https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66444
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The testcase has been reduced from much larger testcase, the content of the
fn1 function matters only for the IPA-RA analysis, so can be changed to
something else, and the other functions supposedly can be de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66454
--- Comment #2 from patrick at parcs dot ath.cx ---
Created attachment 35712
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35712&action=edit
rough patch
Here is a rough patch of the aforementioned change -- to look at the column of
the fir
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65932
gccbugs at rooted dot tk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gccbugs at rooted dot tk
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66455
Bug ID: 66455
Summary: is_always_equal unimplemented
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66271
--- Comment #7 from gccbugs at rooted dot tk ---
Seems like it is indeed the same issue.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66454
--- Comment #1 from patrick at parcs dot ath.cx ---
We suppress the warning for
int *p;
void
foo (int n)
{
if (p)
foo (1);
else // guard token
if (p) // body token
foo (2);
foo (3); // next toke
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66454
Bug ID: 66454
Summary: Common -Wmisleading-indentation false-positive
triggered in the Linux kernel
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66443
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66453
Bug ID: 66453
Summary: In a deadlock libitm allocates all available RAM until
oom is called
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66421
Nathan Sidwell changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nathan at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66271
Jim Wilson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wilson at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66444
--- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Looks like reload_cse_move2add could use a similar fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66444
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |vries at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66452
Bug ID: 66452
Summary: [6 Regression] [UBSAN] *.Lubsan_data0' defined but not
used
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66451
Bug ID: 66451
Summary: Array not fully destructed if element destructor
throws exception
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66449
--- Comment #1 from Dmitry G. Dyachenko ---
start FAIL for me : r224020
configure as
$ ~/src/gcc_r224020/configure --prefix=/usr/local/gcc_current --enable-static
--enable-checking=release --enable-languages=c,c++,lto --enable-plugin
--disable-l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66450
Bug ID: 66450
Summary: [5 Regression][C++11][constexpr] Issues when
delegating implicit copy constructor in constexpr
function
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66442
--- Comment #4 from Andreas Schwab ---
Fixes the test case on m68k.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66448
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Aldy Hernandez from comment #2)
> > 2. Once (1) is fixed, bootstrap then fails with:
> >
> > /GCC/gcc-trunk/gcc/ipa-pure-const.c:1640:1: error:
> > ‘{anonymous}::pass_ipa_pure_const::pass_ipa_pu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66448
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66442
--- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to vries from comment #2)
> Created attachment 35711 [details]
> tentative patch
Bootstrap and reg-test on x86_64 succeeded.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66258
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Whomever approved the patch for the trunk can also approve the backport.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66449
Bug ID: 66449
Summary: [6 Regression] ICE: in build2_stat, at tree.c:4376
with -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66442
--- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 35711
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35711&action=edit
tentative patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52960
Jan Kratochvil changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dodji at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66448
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-apple-darwin14 |*-apple-darwin*
Status|UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66448
--- Comment #1 from Iain Sandoe ---
Created attachment 35710
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35710&action=edit
declare "extern int __CFConstantStringClassReference" lazily
There seem to be three issues triggered by 224161
1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52869
--- Comment #1 from htfy96 ---
#include
using namespace std;
class A
{
public:
void g() noexcept(false) {}
void f() noexcept( noexcept( g() )) {};
};
A a;
int main()
{
cout<
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66448
Bug ID: 66448
Summary: [6 Regression] Bootstrap fails on darwin after r224161
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
29 matches
Mail list logo
