https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64971
Bug ID: 64971
Summary: [5 Regression] gcc.c-torture/compile/pr37433.c ICEs
with -mabi=ilp32
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64893
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39723
--- Comment #10 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Yea, as is the case with coloring algorithms order of popping off the coloring
stack will impact the final allocation in either a positive or negative way.
I'm not at all worried about those kind of effect
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64965
Harald van Dijk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||harald at gigawatt dot nl
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62631
--- Comment #27 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2015-02-07, at 5:24 PM, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62631
>
> --- Comment #26 from Eric Botcazou ---
>> The generated code on PA look
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62631
--- Comment #26 from Eric Botcazou ---
> The generated code on PA looks optimal to me:
>
> zdep %r25,29,30,%r28
> b .L2
> ldi 99,%r19
> .L6:
> zdep %r25,29,30,%r28
> .L2:
> addl %r26,%r28,%r28
> ld
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42994
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|sparc64-suse-linux-gnu |
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37109
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59009
--- Comment #52 from clyon at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The patch I propose is broken, I missed the new warnings in my build log.
I inserted
#ifdef SYSCALL(chown32)
before
PRE_SYSCALL(chown16)
in sanitizer_common/sanitizer_common_syscalls.inc
but t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64952
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62631
--- Comment #25 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2015-02-06, at 6:33 AM, ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> Correction: we have only one IV on the PA, but it's 'i' and not 'p'.
>
> Dave, is the generated code optimimal on the PA or sho
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64965
Rasmus Villemoes changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |minor
--- Comment #2 from Rasmus Vill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64965
--- Comment #1 from Rasmus Villemoes ---
Created attachment 34693
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34693&action=edit
Make __FILE__ work for filenames containing newline
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64970
Bug ID: 64970
Summary: Hard error instead of SFINAE for expression in nested
template alias
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62247
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
With cross-compiler I get the same anon3.s (no .weak occurrences in the
assembly) as in 4.9. As neither the test nor dg-require-weak seems to have
changed, I guess the important questions are:
1) can you com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64969
Bug ID: 64969
Summary: generic functions do not work with placeholder return
types
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60956
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60956
--- Comment #9 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sat Feb 7 15:13:15 2015
New Revision: 220505
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220505&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-02-07 Jerry DeLisle
PR libgfortran/60956
* io/fbuf.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64966
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64340
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64340
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Sat Feb 7 14:44:26 2015
New Revision: 220504
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=220504&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR middle-end/64340
* gcc-interface/trans.c (gigi): Recreate opti
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64968
Bug ID: 64968
Summary: Upgrade GCC Bugzilla to 5.0
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: web
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59402
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64693
--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu ---
A patch is posted at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-01/msg02108.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64693
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64908
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63897
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
k/gcc-bugs/20150207/objdir/./gcc/xgcc -shared-libgcc
-B/home/cryolite/work/gcc-bugs/20150207/objdir/./gcc -nostdinc++
-L/home/cryolite/work/gcc-bugs/20150207/objdir/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/src
-L/home/cryolit
e/work/gcc-bugs/20150207/objdir/x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu/libstdc++-v3/src/.li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64966
Bug ID: 64966
Summary: -fcompare-debug failure with -O -fschedule-insns
--param=max-sched-ready-insns=0
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64932
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Assigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64932
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63679
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[5.0 Regression][AArch64] |[5 Regression][AArch64]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64935
--- Comment #10 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Do you plan to post your patch to gcc-patches, Maxim?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64908
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64256
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64123
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63546
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60607
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
39 matches
Mail list logo