[Bug fortran/66929] [6 regression] ICE with iso_varying_string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66929 --- Comment #5 from Jürgen Reuter --- Maybe stressing again: this is pretty much a blocker for us because it is in a 'standard' module which we don't want to modify, and on which all parts of our code depend. We'd appreciate a reliable and quick

[Bug fortran/66942] trans-expr.c:5701 runtime error: member call on null pointer of type 'struct vec'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66942 --- Comment #2 from Vittorio Zecca --- 1) No explicit options, just the default ones, -S will suffice. 2) Sorry, I did not specify the target is x86-64, but I got the same with -m32 3) sub is not needed, the code should just be compiled to exhibi

[Bug gcov-profile/66899] [6 Regression] ICE when compiling pkcs7_trust.c in Linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66899 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |6.0

[Bug bootstrap/66955] New: Bootstrap error: libcc1 compiled as shared library despite --disable-shared

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66955 Bug ID: 66955 Summary: Bootstrap error: libcc1 compiled as shared library despite --disable-shared Product: gcc Version: 5.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: nor

[Bug lto/54911] lto-wrapper fails when compiling gcc with -flto -fuse-linker-plugin

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54911 isomorphisms at sdf dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||isomorphisms at sdf dot org

[Bug debug/66468] [6 Regression] ICE in in check_die, at dwarf2out.c:5719

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66468 --- Comment #8 from Jason Merrill --- The problem seems to be that we inlined the function, but DECL_POSSIBLY_INLINED remains unset, so dwarf2out doesn't think it needs to call dwarf2out_abstract_function. There also doesn't seem to be a cgraph

[Bug middle-end/66881] Possibly inefficient std::atomic codegen on x86 for simple arithmetic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66881 JF Bastien changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jfb at chromium dot org --- Comment #6 from

[Bug c++/66954] New: function multiversioning fails for target "aes"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66954 Bug ID: 66954 Summary: function multiversioning fails for target "aes" Product: gcc Version: 5.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug tree-optimization/66952] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66952 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- Started with r225861.

[Bug tree-optimization/66949] [6 Regression] ICE at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in tree_ssa_phiopt_worker, at tree-ssa-phiopt.c:335

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66949 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- Started with r225722.

[Bug tree-optimization/66951] [6 Regression] ICE at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu, verify_ssa failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66951 --- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek --- Started with r225923.

[Bug libobjc/54720] libobjc install-strip target not populated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54720 --- Comment #2 from Keith Marshall --- Created attachment 36018 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36018&action=edit Differences between "find staged" for each of "install-strip" and "install" cases.

[Bug libobjc/54720] libobjc install-strip target not populated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54720 Keith Marshall changed: What|Removed |Added CC||keith.marshall at mailinator dot c

[Bug c/66953] New: Missing documentation for support of unicode literals under -std=gnu99

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66953 Bug ID: 66953 Summary: Missing documentation for support of unicode literals under -std=gnu99 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/54366] [meta-bug] decltype issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54366 Bug 54366 depends on bug 65091, which changed state. Bug 65091 Summary: decltype(~arg) fails for template functions https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65091 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c++/65091] decltype(~arg) fails for template functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65091 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/66952] [6 Regression] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66952 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/66952] New: wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66952 Bug ID: 66952 Summary: wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-

[Bug tree-optimization/66951] [6 Regression] ICE at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu, verify_ssa failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66951 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/66949] [6 Regression] ICE at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in tree_ssa_phiopt_worker, at tree-ssa-phiopt.c:335

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66949 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug tree-optimization/66951] New: ICE at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu, verify_ssa failed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66951 Bug ID: 66951 Summary: ICE at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu, verify_ssa failed Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: t

[Bug libgomp/66950] New: FAIL: libgomp.fortran/examples-4/simd-7.f90 -O0 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66950 Bug ID: 66950 Summary: FAIL: libgomp.fortran/examples-4/simd-7.f90 -O0 execution test Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/66949] New: ICE at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in tree_ssa_phiopt_worker, at tree-ssa-phiopt.c:335

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66949 Bug ID: 66949 Summary: ICE at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu in tree_ssa_phiopt_worker, at tree-ssa-phiopt.c:335 Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/66768] address space gets lost on literal pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66768 Georg-Johann Lay changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||addr-space CC|

[Bug debug/66468] [6 Regression] ICE in in check_die, at dwarf2out.c:5719

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66468 --- Comment #7 from Jason Merrill --- (In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #5) > It was my understanding that DW_AT_inline cannot appear in conjunction > with location info. Right. "A debugging information entry that is a member of an abstr

[Bug sanitizer/66908] Uninitialized variable when compiled with UBsan

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66908 --- Comment #1 from Yury Gribov --- Looks like -fsanitize=bounds may introduce uninitialized variables when run after shift.

[Bug tree-optimization/66948] New: Performance regression in bit manipulation code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66948 Bug ID: 66948 Summary: Performance regression in bit manipulation code Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug preprocessor/66932] Preprocessor includes wrong header file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66932 --- Comment #5 from Michael McWilliam --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4) > An empty : causes the current directory to be added. Thanks for explaining that... Including the current directory with an empty : makes sense (as it is in t

[Bug fortran/66929] [6 regression] ICE with iso_varying_string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66929 Jürgen Reuter changed: What|Removed |Added CC||juergen.reuter at desy dot de --- Commen

[Bug c++/66921] failure to determine size of static constexpr array that is nested within a templated class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66921 Billy Donahue changed: What|Removed |Added CC||billydonahue at google dot com --- Comme

[Bug fortran/66942] trans-expr.c:5701 runtime error: member call on null pointer of type 'struct vec'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66942 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug bootstrap/66947] New: Bootstrap error: Extraneous text after `else' directive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66947 Bug ID: 66947 Summary: Bootstrap error: Extraneous text after `else' directive Product: gcc Version: 5.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priori

[Bug target/66217] PowerPC rotate/shift/mask instructions not optimal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66217 --- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool --- Author: segher Date: Mon Jul 20 16:30:56 2015 New Revision: 226005 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=226005&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/66217 * config/rs6000/constraints.md ("S",

[Bug tree-optimization/66946] New: Spurious uninitialized warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66946 Bug ID: 66946 Summary: Spurious uninitialized warning Product: gcc Version: 6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization

[Bug c++/66944] static thread_local member in class template may cause compilation to fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66944 zhykzhykzhyk at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |major

[Bug middle-end/66945] New: ICE in generic_simplify (generic-match.c:24790)

: middle-end Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: antoine.balestrat at gmail dot com Target Milestone: --- Hello ! This very pathological testcase seems to trigger an ICE with a freshly built gcc. $ xgcc --version gcc (GCC) 6.0.0 20150720 (experimental) $ cat

[Bug libfortran/66936] io/unix.c gratuitously uses S_IRWXG and S_IRWXO on the basis that umask() is available

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66936 --- Comment #10 from Keith Marshall --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #9) > Well it is a libgfortran bug yes. Which, being pedantic, makes it a GCC bug, because libgfortran is a component of GCC. > What we could do add to io/unix.c:

[Bug c++/66944] New: static thread_local member in class template may cause compilation to fail

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66944 Bug ID: 66944 Summary: static thread_local member in class template may cause compilation to fail Product: gcc Version: 5.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: reje

[Bug tree-optimization/66926] [6 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/graphite/vect-pr40979.f90 -O (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66926 --- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab --- See . The sources are available in .

[Bug tree-optimization/66372] [6 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66372 --- Comment #4 from James Greenhalgh --- I think this is the same issue as I spotted in the larger testcase. Looking at the cancelled jumps: trunk/foo.c.096t.dom1: Cancelling jump thread: (6, 8) incoming edge; (8, 13) joiner; (13, 9) norma

[Bug tree-optimization/66926] [6 regression] FAIL: gfortran.dg/graphite/vect-pr40979.f90 -O (internal compiler error)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66926 --- Comment #2 from Yuri Rumyantsev --- Could somebody provides me with an instruction how to build trunk (fresh) compiler with graphite? Thanks.

[Bug tree-optimization/66372] [6 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66372 James Greenhalgh changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jgreenhalgh at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug target/66912] Copy relocation against protected symbol doesn't work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66912 --- Comment #2 from nsz at gcc dot gnu.org --- protected only means it cannot be overridden. so we know the symbol will be resolved to the local one, however it may be visible externally and then the address must be the same in the other modules

[Bug c++/55095] Wshift-overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55095 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/66930] [5 Regression]: gengtype.c is miscompiled during stage2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66930 --- Comment #4 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #3) > Will test that once the current build of r223346 has finished. Another hint is a changelog entry for the Debian package 5.1.1-11: * Bui

[Bug c++/55095] Wshift-overflow

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55095 --- Comment #12 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Mon Jul 20 13:43:45 2015 New Revision: 225998 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225998&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/55095 * c-common.c (c_fully_fold_internal): War

[Bug target/66930] [5 Regression]: gengtype.c is miscompiled during stage2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66930 --- Comment #3 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #2) > r223346 isn't affected either, 5.1.1-6 is still building and already got > past gengtype.c in stage 2. Going through the other logs while

[Bug target/66912] Copy relocation against protected symbol doesn't work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66912 --- Comment #1 from Richard Earnshaw --- Erm, isn't that the whole point of marking the symbol 'protected'? >From the ELF spec: STV_PROTECTED A symbol defined in the current component is protected if it is visible in other components but n

[Bug fortran/66035] [5/6 Regression] gfortran ICE segfault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66035 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--

[Bug fortran/64589] [OOP] Linking error due to undefined integer symbol with unlimited polymorphism

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64589 vehre at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|--

[Bug c/66918] Disable "inline function declared but never defined" warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66918 --- Comment #6 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- (In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #5) > I don't think the C++ FE has this warning; it's about C99 inlines. If not, it has a very similar warning: /home/manuel/test.cc:1:13: warning: inline funct

[Bug target/63304] Aarch64 pc-relative load offset out of range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63304 Wilco changed: What|Removed |Added CC||wdijkstr at arm dot com --- Comment #17 from Wil

[Bug c/66918] Disable "inline function declared but never defined" warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66918 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug fortran/66929] [6 regression] ICE with iso_varying_string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66929 --- Comment #3 from Mikael Morin --- Reduced test: module iso_varying_string type, public :: varying_string character(LEN=1), dimension(:), allocatable :: chars end type varying_string interface operator(/=) module procedure op_n

[Bug c++/66943] GCC warns of Unknown Pragma for OpenMP, even though it support it.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66943 --- Comment #8 from Jeffrey Walton --- (In reply to Jeffrey Walton from comment #6) > > Maybe it could be in effect with `-Wextra`? > > That would just move the problem somewhere else instead of fixing it. Many > people do compile with -Wall -We

[Bug c++/66943] GCC warns of Unknown Pragma for OpenMP, even though it support it.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66943 --- Comment #7 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- (In reply to Jeffrey Walton from comment #6) > Maybe it could be in effect with `-Wextra`? That would just move the problem somewhere else instead of fixing it. Many people do compile with -Wall -Wextr

[Bug target/63304] Aarch64 pc-relative load offset out of range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63304 Jiong Wang changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jiwang at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #16 f

[Bug c++/66943] GCC warns of Unknown Pragma for OpenMP, even though it support it.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66943 --- Comment #6 from Jeffrey Walton --- (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #5) > ... > For what is worth, I understand the point by Andrew that without -fopenmp, > the #pragmas are effectively ignored, thus the warning seems useful. Per

[Bug target/65952] [AArch64] Will not vectorize storing induction of pointer addresses for LP64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65952 --- Comment #10 from vekumar at gcc dot gnu.org --- With the patch I get loop: adrpx0, array ldr q1, .LC0 ldr q2, .LC1 adrpx1, ptrs add x1, x1, :lo12:ptrs ldr x0, [x0, #:lo12

[Bug target/65952] [AArch64] Will not vectorize storing induction of pointer addresses for LP64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65952 vekumar at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vekumar at gcc dot gnu.org -

[Bug fortran/64986] class_to_type_4.f90: valgrind error: Invalid read/write of size 8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64986 --- Comment #10 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #9) > The components are deallocated after the containing object. > Draft patch: Yes, this fixes the testsuite failure for me.

[Bug c++/66943] GCC warns of Unknown Pragma for OpenMP, even though it support it.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66943 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug target/63304] Aarch64 pc-relative load offset out of range

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63304 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org --

[Bug middle-end/66915] [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/fixed-point/unary.c execution test on arm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66915 --- Comment #2 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Created attachment 36015 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36015&action=edit Diff between good and bad versions of the assembly

[Bug c++/53431] C++ preprocessor ignores #pragma GCC diagnostic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53431 --- Comment #12 from Manuel López-Ibáñez --- (In reply to Allan Chandler from comment #11) > Now you've done it. This was reported over three years ago and now it's > affected someone on Stack Overflow. You guys are in for it now :-) Unfortunate

[Bug preprocessor/66932] Preprocessor includes wrong header file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66932 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- An empty : causes the current directory to be added.

[Bug target/66930] [5 Regression]: gengtype.c is miscompiled during stage2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66930 --- Comment #2 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz --- (In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #1) > (In reply to John Paul Adrian Glaubitz from comment #0) > > As previously discussed in private mail, I am now filing a bug report for > > the regression i

[Bug inline-asm/49611] Inline asm should support input/output of flags

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49611 --- Comment #17 from Jeremy --- Did you mean "stc" rather than "setc" ??? But yes, it looks like its working well. On 20 July 2015 at 10:05, gccbugzilla at limegreensocks dot com < gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug libfortran/66936] io/unix.c gratuitously uses S_IRWXG and S_IRWXO on the basis that umask() is available

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66936 --- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Keith Marshall from comment #8) > (In reply to kargl from comment #7) > > So add > > > > #define S_IRWXG 0 > > #define S_IRWXO 0 > > > > to the header file wherever mingw defines the available

[Bug c++/66943] GCC warns of Unknown Pragma for OpenMP, even though it support it.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66943 --- Comment #4 from Jeffrey Walton --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > The warning is correct though, maybe it should add a message about needing > -fopenmp to have them to be known. >From a dumb user's point of view (folks like me

[Bug inline-asm/49611] Inline asm should support input/output of flags

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49611 --- Comment #16 from David --- I've tried it now and it seems to do good things. This code: int main(int argc, char *argv[]) { char x; asm("setc" : "=@ccc"(x)); if (!x) return 6; else return argc; } produces this outp

[Bug c++/66943] GCC warns of Unknown Pragma for OpenMP, even though it support it.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66943 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- The warning is correct though, maybe it should add a message about needing -fopenmp to have them to be known.

[Bug c++/66943] GCC warns of Unknown Pragma for OpenMP, even though it support it.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66943 --- Comment #2 from Jeffrey Walton --- My bad... Here's the error message: g++ -DNDEBUG -g2 -O3 -Wall -march=native -pipe -c nbtheory.cpp nbtheory.cpp:655:0: warning: ignoring #pragma omp parallel [-Wunknown-pragmas] #pragma omp parallel ^ nb

[Bug c++/66943] GCC warns of Unknown Pragma for OpenMP, even though it support it.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66943 --- Comment #1 from Jeffrey Walton --- I've experienced this issue on Cygwin i386 and x86_64 running GCC 4.8.1; Fedora 21 and 22, i386 and x86_64 running GCC 4.9 and 5.1, and a few others. So it appears to be a widespread issue, and not an isola

[Bug c++/66943] New: GCC warns of Unknown Pragma for OpenMP, even though it support it.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66943 Bug ID: 66943 Summary: GCC warns of Unknown Pragma for OpenMP, even though it support it. Product: gcc Version: 4.8.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/53431] C++ preprocessor ignores #pragma GCC diagnostic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53431 Allan Chandler changed: What|Removed |Added CC||allan.chandler at oakton dot com.a

[Bug middle-end/66931] ICE in convert_move, at expr.c:316

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66931 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/66942] New: trans-expr.c:5701 runtime error: member call on null pointer of type 'struct vec'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66942 Bug ID: 66942 Summary: trans-expr.c:5701 runtime error: member call on null pointer of type 'struct vec' Product: gcc Version: 5.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severit

[Bug target/66920] ICE in expand_debug_locations, at cfgexpand.c:3826

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66920 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Component|debug

[Bug middle-end/66931] ICE in convert_move, at expr.c:316

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66931 --- Comment #1 from Uroš Bizjak --- *** Bug 66920 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***