https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52846
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot
ethz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66925
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66925
Bug ID: 66925
Summary: [3.9 optimization regression] _mm_cvtsi32_si128
spilling to memory
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66924
Bug ID: 66924
Summary: Bad diagnostic for parameter name used as non-type
template argument
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51939
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49632
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61980
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48642
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48482
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61965
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60340
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48393
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46851
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46851
--- Comment #2 from Sebastian Pop ---
Author: spop
Date: Sat Jul 18 01:11:05 2015
New Revision: 225979
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225979&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
fix pr46851 and pr60340: remove unmaintained omega dependence test
Regstra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60340
--- Comment #2 from Sebastian Pop ---
Author: spop
Date: Sat Jul 18 01:11:05 2015
New Revision: 225979
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225979&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
fix pr46851 and pr60340: remove unmaintained omega dependence test
Regstra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61929
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fragabr at gmail dot com
--- Comment #12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65850
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66923
Bug ID: 66923
Summary: Variable template initialized using auto deduces wrong
type
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66922
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66906
--- Comment #5 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Jul 17 23:02:25 2015
New Revision: 225974
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225974&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Replicate static chain on the stack
If we put static chain on the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66906
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66865
--- Comment #15 from austinenglish at gmail dot com ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #14)
> Can you please retry now that PR 66782 and PR 66838 are both fixed on
> mainline and gcc-5 branch?
Works here in r225965 / da5e6421269c9683f17fb5
/local/gcc-trunk
--enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 6.0.0 20150717 (experimental) [trunk revision 225918] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk -m64 -O0 small.c; ./a.out
$ gcc-5.1 -m64 -O1 small.c; ./a.out
$ gcc-trunk -m32 -O1 small.c; ./a.out
$
$ gcc-trunk -m64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57271
Mark H Weaver changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mhw at netris dot org
--- Comment #10 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28492
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66921
Bug ID: 66921
Summary: failure to determine size of static constexpr array
that is nested within a templated class
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66920
Bug ID: 66920
Summary: ICE in expand_debug_locations, at cfgexpand.c:3826
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66866
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-*-* |x86
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66866
--- Comment #11 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Fri Jul 17 21:39:27 2015
New Revision: 225970
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225970&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/66866
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_expand
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49611
--- Comment #14 from David ---
(In reply to Jeremy from comment #12)
> It probably does a setcc on x86 which doesn't really gain much
I don't have a 6.0 build to test with yet, but I don't believe that's quite
correct. Looking at the testsuite
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53905
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64394
AK changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hiraditya at msn dot com
--- Comment #3 from AK --
%edx, (%rdi)
ret
.cfi_endproc
.LFE1:
.size g, .-g
.section.text.unlikely
.LCOLDE1:
.text
.LHOTE1:
.ident "GCC: (GNU) 6.0.0 20150717 (experimental)"
.section.note.GNU-stack,"",@progbits
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66919
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code
Status|U
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66919
Bug ID: 66919
Summary: [5 Regression] C++14 ICE during error reporting
Product: gcc
Version: 5.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66866
--- Comment #10 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Fri Jul 17 20:25:09 2015
New Revision: 225968
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225968&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/66866
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_expand
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66909
--- Comment #2 from Nate Craun ---
It seems that clang has a similar issue. I added an entry on their bug tracker
here: https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=24168
As mentioned in clang's bug tracker:
I think the problem is related to the use o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66918
Bug ID: 66918
Summary: Disable "inline function declared but never defined"
warning
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66468
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu ---
Any progress on this? FDO+LTO bootstrap has been broken for weeks now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66917
Bug ID: 66917
Summary: ARM: NEON: memcpy compiles to vld1 and vst1 with
incorrect alignment
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61831
--- Comment #52 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #51)
> (In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #50)
> > Should I file a new PR?
>
> Yes, please.
> Two commits today, two regressions.
There is another PR that s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66783
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61831
--- Comment #51 from Mikael Morin ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #50)
> Should I file a new PR?
Yes, please.
Two commits today, two regressions.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65850
AK changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hiraditya at msn dot com
--- Comment #4 from AK --
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66703
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86
Resolution|WONTFIX
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66911
--- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl ---
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 06:21:38PM +, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66911
>
> --- Comment #3 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> [Book15] f90/bug% gfc pr66911
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66814
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66703
--- Comment #8 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Fri Jul 17 18:45:50 2015
New Revision: 225962
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225962&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline:
2015-07-10 Uros Bizjak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66814
--- Comment #6 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Fri Jul 17 18:44:33 2015
New Revision: 225961
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225961&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline:
2015-07-10 Uros Bizjak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61831
--- Comment #50 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
Compiling the original test of pr40440 after revision r225926 gives an ICE:
[Book15] f90/bug% gfcp pr40440.f90 iso_varying_string.o
pr40440.f90:69:0:
call ifile_append_from_string (ifile, var_s
nable-lto
--enable-plugin --with-arch=corei7 --with-cpu=corei7
Thread model: posix
gcc version 6.0.0 20150717 (experimental) [trunk revision 225931] (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66907
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66911
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66906
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
A patch i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66092
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jul 17 17:43:09 2015
New Revision: 225959
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225959&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/66092
PR c++/66834
* gcc/cp/pt.c (coerce_te
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66834
--- Comment #14 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Jul 17 17:43:09 2015
New Revision: 225959
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225959&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/66092
PR c++/66834
* gcc/cp/pt.c (coerce_t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66890
--- Comment #4 from Andi Kleen ---
Created attachment 36008
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36008&action=edit
Updated patch with documentation and param
I updated the patch with proper documentation and a param for the cut o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52846
--- Comment #23 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Fri Jul 17 17:32:09 2015
New Revision: 225958
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225958&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-07-17 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/52846
* decl.c (gfc_m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52846
--- Comment #22 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Fri Jul 17 17:27:42 2015
New Revision: 225957
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225957&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-07-17 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/52846
* decl.c (gfc_m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52846
--- Comment #21 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Fri Jul 17 17:26:42 2015
New Revision: 225956
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225956&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-07-17 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/52846
* decl.c (gfc_m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52846
--- Comment #20 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Fri Jul 17 17:26:12 2015
New Revision: 225955
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225955&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-07-17 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/52846
* decl.c (gfc_m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52846
--- Comment #19 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Fri Jul 17 17:25:55 2015
New Revision: 225953
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225953&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-07-17 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/52846
* decl.c (gfc_m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52846
--- Comment #16 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Fri Jul 17 17:24:32 2015
New Revision: 225946
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225946&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-07-17 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/52846
* decl.c (gfc_m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52846
--- Comment #18 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Fri Jul 17 17:25:04 2015
New Revision: 225948
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225948&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-07-17 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/52846
* decl.c (gfc_m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52846
--- Comment #17 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Fri Jul 17 17:24:49 2015
New Revision: 225947
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225947&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-07-17 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/52846
* decl.c (gfc_m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52846
--- Comment #15 from Paul Thomas ---
Author: pault
Date: Fri Jul 17 17:23:45 2015
New Revision: 225945
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225945&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-07-17 Paul Thomas
PR fortran/52846
* decl.c (gfc_m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66916
--- Comment #1 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 36007
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36007&action=edit
good assembly before the offending commit
Attaching the good assembly before the commit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66916
Bug ID: 66916
Summary: [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/arm/pr43920-2.c
object-size text <= 54
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66915
--- Comment #1 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
My cross was configured with:
--with-newlib --without-isl --with-arch=armv7-a --with-float=hard
--with-fpu=neon-vfpv4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66911
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61929
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66915
Bug ID: 66915
Summary: [6 Regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/fixed-point/unary.c
execution test on arm
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61929
--- Comment #10 from Sebastian Pop ---
Author: spop
Date: Fri Jul 17 16:34:21 2015
New Revision: 225942
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225942&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
[graphite] fix pr61929
This fixes bootstrap of GCC with BOOT_CFLAGS="-g -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66703
--- Comment #7 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Fri Jul 17 16:30:53 2015
New Revision: 225941
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225941&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline:
2015-07-10 Uros Bizjak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66814
--- Comment #5 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Fri Jul 17 16:27:58 2015
New Revision: 225940
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225940&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline:
2015-07-10 Uros Bizjak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53499
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66914
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53499
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||barry.revzin at gmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66906
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
We fail to account static chain on stack with stack alignment.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66824
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66905
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
ISAs are disabled by default. x86 backend will enable them later.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66914
Bug ID: 66914
Summary: incorrect template partial ordering prefers non-member
function instead of being ambiguous
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66865
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66838
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66913
Bug ID: 66913
Summary: jit: missing error-checking that value fits in type
for gcc_jit_context_new_rvalue_from_ API entrypoints
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47785
Ray Kinsella changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ray.kinsella at intel dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66906
--- Comment #2 from H.J. Lu ---
This avoids ICE, but executable crashes:
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
index 0551a75..47b4f06 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/i386.c
@@ -11643,7 +11643,9 @@
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66912
Bug ID: 66912
Summary: Copy relocation against protected symbol doesn't work
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66838
--- Comment #7 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Fri Jul 17 13:50:38 2015
New Revision: 225935
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225935&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Backport from mainline:
2015-07-15 Uros Bizjak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66911
Bug ID: 66911
Summary: ICE on allocate character with source as a derived
type component
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66909
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66910
Bug ID: 66910
Summary: allocatable character in derived type gives segfault
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66909
Bug ID: 66909
Summary: Internal Compiler Error when #including files from
/sys on Linux
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66870
--- Comment #12 from Alan Modra ---
Created attachment 36003
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36003&action=edit
fix shrink-wrap issue
The attached patch cures the shrink wrap problem. I haven't yet bootstrapped
it but fmt.o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66906
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66824
--- Comment #4 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Fri Jul 17 11:52:09 2015
New Revision: 225929
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225929&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add a testcase for PR target/66824
PR target/66824
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58265
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|SUSPENDED |ASSIGNED
Assignee|paolo.carl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49611
--- Comment #13 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Jeremy from comment #12)
> Hi David,
> That's very interesting. Its not in gcc 5.2.0 released yesterday though.
That is because 5.2 is a patch release off of the 5 branch. It was added to gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30527
--- Comment #4 from Davin McCall ---
I recently stumbled across section 6.43.2.7 of the manual, which does in fact
document the operand modifiers for (and only for) x86. Modifiers for other
architectures are not documented.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66908
Bug ID: 66908
Summary: Uninitialized variable when compiled with UBsan
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo