https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65062
--- Comment #2 from Thiago Macieira ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> it was just fixed yesterday, see bug 64898. Please check the latest GCC
> before filing a bug especially during stage 4.
>
> *** This bug has been marked as a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65062
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64898
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thiago at kde dot org
--- Comment #5 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65062
Bug ID: 65062
Summary: [4.9 Regression] Miscompilation: invalid C++ mangled
name for global variable
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65015
--- Comment #18 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 34753
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34753&action=edit
A patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65061
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65061
Bug ID: 65061
Summary: [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] Issue with using declaration
and member class template
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60894
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|fabien at gcc dot gnu.org |paolo.carlini at oracle
dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60894
--- Comment #13 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Feb 13 23:57:10 2015
New Revision: 220702
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220702&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2015-02-13 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/60894
* decl.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64823
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65060
--- Comment #2 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Fri Feb 13 23:53:54 2015
New Revision: 220701
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220701&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR bootstrap/65060
Revert my change for tree-optimization/64
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65060
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65053
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62217
--- Comment #7 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
But replacement with the most dominating name (presumably a default def
dominates everything) isn't going to help here.
In many ways we'd be better off if we didn't propagate from those equality
comparisons
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65053
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Feb 13 23:20:31 2015
New Revision: 220700
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220700&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/65053
* tree-ssa-phiopt.c (value_replacement)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65060
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Assignee|unassigned at gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65060
Bug ID: 65060
Summary: [5 Regression] r220696 breaks bootstrap on
Linux/x86-32
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62132
howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||howarth at bromo dot med
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64432
--- Comment #16 from Harald Anlauf ---
(In reply to Jerry DeLisle from comment #15)
> I was looking at this one just the other day. There are three PRs related
> to SYSTEM_CLOCK that we should attempt to close. I will look some more
> tonight.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62017
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62017
--- Comment #12 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Feb 13 22:14:07 2015
New Revision: 220699
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220699&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/62017
* decl.c (begin_destructor_body): Only clobber the a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65054
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65057
--- Comment #3 from Sandro Mani ---
Yes, without -fuse-ld=gold it works.
What I forgot to mention: qt worked with gcc 4.9 (and the options passed to the
Qt configure script haven't changed). The build log of a qt5-qtbase build built
with gcc 4.9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65050
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65050
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
Author: mpolacek
Date: Fri Feb 13 22:07:36 2015
New Revision: 220698
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220698&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/65050
* c-decl.c (grokdeclarator): Print also the type whe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65054
--- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Feb 13 22:07:30 2015
New Revision: 220697
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220697&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/65054
* pt.c (template_args_equal): Look through conversion
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65058
--- Comment #2 from Michael Haubenwallner
---
Proposed patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-02/msg00885.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65057
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65059
Bug ID: 65059
Summary: [5 Regression] Chrome LTO: lto1: internal compiler
error: in ipa_comdats, at ipa-comdats.c:360
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65058
--- Comment #1 from Michael Haubenwallner
---
Probably this happens since gcc-4.3 due to this commit:
https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs/gcc/trunk/gcc/varasm.c?r1=119764&r2=119763&pathrev=119764
Problem is that assemble_external() does not call ASM_OU
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65057
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Does this work without -fuse-ld=gold ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65058
Bug ID: 65058
Summary: AIX: missing extern decorations "[DS]" for functions
and "[RW]" for variables
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64927
--- Comment #11 from Harald Anlauf ---
(In reply to Dominique d'Humieres from comment #10)
> > After Dominique pointed out a range of revisions where the
> > bug disappeared in the 4.9 branch, I browsed through the list
> > of svn log messages.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64172
--- Comment #13 from Vladimir Makarov ---
I've investigated the generated code. The problem is in IRA live-range
splitting on the region borders. The pseudo to consider is 157 which contains
local_prng.d in the following code
void randmemset (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65057
Bug ID: 65057
Summary: Broken shared library if created with -fuse-ld=gold
-shared -Wl,--dynamic-list
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64980
--- Comment #10 from Bernd Edlinger ---
(In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #9)
>
> (In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #8)
> > The call of get_d_position is now rewritten as follows:
> >
> > this.22 = VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR > __class_muli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64823
--- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Fri Feb 13 21:09:58 2015
New Revision: 220696
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220696&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/64823
* tree-vrp.c (identify_jump_threads): Ha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64823
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65028
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47477
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||law at redhat dot com
Summar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47477
--- Comment #21 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Fri Feb 13 20:17:55 2015
New Revision: 220695
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220695&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/47477
* match.pd (convert (plus/minus (convert
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63744
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65015
--- Comment #17 from H.J. Lu ---
This patch works wit the existing linker:
diff --git a/gcc/varasm.c b/gcc/varasm.c
index 0211306..f3241a8 100644
--- a/gcc/varasm.c
+++ b/gcc/varasm.c
@@ -7043,7 +7043,12 @@ default_file_start (void)
fputs (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65028
--- Comment #6 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Fri Feb 13 20:04:32 2015
New Revision: 220693
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220693&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ipa/65028
* ipa-inline-transform.c (mark_all_inlined_calls_cdt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65028
--- Comment #7 from Jan Hubicka ---
Author: hubicka
Date: Fri Feb 13 20:05:39 2015
New Revision: 220694
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220694&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ipa/65028
* ipa-prop.c (update_indirect_edges_after_inlining):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64980
--- Comment #9 from Mikael Morin ---
(In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #8)
> I will post this new patch, which combines Mikael's patch and
> fixes class_41.f03 and these test cases,
Actually, my patch was not supposed to be a real fix, ra
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63744
--- Comment #11 from Mikael Morin ---
Author: mikael
Date: Fri Feb 13 19:33:27 2015
New Revision: 220692
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220692&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Use the local name instead of the original name in the check for name co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65015
--- Comment #16 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #11)
> For reference, the following patch doesn't work:
>
> Index: gcc/varasm.c
> ===
> --- gcc/varasm.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60211
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Agreed, we usually don't backport fixes for invalid-code bugs.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65028
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka ---
>
> 2015-02-13 Martin Jambor
>
> PR ipa/65028
> * ipa-inline-transform.c (mark_all_inlined_calls_cdtor): New function.
> (inline_call): Use it.
Oops, that is quite an oversight at my side. The
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64980
--- Comment #8 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Created attachment 34751
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34751&action=edit
Proposed Fix
OK, now I see the original test case exposes an aliasing violation
when node is passed to node._v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63744
--- Comment #10 from Mikael Morin ---
Author: mikael
Date: Fri Feb 13 18:48:35 2015
New Revision: 220690
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220690&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Use the local name instead of the original name in the check for name co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65054
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65053
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65056
Bug ID: 65056
Summary: Missed optimization (x86): Redundant test/compare
after arithmetic operations
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
URL: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64812
Anthony G. Basile changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||basile at opensource dot
dyc.edu
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60211
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|paolo.carlin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65055
Bug ID: 65055
Summary: Types and variables differ in handling of multiple
instances of attribute aligned
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60211
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Feb 13 17:57:13 2015
New Revision: 220689
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220689&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2015-02-13 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/60211
* parser.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65048
--- Comment #2 from Sebastian Pop ---
Created attachment 34750
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34750&action=edit
fix
We used to attempt to jump thread this path that is not connex:
FSM jump thread: (7, 10) (13, 14)
This is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65053
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65054
--- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek ---
Started with r219973.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65015
--- Comment #15 from H.J. Lu ---
I opened:
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17973
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61397
--- Comment #4 from Michael Meissner ---
I put a LP64 on the test, because it was using 64-bit shifts in order to force
registers to be allocated from the Altivec register set. If you compile it in
32-bit mode, the emulation of 64-bit shifts/mas
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61397
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab ---
c9f03f9b6e7a888a270638c07190513189f8c33d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64506
--- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Feb 13 17:09:04 2015
New Revision: 220688
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220688&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-02-13 Jerry DeLisle
PR fortran/64506
* gfortran.dg/co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65054
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
That typedef is not really necessary:
const char *
foo (void)
{
return ((char *const) "abc" + 1);
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65028
--- Comment #4 from Martin Jambor ---
OK, so here are my findings. Switching off IPA-CP helps because the
pass then does not propagate polymorphic context from
_ZN8MySoPlexC2EN6soplex6SoPlex4TypeENS1_14RepresentationE/5887 to
_ZN6soplex9SPxSolve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64506
--- Comment #3 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Fri Feb 13 16:57:28 2015
New Revision: 220687
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220687&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-02-13 Jerry DeLisle
PR fortran/64506
* scanner.c (gfc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65054
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
ld/gcc/xgcc version 5.0.0 20150213
(experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65054
Bug ID: 65054
Summary: internal compiler error: in maybe_constant_value, at
cp/constexpr.c:3646
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63491
--- Comment #5 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Sorry, I can not reproduce the bug on the today trunk. Probably it was fixed
by numerous changes in LRA since Oct.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65053
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I believe this is a phiopt1 bug.
In *.ifcombine we have:
:
n_5 = foo ();
if (n_5 != 0)
goto ;
else
goto ;
:
# RANGE [0, 4294967294]
u_6 = n_5 + 4294967295;
:
# u_3 = PHI
goto ;
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65053
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65053
Bug ID: 65053
Summary: [5 Regression] PostgreSQL miscompilation
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optim
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65034
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59971
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65051
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65015
--- Comment #14 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On February 13, 2015 2:42:45 PM CET, "hjl.tools at gmail dot com"
wrote:
>https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65015
>
>--- Comment #13 from H.J. Lu ---
>We are generating
>
>.file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62209
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65051
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Feb 13 16:02:31 2015
New Revision: 220685
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220685&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/65051
* call.c (reference_binding): Don't look for bad conv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65052
--- Comment #3 from dhowells at redhat dot com ---
The compiler was built as:
#!/bin/bash
cd /data/fedora/cross-gcc/tmp/
tar xf /tmp/gcc-5.0.0-20150210.tar.bz2
mkdir build
cd build
CC=gcc \
CXX=g++ \
CFLAGS='-O2 -g -Wall -fexceptions -fstack-p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64933
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64986
--- Comment #3 from paul.richard.thomas at gmail dot com ---
Dear Uros and Dominique,
I'll try to get to this when I can. I have a horrible feeling that it
is the old problem of array constructors within array constructors all
of which are allo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65052
--- Comment #2 from dhowells at redhat dot com ---
Compiled with:
/data/fedora/cross-gcc/tmp/build/./gcc/xgcc
-B/data/fedora/cross-gcc/tmp/build/gcc/ -B/usr/c6x-uclinux/bin/ -O2 -c min.i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65052
Bug ID: 65052
Summary: ICE in c6x-uclinux target when building libgcc
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65052
--- Comment #1 from dhowells at redhat dot com ---
This can be produced by the following minimal source:
typedef int DItype __attribute__ ((mode (DI)));
typedef int shift_count_type __attribute__((mode (__libgcc_shift_count__)));
int __gnu_lshrd
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65046
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|-Wabi-tag doesn't warn |[5 regression] -Wabi-tag
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65051
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62209
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Note, this no longer fails starting with r217827. I'll have a look
nevertheless, in case that wasn't a fix but just made a bug latent.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64970
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64927
--- Comment #10 from Dominique d'Humieres ---
> After Dominique pointed out a range of revisions where the
> bug disappeared in the 4.9 branch, I browsed through the list
> of svn log messages. However, all fortran-related commits that
> looked
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64970
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Fri Feb 13 14:54:48 2015
New Revision: 220684
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220684&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2015-02-13 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/64970
* decl.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65051
Bug ID: 65051
Summary: [5 Regression] r210436 regression?
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
As
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64956
--- Comment #6 from Jason Merrill ---
(In reply to Matthias Klose from comment #3)
> #if !defined(__GXX_ABI_VERSION) || __GXX_ABI_VERSION != 1002
> #error The C++ ABI version of compiler you are using does not match
> #error that of the compiler
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65051
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60211
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65034
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Feb 13 14:42:30 2015
New Revision: 220683
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220683&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR ipa/65034
* stmt.c (emit_case_nodes): Use void_type_node instea
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39627
Bug 39627 depends on bug 39988, which changed state.
Bug 39988 Summary: F2008: Default initialization, structure constructors, and
allocatable components
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39988
What|Removed
1 - 100 of 143 matches
Mail list logo
