https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65516
--- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka ---
I commited the change to mainline, so you only need to update the tree.
Honza
I commited the change to mainline, so you only need to update the tree.
Honza
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65516
--- Comment #6 from David Kredba ---
Could you please attach the patch as attachement to here? I am not able to save
it as valid patch file even after I switched ml to "raw text".
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64317
--- Comment #25 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Unwanted loads have been eliminated by the postreload-gcse improvements.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64317
--- Comment #24 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Mon Mar 23 05:21:04 2015
New Revision: 221585
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221585&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/64317
* Makefile.in (OBJS): Add gcse-co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52036
Alexander Dubov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||oakad at yahoo dot com
--- Comment #10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62049
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60956
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65519
--- Comment #1 from YunQiang Su ---
It only fails when using -O2 +, while
build successfully when using -O1.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65520
Bug ID: 65520
Summary: elaborated-type-specifiers and inaccessible
injected-class-names
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65519
Bug ID: 65519
Summary: Unable to coalesce ssa_names 2 and 87 which are marked
as MUST COALESCE if ZCX_By_Default is set False
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60956
--- Comment #11 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Mon Mar 23 01:32:15 2015
New Revision: 221584
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221584&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-03-22 Jerry DeLisle
PR libgfortran/60956
Backport fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64860
--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka ---
Created attachment 35100
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35100&action=edit
partial patch
Hi,
this is a patch that adds necessary checks into resolution code. Basically if
static linking is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65456
--- Comment #10 from David Edelsohn ---
I believe that the choice to scalarize is based on the vector cost model.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65515
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65475
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65475
--- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Mon Mar 23 00:17:07 2015
New Revision: 221582
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221582&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ipa/65475
* ipa-devirt.c: Include demangle.h
(odr_type_d):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60956
--- Comment #10 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Mon Mar 23 00:16:01 2015
New Revision: 221578
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221578&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-03-22 Jerry DeLisle
PR libgfortran/60956
Backport fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65516
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65505
--- Comment #3 from Kazumoto Kojima ---
(In reply to Oleg Endo from comment #2)
> I'm now testing the patch in attachment 35084 [details] on sh-elf.
> Kaz, could you please also pre-test it on sh4-linux?
No new failures on sh4-unknown-linux-gnu.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65518
ikonomisma at googlemail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |tree-optimization
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65168
--- Comment #12 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #11)
> Great, then my suggestion would be to use exactly the same wording for
> references.
I guess the Clang devs added their wording because someone mistake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65518
Bug ID: 65518
Summary: gcc consumes all memory with -O3
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65502
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65168
--- Comment #11 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Great, then my suggestion would be to use exactly the same wording for
references.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59513
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jvdelisle at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59513
--- Comment #29 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Mar 22 21:37:13 2015
New Revision: 221575
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221575&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-03-22 Jerry DeLisle
PR libgfortran/59513
* gfortran.t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65502
--- Comment #2 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Sun Mar 22 21:10:24 2015
New Revision: 221574
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221574&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ipa/65502
* ipa-comdats.c (enqueue_references): Walk through t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65517
--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Started with r221409.
trippels@gcc2-power8 ~ % ~/gcc_build_dir_/gcc/cc1 -fpreprocessed foo.i -quiet
-dumpbase foo.i -auxbase foo -O2 -w -version -o /dev/null
GNU C11 (GCC) version 5.0.0 20150313 (exper
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65503
Mikhail Maltsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||maltsevm at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65517
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65168
--- Comment #10 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #9)
> > What about "the address of the object bound to 'r' may be assumed to always
> > convert to true"?
>
> Why only warn about references, and not also for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65168
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #8)
> Sure, I was trying to make the Clang message a bit more understandable. I
> got completely confused by "pointer may be assumed to always convert to
> true
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60851
--- Comment #13 from Uroš Bizjak ---
Created attachment 35099
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35099&action=edit
Proposed patch for 4.9 branch
In 4.9 branch, the check is located in three different places throughout
constrain
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65517
Bug ID: 65517
Summary: src/getargs.c:112:1: internal compiler error: in
get_loop_body, at cfgloop.c:856
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60851
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59513
--- Comment #28 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Mar 22 18:42:52 2015
New Revision: 221572
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221572&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-03-22 Jerry DeLisle
PR libgfortran/59513
* io/transfe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65168
--- Comment #8 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #7)
> The diagnostic needs rewording, &r is not the address of a reference, it's
> the address of whatever the reference is bound to. Please don't add
> diagnos
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65168
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The diagnostic needs rewording, &r is not the address of a reference, it's the
address of whatever the reference is bound to. Please don't add diagnostics
that talk about something that has no meaning in th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65168
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65168
--- Comment #5 from Jan Kratochvil ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #3)
> Does this patch work in your real-world code?
There were just many tests like:
if (!&r)
return 0;
So it should really work, thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65504
--- Comment #15 from Eric Botcazou ---
It's a bug in Dead Store Elimination (so -fno-dse is the workaround) exposed by
a combination of GCSE and FWPROP which changes the canonicalization of
addresses (so -fno-gcse and -fno-forward-propagate paper
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65516
--- Comment #4 from David Kredba ---
Created attachment 35097
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35097&action=edit
Preprocessed source file gzipped
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65516
--- Comment #3 from David Kredba ---
Created attachment 35096
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35096&action=edit
Preprocessed source file gzipped
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65516
--- Comment #2 from David Kredba ---
Created attachment 35095
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35095&action=edit
Preprocessed source file gzipped
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65516
--- Comment #1 from David Kredba ---
Created attachment 35094
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=35094&action=edit
Preprocessed source file gzipped
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65516
Bug ID: 65516
Summary: lto1: internal compiler error: in get_odr_type, at
ipa-devirt.c:1809
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65168
--- Comment #4 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
Or even:
int fii(int p) {
int &r=p;
return !&r;
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65168
--- Comment #3 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
I got confused by Clang's message. The problem is not the pointer or NULL. The
problem is converting the address of a reference to bool:
int fii(int *p) {
int &r=*p;
return !&r;
}
This is trivial
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65456
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65515
John David Anglin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11 |hppa64-hp-hpux11.11
Ho
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65512
--- Comment #5 from Peter VARGA ---
1) There are bugs which are not important. It is always a point of view. As a
starter here I had 2 possibilities and I took the wrong. More or less you may
be right but it was a simple misunderstanding. AND I d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65512
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Peter VARGA from comment #3)
> 1) I had no idea how the importance is qualified. Is my 1st bug report. For
> me it was a blocker because I could not finish compiling
That applies to most bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65512
--- Comment #3 from Peter VARGA ---
1) I had no idea how the importance is qualified. Is my 1st bug report. For me
it was a blocker because I could not finish compiling
2) Not using -Werror is really a bit hard - don't you think?! My workaround i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65512
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|blocker |normal
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52595
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nilschrbrause at googlemail
dot co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65514
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65514
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65503
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
You're creating a huge object on the stack, which is a bad idea, and the
problem is probably that GCC is running out of memory.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65498
--- Comment #5 from Louis Dionne ---
[Just a quick comment: thank you for being so responsive. Most of my bug
reports on Clang are left hanging for a long while before anyone ever considers
them, and I appreciate it not being the case here.]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65500
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65515
Bug ID: 65515
Summary: [5 Regression] FAIL:
gcc.c-torture/compile/limits-fndefn.c -O2 -flto
-flto-partition=none (ICE) -- SIGSEGV for stack
growth failure
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65168
--- Comment #2 from Jan Kratochvil ---
It should check the '!&r' condition which makes no sense. The variable
initialization in real world programs is too complicated to be able to figure
out it may be NULL.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65510
--- Comment #2 from Chen Gang ---
For test.i:
int oxu_driver_init(void)
{
*(volatile unsigned int *)(-1) = *(unsigned int *)(-1);
}
If test.i use a valid number (>= 0x10) or normal variable instead of "-1", it
will be OK (the insns are almost
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65498
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65513
Mikhail Maltsev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||maltsevm at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65514
Bug ID: 65514
Summary: Initializing a non-static const data member of a
template class from a static const data member of
another template class results in errors in certain
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65513
--- Comment #1 from Peter VARGA ---
One of these following steps do not produce any error message and the compiler
can finish successfully:
1) Add {} to the sDateTime member
2) Remove the std::atomic member
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65513
Bug ID: 65513
Summary: gcc stops with "internal compiler error"
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65512
--- Comment #1 from Peter VARGA ---
Output for the -v option:
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=g++
Target: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-4.9.2_source/configure --disable-multilib
Thread model: posix
gcc version 4.9.2 (GCC)
CO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65512
Bug ID: 65512
Summary: Inconsistent report of uninitialized members
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: blocker
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65509
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Started I think with r218462.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65168
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|x86_64-linux-gnu|
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65509
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65511
--- Comment #3 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
testcase:
...
#define N 1000
unsigned int a[N];
unsigned int b[N];
unsigned int c[N];
void __attribute__((noclone,noinline))
f (unsigned int n)
{
int i;
#pragma omp parallel
{
#pragma omp for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65511
--- Comment #2 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
using tentative patch, we get:
...
if (ivtmp_25 < _12)
goto ;
else
goto ;
;;succ: 13 [99.0%] (TRUE_VALUE,EXECUTABLE)
;;14 [1.0%] (FALSE_VALUE,EXECUTABLE)
...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65443
vries at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #35078|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65511
--- Comment #1 from vries at gcc dot gnu.org ---
tentative patch:
...
diff --git a/gcc/tree-cfg.c b/gcc/tree-cfg.c
index 0f5e428..837dbbd 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-cfg.c
+++ b/gcc/tree-cfg.c
@@ -6175,6 +6175,7 @@ gimple_duplicate_sese_tail (edge entry
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65509
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65511
Bug ID: 65511
Summary: transform_to_exit_first_loop
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: trivial
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65510
Chen Gang changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gang.chen.5i5j at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65510
Bug ID: 65510
Summary: target-tic6x: unrecognizable insn with -O(1,2,3,s).
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
82 matches
Mail list logo
