[Bug c++/58751] [C++11] Inheriting constructors do not work properly with virtual inheritance.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58751 --- Comment #2 from Job Noorman --- I can also confirm that this is reproducible with GCC 4.9. Also note that Clang *does* accept this code.

[Bug c++/63339] "using constructors" from virtual bases are implicitly deleted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63339 Job Noorman changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/58751] [C++11] Inheriting constructors do not work properly with virtual inheritance.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58751 Job Noorman changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jobnoorman at gmail dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/63339] New: "using constructors" from virtual bases are implicitly deleted

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63339 Bug ID: 63339 Summary: "using constructors" from virtual bases are implicitly deleted Product: gcc Version: 4.9.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug testsuite/61606] About GCC install, testing step (mostly check...)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61606 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug middle-end/63338] Compiling large amounts of large switch cases takes a large amount of time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63338 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |middle-end --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pi

[Bug c/63338] Compiling large amounts of large switch cases takes a large amount of time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63338 --- Comment #1 from Steven Stewart-Gallus --- Created attachment 33535 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33535&action=edit Preprocessed source code

[Bug c/63338] New: Compiling large amounts of large switch cases takes a large amount of time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63338 Bug ID: 63338 Summary: Compiling large amounts of large switch cases takes a large amount of time Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug target/63250] Complex fp16 arithmetic uses nonexistent libgcc functions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63250 --- Comment #1 from Joseph S. Myers --- Author: jsm28 Date: Tue Sep 23 00:48:46 2014 New Revision: 215491 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215491&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Remove LIBGCC2_LONG_DOUBLE_TYPE_SIZE target macro. This patch removes t

[Bug preprocessor/63337] Hexadecimal exponent: improvements to error message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63337 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- C

[Bug rtl-optimization/58968] Powerpc -mlra cannot compile ormas1.f in gamess Spec 2006 with -m32 -mcpu=power7 -O3 -mlra -w -ffast-math -funroll-loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58968 --- Comment #8 from Michael Meissner --- The gamess benchmark also runs fine with the options when built with subversion 215404 on the gcc-4_9-branch

[Bug go/60406] recover.go: test13reflect2 test failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60406 --- Comment #8 from boger at us dot ibm.com --- Update on my previous work: 1) My previous update referred to a build that was done with the patches that were submitted to gcc and patches that Dominik provided me for libffi. I found that if I on

[Bug c++/61825] [5 regression] g++.dg/cpp0x/static_assert9.C FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61825 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/63255] [5.0 regression] FAIL: gcc.dg/lto/ipareference2 c_lto_ipareference2_0.o-c_lto_ipareference2_1.o execute -O1 -flto -flto-partition=1to1 -fwhole-program

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63255 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/62219] [c++11] Spurious error for lambda in a friend function of a class template with a default template parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62219 Paolo Carlini changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/62219] [c++11] Spurious error for lambda in a friend function of a class template with a default template parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62219 --- Comment #4 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Mon Sep 22 19:48:54 2014 New Revision: 215483 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215483&root=gcc&view=rev Log: /cp 2014-09-22 Paolo Carlini PR c++/62219 * pt.c (c

[Bug rtl-optimization/58968] Powerpc -mlra cannot compile ormas1.f in gamess Spec 2006 with -m32 -mcpu=power7 -O3 -mlra -w -ffast-math -funroll-loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58968 --- Comment #7 from Michael Meissner --- Just to be clear, it is fixed in GCC 5 trunk sources. I'll build it with the GCC 4.9 branch as well.

[Bug rtl-optimization/58968] Powerpc -mlra cannot compile ormas1.f in gamess Spec 2006 with -m32 -mcpu=power7 -O3 -mlra -w -ffast-math -funroll-loops

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58968 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/63320] [5 Regression] bogus ‘this’ was not captured for this lambda function error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63320 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/60755] lambda capturing `this` doesn't honor const qualifier of the enclosing member function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60755 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Mon Sep 22 19:22:11 2014 New Revision: 215478 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215478&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/63320 PR c++/60463 PR c++/60755 * lambda.c (maybe_r

[Bug c++/60463] Lambda function can call a non-const member function with const this

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60463 --- Comment #4 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Mon Sep 22 19:22:11 2014 New Revision: 215478 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215478&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/63320 PR c++/60463 PR c++/60755 * lambda.c (maybe_r

[Bug c++/63320] [5 Regression] bogus ‘this’ was not captured for this lambda function error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63320 --- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Mon Sep 22 19:22:11 2014 New Revision: 215478 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215478&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/63320 PR c++/60463 PR c++/60755 * lambda.c (maybe_r

[Bug c++/62219] [c++11] Spurious error for lambda in a friend function of a class template with a default template parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62219 --- Comment #3 from paolo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: paolo Date: Mon Sep 22 19:21:20 2014 New Revision: 215477 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215477&root=gcc&view=rev Log: /cp 2014-09-22 Paolo Carlini PR c++/62219 * pt.c (c

[Bug c++/61465] Bogus parameter set but not used warning in constructor initialization list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61465 --- Comment #5 from Jason Merrill --- Author: jason Date: Mon Sep 22 18:47:16 2014 New Revision: 215476 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215476&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/61465 * call.c (convert_like_real) [ck_identity]: Call mark

[Bug target/63335] GCC:failures for vector double on calls to bif vec_[all|any]_[nge|nle]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63335 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/63334] -m16 should turn off unsupported instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63334 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|-m16 should turn off MMX, |-m16 should turn off |SSE, A

[Bug preprocessor/63337] Hexadecimal exponent: improvements to error message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63337 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/63337] New: Hexadecimal exponent: improvements to error message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63337 Bug ID: 63337 Summary: Hexadecimal exponent: improvements to error message Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c/63336] New: cilkplus array notation ICE in find_rank

-with-system-zlib - -disable-werror --without-cloog --without-isl Thread model: posix gcc version 5.0.0 20140922 (experimental) (GCC) COLLECT_GCC_OPTIONS='-std=c99' '-c' '-fcilkplus' '-v' '-mtune=generic' '-march=x 86-64' '-pthread' /

[Bug libgcc/63335] New: GCC:failures for vector double on calls to bif vec_[all|any]_[nge|nle]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63335 Bug ID: 63335 Summary: GCC:failures for vector double on calls to bif vec_[all|any]_[nge|nle] Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/63334] New: -m16 should turn off MMX, SSE, AVX as well as VEX-encoded scalar instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63334 Bug ID: 63334 Summary: -m16 should turn off MMX, SSE, AVX as well as VEX-encoded scalar instructions Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: nor

[Bug lto/63333] New: lto, 1to1 segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6 Bug ID: 6 Summary: lto, 1to1 segmentation fault Product: gcc Version: 4.9.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: lto Assign

[Bug middle-end/63197] tc-m68k.c: Wrong warning "array subscript is below array bounds"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63197 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-linux Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/63197] tc-m68k.c: Wrong warning "array subscript is below array bounds"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63197 Alan Modra changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amodra at gmail dot com --- Comment #3 from

[Bug fortran/63331] Fortran -fcompare-debug issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63331 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 33532 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=33532&action=edit gcc5-pr63331.patch Untested patch to fix (or work around) all but the last 2 FAILs. It seems there is no real n

[Bug middle-end/63197] tc-m68k.c: Wrong warning "array subscript is below array bounds"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63197 --- Comment #2 from Jan-Benedict Glaw --- With today's binutils snapshot, there's a gas_assert in front of it, which silences this bogus warning. That needs to be reverted to test GCC wrt. this issue.

[Bug target/63330] vector shuffle resembling vector shift not expanded optimally

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63330 David Edelsohn changed: What|Removed |Added Target|x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-*|x86_64-*-*, i?86-*-*,

[Bug c/63303] Pointer subtraction is broken when using -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63303 --- Comment #11 from mikulas at artax dot karlin.mff.cuni.cz --- Richard Biener: if the middle end tells us that one pointer is greater or equal than the other pointer, we could do unsigned subtraction and shift. But if we don't know which pointe

[Bug libstdc++/63329] std::bind does not define argument_type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63329 --- Comment #3 from Thomas Sanchez --- While it is not really intuitive I understand. Thanks for your time!

[Bug libstdc++/63329] std::bind does not define argument_type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63329 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/53626] [C++11] move assignment for ifstream

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53626 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/54316] [C++11] move constructor for stringstream

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54316 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/54316] [C++11] move constructor for stringstream

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54316 Bug 54316 depends on bug 53626, which changed state. Bug 53626 Summary: [C++11] move assignment for ifstream https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53626 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug testsuite/63332] problem with VERIFY in ext/random/k_distribution/operators/serialize.cc execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63332 --- Comment #1 from Richard PALO --- BTW, I'm curious if the problem is related to float rounding in I/O, as in FAIL: ext/random/hypergeometric_distribution/operators/values.cc execution test

[Bug testsuite/63332] New: problem with VERIFY in ext/random/k_distribution/operators/serialize.cc execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63332 Bug ID: 63332 Summary: problem with VERIFY in ext/random/k_distribution/operators/serialize.cc execution test Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UN

[Bug libstdc++/53626] [C++11] move assignment for ifstream

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53626 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Mon Sep 22 13:34:09 2014 New Revision: 215463 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215463&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Make streams movable and swappable. PR libstdc++/54316 PR libstd

[Bug libstdc++/54316] [C++11] move constructor for stringstream

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54316 --- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely --- Author: redi Date: Mon Sep 22 13:34:09 2014 New Revision: 215463 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215463&root=gcc&view=rev Log: Make streams movable and swappable. PR libstdc++/54316 PR libstd

[Bug fortran/63331] Fortran -fcompare-debug issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63331 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/63331] New: Fortran -fcompare-debug issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63331 Bug ID: 63331 Summary: Fortran -fcompare-debug issues Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran As

[Bug c++/61857] An init-capturing lambda is parsed incorrectly when used in a braced-init-list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61857 --- Comment #1 from Paolo Carlini --- In our case the issue is slightly different, the problem is in cp_parser_initializer_list, here: cp_parser_parse_tentatively (parser); cp_lexer_consume_token (parser->lexer); designator = c

[Bug libstdc++/63329] std::bind does not define argument_type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63329 --- Comment #1 from Thomas Sanchez --- BTW, I forgot to add that the compiler is invoked with this command: g++ -std=c++11 test.cpp Also, funny thing, with clang, it is the first one that do not compile :) Thanks,

[Bug lto/63226] [5 Regression] ICE with -flto-odr-type-merging

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63226 Markus Trippelsdorf changed: What|Removed |Added Status|WAITING |RESOLVED CC|

[Bug target/63330] vector shuffle resembling vector shift not expanded optimally

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63330 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- (this is aimed at removing VEC_RSHIFT_EXPR and thus no longer using vec_shr)

[Bug target/63330] New: vector shuffle resembling vector shift not expanded optimally

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63330 Bug ID: 63330 Summary: vector shuffle resembling vector shift not expanded optimally Product: gcc Version: 4.9.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimizati

[Bug libstdc++/63329] New: std::bind does not define argument_type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63329 Bug ID: 63329 Summary: std::bind does not define argument_type Product: gcc Version: 4.9.2 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++

[Bug c++/63323] "confused by earlier errors, bailing out" with no other errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63323 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/63323] "confused by earlier errors, bailing out" with no other errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63323 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- Author: mpolacek Date: Mon Sep 22 11:27:54 2014 New Revision: 215459 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215459&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR c++/63323 * ubsan.c (is_ubsan_builtin_p): Turn assert into a

[Bug target/63312] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/float128-exact-underflow.c -O0 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63312 Joseph S. Myers changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.0

[Bug target/63312] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/float128-exact-underflow.c -O0 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63312 Joseph S. Myers changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/63312] FAIL: gcc.dg/torture/float128-exact-underflow.c -O0 execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63312 --- Comment #3 from Joseph S. Myers --- Author: jsm28 Date: Mon Sep 22 11:08:03 2014 New Revision: 215458 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215458&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR target/63312 * config/ia64/sfp-machine.h (FE_EX_ALL, FP_TRAPP

[Bug debug/63328] c-c++-common/gomp/pr60823-3.c test fails with -fcompare-debug

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63328 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug debug/63328] c-c++-common/gomp/pr60823-3.c test fails with -fcompare-debug

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63328 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Sep 22 10:34:16 2014 New Revision: 215455 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215455&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR debug/63328 * omp-low.c (ipa_simd_modify_stmt_ops): For debug s

[Bug middle-end/63311] [4.9/5 Regression] -O1 optimization introduces valgrind warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63311 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug debug/63328] c-c++-common/gomp/pr60823-3.c test fails with -fcompare-debug

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63328 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- Author: jakub Date: Mon Sep 22 10:32:09 2014 New Revision: 215454 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215454&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR debug/63328 * omp-low.c (ipa_simd_modify_stmt_ops): For debug s

[Bug bootstrap/63280] [5 Regression] Double free in GCC compiled with LTO and -O3.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63280 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org Target Mi

[Bug debug/63284] [4.9/5 Regression] -fcompare-debug issue due to redirection to __builtin_unreachable ()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63284 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/63307] [4.9/5 Regression] Cilk+ breaks -fcompare-debug bootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63307 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.2

[Bug middle-end/63311] [4.9/5 Regression] -O1 optimization introduces valgrind warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63311 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- This is probably ifcombine at work and the target splitting the combined condition back, but the other way around.

[Bug middle-end/63311] [4.9/5 Regression] -O1 optimization introduces valgrind warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63311 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |4.9.2

[Bug ipa/63313] [5 Regression] ICE in ipa-comdats.c:371

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63313 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |5.0 Target Milestone|---

[Bug sanitizer/63316] [5.0 Regression] False asan positive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63316 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.0

[Bug pch/63319] [5 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault building qt5 with pch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63319 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.0

[Bug tree-optimization/63288] [5 Regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/20140326-1.c FAILs with -Og -fgcse -fif-conversion2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63288 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.0

[Bug debug/63285] [4.9 Regression] -fcompare-debug scheduler related failure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63285 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug lto/63286] [5 Regression] FAIL: g++.dg/lto/20101014-2 cp_lto_20101014-2_0.o assemble, * after r215196

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63286 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.0

[Bug c++/63295] Insane memory use

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63295 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||compile-time-hog --- Comment #1 from Ri

[Bug ipa/63298] [5 Regression] internal compiler error: in types_same_for_odr, at ipa-devirt.c:449 with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63298 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |5.0

[Bug debug/63328] New: c-c++-common/gomp/pr60823-3.c test fails with -fcompare-debug

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63328 Bug ID: 63328 Summary: c-c++-common/gomp/pr60823-3.c test fails with -fcompare-debug Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug ipa/63298] [5 Regression] internal compiler error: in types_same_for_odr, at ipa-devirt.c:449 with LTO

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63298 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/63327] Poor caret location in error mesage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63327 Dominique d'Humieres changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/63270] [5 Regression] internal compiler error: in odr_types_equivalent_p, at ipa-devirt.c:1075

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63270 --- Comment #5 from marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Author: marxin Date: Mon Sep 22 09:39:20 2014 New Revision: 215451 URL: https://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?rev=215451&root=gcc&view=rev Log: PR lto/63270 - new test * g++.dg/lto/pr63270_0.C: New tes

[Bug debug/60782] DWARF does not represent _Atomic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60782 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug debug/55641] debug info for the type of a reference declared with a typedef has spurious 'const'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55641 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/63323] "confused by earlier errors, bailing out" with no other errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63323 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug c++/63323] "confused by earlier errors, bailing out" with no other errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63323 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/63323] "confused by earlier errors, bailing out" with no other errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63323 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug sanitizer/63316] [5.0 Regression] False asan positive

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63316 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- MALLOC_ABI_ALIGNMENT is BITS_PER_WORD (too small for Linux actually, glibc guarantees 2 * BITS_PER_WORD). So, this IMNSHO is a libsanitizer bug, in that it doesn't provide the Linux ABI guaranteed alignments.

[Bug fortran/63327] New: Poor caret location in error mesage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63327 Bug ID: 63327 Summary: Poor caret location in error mesage Product: gcc Version: 5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug c/63303] Pointer subtraction is broken when using -fsanitize=undefined

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63303 --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener --- To support the standards definition of p1 - p2 we'd need a POINTER_DIFF_EXPR that also embeds the exact division by the array element size. Btw, while C and C++ share pointer_int_sum they have differing im

[Bug fortran/44882] Bogus types in references with mismatched commons

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44882 --- Comment #15 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Fri, 19 Sep 2014, dominiq at lps dot ens.fr wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44882 > > Dominique d'Humieres changed: > >What|Removed

[Bug debug/63300] 'const volatile' sometimes stripped in debug info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63300 Mark Wielaard changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a