[Bug c/61534] Wlogical-op should not warn when either operand comes from macro expansion

2014-11-01 Thread manu at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61534 Manuel López-Ibáñez changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Depends on|

[Bug target/63709] New: msp430 Y constraint generates unacceptable constant in large mode

2014-11-01 Thread pab at pabigot dot com
/xgcc -B/tmp/gcc/./gcc/ -B/usr/local/gcc-msp430-elf-dev-20141101/msp430-elf/bin/ -B/usr/local/gcc-msp430-elf-dev-20141101/msp430-elf/lib/ -isystem /usr/local/gcc-msp430-elf-dev-20141101/msp430-elf/include -isystem /usr/local/gcc-msp430-elf-dev-20141101/msp430-elf/sys-include-g -O2 -mlarge -O2

[Bug ada/62235] segmentation fault on Ada 2012 code

2014-11-01 Thread simon at pushface dot org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62235 simon at pushface dot org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||simon at pushface dot org ---

[Bug ada/63708] New: [5.0 Regression] FAIL: cxf3002

2014-11-01 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63708 Bug ID: 63708 Summary: [5.0 Regression] FAIL: cxf3002 Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ada Assi

[Bug c++/63707] Brace initialization of array sometimes fails if no copy constructor

2014-11-01 Thread john.lindgren at aol dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63707 John Lindgren changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #33860|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug c++/63707] Brace initialization of array sometimes fails if no copy constructor

2014-11-01 Thread john.lindgren at aol dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63707 --- Comment #3 from John Lindgren --- Created attachment 33862 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33862&action=edit Test case 4

[Bug c++/63707] Brace initialization of array sometimes fails if no copy constructor

2014-11-01 Thread john.lindgren at aol dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63707 --- Comment #2 from John Lindgren --- Created attachment 33861 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33861&action=edit Test case 3

[Bug c++/63707] Brace initialization of array sometimes fails if no copy constructor

2014-11-01 Thread john.lindgren at aol dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63707 --- Comment #1 from John Lindgren --- Created attachment 33860 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33860&action=edit Test case 2

[Bug c++/63707] New: Brace initialization of array sometimes fails if no copy constructor

2014-11-01 Thread john.lindgren at aol dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63707 Bug ID: 63707 Summary: Brace initialization of array sometimes fails if no copy constructor Product: gcc Version: 4.9.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug ipa/63671] [5 Regression] 21% tramp3d-v4 performance hit due to -fdevirtualize

2014-11-01 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63671 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug bootstrap/63573] [5 Regression] libgo: ICE building libgo on powerpc-linux-gnu

2014-11-01 Thread hubicka at ucw dot cz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63573 --- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka --- There is a pasto in the previous patch. This is what I am testing. Index: calls.c === --- calls.c(revision 216942) +++ calls.c(working c

[Bug ada/63656] a-tags.adb:82:04: warning: types for unchecked conversion have different sizes

2014-11-01 Thread arekm at maven dot pl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63656 --- Comment #2 from Arkadiusz Miskiewicz --- Hm, isn't it already selected properly? --- gcc-4.9.2/gcc/ada/gcc-interface/Makefile.in~2014-11-01 15:07:27.0 +0100 +++ gcc-4.9.2/gcc/ada/gcc-interface/Makefile.in 2014-11-01 15:11:17

[Bug c++/56480] Explicit specialization in a namespace enclosing the specialized template

2014-11-01 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56480 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid CC|

[Bug c++/63705] function template specialization outside namespace rejected with C++11

2014-11-01 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63705 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/56480] Explicit specialization in a namespace enclosing the specialized template

2014-11-01 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56480 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org --- Co

[Bug c++/63705] function template specialization outside namespace rejected with C++11

2014-11-01 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63705 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- PR 56480 ?

[Bug target/63691] GCC 4.9.x fails to build GLIBC 2.20 on HPPA

2014-11-01 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63691 John David Anglin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libgcc/56846] _Unwind_Backtrace on ARM and noexcept

2014-11-01 Thread npl at chello dot at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56846 --- Comment #10 from npl at chello dot at --- Hi, thanks for the fix, any chance of adding this to 4.9 and 4.8 aswell?

[Bug c++/63705] function template specialization outside namespace rejected with C++11

2014-11-01 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63705 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/63651] Lot of failures in obj(c|-c++) with yosemite

2014-11-01 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63651 Francois-Xavier Coudert changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/63691] GCC 4.9.x fails to build GLIBC 2.20 on HPPA

2014-11-01 Thread aaro.koskinen at iki dot fi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63691 --- Comment #10 from Aaro Koskinen --- (In reply to Andreas Schwab from comment #9) > You don't need a link test, you only need to check whether there is a > reference to abort. A simple test: $ cat pr63691.c void foo (int a, char *p) {

[Bug target/59888] Darwin linker error "illegal text-relocation" with -shared

2014-11-01 Thread fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59888 --- Comment #13 from Francois-Xavier Coudert --- Might this be related with PR63622 (and thus PR63580)?

[Bug c++/63705] function template specialization outside namespace rejected with C++11

2014-11-01 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63705 --- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf --- See also: https://groups.google.com/a/isocpp.org/forum/#!topic/std-discussion/ZCRb8iZwtos

[Bug c++/63705] function template specialization outside namespace rejected with C++11

2014-11-01 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63705 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.0 --- Comment #1 from Markus Tri

[Bug libstdc++/63706] New: stl_heap.h:make_heap()'s worst time complexity doesn't conform with C++ standard

2014-11-01 Thread tomytsai at gmail dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63706 Bug ID: 63706 Summary: stl_heap.h:make_heap()'s worst time complexity doesn't conform with C++ standard Product: gcc Version: 4.9.3 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity

[Bug c++/63705] New: [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] function template specialization outside namespace rejected with C++11

2014-11-01 Thread trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63705 Bug ID: 63705 Summary: [4.8/4.9/5 Regression] function template specialization outside namespace rejected with C++11 Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/63691] GCC 4.9.x fails to build GLIBC 2.20 on HPPA

2014-11-01 Thread sch...@linux-m68k.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63691 --- Comment #9 from Andreas Schwab --- You don't need a link test, you only need to check whether there is a reference to abort.