https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66480
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66411
--- Comment #2 from Doug Kwan ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> This has been fixed for 4.9.3
Do you know which patch fixes it?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66480
jvdelisle at charter dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jvdelisle at charter dot ne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48181
--- Comment #12 from Bernhard Kaindl
---
x86 has no -fno-lra / -mno-lra flag in gcc-4.8.4 and 4.9.2,
so these compilers they can't show this issue.
Thus, the tag [4.8/4.9 Regression] does not apply and should be changed to
[4.5/4.6 regression].
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66481
Bug ID: 66481
Summary: Implicit lambda capture by reference of variable named
"closure" causes crash
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: m
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66355
kalmquist1 at hotmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolut
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4131
kalmquist1 at hotmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kalmquist1 at hotmail dot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48181
Bernhard Kaindl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernhard.kaindl@thalesgroup
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66480
--- Comment #2 from Nicolas Bock ---
gcc-4.9.2 fails as well.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64164
Alexandre Oliva changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66375
Bernhard Kaindl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernhard.kaindl@thalesgroup
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66448
--- Comment #14 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Created attachment 35734
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35734&action=edit
Patch to ICE on other duplicate DW_AT_ attributes
On 06/09/2015 08:00 AM, iains at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60656
Bernhard Kaindl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernhard.kaindl@thalesgroup
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66480
--- Comment #1 from Nicolas Bock ---
gcc-4.7.4 fails just the same.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66480
Bug ID: 66480
Summary: FPE calling cpu_time() with -ffpe-trap=inexact
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66441
--- Comment #5 from Leo Carreon ---
Is this fix going to be applied to Fedora 22?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66417
--- Comment #5 from Leo Carreon ---
Is this fix going to be applied to Fedora 22?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66464
--- Comment #2 from Leo Carreon ---
Just clarifying that my comments are to do with codecvt_utf16 and
codecvt_utf8.
The way I understand it, codecvt_utf16 should be converting between
UTF-16 and UCS-4. UTF-16 uses 2 bytes for characters in the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66479
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66479
--- Comment #2 from Jann Horn ---
$ ulimit -s
8192
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66479
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65460
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65460
--- Comment #7 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: vries
Date: Tue Jun 9 21:14:46 2015
New Revision: 224303
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224303&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Mark offloaded functions as parallelized
2015-06-09 Tom de Vri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66479
Bug ID: 66479
Summary: -fstack-check doesn't prevent stack allocation with
size -1
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58074
Richard Smith changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||richard-gccbugzilla@metafoo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66478
Bug ID: 66478
Summary: [constexpr] accepts-invalid with read of non-constant
variable as discarded value
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66477
Bug ID: 66477
Summary: [constexpr] accepts-invalid with constexpr member call
on non-constant reference
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66163
--- Comment #14 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #13)
> Great, do you have patch?
> Honza
Yes, I've suggested a patch here:
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1167119
Let's see if it will be accepted by Mozi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66474
--- Comment #1 from Michael Meissner ---
Created attachment 35732
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35732&action=edit
Proposed patch to fix the problem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66473
--- Comment #4 from Kirill Yukhin ---
Sure, I'll report tomorrow.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15350
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19987
Bug 19987 depends on bug 15350, which changed state.
Bug 15350 Summary: [tree-ssa] Convert if ((1 << a) & 1) into if (a == 0).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=15350
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66387
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Jun 9 17:19:18 2015
New Revision: 224292
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224292&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/66387
* semantics.c (process_outer_var_ref): Make s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66383
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Jun 9 17:19:12 2015
New Revision: 224291
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224291&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/66383
* tree.c (replace_placeholders_r): Handle pla
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51747
--- Comment #16 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Jun 9 16:56:12 2015
New Revision: 224289
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224289&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
DR 1467
PR c++/51747
* typeck2.c (digest_init_r):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64504
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||documentation
Status|UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66163
--- Comment #13 from Jan Hubicka ---
Great, do you have patch?
Honza
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66475
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66476
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66476
Bug ID: 66476
Summary: Erroneous initializer_list lifetime extension from
temporary initializer_list
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66475
Bug ID: 66475
Summary: Access checking in templates circumvented with 'using'
(C++11)
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66474
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66474
Bug ID: 66474
Summary: Document the use of %x in powerpc asm statements
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64164
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dje at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #38
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66306
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66473
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66473
--- Comment #3 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Ops, Kirill is already looking at this.
Kirill, you have much better facilities for testing, do you want to take the
proposed patch from here?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66473
--- Comment #2 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Created attachment 35729
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35729&action=edit
Proposed patch
Patch that fixes the failure.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66473
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65966
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66387
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Jun 9 15:27:01 2015
New Revision: 224287
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224287&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/66387
* semantics.c (process_outer_var_ref): Make s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64504
--- Comment #6 from Andrey Vihrov ---
Thanks for your reply. You have a point: using -fwhole-program introduces more
effects than needed, as evidenced by this bug report, so an anonymous namespace
is safer and cleaner.
In any case, in this bug r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58616
Bug 58616 depends on bug 65815, which changed state.
Bug 65815 Summary: brace elision doesn't work in NSDMI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65815
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65815
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65815
--- Comment #9 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Jun 9 14:59:08 2015
New Revision: 224286
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224286&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2015-06-09 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/65815
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66448
--- Comment #13 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Jun 9 14:51:30 2015
New Revision: 224285
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224285&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR bootstrap/66448
* toplev.c (check_global_declaration):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66468
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66193
--- Comment #14 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
Attached some prepared test files.
Added more test cases for integer and real.
Added new test case for logical :
subroutine s2
logical(8), parameter :: z1(2) = .true. .or. [ logical(8) :: [ logic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66193
--- Comment #13 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
Created attachment 35728
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35728&action=edit
test case pr66193_3_diverse.f90
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66193
--- Comment #12 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
Created attachment 35727
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35727&action=edit
test case pr66193_2_integer.f90
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66193
--- Comment #11 from Gerhard Steinmetz
---
Created attachment 35726
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35726&action=edit
test case pr66193_1_real.f90
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66299
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66299
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Tue Jun 9 14:24:04 2015
New Revision: 224283
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224283&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/66299
* match.pd ((CST1 << A) == C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66383
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Tue Jun 9 14:13:22 2015
New Revision: 224282
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224282&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/66383
* tree.c (replace_placeholders_r): Handle pla
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66473
Bug ID: 66473
Summary: ICE: in extract_insn, at recog.c:2343 (unrecognizable
insn) with -mavx512f
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66471
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Just as a quick observation from looking at host-mingw32.c:
#include "config.h"
#include "system.h"
#include "coretypes.h"
#include "hosthooks.h"
#include "hosthooks-def.h"
#include "diagnostic.h"
#define
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66472
--- Comment #6 from Christoph Hertzberg
---
Ok, good point on shadowing free functions.
Next pathological example: If you have a template specialization of your Base
with a static member variable called `size`, wouldn't the warning make sense?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66472
--- Comment #5 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #3)
> I compile with g++ -wrapper gdb,--args ... where this gcc was compile with
> -O0 -g. Breaking on warning_at shows that member is a using_decl.
Is there anywa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66472
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66472
--- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Gael Guennebaud from comment #0)
> As suggested there https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57709#c16, I
> tried to break at the call to warning_at to give you more input, but with no
> luck
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66472
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66163
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66163
--- Comment #11 from Martin Liška ---
Fixing all sanitizer issues in Firefox helped me to successfully built FF with
LTO. The binary does not segfault :)
Martin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66472
--- Comment #2 from Gael Guennebaud ---
But with the same reasoning you would end up reintroducing shadow warnings
between local variables and *any* functions, not only the ones visible from a
using statement. It has been recognized that triggeri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66472
Christoph Hertzberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||chtz at informatik dot
uni-bremen.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66423
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Tue Jun 9 12:31:43 2015
New Revision: 224279
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224279&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-06-09 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/66423
* mat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66423
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66448
--- Comment #12 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #11)
> (In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #10)
> > It's not supposed to. It's for issue three as stated.
>
> The test suite is running - was going to wait to report
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66471
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to İsmail Dönmez from comment #2)
> (In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1)
> > Created attachment 35725 [details]
> > Patch
> >
> > May I ask you for testing the patch?
>
> Fixes the bootstrap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66471
--- Comment #2 from İsmail Dönmez ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1)
> Created attachment 35725 [details]
> Patch
>
> May I ask you for testing the patch?
Fixes the bootstrap for me, thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66471
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 35725
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35725&action=edit
Patch
May I ask you for testing the patch?
Thanks,
Martin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66472
Bug ID: 66472
Summary: -Wshadow gets confused by using statements in template
classes
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66471
Bug ID: 66471
Summary: BITMAP is a reserved keyword on MinGW
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66470
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45780
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
I think -Wbool-arith makes sense as a separate option. While -Wc90-c99-compat
warns about any use of bool (in a declaration, cast, ...), -Wbool-arith would
only warn about suspicious uses of boolean vars.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57709
--- Comment #16 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Gael Guennebaud from comment #15)
> -Wshadow still trigger false positive when a base member functions is
> imported with the "using" keyword, as in the following example (tested with
> gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57709
Gael Guennebaud changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gael.guennebaud at gmail dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66464
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66468
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66470
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64164
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66470
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66470
Bug ID: 66470
Summary: [4.8/4.9/5/6 Regression] TLS ICE due to
ix86_split_long_move
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33661
--- Comment #13 from Andreas Krebbel ---
Created attachment 35723
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35723&action=edit
Experimental fix
The attached patch fixes the problem for me.
There appear to be two problems:
1. When par
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66448
--- Comment #11 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #10)
> It's not supposed to. It's for issue three as stated.
indeed;
state as of now is that (with both proposed patches in place and
--disable-werror), the multiple D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66468
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66030
--- Comment #14 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Tue Jun 9 08:50:00 2015
New Revision: 224273
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224273&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/66030
* config/abi/pre/gnu.ver: Export code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66468
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #2)
> The testcase is invalid:
>
> markus@x4 testc % g++ -r -nostdlib a.ii c.ii e.ii -g -O2 -flto
> a.ii:21:8: warning: ‘Run’ violates the C++ One Definition Rule
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66448
--- Comment #10 from Aldy Hernandez ---
It's not supposed to. It's for issue three as stated.
On Jun 9, 2015 4:36 AM, "dominiq at lps dot ens.fr"
wrote:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66448
>
> --- Comment #9 from Dominique d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66468
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
