https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51366
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #58 from Kazumoto Kojima ---
(In reply to Kazumoto Kojima from comment #57)
> revised patch for the problem in c#25
I've looked into the remained ICEs for usual sh4-unknown-linux-gnu
test and got that they are similar to the ICE in c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
Kazumoto Kojima changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #33526|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63194
--- Comment #3 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Sat Oct 11 02:26:33 2014
New Revision: 216114
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=216114&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/63194
* method.c (defaulted_late_check): Call maybe_instant
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63509
Bug ID: 63509
Summary: Misleading error message when building gcc without C++
compiler installed
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63493
--- Comment #1 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
Note: if Richard Henderson's patch series at
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-10/msg01009.html is committed, then the
this will need to be implemented in libffi, not libgo.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63376
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mliska at suse dot cz
--- Comment #6 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63508
--- Comment #1 from Mario Lang ---
Created attachment 33684
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33684&action=edit
bug.cpp
g++ -std=c++11 bug.cpp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63508
Bug ID: 63508
Summary: ICE when using bracketed initializer on pointer to
member function of a templated class
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61909
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63275
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63485
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dcb314 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63497
--- Comment #4 from Tim Shen ---
Hi Yue Wang, I'm sorry if my last reply looks scary. I should have put it in
libstdc++ list. I didn't mean to reply you with all implementation details.
Anyway, the cause is clear, and it will be fixed in trunk (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63454
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63485
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ai.azuma at gmail dot com
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63437
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63415
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63500
--- Comment #6 from François Dumont ---
Sorry, I reproduced the problem and it is not in _Safe_iterator operator-> so
my previous remark is out of subject.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63415
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Oct 10 20:35:26 2014
New Revision: 216107
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=216107&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/63415
* pt.c (value_dependent_expression_p) [CONSTRUCTOR]:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63437
--- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill ---
Author: jason
Date: Fri Oct 10 20:35:18 2014
New Revision: 216106
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=216106&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c++/63437
* cp-tree.h (REF_PARENTHESIZED_P): Also allow INDIREC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63497
--- Comment #3 from Yue Wang ---
Hi guys!
Thx for replying.
To be honest,as a newbie I'm not good enough to understand @Tim's reply...
Thx again for the efforts, hoping that gcc's std::regex would be better and
better.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63471
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||fxcoudert at gcc dot gnu.org
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63376
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59758
Richard Henderson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63501
--- Comment #4 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Michael Meissner from comment #3)
> The -mupper-regs-df and -mupper-regs-sf options are a work in progress. I
> am working on these options right now on a private branch, but the code is
> not y
++
--with-sysroot=/home/dave/opt/gnu/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/root
--with-build-sysroot=/home/dave/opt/gnu/hppa2.0w-hp-hpux11.11/root
Thread model: posix
gcc version 5.0.0 20141010 (experimental) [trunk revision 216098] (GCC)
./gcc/cc1 -fpreprocessed team.i -quiet -dumpbase team.c -auxbase-strip
.libs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
--- Comment #56 from Oleg Endo ---
There are some LRA changes coming ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-10/msg00948.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63495
--- Comment #6 from Paul Eggert ---
That was fast! Thank you.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63495
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63495
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Oct 10 17:51:14 2014
New Revision: 216102
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=216102&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/63495
* c-common.c (min_align_of_type): Don't decrease alignm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63495
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Oct 10 17:43:21 2014
New Revision: 216101
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=216101&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR c/63495
* stor-layout.c (min_align_of_type): Don't decrease ali
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63419
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||trippels at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63483
--- Comment #20 from uros at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: uros
Date: Fri Oct 10 17:36:21 2014
New Revision: 216100
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=216100&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR rtl-optimization/63483
* alias.c (true_dependence_1):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63352
--- Comment #20 from Richard PALO ---
>From what I've been able to gather, 'f' precision 17 & 18 incorrectly terminate
with a '2' where they seemingly need be '1' and '5' respectfully
(along with corresponding 'e' with precision 16 & 17).
The de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63405
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63405
--- Comment #16 from Gert-jan Los ---
2014-10-08 23:06:21 CEST schrieb jason at gcc dot gnu.org:
> --- Comment #12 from Jason Merrill ---
> Author: jason
> Date: Wed Oct 8 21:05:50 2014
> New Revision: 216013
>
> URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63501
--- Comment #3 from Michael Meissner ---
The -mupper-regs-df and -mupper-regs-sf options are a work in progress. I am
working on these options right now on a private branch, but the code is not yet
ready for incorporation into the tree. I don't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63507
--- Comment #4 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
For me it fails with:
ld: error: /var/tmp/test/./gcc/liblto_plugin.so: could not load plugin library:
/var/tmp/test/./gcc/liblto_plugin.so: undefined symbol:
__asan_option_detect_stack_use_after_return
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49561
--- Comment #21 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Oct 10 16:14:52 2014
New Revision: 216097
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=216097&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/49561
* acinclude.m4 (GLIBCXX_ENABLE_LIBSTDCXX_CXX1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63376
--- Comment #3 from John David Anglin ---
(gdb) frame 2
#2 0x007eaf1c in
_ZL28evaluate_properties_for_edgeP11cgraph_edgebPjP3vecIP9tree_node7va_heap6vl_ptrES8_PS2_IP21ipa_agg_jump_functionS5_S6_E
(e=0x7afef780,
inline_p=true, clause_ptr=0x7e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63507
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
r209476 was the change which was supposed to fix it in ~ May. I'm afraid I
haven't tried asan bootstrap more recently than that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61347
Bug 61347 depends on bug 49561, which changed state.
Bug 49561 Summary: [C++0x] std::list::size complexity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49561
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49561
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63507
Yury Gribov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||y.gribov at samsung dot com
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63404
--- Comment #12 from Richard Henderson ---
Author: rth
Date: Fri Oct 10 15:56:07 2014
New Revision: 216096
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=216096&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR target/63404
* shrink-wrap.c (move_insn_for_shrink_wrap): Don't u
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63507
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63347
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
--- Comment #6 from Andreas Schwab
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49561
--- Comment #19 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Author: redi
Date: Fri Oct 10 15:33:57 2014
New Revision: 216094
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=216094&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR libstdc++/49561
* acinclude.m4 (GLIBCXX_ENABLE_LIBSTDCXX_CXX1
64-unknown-linux-gnu
Configured with: /home/max/workspace/downloads/gcc/configure --enable-multilib
--enable-checking --target=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
--host=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu --build=x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
--prefix=/home/max/install/bootstrap-asan --enable-bootstrap
--with-build-config=boot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50543
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63491
--- Comment #4 from Peter Bergner ---
I'll add that we hit this as part of our work on trying to move POWER over to
using LRA by default.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51479
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63432
--- Comment #26 from H.J. Lu ---
I will find a testcase when it fails again.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54488
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
I had patches to implement the suggestion, work on outermost loops separately.
Of course it won't help once you wrap all of them in a single outer loop
(which is why I didn't end up committing this).
Re-mea
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63506
--- Comment #3 from Steffen Müthing ---
Ooops, yes, I did. Actually I meant to write decltype(*iterator()), but
decltype(*it()) doesn't make sense, of course.
And to avoid further confusion: The function get() in the iterator is just
there as an
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63419
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 33682
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33682&action=edit
autoreduced testcase
Fix in testing, autoreduced testcase attached (still too big for my taste).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63379
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Oct 10 14:23:35 2014
New Revision: 216086
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=216086&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-10-10 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/63379
* tree
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63379
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.9.2, 5.0
Summary|[4.8/4.9/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63506
--- Comment #2 from Marc Glisse ---
Do you mean decltype(*it) (without the extra parentheses) everywhere?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63506
--- Comment #1 from Steffen Müthing ---
I forgot to mention: This problem is specific to operator*(). If you add an
equivalent normal member function and replace the dereferencing operations with
calls to that function, the problem does not occur
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63506
Bug ID: 63506
Summary: GCC deduces wrong return type of operator*() inside
template functions
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63503
Ramana Radhakrishnan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54488
Evgeniya Maenkova changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||evgeniya.maenkova at gmail dot
com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63471
--- Comment #8 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 10/10/2014 3:42 AM, jb at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> So, are you planning on enabling _REENTRANT in the HP-UX 11 driver like you
> did
> for 10, or do you want to solve this in some other way?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63503
Wilco changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wdijkstr at arm dot com
--- Comment #6 from Wilc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62249
--- Comment #4 from Zack Weinberg ---
The "delta-minimized self-contained test case" should require only `-O2 -flto`
to reproduce the problem. The other test case, however, should require
`-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2` in addition, and to be compiled aga
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62249
Ilya Palachev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||i.palachev at samsung dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63464
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Oct 10 12:15:30 2014
New Revision: 216072
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=216072&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR tree-optimization/63464
* tree-switch-conversion.c (struct case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59488
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59488
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Oct 10 11:24:31 2014
New Revision: 216071
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=216071&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR fortran/59488
* trans-openmp.c (gfc_omp_predetermined_sharing):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63505
Bug ID: 63505
Summary: [4.8/4.9 Regression] ICE with -fdebug-types-section in
should_move_die_to_comdat, at dwarf2out.c:6702
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63379
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Oct 10 11:17:13 2014
New Revision: 216070
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=216070&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-10-10 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/63379
* tree
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63375
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
No, RTL forwprop1 still breaks the testcase according to comment #4.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59488
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Oct 10 11:09:32 2014
New Revision: 216068
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=216068&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR fortran/59488
* trans-openmp.c (gfc_omp_predetermined_sharing):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59488
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Fri Oct 10 11:08:37 2014
New Revision: 216067
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=216067&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR fortran/59488
* trans-openmp.c (gfc_omp_predetermined_sharing):
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63476
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63380
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Oct 10 11:05:39 2014
New Revision: 216066
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=216066&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-10-10 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/63380
* tree
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63476
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Author: rguenth
Date: Fri Oct 10 11:04:39 2014
New Revision: 216065
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=216065&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-10-10 Richard Biener
PR tree-optimization/63476
* tree
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63497
--- Comment #2 from Tim Shen ---
Thanks for reporting :)
This bug is still in trunk, it just somehow can't trigger the segfault or wrong
output.
The line trunk/bits/regex_executor.tcc:297 :
if (__state._M_matches(*_M_current))
doesn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63352
Richard PALO changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #33676|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63500
--- Comment #5 from François Dumont ---
I never understood why safe iterators operators are not simply calling
respective operator on the underlying iterator. All operators are respecting
this rule except the operator->. So I will try to use this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63483
--- Comment #19 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #18)
> Looks ok with all the explanation. I wonder when is the appropriate
> time to retire support for architectures without byte granular
> memory access.
Thank
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63504
--- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
(In reply to Markus Trippelsdorf from comment #2)
> To reproduce issue 3) run:
>
> valgrind --track-origins=yes --trace-children=yes gfortran
> gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/actual_array_result_1.f90
> -fn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367
Bug 54367 depends on bug 63207, which changed state.
Bug 63207 Summary: [5 regression] ICE in expand_expr_real_l when instantiating
a template with a lambda that captures a const variable with a dependent
initializer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63207
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63504
--- Comment #2 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
To reproduce issue 3) run:
valgrind --track-origins=yes --trace-children=yes gfortran
gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/actual_array_result_1.f90 -fno-diagnostics-show-caret
-fdiagnostics-color=never -Os -c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63387
--- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse ---
According to Joseph's explanation at
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17441 , this transformation
should be conditional to !flag_signaling_nans.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59488
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63405
--- Comment #14 from Gert-jan Los ---
2014-10-08 23:06:21 CEST schrieb jason at gcc dot gnu.org:
> --- Comment #12 from Jason Merrill ---
> Author: jason
> Date: Wed Oct 8 21:05:50 2014
> New Revision: 216013
>
> URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63405
--- Comment #15 from Gert-jan Los ---
Created attachment 33678
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33678&action=edit
test.log
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63352
--- Comment #18 from Richard PALO ---
Created attachment 33676
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33676&action=edit
another test program
after coming across
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/16839658/printf-width-specificer-to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63471
--- Comment #7 from Janne Blomqvist ---
(In reply to dave.anglin from comment #3)
> On some platforms (MacOS 10.4 and Solaris 11), ttyname_r may return a
> 'char *', not 'int'.
FWIW, libgfortran uses the AC_USE_SYSTEM_EXTENSIONS macro, which on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63504
--- Comment #1 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Two more variations of issue 3)
==47649== Invalid read of size 4
==47649==at 0x10B00978: reg_num_sign_bit_copies_for_combine(rtx_def const*,
machine_mode, rtx_def const*, machine_mode, unsigned int
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63504
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63352
--- Comment #17 from Richard PALO ---
Created attachment 33675
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33675&action=edit
c test program for snprintf
I tried the attached test program and post the following results from my system
dem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63483
--- Comment #18 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 9 Oct 2014, ubizjak at gmail dot com wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63483
>
> Uroš Bizjak changed:
>
>What|Removed |Added
> -
96 matches
Mail list logo
