https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63354
Bug ID: 63354
Summary: -pg -mprofile-kernel creates unused stack frames on
leaf functions on ppc64le
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63353
Bug ID: 63353
Summary: libstdc++-v3/src/c++11/ios.cc:232: possible typo ?
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56253
--- Comment #12 from Marc Glisse ---
(In reply to Agner Fog from comment #11)
> Thanks for the links Marc.
> You are right, the discussion in the gcc-patches mailing list ignores
> integer vectors. You need a solution that also allows optimizati
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63352
Bug ID: 63352
Summary: problem with fmt_g0_1.f08 on i386-pc-solaris2.11
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63351
Bug ID: 63351
Summary: Optimization: contract broadcast intrinsics when
AVX512 is enabled
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56253
--- Comment #11 from Agner Fog ---
Thanks for the links Marc.
You are right, the discussion in the gcc-patches mailing list ignores integer
vectors. You need a solution that also allows optimizations on integer
intrinsic functions (perhaps cast
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63349
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63344
Andi Kleen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63350
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63350
Bug ID: 63350
Summary: LTO error: error: inlining failed in call to
always_inline 'f': function body not available
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63302
--- Comment #1 from John David Anglin ---
This is with:
dave@mx3210:~/debian/gcc/gcc/gcc-4.9-4.9.1$ gcc-4.9 -v
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/usr/bin/gcc-4.9.real
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/hppa-linux-gnu/4.9/lto-wrapper
Target: hppa-l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63349
Bug ID: 63349
Summary: ICE with template in fold-const.c
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63349
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.7.0, 5.0
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62313
--- Comment #11 from Dmitry Vyukov ---
Just test it with
g++ test.cc -Wall -lpthread -fsanitize=thread -pie -fPIE -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG -g
-O2
There is nothing else I can do on top of that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63348
--- Comment #1 from baoshan ---
I believe this regression is introduced by the code for cleanup_barriers() in
jump.c of patch https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-06/msg02164.html:
The call insn was followed by a barrier insn, the try_split()
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63348
Bug ID: 63348
Summary: regression gcc.dg/pr43670.c fail on MIPS
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: rtl-optimi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63347
Andreas Schwab changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61578
--- Comment #8 from Fredrik Hederstierna
---
Created attachment 33544
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33544&action=edit
CSiBE test results size
Attached some tests with CSiBE v2.1.1 for arm-eabi.
It seems like the results a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63343
--- Comment #2 from Pawel Sikora ---
release code is scary,
debug code is broken,
nightmare :>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63347
Bug ID: 63347
Summary: m68k misoptimisation with -fschedule-insns
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.4
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: major
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62313
François Dumont changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63345
--- Comment #5 from Byoungyoung Lee ---
Thank you for the quick response! The patch I've uploaded is simply the results
by replacing all static_cast in the error reports with reinterpret_cast, so
that the tool stops complaining and it servers as
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55212
Oleg Endo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24693
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Created attachment 33542
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33542&action=edit
Patch to cache a free node.
(In reply to Paolo Carlini from comment #2)
> More interesting work to do:
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63345
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #3)
> thanks for the report. I don't think we should blindly replace static_cast
> with reinterpret_cast but rather try and understand what is going on.
Yes, I strongl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63343
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63345
--- Comment #3 from Marc Glisse ---
Hello,
thanks for the report. I don't think we should blindly replace static_cast with
reinterpret_cast but rather try and understand what is going on. For instance,
for std::list, I believe the only case wher
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63345
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56253
--- Comment #10 from Marc Glisse ---
Two random links into the latest conversation:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-07/msg01812.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-06/msg02288.html
That version of the patch doesn't handle integ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56253
--- Comment #9 from Agner Fog ---
Many programmers are using a vector class library rather than writing intrinsic
functions directly. Such libraries have overloaded operators which are inlined
to produce intrinsic functions. Therefore, we cannot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57840
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||documentation
Status|UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43744
--- Comment #15 from John Paul Adrian Glaubitz ---
Hmm, so for whatever reason, the problem does not occur again anymore and
binutils just builds fine [1].
I did not upgrade the compiler, however it might be that the any dependencies
were update
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63338
--- Comment #4 from Steven Stewart-Gallus ---
> What version of GCC and on which target?
Right, I should have mentioned that earlier.
> $ uname -a
> Linux alonzo 3.13.0-34-generic #1trisquel1 SMP Sun Aug 24 04:17:04 UTC 2014
> x86_64 x86_64 x
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63346
Bug ID: 63346
Summary: xserver_xorg-server-1.15.1 crash on RaspberryPi when
compiled with gcc-4.9
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63345
--- Comment #1 from Byoungyoung Lee ---
Created attachment 33541
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33541&action=edit
Error reports in running Chromium browsers.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63345
Bug ID: 63345
Summary: Multiple undefined behaviors (static_cast<>) in
libstdc++-v3/include/bits
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61857
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54367
Bug 54367 depends on bug 61857, which changed state.
Bug 61857 Summary: An init-capturing lambda is parsed incorrectly when used in
a braced-init-list
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61857
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61857
--- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Sep 23 18:07:59 2014
New Revision: 215528
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215528&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
/cp
2014-09-23 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/61857
* parser.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58757
--- Comment #4 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Marc Glisse from comment #3)
> (In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #2)
> > Well, the testcase does fail on alpha:
>
> Thanks. In the original testcase (
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56253
Agner Fog changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||agner at agner dot org
--- Comment #8 from A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63331
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Author: jakub
Date: Tue Sep 23 15:25:55 2014
New Revision: 215516
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215516&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
PR fortran/63331
* trans-types.c (gfc_get_array_descr_info): Build
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=49859
Manuel López-Ibáñez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||manu at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63344
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|DUPLICATE |INVALID
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinsk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63344
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61848
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mliska at suse dot cz
--- Comment #14 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63280
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolutio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63280
--- Comment #1 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
Author: rsandifo
Date: Tue Sep 23 14:47:45 2014
New Revision: 215515
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215515&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
gcc/
PR bootstrap/63280
* target-globals.c (targ
27;ve encountered an error in Linux kernel:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic_numachip.c?id=refs/tags/next-20140923
arch/x86/kernel/apic/apic_numachip.c:33:12: error: numachip_system causes a
section type conflict with apic_numachip
s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61945
--- Comment #3 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
Another testcase:
markus@x4 tmp % cat t.ii
class A {
virtual int orbits();
};
class B : A {
template
void orbits();
};
(4.9 is fine)
markus@x4 tmp % g++ -Woverloaded-virtual -c t.ii
t.ii:2:15:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63343
Bug ID: 63343
Summary: g++ accepts incompatible iterator assignemt
Product: gcc
Version: 4.9.2
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: libst
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63341
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60406
--- Comment #10 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to boger from comment #9)
> On ppc64le, this works as expected but on ppc64(be) the code that is
> generated from this is not the address of the function but the address of
> the .opd entry that is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60406
--- Comment #9 from boger at us dot ibm.com ---
The patch to fix the recover.go problem causes significant regression in gccgo
when built for ppc64 (BE). There are 32 unexpected failures in the gcc go
testsuite with the patch 32 unexpected failur
jtaylor/gcc.git/configure --disable-werror
--enable-languages=c,c++,fortran --enable-tls
--prefix=/scratch/jtaylor/gcc/local-trunk --with-gmp=/usr --with-mpfr=/usr
--with-mpc=/usr --with-cloog=/usr --with-ppl=/usr --with-isl=/usr
--disable-bootstrap
Thread model: posix
gcc version 5.0.0 20140923 (exper
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63341
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Another testcase:
typedef union U { unsigned short s; unsigned char c; } __attribute__((packed))
U;
struct S { char e __attribute__((aligned (16))); U s[32]; };
struct S t = {0, {{0x5010}, {0x5111}, {0x5212},
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61945
Markus Trippelsdorf changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63341
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Note that vect_create_addr_base_for_vector_ref _does_ multiply offset by
the scalar element size (even if it calls it 'step'):
tree step = TYPE_SIZE_UNIT (TREE_TYPE (DR_REF (dr)));
...
if (offset)
{
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63341
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Btw, should be reproducible with negative step cases on x86_64 as well, as we
do
there
if (negative)
offset = size_int (-TYPE_VECTOR_SUBPARTS (vectype) + 1);
?
I suppose interpreting offset in terms
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61857
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63341
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Hum, from the comment on vect_create_data_ref_ptr I would expect offset to be
in units of the _vector_ size ...
Output:
1. Declare a new ptr to vector_type, and have it point to the base of the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62026
--- Comment #13 from Markus Trippelsdorf ---
A bit more reduced (just testing upcoming creduce release):
class C;
class F {
virtual C m_fn1();
};
class C {
public:
virtual int *m_fn3(int);
};
class G : F, C {
int offsets;
int *m_fn3(int
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61945
--- Comment #1 from tbsaunde at gcc dot gnu.org ---
minimized test case
class A
{
virtual void NotifyDialMMISuccess();
};
class : A
{
template <0> void NotifyDialMMISuccess();
};
ICEs with g++ -Woverloaded-virtual -std=gnu++11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63341
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I see non-NULL offset passed to vect_create_data_ref_ptr by vectorizable_store
(for negative case), vectorizable_load (for this
dr_explicit_realign_optimized),
and to vect_create_addr_base_for_vector_ref in v
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62026
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63341
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.8.4
Summary|[4.8/4.9/5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63340
--- Comment #3 from Andreas Schwab ---
Reduced:
extern void abort (void);
extern void exit (int);
#define TEST_COMPOUND(TYPE, LHSVAL, RHSVAL, OP)\
do\
{
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63341
Bug ID: 63341
Summary: [4.8/4.9/5 RegressionVectorizer
Product: gcc
Version: 4.8.3
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63340
--- Comment #2 from Andreas Schwab ---
setf.s f6 = r14 vs. setf.sig f6 = r14
setf.d f6 = r14 vs. setf.sig f6 = r14
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63340
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63340
--- Comment #1 from Andreas Schwab ---
Created attachment 33537
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33537&action=edit
Assembler output w/ r215449 reverted
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63340
Bug ID: 63340
Summary: [5.0 regression] FAIL:
gcc.dg/atomic/c11-atomic-exec-2.c -O2 execution
test
Product: gcc
Version: 5.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61606
--- Comment #2 from Fernando G. Tinetti ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #1)
> (In reply to Fernando G. Tinetti from comment #0)
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm making my own todo list for GCC install from sources, given that at some
> > point I would li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58751
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63338
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62155
Paolo Carlini changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62155
--- Comment #2 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Author: paolo
Date: Tue Sep 23 08:09:14 2014
New Revision: 215497
URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215497&root=gcc&view=rev
Log:
2014-09-23 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/62155
* g++.dg/cpp0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62155
--- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini ---
Since it's just an ICE on invalid, I'm adding the testcase and closing the bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7652
Michael T. changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||m.j.thayer at googlemail dot
com
--- Commen
80 matches
Mail list logo
