https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65232
Bug ID: 65232
Summary: [5 Regression] bootstrap failure (ICE in
change_symbol_block, at varasm.c:1230) on
arm-linux-gnueabihf, in libstdc++ stage1
Product: gcc
Ve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64812
--- Comment #8 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Also happens with gcc-5 when linking two different LibreOffice libraries.
(libscfiltlo.so and libooxlo.so)
The undefined symbol is:
x4 ~ # c++filt _ZThn40_N3utl28OSeekableOutputStreamWrapper7acquireEv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63890
--- Comment #12 from Jan Hubicka ---
Hi,
the problem is that darwin output profiler after prologue.
With ACCUMULATE_OUTGOING_ARGS we leave stack pointer aligned to boundary - 4
(for return pointer) without we leave it aligned.
I guess it is possi
Hi,
the problem is that darwin output profiler after prologue.
With ACCUMULATE_OUTGOING_ARGS we leave stack pointer aligned to boundary - 4
(for return pointer) without we leave it aligned.
I guess it is possible to compensate this in FUNCTION_PROFILER, but I am not
convinced this will work reliabl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65150
--- Comment #24 from Jan Hubicka ---
I beleive so, at least I can bootstrap w/o the aliases.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65088
--- Comment #3 from Marat Zakirov ---
> I think this has been discussed on the gcc mailing list
Marek could you please share some resuting conclusion at least for x86
platform?
Why didn't x86 GCC RTL fold these loads/stores?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65228
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65120
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65150
mrs at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63892
Bug 63892 depends on bug 65150, which changed state.
Bug 65150 Summary: [5 Regression] r220875 causes bootstrap failure on x86_64
darwin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65150
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65231
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65231
Roman Proskuryakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||documentation
Severity|no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65231
Bug ID: 65231
Summary: Dead link in man page to the status of C99 features
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65230
Bug ID: 65230
Summary: pretty-print inconsistent output for similar objects
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65120
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65150
--- Comment #22 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Fri Feb 27 02:06:48 2015
New Revision: 221040
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221040&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR bootstrap/65150
* ipa-icf.c (symbol_compare_collection::symbol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65220
--- Comment #8 from Aldy Hernandez ---
FWIW, patch succeeded as I posted it. No regressions. Fixes PR.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65229
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65229
Bug ID: 65229
Summary: pretty-printer exception on std::bitset<0>
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libstdc+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65220
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||uros at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65220
--- Comment #6 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Created attachment 34886
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34886&action=edit
corrected patch
I cheated and looked at test results before bootstrap. There I found that
gcc.dg/torture/call
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65138
--- Comment #5 from Michael Meissner ---
Ok, after figuring out that I was building on gcc2-power8.osuosl.org (the old
big endian system that is going away), I checked out the current revision
(221024) and rebuilt a tool chain on gcc2-2-power8.os
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65138
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65228
--- Comment #3 from Jan Kratochvil ---
Interesting that FSF GCC r220934 which should be gcc-5.0.0-0.16.fc23.x86_64
still crashes while that Fedora GCC does not crash.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65215
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Feb 26 21:01:59 2015
New Revision: 221033
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221033&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/65215
* tree-ssa-math-opts.c (find_bswap_or_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65215
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65216
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Thu Feb 26 21:03:14 2015
New Revision: 221034
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221034&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/65216
* tree-ssa-reassoc.c (rewrite_expr_tree
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65216
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65061
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fabien.chene at gmail dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65228
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65228
Jan Kratochvil changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|other |c
Host|x86_64-linux-gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64693
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
Author: marxin
Date: Thu Feb 26 20:21:38 2015
New Revision: 221031
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221031&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Fix PR ipa/64693
PR ipa/64693
* ipa-icf.c (symbol_compare_collect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64693
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
FAIL: gcc (GCC) 5.0.0 20150226 (experimental)
PATH="/home/jkratoch/redhat/gcchead-root/bin:$PATH"
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/home/jkratoch/redhat/gcchead-root/lib64
/home/jkratoch/redhat/gdb-clean/gdb/gdb -nx gdb -ex start -ex 'compile code -r
__auto_type qwe = def'
gdb command li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65227
--- Comment #2 from Bert Wesarg ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> You should always include gcc-plugin.h first when compiling plugins.
But the documentation in gcc/doc/plugins.texi only reads:
The header @file{gcc-plugin.h} must
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65192
Georg-Johann Lay changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65227
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|major |normal
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65192
--- Comment #1 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Author: gjl
Date: Thu Feb 26 19:43:54 2015
New Revision: 221029
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221029&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/65192
* config/avr/avr-protos.h (tiny_valid_direct_memo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65227
Bug ID: 65227
Summary: Plugin headers are unusable when included after
inttypes.h
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61142
--- Comment #6 from Oleg Endo ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Thu Feb 26 19:14:23 2015
New Revision: 221026
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221026&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/61142
* config/sh/sh.c (sh_check_add_incdec_notes):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65008
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65008
--- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Thu Feb 26 18:59:50 2015
New Revision: 221025
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221025&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ipa/65008
* ipa-inline.c (early_inliner): Recompute inline p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65220
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
Assi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65226
Bug ID: 65226
Summary: hgcc-plugin.h is unusable when GCC was build with
non-system or in-tree GMP
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: cri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65088
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49748
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58942
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58288
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57647
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63420
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65171
Bill Schmidt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65171
--- Comment #8 from Bill Schmidt ---
Author: wschmidt
Date: Thu Feb 26 17:43:03 2015
New Revision: 221022
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221022&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-02-26 Bill Schmidt
PR target/65171
* config/rs6000/rs60
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64999
--- Comment #34 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
You're right, we could just change runtime_callers. Or, simpler still, just
change callback in libgo/runtime/go-callers.c. Good point.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35330
--- Comment #12 from Kai Tietz ---
issue seems to be that in declare_weak we don't check that DECL is actually
either a function, or a variable declaration.
Fix would be to add an error-message in declare_weak ().
Index: varasm.c
==
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65225
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=35330
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktietz at gcc dot gnu.org
Assignee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65225
Bug ID: 65225
Summary: [AArch64] Various aarch64_rtx_costs improvements
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65224
Bug ID: 65224
Summary: fprofile-reorder-functions reorders using expand order
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64432
--- Comment #31 from Jerry DeLisle ---
I have generated a test case that includes all possible combinations and found
some issues with the patch related to Real (KIND 10). I am working this now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65175
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65223
Bug ID: 65223
Summary: Regresion on elemental type-bound procedure's passed
object with INTENT(OUT)
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65112
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65202
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64367
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64999
--- Comment #33 from boger at us dot ibm.com ---
(In reply to Ian Lance Taylor from comment #32)
> > I don't think it is a good idea to add code in multiple places to fix up
> > the pc values after calling runtime.Callers. That seems prone to er
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55993
--- Comment #12 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to splinterofchaos from comment #11)
> I still get an error with 4.9 when using one of the less reduced cases,
> although not when using the test cases in that patch.
>
>
> #include
> struct A {
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64999
--- Comment #32 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
> I don't think it is a good idea to add code in multiple places to fix up the
> pc values after calling runtime.Callers. That seems prone to error and
> confusing for future updates to the code.
Righ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64999
--- Comment #31 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
> Why is it important to be able to map a file:line to a single PC?
The problem is that the Go code in the runtime/pprof package assumes that it
can take a single PC value and map that to a meaningful fi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53118
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P2 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64946
--- Comment #9 from vekumar at gcc dot gnu.org ---
This match.pd pattern vectorizes the PR but works only with -fwrapv.
(simplify
( convert (abs (convert@1 @0)))
( if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (type)
/* We check for type compatibility between @0 a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46102
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46102
--- Comment #12 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Author: aldyh
Date: Thu Feb 26 15:31:52 2015
New Revision: 221016
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221016&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR debug/46102
* dwarf2out.c (dwarf2out_init): Disable -felimina
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65220
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 34884
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34884&action=edit
gcc5-pr65520.patch
Untested patch for the i386.md change.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64999
--- Comment #30 from boger at us dot ibm.com ---
I don't think it is a good idea to add code in multiple places to fix up the pc
values after calling runtime.Callers. That seems prone to error and confusing
for future updates to the code.
>Fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55993
splinterofchaos at gmail dot com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||splinterofchaos at gmai
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65202
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Thu Feb 26 15:03:23 2015
New Revision: 221015
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221015&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/65202
* constexpr.c (cxx_eval_constant_expression): Don'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64570
--- Comment #3 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2)
> Fails everywhere, 4.6 rejects the testcase. Looks more like a C++ frontend
> issue to me.
Still goes wrong over a month later with trunk dated 20150225.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65038
--- Comment #2 from Kai Tietz ---
Suggested patch send at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-02/msg01615.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65038
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65193
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
I already get
> ./xg++ -B. -nostdlib -fPIC -flto -shared t.ii -O2 -g
t.ii: In function ‘float_next_imp’:
t.ii:33:7: error: address taken, but ADDRESSABLE bit not set
float_next_imp (T p1, Policy p2)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65220
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65217
--- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Thu Feb 26 14:17:06 2015
New Revision: 221010
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221010&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Add a testcase for PR target/65217
PR target/65217
* gcc.t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65048
--- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Fixed by Sebastain's change on the trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65048
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65048
--- Comment #3 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Thu Feb 26 13:56:39 2015
New Revision: 221007
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221007&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/65048
* tree-ssa-threadupdate.c (valid_jump_th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43701
Kai Tietz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61634
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65171
--- Comment #7 from Bill Schmidt ---
Yes, this is unrelated and not really a problem. Something has caused us to
recently start spilling a couple of nonvolatile vector registers to the stack
for this test case, resulting in the failure. I'm goi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61634
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Thu Feb 26 13:28:48 2015
New Revision: 221006
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=221006&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-02-26 Richard Biener
Backport from mainline
2014-11-2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64374
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65222
Bug ID: 65222
Summary: [5 Regression] -mtune= or -march=: Not all options not
documented: slm, knl, shanghai, istanbul
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65220
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
We hit
rtx
allocate_dynamic_stack_space (rtx size, unsigned size_align,
unsigned required_align, bool cannot_accumulate)
{
...
/* ??? STACK_POINTER_OFFSET is always defined n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65221
--- Comment #1 from Philipp Ittershagen ---
$ g++ -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=g++
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/4.9/lto-wrapper
Target: x86_64-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Debian 4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65221
Bug ID: 65221
Summary: typedef-name identifier not resolved in static member
instantiation
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64997
alalaw01 at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65220
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63509
Richard W.M. Jones changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rjones at redhat dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65220
Bug ID: 65220
Summary: Regression: integer division in stack alignment for
VLA allocation
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65216
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 34883
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34883&action=edit
gcc5-pr65216.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65219
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
