https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61969
--- Comment #5 from Andi Kleen ---
func_52 disappears during/after nrv:
in 173t.nrv:
;; Function func_52 (func_52, funcdef_no=86, decl_uid=2858, cgraph_uid=54,
symbol_order=1152)
func_52 (uint32_t p_53)
{
extern const struct S0 l_55 = {.f0=4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61969
--- Comment #4 from Andi Kleen ---
The problem is when returning a struct from func_52:
const struct S0 func_52 (uint32_t p_53)
{
const struct S0 l_55 = { 4, 40290, 10, 4 };
return l_55;
}
The main code stores the struct value from the sta
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61969
Andi Kleen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63302
--- Comment #6 from Zhenqiang Chen ---
I double checked the function optimize_range_tests_diff. Overall, I think it
does the right thing. X86 and ARM work correctly. The ldil.c.169t.optimized is
:
x_2 = ival_1(D) & -2147481601;
_8 = x_2 +
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63384
Andi Kleen changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #33585|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63384
--- Comment #1 from Andi Kleen ---
With a newer compiler version
gcc version 5.0.0 20140926 (experimental) (GCC)
the test case doesn't crash anymore, but just runs very very long. I killed it
after 20s. This happens with the following two opt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63393
--- Comment #4 from Evgeniy Dushistov ---
(In reply to Mikael Pettersson from comment #3)
> I don't know if this is supposed to be "fixed" (for all str* and mem*
> functions one might want to implement oneself), but the standard workaround
> is t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63395
--- Comment #10 from Mikael Pettersson ---
I strongly suspect 32-bit Cygwin uses x87 by default, while 64-bit Cygwin
probably uses SSE2 by default. These two FP implementations are very
different, and it's not at all surprising to see different
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63394
--- Comment #1 from Mikael Pettersson ---
(In reply to Bruce Dale from comment #0)
> gcc build options: unknown
"gcc -v" will tell you that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63393
--- Comment #3 from Mikael Pettersson ---
I don't know if this is supposed to be "fixed" (for all str* and mem* functions
one might want to implement oneself), but the standard workaround is to compile
with -fno-tree-loop-distribute-patterns. Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63395
--- Comment #9 from bernardwidynski at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 33599
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33599&action=edit
Cygwin64 cygcheck output
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63395
--- Comment #8 from bernardwidynski at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 33598
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33598&action=edit
Cygwin cygcheck output
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63395
--- Comment #7 from bernardwidynski at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 33597
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33597&action=edit
Cygwin64 make output
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63395
--- Comment #6 from bernardwidynski at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 33596
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33596&action=edit
Cygwin make output
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63395
--- Comment #5 from bernardwidynski at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 33595
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33595&action=edit
makefile
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63395
--- Comment #4 from bernardwidynski at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 33594
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33594&action=edit
Cygwin64 .i file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63395
--- Comment #3 from bernardwidynski at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 33593
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33593&action=edit
Cywin .i file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63395
--- Comment #2 from bernardwidynski at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 33592
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33592&action=edit
Cygwin64 output file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63395
--- Comment #1 from bernardwidynski at gmail dot com ---
Created attachment 33591
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33591&action=edit
Cygwin output file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63395
Bug ID: 63395
Summary: Cygwin vs Cygwin64 Floating Point Discrepancy
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: oth
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63394
Bug ID: 63394
Summary: Segmentation Fault with -O3 flag on ARM v61 Processor
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2972
--- Comment #20 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #14)
> Created attachment 20817 [details]
> better -Wmeminit patch
>
> This version ignores empty classes and checks for a nontrivial default ctor
> instead of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19808
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2005-05-09 00:52:15 |2014-9-27
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63386
--- Comment #5 from TechoMan ---
TDM version - gcc version 4.8.1 (tdm-2)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63386
--- Comment #4 from TechoMan ---
gcc version 4.8.1 (GCC).
Why CB release - that error was only on release of CB. It changes some
variables , such as -O2. Originaly it was rel. CB, but i found what its O2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63393
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
I think what is happening is hand coded memset is being optimized to memset and
then becoming an infinite loop. I thought there was a fix for this already.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63393
Evgeniy Dushistov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|-ffreestanding not work:|[regression]-ffreestanding
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63393
Bug ID: 63393
Summary: -ffreestanding not work: memset call cause valgrind
crash
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63392
Bug ID: 63392
Summary: poor error recovery with missing typename
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63391
Bug ID: 63391
Summary: Erroneous -Wsign-conversion with offsetof
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63390
Bug ID: 63390
Summary: [SH] Hoist/schedule constant pool loads
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61164
--- Comment #3 from Gleb Pfotenhauer-Malinowski ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg02469.html
Sorry, previous patch is incomplete.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54236
--- Comment #9 from Oleg Endo ---
The following function compiled with -O2
unsigned int check (unsigned int x)
{
return x == 0 ? 1 : x;
}
results in:
tst r4,r4
bt/s.L7
mov #1,r0
mov r4,r0
.L7:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63389
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63389
Bug ID: 63389
Summary: Wrong warning about 64 bit integer constant overflow
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: minor
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16564
--- Comment #22 from Manuel López-Ibáñez ---
(In reply to Volker Reichelt from comment #18)
> The first error message about exceeding the maximum template instantiation
> depth appears rather quickly. So maybe we could make the first error messag
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59804
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||error-recovery,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36534
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63376
--- Comment #2 from John David Anglin ---
This was bug was introduced by r214422:
Author: marxin
Date: Mon Aug 25 13:01:47 2014
New Revision: 214422
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=214422&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
IPA C++ refactoring 4/N
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37173
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61164
--- Comment #2 from Gleb Pfotenhauer-Malinowski ---
Patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-09/msg02460.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60969
Maciej W. Rozycki changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ma...@linux-mips.org
--- Comment #31
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58321
Dominique d'Humieres changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mrs at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53871
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kuq03132 at qoika dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63388
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
Re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63388
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Severity|major
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63388
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63388
--- Comment #1 from kuq03132 at qoika dot com ---
(problem might be in libstdc++)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63388
Bug ID: 63388
Summary: cout of enum class value - segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63182
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62768
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57598
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=48979
Francois-Xavier Coudert changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
CC|
53 matches
Mail list logo
