https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66424
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66359
Tim Shen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66359
--- Comment #5 from Tim Shen ---
Author: timshen
Date: Fri Jun 5 04:58:26 2015
New Revision: 224144
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224144&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/66359
Backport from mainline
2014-11-13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63775
--- Comment #4 from Tim Shen ---
Author: timshen
Date: Fri Jun 5 04:58:26 2015
New Revision: 224144
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224144&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/66359
Backport from mainline
2014-11-13
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66350
TC changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rs2740 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4 from TC ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66390
--- Comment #2 from tornenvi at gmail dot com ---
also note that line 84 of \gcc\ada\a-tigeli.adb reads
memset (S, 10, size_t (N));
I believe the hardcoded '10' here should be 'LM'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66423
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66422
--- Comment #4 from Ganesh Ajjanagadde ---
Updated attachment that compiles to standalone executable (invoked with similar
flags for with/without warning as before: gcc -Warray-bounds -O3 test.c,
gcc -Warray-bounds test.c respectively).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66422
Ganesh Ajjanagadde changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #35698|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66425
Bug ID: 66425
Summary: (void) cast doesn't suppress
__attribute__((warn_unused_result))
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65669
--- Comment #3 from Doug Evans ---
(In reply to Doug Evans from comment #2)
> I was wondering if one could just do a strip --strip-debug of globals_io.o
> in the Makefile.
This doesn't work, as is, because gdb ignores the DIE with the real type
-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 6.0.0 20150604 (experimental) [trunk revision 224114] (GCC)
$
$ gcc-trunk -m32 -Os small.c; ./a.out
small.c: In function ‘fn1’:
small.c:7:1: warning: type of ‘p’ defaults to ‘int’ [-Wimplicit-int]
fn1 (p)
^
$ gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66423
Bug ID: 66423
Summary: a % (1 << b) no longer gets folded to a & (1 << b) for
unsigned a and b
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66422
--- Comment #2 from Ganesh Ajjanagadde ---
But myfoo->foo_size is not set within the foo_loop function.
For instance, myfoo->foo_size could be set outside the function boundary,
and then the function could be called (say foo_size = 3 or 4).
This
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66422
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I don't think this is a false warning as you are saying the size is at least 4
which means if buf[ does not contain 1, you will access past the loop bounds.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66422
Bug ID: 66422
Summary: -Warray-bounds false positive with -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65945
--- Comment #11 from James Y Knight ---
As far as I can tell, the C++ ABI discussion,
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lang.c++.abi/265
concluded that alignof(nullptr_t) should be alignof(void*) already.
Any chance this change can be made an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66418
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse ---
Two relevant links to optimize set_intersection (they consider the intersection
of k sets, but the case k=2 is still interesting)
http://erikdemaine.org/papers/SODA2000/
http://erikdemaine.org/papers/ALENEX200
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66421
Bug ID: 66421
Summary: G++ fails compilation when assigning tuple created
with variadic template to auto variable
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65751
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66420
Bug ID: 66420
Summary: valgrind error in improve_allocation
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
As
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58749
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Status|ASS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32834
Bug 32834 depends on bug 58749, which changed state.
Bug 58749 Summary: PACK(ADJUSTL([" a"," b"]), [.TRUE.,.FALSE.]) causes an
internal compiler error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58749
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58749
--- Comment #3 from Thomas Koenig ---
Author: tkoenig
Date: Thu Jun 4 18:55:29 2015
New Revision: 224137
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224137&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-06-04 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/58749
* iresolve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58749
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|2013-10-16 0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66369
--- Comment #9 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Marcus Kool from comment #8)
> Can you confirm that the code has
> return __builtin_ctzl(v);
__inline__ long find_pos32( unsigned char ch, mycharset32 set )
{
__m256i regchx256;
__m256
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66369
--- Comment #8 from Marcus Kool ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #5)
> Created attachment 35693 [details]
> Patch to add zero-extended MOVMSK patterns
>
> This patch adds zero-extended MOVMSK patterns.
>
> However, one more cast from (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66319
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54304
--- Comment #16 from Andrew Pinski ---
Just to let everyone know this is how Darin's ld work. It searches for shared
libraries through all of the library patches and then if it does not find one,
it searches for a static library. So for Darwin, y
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54304
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egall at gwmail dot gwu.edu
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66067
--- Comment #10 from James Almer ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #9)
> I've tested latest gcc-5 branch and still cannot reproduce the issue.
> The only ICE I get building range-v3 is PR66405.
Odd. I'll see about reporting the g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66394
--- Comment #7 from Martin Liška ---
Ok, so 4.8 is unaffected branch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63843
--- Comment #6 from Christophe Lyon ---
Author: clyon
Date: Thu Jun 4 12:43:03 2015
New Revision: 224125
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224125&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-06-02 Christophe Lyon
Backport from trunk r217753.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66394
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
Correct patch:
diff --git a/gcc/DATESTAMP b/gcc/DATESTAMP
index 36a0ea2..415abbf 100644
--- a/gcc/DATESTAMP
+++ b/gcc/DATESTAMP
@@ -1 +1 @@
-20150603
+20150604
diff --git a/gcc/lto-cgraph.c b/gcc/lto
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66394
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška ---
Situation with all branches younger than 4.8 is:
4.8-branch: a bit different issue is touched and fixed in r208454, I'm going to
test a backport from 4.9 branch
4.9-branch - master: in r201468 Honza added str
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66067
--- Comment #9 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
I've tested latest gcc-5 branch and still cannot reproduce the issue.
The only ICE I get building range-v3 is PR66405.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66405
--- Comment #5 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Started with r217250 aka DR 1558.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66394
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[4.9/5/6 Regression] ICE in |[4.8/4.9/5/6 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66405
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66418
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66396
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66251
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jun 4 11:11:36 2015
New Revision: 224124
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224124&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-06-04 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/66251
* gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66251
--- Comment #14 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Jun 4 11:10:47 2015
New Revision: 224123
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224123&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-06-04 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/66251
* gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66415
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66415
--- Comment #6 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #5)
> Oops, the patch does not fixed the reduced case, so something else is needed
> as well :(.
It seems this is triggering:
if (map != LINEMAPS_LAST_ORDINAR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66394
--- Comment #3 from Martin Liška ---
Started with r201408.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66369
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66369
--- Comment #6 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Thu Jun 4 10:06:11 2015
New Revision: 224120
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224120&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/66369
* config/i386/sse.md (_pmovmsk): M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50800
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tim at klingt dot org
--- Comment #18 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57472
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66419
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66419
Bug ID: 66419
Summary: [6 regression] FAIL:
gcc.target/aarch64/aapcs64/va_arg-6.c execution, -O3
-g
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66415
--- Comment #5 from Marek Polacek ---
Oops, the patch does not fixed the reduced case, so something else is needed as
well :(.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45170
Bug 45170 depends on bug 47674, which changed state.
Bug 47674 Summary: gfortran.dg/realloc_on_assign_5.f03: Segfault at run time
for deferred (allocatable) string length
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47674
What|Rem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47674
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66385
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||36854
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66200
--- Comment #3 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Fixed on trunk so far.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66192
--- Comment #2 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Author: ramana
Date: Thu Jun 4 09:19:51 2015
New Revision: 224118
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224118&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Remove TARGET_RELAXED_ORDERING and optimize for weak memory models
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66200
--- Comment #2 from Ramana Radhakrishnan ---
Author: ramana
Date: Thu Jun 4 09:19:51 2015
New Revision: 224118
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224118&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Remove TARGET_RELAXED_ORDERING and optimize for weak memory models
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66418
Bug ID: 66418
Summary: Optimize set_intersection when one list is much
smaller and the other has random access
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Key
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66415
--- Comment #4 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #2)
> Manuel, does that look fine to you?
I wonder why line is NULL, but even if it can only happen due to bugs in other
parts of the compiler, we should not ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66415
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
void
fn1 (void)
{
__builtin_printf
("x%dxxx");
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66050
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66385
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Koenig ---
*** Bug 66050 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66415
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66417
Bug ID: 66417
Summary: std::codecvt_utf16 generates
incorrect output
Product: gcc
Version: 5.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66415
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66190
--- Comment #11 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Thu Jun 4 08:39:01 2015
New Revision: 224117
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224117&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR sanitizer/66190
* cp-gimplify.c (struct cp_generici
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66413
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66341
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66341
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Thu Jun 4 08:17:45 2015
New Revision: 224115
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=224115&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/66341
* c-typeck.c (build_c_cast): Wrap VALUE into
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66416
Bug ID: 66416
Summary: Regression: string::find 3.5 times slower than memrchr
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66415
Bug ID: 66415
Summary: ice in location_column_from_byte_offset
Product: gcc
Version: 6.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66351
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab ---
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2015-06/msg00430.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66414
Bug ID: 66414
Summary: Regression: string::find ten times slower than strstr
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66388
--- Comment #2 from amker at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Had a patch, will polish it after annual leave.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=66412
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
77 matches
Mail list logo