https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58265
Antony Polukhin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||antoshkka at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66891
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-*-* |x86
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66896
--- Comment #5 from Vittorio Zecca ---
Yes I applied the fix and it now works on all the gcc testsuite.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66891
--- Comment #4 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Fri Jul 17 06:32:58 2015
New Revision: 225918
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225918&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/66891
* calls.c (expand_call):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49611
--- Comment #11 from David ---
Apparently this feature has been checked in:
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Extended-Asm.html#FlagOutputOperands
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49611
--- Comment #10 from David ---
There was some discussion of this on the gcc mailing list. Not sure what
became of it: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2015-05/msg6.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66902
Bug ID: 66902
Summary: _S_debug_messages is unneccessary public
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66901
Bug ID: 66901
Summary: Segmentation fault in compiler instead of error
message for ill-formed program with namespace alias
and qualified definition
Product: gcc
V
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66311
--- Comment #5 from Kenneth Zadeck ---
thanks
> On Jul 16, 2015, at 5:12 AM, rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
> wrote:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66311
>
> Richard Biener changed:
>
> What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66724
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66725
--- Comment #8 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Fri Jul 17 00:31:45 2015
New Revision: 225917
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225917&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-07-16 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/66724
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66724
--- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Fri Jul 17 00:31:45 2015
New Revision: 225917
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225917&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-07-16 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/66724
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66724
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Fri Jul 17 00:05:02 2015
New Revision: 225913
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225913&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-07-16 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/66724
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66218
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Fixed more. :)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66218
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Thu Jul 16 22:39:22 2015
New Revision: 225911
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225911&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/66218
* gcc/cp/constraint.cc (satisfy_argument_dedu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66900
Bug ID: 66900
Summary: No error message for ill-formed program with qualified
name lookup
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66844
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Yes, one of those is a bug, I'm not sure which. :)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66899
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66870
--- Comment #10 from boger at us dot ibm.com ---
Now that I am building on ppc64 with a new enough glibc, using my latest
patches for rs6000.c and Andreas' patch, and forcing the gold linker to be
used, I am hitting a testcase failure in the libgo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66864
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66864
--- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Thu Jul 16 19:22:38 2015
New Revision: 225903
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225903&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-07-16 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/66864
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66725
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56520
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66545
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66545
--- Comment #9 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Thu Jul 16 19:03:05 2015
New Revision: 225901
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225901&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-07-16 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/66545
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66899
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56520
--- Comment #10 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Thu Jul 16 18:44:56 2015
New Revision: 225900
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225900&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-07-16 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/56520
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66899
Bug ID: 66899
Summary: ICE when compiling pkcs7_trust.c in Linux
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66899
--- Comment #1 from H. Peter Anvin ---
I have not yet narrowed down the set of options required to manifest the bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66725
--- Comment #6 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: kargl
Date: Thu Jul 16 18:21:22 2015
New Revision: 225898
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225898&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-07-03 Steven G. Kargl
PR fortran/66725
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66898
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66891
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hjl.tools at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66844
--- Comment #2 from Casey Carter ---
If the intent is to allow parameters of void type - and I admit the wording of
5.1.4/5 is unclear as to exactly which of the rules of 8.3.5 are intended to
apply to the parameter-declaration-clause of a requir
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66898
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66898
Bug ID: 66898
Summary: [6 Regression] profiledbootstrap failure on x86
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: boo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66844
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66259
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66626
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61929
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||spop at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66259
--- Comment #7 from Matt Godbolt ---
I just tried with binutils 2.24 instead of 2.25, and the issue did not manifest
itself.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65033
--- Comment #9 from Bin Fan ---
I verified this bug is fixed in 5.1.0. However, it is only fixed in g++, so now
in 5.1.0, gcc and g++ reports different result:
-bash-4.1$ cat is_lock_free.c
#include
#include
#define N 10
typedef struct {
cha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66259
Matt Godbolt changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matt at godbolt dot org
--- Comment #6 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66897
Bug ID: 66897
Summary: ICE when using remove_reference with type tagged with
__may_alias__
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66626
--- Comment #23 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Thu Jul 16 15:26:35 2015
New Revision: 225891
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225891&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-07-16 Vladimir Makarov
PR rtl-optimization/66626
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66737
--- Comment #7 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Ilya Enkovich from comment #6)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #5)
> > I don't think it is correct. Please see SPEC_64 and SPEC_32 defined
> > in gnu-user64.h. You should define MPX_SPEC with SPE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66737
--- Comment #6 from Ilya Enkovich ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #5)
> I don't think it is correct. Please see SPEC_64 and SPEC_32 defined
> in gnu-user64.h. You should define MPX_SPEC with SPEC_64 and SPEC_32.
It should be OK since we
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66896
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66896
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Thu Jul 16 14:53:08 2015
New Revision: 225888
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225888&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR ipa/66896.
* g++.dg/ipa/pr66896.c: New test.
PR ip
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52846
--- Comment #14 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to Salvatore Filippone from comment #13)
> Created attachment 35996 [details]
> test case
>
> Cleaned up a bit of noise due to the process of reducing the test case: it
> was spitting out a legitima
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66737
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Ilya Enkovich from comment #4)
> OK then. Testing this patch now:
>
> diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/linux-common.h b/gcc/config/i386/linux-common.h
> index 63dd8d8..232acea 100644
> --- a/gcc/config/i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66896
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Thu Jul 16 14:48:18 2015
New Revision: 225887
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225887&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR ipa/66896.
* g++.dg/ipa/pr66896.c: New test.
PR ip
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66737
--- Comment #4 from Ilya Enkovich ---
OK then. Testing this patch now:
diff --git a/gcc/config/i386/linux-common.h b/gcc/config/i386/linux-common.h
index 63dd8d8..232acea 100644
--- a/gcc/config/i386/linux-common.h
+++ b/gcc/config/i386/linux-c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65726
--- Comment #6 from Gerald Pfeifer ---
I still can reproduce the failure by configuring with --disable-bootstrap
and then "make" or "make all".
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66737
--- Comment #3 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Ilya Enkovich from comment #1)
> Why don't we need it for 32bit? What if we use calling convention allowing
> args on registers?
You can only safely pass arguments in registers when calling internal
f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66737
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66748
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66748
--- Comment #6 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Thu Jul 16 13:33:12 2015
New Revision: 225878
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225878&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/66748
* tree.c (handle_abi_tag_attribute): Check
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66748
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Thu Jul 16 13:25:25 2015
New Revision: 225877
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225877&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/66748
* tree.c (handle_abi_tag_attribute): Check
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52846
--- Comment #13 from Salvatore Filippone ---
Created attachment 35996
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35996&action=edit
test case
Cleaned up a bit of noise due to the process of reducing the test case: it was
spitting out a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66737
--- Comment #1 from Ilya Enkovich ---
Why don't we need it for 32bit? What if we use calling convention allowing args
on registers?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52846
--- Comment #12 from Salvatore Filippone ---
(In reply to Salvatore Filippone from comment #11)
> Created attachment 35995 [details]
> test case
Enjoy :)
[sfilippo@jacobi tlink]$ gfortran -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gfortran
COLLECT_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52846
--- Comment #11 from Salvatore Filippone ---
Created attachment 35995
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35995&action=edit
test case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66893
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66893
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Barry Revzin from comment #0)
> According to [over.match.ref]:
>
> Those non-explicit conversion
Doesn't non-explicit rule out your conversion function?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66894
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jul 16 11:27:34 2015
New Revision: 225870
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=225870&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-07-16 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/66894
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66894
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66892
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66895
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52846
--- Comment #10 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com ---
Hi Salvatore,
If you could reduce the source that produces this error for me, I
would be grateful. By the looks of it, the name mangling is
functioning correctly but is picking up the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66760
--- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor ---
I have committed the patch to trunk as r225838 but unfortunately
forgot to mention the bug in the commit message. If there are no
issues, I will backport it to the gcc 5 branch next week.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7651
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.3 |---
--- Comment #33 from Manuel Lóp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66896
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 35994
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35994&action=edit
Suggested patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19541
Miroslav Matějů changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||melebius at gmail dot com,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64099
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.2 |5.3
--- Comment #16 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64860
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.2 |5.3
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65501
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.2 |5.3
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56974
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.2 |5.3
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62211
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.2 |5.3
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64289
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.2 |5.3
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65076
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.2 |5.3
--- Comment #59 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64132
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.2 |5.3
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65345
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.2 |5.3
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65689
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.2 |5.3
--- Comment #12 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66047
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.2 |5.3
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66738
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.2 |5.3
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63989
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.2 |5.3
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65844
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.2 |5.3
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61105
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.2 |5.3
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49857
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.2 |5.3
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57868
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.2 |5.3
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66038
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.2 |5.3
--- Comment #24 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64331
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.2 |5.3
--- Comment #9 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65683
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.2 |5.3
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65771
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.2 |5.3
--- Comment #16 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66728
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.2 |5.3
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66828
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.2 |5.3
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65702
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.2 |5.3
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60806
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.2 |5.3
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66147
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.2 |5.3
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65931
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|5.2 |5.3
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener
1 - 100 of 202 matches
Mail list logo