc in PIE incompatible with DSO created by -Wl,-Bsymbolic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65886 --- Comment #33 from Thiago Macieira --- gcc 5.2.1 can no longer reproduce the testcase. Has the situation changed?

[Bug c++/66937] Do not compare constraints for unconstrained template template parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66937 --- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Thu Aug 6 17:42:25 2015 New Revision: 226687 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226687&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/66937 * pt.c (is_compatible_template_arg): A templa

[Bug c++/67138] New: [concepts] bogus "not more constrained" error for more constrained partial specialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67138 Bug ID: 67138 Summary: [concepts] bogus "not more constrained" error for more constrained partial specialization Product: gcc Version: c++-concepts Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libfortran/66936] io/unix.c gratuitously uses S_IRWXG and S_IRWXO on the basis that umask() is available

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66936 Francois-Xavier Coudert changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/66538] Parameter not in scope of generic lambda trailing decltype

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66538 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/66533] [C++14] ICE: in dependent_type_p, at cp/pt.c:21073

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66533 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/66533] [C++14] ICE: in dependent_type_p, at cp/pt.c:21073

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66533 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Thu Aug 6 16:36:58 2015 New Revision: 226685 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226685&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/66533 * parser.c (cp_parser_primary_expression): Do

[Bug c++/66533] [C++14] ICE: in dependent_type_p, at cp/pt.c:21073

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66533 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Thu Aug 6 16:33:14 2015 New Revision: 226684 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226684&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/66533 * parser.c (cp_parser_primary_expression): Do

[Bug bootstrap/67137] New: --enable-languages=jit and --disable-shared

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67137 Bug ID: 67137 Summary: --enable-languages=jit and --disable-shared Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: bootstr

[Bug c++/67131] [6 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67131 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/67130] [6 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected identifier_node, have template_decl in write_unqualified_id, at cp/mangle.c:1218

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67130 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/67130] [6 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected identifier_node, have template_decl in write_unqualified_id, at cp/mangle.c:1218

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67130 --- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- Fixed. Thanks.

[Bug c++/67131] [6 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67131 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Thu Aug 6 14:28:26 2015 New Revision: 226677 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226677&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/67130 PR c++/67131 PR c++/66260 * m

[Bug c++/66260] [C++14] Failure to compile variable template with recursively defined partial specialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66260 --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Thu Aug 6 14:28:26 2015 New Revision: 226677 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226677&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/67130 PR c++/67131 PR c++/66260 * m

[Bug c++/67130] [6 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected identifier_node, have template_decl in write_unqualified_id, at cp/mangle.c:1218

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67130 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Thu Aug 6 14:28:26 2015 New Revision: 226677 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226677&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/67130 PR c++/67131 PR c++/66260 * m

[Bug c++/67131] [6 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67131 --- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Thu Aug 6 14:26:18 2015 New Revision: 226676 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226676&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/67130 PR c++/67131 PR c++/66260 * m

[Bug c++/67130] [6 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected identifier_node, have template_decl in write_unqualified_id, at cp/mangle.c:1218

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67130 --- Comment #1 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Thu Aug 6 14:26:18 2015 New Revision: 226676 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226676&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/67130 PR c++/67131 PR c++/66260 * m

[Bug c++/66260] [C++14] Failure to compile variable template with recursively defined partial specialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66260 --- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Thu Aug 6 14:26:18 2015 New Revision: 226676 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226676&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/67130 PR c++/67131 PR c++/66260 * m

[Bug c++/67131] [6 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67131 --- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #1) > What version of clang compiles that with no errors? Latest trunk.

[Bug c++/67130] [6 Regression] ICE: tree check: expected identifier_node, have template_decl in write_unqualified_id, at cp/mangle.c:1218

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67130 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/67131] [6 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67131 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/67002] [5] [SH]: Bootstrap stage 2/3 comparison failure - gcc/real.o differs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67002 --- Comment #20 from Oleg Endo --- (In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #19) > (In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #18) > In the problematic situation, get_max_insn_count returns the false > value after > > if (MAY_HAVE_DEBUG_INSNS)

[Bug sanitizer/67136] New: sanitizer reports "member access within null pointer" for correct C++ code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67136 Bug ID: 67136 Summary: sanitizer reports "member access within null pointer" for correct C++ code Product: gcc Version: 5.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: majo

[Bug c++/67135] New: [thread_local] heap-use-after-free (OS X 10.10.4)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67135 Bug ID: 67135 Summary: [thread_local] heap-use-after-free (OS X 10.10.4) Product: gcc Version: 5.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/67002] [5] [SH]: Bootstrap stage 2/3 comparison failure - gcc/real.o differs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67002 --- Comment #19 from Kazumoto Kojima --- (In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #18) In the problematic situation, get_max_insn_count returns the false value after if (MAY_HAVE_DEBUG_INSNS) expand_debug_locations (); in pass_expand::ex

[Bug target/67129] x86: erratic parsing of "#pragma GCC target ("...")"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67129 --- Comment #5 from Dominik Vogt --- Created attachment 36139 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36139&action=edit experimental fix The attached patch fixes the problem for me (on x86), but it really needs reviewing.

[Bug fortran/66927] [6 Regression] ICE in gfc_conf_procedure_call

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66927 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|un

[Bug fortran/67123] ICE with source allocation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67123 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |NEW --- Comment #2 from vehre

[Bug target/56309] conditional moves instead of compare and branch result in almost 2x slower code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56309 --- Comment #34 from Yuri Rumyantsev --- Created attachment 36138 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36138&action=edit simple reproducer Use -O3 -std=c++14 options to compile and -fno-tree-loop-if-convert to get better performa

[Bug target/56309] conditional moves instead of compare and branch result in almost 2x slower code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56309 --- Comment #33 from Yuri Rumyantsev --- With current compiler there is not performance difference for by-ref and by-val test-cases, but if we turn off if-convert transformation we will get ~2X speed-up: on Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU X5670 @

[Bug preprocessor/58381] crash in diagnostic_report_current_module when a fatal_error happens during PCH processing on NetBSD/spa64rc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58381 --- Comment #5 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- (In reply to Martin Husemann from comment #3) > This still applies to recent versions and is an obvious fix. Please apply! Points #7 and #8 in https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Community can help you to get you

[Bug preprocessor/58381] crash in diagnostic_report_current_module when a fatal_error happens during PCH processing on NetBSD/spa64rc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58381 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug fortran/64022] [F2003][IEEE] ieee_support_flag does not handle kind=10 and kind=16 REAL variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64022 --- Comment #10 from Francois-Xavier Coudert --- Author: fxcoudert Date: Thu Aug 6 09:22:30 2015 New Revision: 226670 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226670&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR fortran/64022 * gfortran.dg/ieee/large_2

[Bug middle-end/67124] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O1, -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67124 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added CC|uros at gcc dot gnu.org|rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug middle-end/67133] [6 Regression] ICE at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu in gimple_op, at gimple.h:2274

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67133 --- Comment #6 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- (In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #5) > Well, it is a >5MB testcase and reducing isn't instantaneous unfortunately. No problem, I'm not in a hurry. I need to bootstrap gcc and that will tak

[Bug middle-end/67133] [6 Regression] ICE at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu in gimple_op, at gimple.h:2274

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67133 --- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #4) > Please submit a full bug report, > with preprocessed source if appropriate. > See for instructions. Well, it is a >5MB

[Bug target/67124] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O1, -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67124 --- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > Hmm, looks like a target issue. We expand from Not this time. It looks to me that generic code is at fault, performing DImode move from %rdx to %xmm0, instead of

[Bug middle-end/67133] [6 Regression] ICE at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu in gimple_op, at gimple.h:2274

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67133 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug middle-end/67133] [6 Regression] ICE at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu in gimple_op, at gimple.h:2274

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67133 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|6.0 |--- --- Comment #3 from Markus Tri

[Bug c++/67131] [6 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67131 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug middle-end/67133] [6 Regression] ICE at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu in gimple_op, at gimple.h:2274

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67133 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||lopezibanez at gmail dot com --- Commen

[Bug middle-end/67133] [6 Regression] ICE at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu in gimple_op, at gimple.h:2274

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67133 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug c/67134] internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67134 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/67133] [6 Regression] ICE at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu in gimple_op, at gimple.h:2274

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67133 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/67134] New: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67134 Bug ID: 67134 Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault Product: gcc Version: 4.7.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug ipa/66896] ipa-prop.c:2479 runtime error: member call on null pointer of type 'struct ipa_polymorphic_call_context'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66896 --- Comment #14 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Vittorio Zecca from comment #13) > I see only two NULL dereferencing in ipa-prop.c my lines 2479 and 2545 > same statement > > dst_ctx->combine_with (ctx); > > Did you take care of both of them

[Bug fortran/64022] [F2003][IEEE] ieee_support_flag does not handle kind=10 and kind=16 REAL variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64022 --- Comment #9 from Francois-Xavier Coudert --- Author: fxcoudert Date: Thu Aug 6 08:38:59 2015 New Revision: 226665 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226665&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR fortran/64022 * gfortran.dg/ieee/large_1.

[Bug middle-end/67133] New: ICE at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu in gimple_op, at gimple.h:2274

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67133 Bug ID: 67133 Summary: ICE at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu in gimple_op, at gimple.h:2274 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c/67132] New: gcc -D__WCHAR_TYPE__='unsigned int' should not complain about built-in types redefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67132 Bug ID: 67132 Summary: gcc -D__WCHAR_TYPE__='unsigned int' should not complain about built-in types redefined Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/67129] x86: erratic parsing of "#pragma GCC target ("...")"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67129 --- Comment #4 from Dominik Vogt --- Also, it is a bad idea to pass global_options_set in this call ix86_valid_target_attribute_tree (args, &global_options, &global_options_set); because it may be modified (via ix86_handle_option()). Unlike

[Bug preprocessor/58381] crash in diagnostic_report_current_module when a fatal_error happens during PCH processing on NetBSD/spa64rc

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58381 Martin Husemann changed: What|Removed |Added Version|4.8.1 |5.2.0 --- Comment #3 from Martin Husem

[Bug preprocessor/58397] Please add host_hooks for NetBSD to make precompiled headers work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58397 Martin Husemann changed: What|Removed |Added Version|4.8.1 |5.2.0 --- Comment #3 from Martin Husem

[Bug preprocessor/58397] Please add host_hooks for NetBSD to make precompiled headers work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58397 Martin Husemann changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #30803|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug go/66303] runtime.Caller() returns infinitely deep stack frames on s390x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66303 Andreas Krebbel changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED --- Comment #15 from Andreas Kr

[Bug go/66303] runtime.Caller() returns infinitely deep stack frames on s390x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66303 Andreas Krebbel changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug c++/67131] New: [6 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67131 Bug ID: 67131 Summary: [6 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++