https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63470
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63802
--- Comment #4 from ygribov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: ygribov
Date: Tue Nov 18 07:37:17 2014
New Revision: 217689
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217689&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-11-18 Yury Gribov
PR sanitizer/63802
gcc/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63913
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63810
Lawrence Velázquez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #34009|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63810
Lawrence Velázquez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #34008|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63810
Lawrence Velázquez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #34007|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63470
Joost VandeVondele changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Joost.VandeVondele at mat dot
ethz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63926
Bug ID: 63926
Summary: [5 Regression] ICE in estimate_edge_growth, at
ipa-inline.h:300
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63810
Lawrence Velázquez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #33976|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63810
Lawrence Velázquez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #33977|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63810
Lawrence Velázquez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #33975|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63731
--- Comment #8 from Yohei Ueda ---
If we can distinguish between the "not found" errors due to invalid host names
and no nss, we can fall back to netgo only when nss is not available.
I noticed that errno is set to 0 for invalid hostnames, and i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63917
--- Comment #2 from Zhenqiang Chen ---
Thanks for the report. I can reproduce the FAIL on IA32. Since the patch does
not impact on -O0, it seams some library functions are wrong. I will
investigate it.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63925
Bug ID: 63925
Summary: ICE with C++14 constexpr when trying to constexprify
std::min
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 57941, which changed state.
Bug 57941 Summary: [c++11] confusing error message with invalid constexpr
constructor in template struct
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57941
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57941
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57335
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63906
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
This doesn't seem like a bug to me, unless they run with unexpected
results. My guess of the reason of different generated code can be the
mapping of registers and variables. s0, s1, s2 are not symmetric as
they are mapping to different parameter registers. GCC may choose
different sequence, in ord
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56041
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63924
--- Comment #1 from Nikos ---
Special thanks and kudos to "T.C." for helping figuring this out:
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/25465379
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63924
Bug ID: 63924
Summary: Constexpr constructible expression "is not constexpr"
when used in a template non-type argument
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63731
--- Comment #7 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
That's really a question for the glibc maintainers. It's entirely a glibc
issue.
My understanding is that it's not actually libc.so that needs to be found.
Glibc implements /etc/nsswitch.conf by loading
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63906
--- Comment #7 from Vladimir Makarov ---
Author: vmakarov
Date: Tue Nov 18 00:14:25 2014
New Revision: 217683
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217683&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-11-17 Vladimir Makarov
PR rtl-optimization/63906
*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63923
Bug ID: 63923
Summary: FAIL: libgomp.c/examples-4/e.50.1.c (test for excess
errors)
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63913
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenther at suse dot de
--- Comment #2 from H
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63888
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63888
--- Comment #2 from hjl at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: hjl
Date: Mon Nov 17 22:12:55 2014
New Revision: 217678
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217678&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
Export "detect_leaks=0"
PR bootstrap/63888
* bootstrap-asa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33911
--- Comment #17 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Nov 17 22:09:27 2014
New Revision: 217677
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217677&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/33911
gcc/cp/
* call.c (build_call_a): Don't warn_deprecat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63844
--- Comment #4 from Andi Kleen ---
I had a typo in the test case (remove += to make the loops identical)
#define N 1000
int a[N], b[N], c[N];
main()
{
int i;
#pragma omp parallel num_threads(4)
for (i = 0; i < N; i++) {
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63922
Bug ID: 63922
Summary: Compiler error with OpenMP, default(none) and an
integer parameter array
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55992
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63815
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63841
--- Comment #10 from Teresa Johnson ---
Missed that one, I will backport to 4.8.
Teresa
On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 1:17 PM, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63841
>
> Jakub Jelinek changed:
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55039
--- Comment #7 from Marc Glisse ---
std::addressof can be constexpr with -std=gnu++XX, and even in strict mode
std::__addressof can be constexpr for internal use in libstdc++.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63815
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #16
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63837
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63841
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63841
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63844
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55039
--- Comment #6 from Daniel Krügler ---
(In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #5)
Given that there exists the still open issue
http://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/lwg-active.html#2296
should this bugzilla issue remain open?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 55039, which changed state.
Bug 55039 Summary: std::addressof vs. constexpr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55039
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55039
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 54968, which changed state.
Bug 54968 Summary: spurious constexpr error,
20_util/tuple/comparison_operators/35480_neg.cc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54968
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54968
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53181
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63906
--- Comment #6 from Vladimir Makarov ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> Created attachment 33996 [details]
> the .i file
Andrew, I'll start to work on this soon. Sorry for inconvenience introduced by
LRA remat. pass.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 50473, which changed state.
Bug 50473 Summary: [C++0x] ICE in type_has_nontrivial_copy_init, at
cp/tree.c:2574
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50473
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50473
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50473
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Nov 17 20:17:56 2014
New Revision: 217672
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217672&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/50473
* decl.c (cp_finish_decl): Don't try to process a non
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63868
iverbin at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52282
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 52282, which changed state.
Bug 52282 Summary: [C++0x] rejects-valid issues with decltype/constexpr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52282
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63844
--- Comment #2 from Andi Kleen ---
Regression, doesn't happen on 4.8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63921
Bug ID: 63921
Summary: [F08] pointer function as lvalue doesn't work when the
function is a type bound function
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63731
--- Comment #6 from boger at us dot ibm.com ---
I understand why some functions like getaddrinfo don't work with static linking
unless the LD_LIBRARY_PATH is set to find libc.so, but then what should happen
if it isn't?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63920
Bug ID: 63920
Summary: Any regular expression should not match an empty
sequence if match_not_null is specified
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63854
dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63898
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pthaugen at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #10 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63919
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63919
Bug ID: 63919
Summary: Segfault with r217560 building 462.libquantum from
cpu2006
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63917
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52282
--- Comment #9 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Mon Nov 17 17:00:38 2014
New Revision: 217660
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=217660&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/52282
* decl.c (build_ptrmemfunc_type): Don't build a diffe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63918
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63918
Bug ID: 63918
Summary: Error in declaration goto statement
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: trivial
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42575
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63908
--- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
On Mon, 17 Nov 2014, leimaohui at cn dot fujitsu.com wrote:
> kernel :3.4.74
Don't expect particularly meaningful floating-point results on e500 for
any kernel without my six-patch series
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63917
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63917
Bug ID: 63917
Summary: [5 Regression] r217646 caused many failures
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-opt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63731
--- Comment #5 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
You are correct. The go command does not rebuild the standard library for
gccgo. There is at present no reasonable way to use the netgo tag with gccgo.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63916
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63916
Bug ID: 63916
Summary: value-numbering fails to forward variable addresses
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59984
--- Comment #15 from Richard Biener ---
Ok, so SCCVN only can forward constant addresses (because variable ones
wouldn't fit in the same refs vector without "inserting" ops). See
vn_reference_maybe_forwprop_address. It's also required so that w
Hi all,
Today I noticed something strange with the way gcc optimises ternary
operations in c (and c++). Consider the following example where I call
foo(int) passing the clamped value of (s0, s1, s2):
/**/
#include
extern
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63910
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63913
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60428
--- Comment #3 from Pierre Ossman ---
Comments?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63914
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
We try to transition from
{ Inf, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0 } * { 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0 } == { Nan, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0 }
to
VARYING * { 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0 } == { 0.0, 0.0, 0.0, 0.0 }
which is... "interesting". -ffast-math
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63914
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63915
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63868
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Ilya Verbin from comment #4)
> It seems that support of offload sections in Mach-O will require substantial
> changes to gcc/config/darwin.c, like it was done for LTO.
>
> I'm going to disable t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63868
--- Comment #4 from Ilya Verbin ---
It seems that support of offload sections in Mach-O will require substantial
changes to gcc/config/darwin.c, like it was done for LTO.
I'm going to disable the generation of any offload sections when a compile
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63915
Bug ID: 63915
Summary: gomp/pr60823-2.c:31:1: error: dead STMT in EH table
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63913
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63866
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zsojka at seznam dot cz
--- Comment #3 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63911
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63897
--- Comment #6 from Igor Zamyatin ---
after RA=after reload
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63897
Igor Zamyatin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at redhat dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59708
--- Comment #17 from Uroš Bizjak ---
On alpha-linux-gnu, I got following g++ failures:
FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/builtin-arith-overflow-17.c -O0 execution test
FAIL: c-c++-common/torture/builtin-arith-overflow-17.c -O2 execution test
FAIL
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63914
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63894
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63912
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63901
--- Comment #3 from Peter A. Bigot ---
But it's already bad, because you have the list of MCUs hard-coded into the
compiler source, which is a lot worse than doing through the specs.
It's really unfortunate that somebody decided to exclude me fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59708
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63914
Bug ID: 63914
Summary: ice in set_lattice_value, at tree-ssa-ccp.c:517
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63913
Bug ID: 63913
Summary: [5 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed: statement
marked for throw, but doesn't with
-fnon-call-exceptions -fsanitize=bool
Product: gcc
V
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63912
Bug ID: 63912
Summary: ice in in inline_call, at ipa-inline-transform.c:339
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63911
Bug ID: 63911
Summary: ICE: xpected tree that contains 'decl common'
structure, have 'identifier_node' in dump_aggr_type,
at cp/error.c:650 with -fdump-ipa-all
-fsa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63910
Bug ID: 63910
Summary: [5 Regression] ICE: simplify_immed_subreg, at
simplify-rtx.c:5519 with
-mstringop-strategy=vector_loop -mavx512f
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63909
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|---
1 - 100 of 131 matches
Mail list logo
