https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64370
--- Comment #11 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #10)
> Assuming fixed then.
ldexp is also OK for alpha.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64579
Bug ID: 64579
Summary: __TM_end __builtin_tend failed to return transactional
state
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61047
--- Comment #13 from Bernd Edlinger ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #9)
> Not worth fixing until we have a bug report for real-life software.
So it looks like this not fixed yet.
I checked that my patch is still working.
Should I p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63926
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64572
--- Comment #7 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
(In reply to Richard Henderson from comment #6)
> Created attachment 34432 [details]
> proposed patch
>
> Should fix both the original report and the testsuite failures.
Confirmed that the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64578
--- Comment #2 from Damian Rouson ---
In Comment 1, I meant to write "is _not_ an option"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64578
--- Comment #1 from Damian Rouson ---
P.S. For the submitted case, a simple workaround is to switch the source
allocation to an assignment. That simple workaround is an option in the
intended application code, wherein the derived type component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64479
--- Comment #7 from Oleg Endo ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Tue Jan 13 01:18:56 2015
New Revision: 219508
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219508&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport form mainline
2015-01-13 Oleg Endo
PR target/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64578
Bug ID: 64578
Summary: Seg-fault and ICE with unlimited polymorphic array
pointer function
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64479
--- Comment #6 from Oleg Endo ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Tue Jan 13 01:01:14 2015
New Revision: 219507
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219507&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
Backport form mainline
2015-01-13 Oleg Endo
PR target/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64575
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61157
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61157
--- Comment #2 from Kazumoto Kojima ---
Sorry for missing this PR. Yes, we can close this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64572
--- Comment #6 from Richard Henderson ---
Created attachment 34432
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=34432&action=edit
proposed patch
Should fix both the original report and the testsuite failures.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64479
--- Comment #5 from Oleg Endo ---
Author: olegendo
Date: Tue Jan 13 00:30:57 2015
New Revision: 219506
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219506&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR target/64479
* rtlanal.c (set_reg_p): Handle SEQUENCE const
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61157
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kkojima at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64078
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #4)
> I have never seen these test cases fail in my tests.
>
> But how do you start the test that it uses all the different combinations
> of -fpic options?
>
> make -k che
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64572
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64577
Bug ID: 64577
Summary: No -Wpadded warning on padding bitfields
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64078
Bernd Edlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot
de
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64572
--- Comment #4 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
The same failures are seen in the libffi test suite at -m32 and -m64. The first
failure appears as...
./cls_align_complex_float.exe
48 0.00,-0.00i 255 0 0.00,0.00i 0: 48 0.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64576
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
===
Schedule of variations:
unix
Running target unix
Using /sw/share/dejagnu/baseboards/unix.exp as board description file for
target.
Using /sw/share/dejagnu/config/unix.exp as generic interface file for target.
Using
/sw/src/fink.build/gcc50-5.0.0-1000/gcc-5-20150112/libffi/testsuite/config/de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64576
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Try a space between the macro argument name and the ".
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64576
Bug ID: 64576
Summary: Preprocessor Error With 5.0 not with 4.9.2
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: preproce
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64575
Bug ID: 64575
Summary: [5 Regression] bootstrap failure for x32
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: bootstrap
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64461
--- Comment #8 from Joel Sherrill ---
Thanks. I didn't build all our Coldfire BSPs but I checked one and it is OK
now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64573
Ed Swierk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #34428|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64574
Bug ID: 64574
Summary: ICE (stack overflow SEGV) with bad template
specialization
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64553
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64573
Bug ID: 64573
Summary: Cmd.Start swallows error from fork()/clone()
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: go
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64560
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64553
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Jan 12 21:45:50 2015
New Revision: 219496
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219496&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/64553
* src/c++11/cxx11-shim_facets.cc: Check for wc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64560
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Mon Jan 12 21:45:44 2015
New Revision: 219495
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219495&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/64560
* src/c++11/cxx11-shim_facets.cc (locale::face
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64565
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64454
--- Comment #8 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7)
> Ah, this, I just didn't want to call fold_unary to create GC garbage when I
> can cheaply see that it is ok.
Makes sense, thanks for the explanation.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64454
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #6)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> > The reason for tree_int_cst_sgn (vr->min) >= 0 was that I don't want to let
> > 0 through and for negative values, h
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64454
--- Comment #6 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> The reason for tree_int_cst_sgn (vr->min) >= 0 was that I don't want to let
> 0 through and for negative values, handling those would require computing
> absolute v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64514
--- Comment #1 from Freddie Chopin ---
The question at stackoverflow has an answer with much simpler test-case which
also shows the problem. http://stackoverflow.com/a/27810002/157344
--- >8 --- >8 --- >8 --- >8 --- >8 --- >8 --- >8 --- >8 ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64513
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||5.0
Summary|[4.8/4.9/5 Regres
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64563
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64454
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64563
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Jan 12 20:48:09 2015
New Revision: 219493
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219493&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/64563
* tree-vrp.c (vrp_evaluate_conditional)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64513
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Jan 12 20:45:38 2015
New Revision: 219492
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219492&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/64513
* config/i386/i386.c (ix86_expand_prologue): Add
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64572
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64454
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Jan 12 20:44:32 2015
New Revision: 219491
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219491&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/64454
* tree-vrp.c (simplify_div_or_mod_using
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64370
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64028
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
--version
arm-rtems4.11-gcc (GCC) 5.0.0 20150112 (experimental)
$ ~/test-gcc/install-head/bin/arm-rtems4.11-gcc -mtune=xscale -O2
/tmp/gumstix.c
../../../../../../rtems/c/src/../../cpukit/score/src/objectextendinformation.c:
In function '_Objects_Extend_information':
../../../../../../
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62060
Bernd Edlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot
de
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64028
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Jan 12 20:30:53 2015
New Revision: 219490
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219490&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR testsuite/64028
* gcc.dg/vect/no-section-anchors-vect-31.c: Add
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64370
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Mon Jan 12 20:30:09 2015
New Revision: 219489
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219489&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR other/64370
* sreal.c (sreal::to_double): Use ldexp instead of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64572
--- Comment #1 from howarth at bromo dot med.uc.edu ---
Observed with...
../gcc-5-20150112/configure --prefix=/sw --prefix=/sw/lib/gcc5.0
--mandir=/sw/share/man --infodir=/sw/lib/gcc5.0/info
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran,lto,objc,obj-c++,java
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64461
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64461
--- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Author: law
Date: Mon Jan 12 20:19:57 2015
New Revision: 219488
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219488&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/64461
* gcc.target/m68k/pr64461.c: New test.
Adde
o `grep -v '^#'
../../../gcc-5-20150112/libffi/libtool-version`-o libffi.la -rpath
/sw/lib/gcc5.0/lib src/prep_cif.lo src/types.lo src/raw_api.lo
src/java_raw_api.lo src/closures.lo src/x86/darwin64_c.lo src/x86/darwin64.lo
libtool: link: /sw/src/fink.build/gcc50-5.0.0-1000/darwin_objdir/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63733
janus at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63854
--- Comment #30 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to David Binderman from comment #29)
> Similar thing in the same area, caught using static analyser cppcheck:
>
> [gcc/jit/jit-playback.c:1791]: (error) Resource leak: f_in
>
> Source code is
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64460
--- Comment #7 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
I guess the testcase is flaky.
I've posted the patch to fix the ICE and the reasoning behind it at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-01/msg00686.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64454
--- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse ---
Thanks, it looks good and it covers the most important case.
Not sure why you are testing "tree_int_cst_sgn (vr->min) >= 0" but it doesn't
hurt. Typo " or signed" -> " for signed" in the first comment.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64460
--- Comment #6 from Joel Sherrill ---
(In reply to ktkachov from comment #5)
> (In reply to Joel Sherrill from comment #4)
> > (In reply to ktkachov from comment #3)
> > > I have a fix in the works. The bug is down to the "shift" attribute value
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64288
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Lots of similar failures when the library is configured with --disable-wchar_t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64571
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
They are defined in src/c++11/fstream-inst.cc so I think I just need to add the
new symbols to the linker script. I'm surprised the testsuite didn't catch it
though!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63733
--- Comment #10 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: janus
Date: Mon Jan 12 19:40:57 2015
New Revision: 219486
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219486&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-01-12 Janus Weil
Backport from mainline
PR for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64571
Volker Reichelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.8.0, 4.9.0, 4.9.2
Target Milestone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64571
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64571
Bug ID: 64571
Summary: [5.0 Regression] Link failure with fstream due to new
string implementation
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64570
Bug ID: 64570
Summary: error: non-trivial conversion at assignment
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64427
--- Comment #8 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #7)
> Fixed.
Thanks HJ! Sorry for not doing it myself sooner...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64520
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64377
--- Comment #9 from Sandra Loosemore ---
I've started running nios2-elf regression tests on hardware to compare against
a pre-breakage version from early November; it probably will not be done until
tomorrow morning.
I've heard that someone is w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64377
--- Comment #8 from Joel Sherrill ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #7)
> Hello.
>
> There's suggested patch [1], may I ask someone from nios2 community for
> testing the patch?
>
> [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2015-01/msg004
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64454
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64569
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||5.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63967
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47679
Sergey Eliseev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gafn...@yandex-team.ru
--- Comment #16
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64427
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64427
--- Comment #6 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Mon Jan 12 17:08:04 2015
New Revision: 219479
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219479&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Avoid undefined behavior in gcc.target/i386/pr64291-1.c
PR tes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64569
Bug ID: 64569
Summary: [MIPS] Unable to build soft-float in conjunction with
binutils 2.25
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64514
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64562
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64513
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64356
Ville Voutilainen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63733
--- Comment #9 from janus at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: janus
Date: Mon Jan 12 16:14:06 2015
New Revision: 219475
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219475&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-01-12 Janus Weil
Backport from mainline
PR fort
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63288
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61047
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zsojka at seznam dot cz
--- Comment #12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64353
Ilya Enkovich changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||enkovich.gnu at gmail dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64530
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||5.0
Summary|[4.9/5 Regressio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64357
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64530
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jan 12 15:37:07 2015
New Revision: 219474
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219474&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-01-12 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/64530
* tree
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64357
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Mon Jan 12 15:34:37 2015
New Revision: 219473
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=219473&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2015-01-12 Richard Biener
PR middle-end/64357
* tree-cfg.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64513
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64568
--- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Here's a target-independent testcase:
% cat test21.ii
namespace std
{
typedef long unsigned size_t;
template class complex;
template complex<_Tp> operator+(complex<_Tp>, complex<_Tp>)
{
complex<_T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64547
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64528
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64565
--- Comment #3 from Jan Hubicka ---
Thanks a lot for testcase! Smells like a roundoff error, too. Will debug it
today.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64568
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Index: gcc/tree-ssa-forwprop.c
===
--- gcc/tree-ssa-forwprop.c (revision 219446)
+++ gcc/tree-ssa-forwprop.c (working copy)
@@ -2281,7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64568
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64511
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||compile-time-hog,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64528
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
1 - 100 of 175 matches
Mail list logo
