https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36312
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||wkoszek at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63462
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63462
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63462
Andi Kleen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61763
--- Comment #5 from Douglas Mencken ---
Re-tried without forcing -O3, and with default -O2 4.9.1 doesn't complain on
stages 2&3 comparison.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63450
--- Comment #3 from Luis Colorado ---
just one thing. When you compile a completely empty function you get `rep ret'
in one line, instead of that on two lines. The result is some assemblers (gnu
as at version 2.20, for example) complainting it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60304
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60916
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61386
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63460
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61416
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63460
--- Comment #5 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Oct 5 23:45:45 2014
New Revision: 215909
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215909&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-10-05 Jerry DeLisle
PR libgfortran/63460
Backport
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61435
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60723
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||oliver at bway dot net
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61501
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63444
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||memory-hog
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61638
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63357
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61891
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63377
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63464
Bug ID: 63464
Summary: compare one character to many: faster
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: enhancement
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63463
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63463
Bug ID: 63463
Summary: [5.0 regression] FAIL: gnat.dg/regpat1.adb execution
test
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63460
--- Comment #4 from Jerry DeLisle ---
Author: jvdelisle
Date: Sun Oct 5 21:11:37 2014
New Revision: 215908
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215908&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-10-05 Jerry DeLisle
PR libgfortran/63460
* io
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63435
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Dixie ---
I tried gcc-5-20140928 snapshot
This snapshot doesn't generate a localalias for the testcase, and it generates
very few localalias symbols in general.
There was only one localalias symbol produced in the ent
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63460
--- Comment #3 from Jerry DeLisle ---
The following fixes this:
Index: unit.c
===
--- unit.c(revision 215870)
+++ unit.c(working copy)
@@ -580,6 +580,7 @@ init_units (void)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63462
Bug ID: 63462
Summary: [RFC] gcc should prevent from overwriting source file
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62056
--- Comment #15 from Agustín Bergé ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #14)
> Agustin, do you have a copyright assignment?
I do not have one. The attached is derived from libstdc++'s and
I have left the license in place, wouldn't tha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63456
François Dumont changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63456
--- Comment #3 from François Dumont ---
Author: fdumont
Date: Sun Oct 5 19:36:15 2014
New Revision: 215906
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215906&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-10-05 François Dumont
PR libstdc++/63456
* include/bi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60406
--- Comment #13 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Ian Lance Taylor from comment #12)
> Can people on systems for which the recover.go test currently fails please
> try this patch and let me know whether it fixes the problem? Thanks.
Unfortunat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63456
--- Comment #2 from François Dumont ---
Author: fdumont
Date: Sun Oct 5 18:44:46 2014
New Revision: 215905
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215905&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-10-05 François Dumont
PR libstdc++/63456
* include/bi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63460
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jvdelisle at gcc dot
gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63456
François Dumont changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
You have been approved by Kushi Aole-UK the sum of 85.00 GBP with draw
number:22330KHO577345 and Serial number 1509/14. Reply for more details
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63461
--- Comment #5 from Mikael Pettersson ---
Use .pushsection and .popsection .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63461
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63239
Mark Wielaard changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63243
Bug 63243 depends on bug 63239, which changed state.
Bug 63239 Summary: DWARF does not represent C++ deleted methods
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63239
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63461
--- Comment #3 from Akos Kiss ---
Created attachment 33651
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33651&action=edit
Assembly output
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63461
--- Comment #2 from Akos Kiss ---
Created attachment 33650
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33650&action=edit
Preprocessed source
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63461
--- Comment #1 from Akos Kiss ---
Created attachment 33649
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33649&action=edit
Example C source code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63239
--- Comment #2 from Mark Wielaard ---
Author: mark
Date: Sun Oct 5 15:25:03 2014
New Revision: 215901
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215901&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR debug/63239 Add DWARF representation for C++11 deleted member function.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63461
Bug ID: 63461
Summary: Inconsistent behaviour on ARM64 when inline assembly
with .text directive is followed by a static variable
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56829
--- Comment #2 from vincenzo Innocente ---
just to add the OpenCL syntax and "doc"
https://www.khronos.org/registry/cl/sdk/1.0/docs/man/xhtml/any.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52952
--- Comment #35 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #13)
> I guess the C/C++ FEs could for non-trivial string literals put into a hash
> table mapping from locus_t (of ADDR_EXPR around STRING_CST) to the first cpp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52952
--- Comment #34 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #27)
> (In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #25)
> > * Cases like:
> >
> > 1: const str[] = "something %d";
> > 2: printf(str);
>
> Note that cl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52952
--- Comment #33 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Manuel López-Ibáñez from comment #32)
> Created attachment 33648 [details]
> dynamically create locations from loc + offset
This version is able to handle macros:
format.c: In function ‘
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52952
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #33647|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63460
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63460
Bug ID: 63460
Summary: Some namelists cannot be read from stdin (unit 5):
Fortran runtime error: End of file
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63454
Daniel Krügler changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||daniel.kruegler@googlemail.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60643
--- Comment #12 from Khem Raj ---
I would like to reopen this bug. As there is more information to explain this
issue. This issue will happen if you first build cross binutils and add the
installation path to PATH variable and then configure gcc
53 matches
Mail list logo
